It has become de rigueur in democrat circles to paint the Republican Presidential candidate as a racist every four years, despite all evidence to the contrary.
Let’s get this straight. Calling Hillary Clinton a “bigot” has reporters asking every Republican in sight if Donald Trump has gone too far. But the Clinton campaign releases a video saying Mr. Trump is the candidate of the Ku Klux Klan and it’s all okey-dokey?
Then again, Mr. Trump has already been likened to Hitler, Mussolini and Stalin. Small wonder there’s a collective ho-hum when Democratic vice presidential nominee Tim Kaine says Mr. Trump is peddling “KKK values.”
This is what Democrats do.
Indeed. Mr. McGurn offers us examples of classic democrat tactics:
• In 2000, for example, an NAACP ad recreated the gruesome murder of James Byrd to imply that then-Gov. Bush was sympathetic to lynching black men. Over footage of a chain being dragged by a pickup truck, Mr. Byrd’s daughter says, “So when Gov. George W. Bush refused to support hate-crimes legislation, it was like my father was killed all over again.”
• When John McCain ran in 2008, Barack Obama warned that Republicans would scare people by saying, “You know, he doesn’t look like all those other presidents on those dollar bills.” The McCain campaign fired back, accusing Mr. Obama of playing the race card from the “bottom of the deck.” Funny thing: All those reporters always hearing “dog whistles” from Republicans somehow didn’t hear this one.
• In 2012, when Mitt Romney went to the NAACP and told them face-to-face about his opposition to ObamaCare, the stories were all about how he was really just trolling for the racist vote. Vice President Joe Biden put it more explicitly, telling a largely African-American audience that if Mr. Romney were to win, he’d “put ya’ll back in chains.”
There is great irony in this. Historically, democrats have kept blacks in chains- not Republicans. Democrats created the Ku Klux Klan. They resisted the 13th Amendment:
Fact: The Republican Party was founded primarily to oppose slavery, and Republicans eventually abolished slavery. The Democratic Party fought them and tried to maintain and expand slavery. The 13th Amendment, abolishing slavery, passed in 1865 with 100% Republican support but only 23% Democrat support in congress.
democrats continued to resist equal rights for blacks through the 50’s:
Fact: In the 1950s, President Eisenhower, a Republican, integrated the US military and promoted civil rights for minorities. Eisenhower pushed through the Civil Rights Act of 1957. One of Eisenhower’s primary political opponents on civil rights prior to 1957 was none other than Lyndon Johnson, then the Democratic Senate Majority Leader. LBJ had voted the straight segregationist line until he changed his position and supported the 1957 Act.
Hillary’s self-described mentor Robert Byrd was a Grand Kleagle in the KKK. In 1945 Byrd is quoted as saying
“I shall never fight in the armed forces with a Negro by my side … Rather I should die a thousand times, and see Old Glory trampled in the dirt never to rise again, than to see this beloved land of ours become degraded by race mongrels, a throwback to the blackest specimen from the wilds.”
But the handwriting was on the wall. Blacks were going to see equality. They were going to become a force in voting. It was only then that democrats, led by Lyndon Johnson, decided they’d cash in.
Lyndon Johnson was a racist. In his first twenty years as a lawmaker Johnson opposed every single civil rights issue. He made frequent use of colorful racist language:
There’s no question that Lyndon Johnson, despite championing the landmark Civil Rights Act of 1964 and signing it into law, was also a sometime racist and notorious vulgarian who rarely shied away from using the N-word in private. For example, he reportedly referred to the Civil Rights Act of 1957 as the “n*gger bill” in more than one private phone conversation with Senate colleagues. And he reportedly said upon appointing African-American judge Thurgood Marshall to the Supreme Court, “Son, when I appoint a n*gger to the court, I want everyone to know he’s a n*gger.”
Doris Kearns Goodwin quoted Johnson:
“These Negroes, they’re getting pretty uppity these days and that’s a problem for us since they’ve got something now they never had before, the political pull to back up their uppityness. Now we’ve got to do something about this, we’ve got to give them a little something, just enough to quiet them down, not enough to make a difference. For if we don’t move at all, then their allies will line up against us and there’ll be no way of stopping them, we’ll lose the filibuster and there’ll be no way of putting a brake on all sorts of wild legislation. It’ll be Reconstruction all over again.”
Adam Serwer:
Lyndon Johnson said the word “n*gger” a lot.
In Senate cloakrooms and staff meetings, Johnson was practically a connoisseur of the word.According to Johnson biographer Robert Caro, Johnson would calibrate his pronunciations by region, using “nigra” with some southern legislators and “negra” with others. Discussing civil rights legislation with men like Mississippi Democrat James Eastland, who committed most of his life to defending white supremacy, he’d simply call it “the n*gger bill.”
Then in 1957, Johnson would help get the “n*gger bill” passed, known to most as the Civil Rights Act of 1957. With the 1964 Civil Rights Act and the 1965 Voting Rights Act, the segregationists would go to their graves knowing the cause they’d given their lives to had been betrayed, Frank Underwood style, by a man they believed to be one of their own. When Caro asked segregationist Georgia Democrat Herman Talmadge how he felt when Johnson, signing the Civil Rights Act, said ”we shall overcome,” Talmadge said “sick.”
It is also claimed that Johnson bragged:
“I’ll have those n*ggers voting Democratic for 200 years.”
Snopes asserts that this is unproven, but given the balance of his words is quite believable. Even Snopes admits:
“it wouldn’t have been entirely out of character”
No it would not. Without any doubt Johnson knew of the burgeoning power of the black vote and wanted to own it. They secured it, but what have democrats done for blacks?
The Democratic Party’s line is that black Americans need their “help” to get by in a racist world. Here’s an alternate theory: Buying into the Democratic Party’s philosophy and accepting “help” has been one of the biggest reasons that black Americans lag behind white Americans. Black males are 6 times as likely to be in prison as white males and black Americans make up 49% of the homicide victims in America. 71.6% of all black Americans are born out of wedlock and black Americans are almost twice as likely to drop out of high school as white Americans, both of which help explain why the black poverty rate is almost 2 1/2 times the white poverty rate.
democrats have been willing assistants in the destruction of the black family:
Liberal advocates had two main ways of dodging the subject of family collapse while still addressing its increasingly alarming fallout. The first, largely the creation of Marian Wright Edelman, who in 1973 founded the Children’s Defense Fund, was to talk about children not as the offspring of individual mothers and fathers responsible for rearing them, but as an oppressed class living in generic, nebulous, and never-to-be-analyzed “families.” Framing the problem of ghetto children in this way, CDF was able to mount a powerful case for a host of services, from prenatal care to day care to housing subsidies, in the name of children’s developmental needs, which did not seem to include either a stable domestic life or, for that matter, fathers. Advocates like Edelman might not have viewed the collapsing ghetto family as a welcome occurrence, but they treated it as a kind of natural event, like drought, beyond human control and judgment. As recently as a year ago, marking the 40th anniversary of the Civil Rights Act, CDF announced on its website: “In 2004 it is morally and economically indefensible that a black preschool child is three times as likely to depend solely on a mother’s earnings.” This may strike many as a pretty good argument for addressing the prevalence of black single-mother families, but in CDF-speak it is a case for federal natural-disaster relief.
The war on black families was not going to wane:
By the early 1980s the media also had woken up to the ruins of the ghetto family and brought about the return of the repressed Moynihan report. Declaring Moynihan “prophetic,” Ken Auletta, in his 1982 The Underclass, proclaimed that “one cannot talk about poverty in America, or about the underclass, without talking about the weakening family structure of the poor.” Both the Baltimore Sun and the New York Times ran series on the black family in 1983, followed by a 1985 Newsweek article called “Moynihan: I Told You So” and a 1986 CBS documentary, The Vanishing Black Family, produced by Bill Moyers, a onetime aide to Lyndon Johnson, who had supported the Moynihan report. The most symbolic moment came when Moynihan himself gave Harvard’s prestigious Godkin lectures in 1985 in commemoration of the 20th anniversary of “The Negro Family.”
For the most part, liberals were having none of it. They piled on Murray’s 1984Losing Ground, ignored Mead and Sowell, and excoriated the word “underclass,” which they painted as a recycled and pseudoscientific version of the “tangle of pathology.” But there were two important exceptions to the long list of deniers. The first was William Julius Wilson. In his 1987 The Truly Disadvantaged, Wilson chastised liberals for being “confused and defensive” and failing to engage “the social pathologies of the ghetto.” “The average poor black child today appears to be in the midst of a poverty spell which will last for almost two decades,” he warned. Liberals have “to propose thoughtful explanations for the rise in inner city dislocations.” Ironically, though, Wilson’s own “mismatch theory” for family breakdown—which hypothesized that the movement of low-skill jobs out of the cities had sharply reduced the number of marriageable black men—had the effect of extending liberal defensiveness about the damaged ghetto family. After all, poor single mothers were only adapting to economic conditions. How could they do otherwise?
Lest you doubt the value of the family, Marjorie Valbrun might dispose of those doubts:
The new report, “The Moynihan Report Revisited,” outlines some of the very same challenges to the well-being of black families chronicled back then, including acute and concentrated poverty in low-income black neighborhoods populated by underemployed and unemployed residents; crime; inequality in housing, employment, education, health care, and the criminal justice system; high rates of nonmarital births and children raised in households headed by single women; and social welfare policies that undermine the role of black men. (The report also offers more context about the larger political, social, legal and economic forces that have contributed to the problems.)
“Today, the share of white children born outside marriage is about the same as the share of black children born outside marriage in Moynihan’s day,” the Urban Institute report said. “The percentage of black children born to unmarried mothers, in comparison, tripled between the early 1960s and 2009, remaining far higher than the percentage of white children born to unmarried mothers.”
About 20 percent of black children were born to unmarried mothers in the early 1960s, compared with 2 to 3 percent of white children. “By 2009, nearly three-quarters of black births and three-tenths of white births occurred outside marriage. Hispanics fell between whites and blacks and followed the same rising trend.”
Gregory Acs, an author of the report and the director of the institute’s Income and Policy Benefits Center, said it was striking to go back to the Moynihan Report and look at where progress was made, where ground was lost and how persistent these disparities have remained over the decades.
“One of the key things to understand is how many strands are attached to this web of problems,” he said. “We can choose not to address these issues now, or address them in piecemeal and continue to throw money at the consequences, or we can create sustainable programs at multiple levels that carry at-risk kids from conception to the workforce.”
Ron Haskins, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institute and a director of its Center on Children and Families, wrote a chapter titled “Moynihan Was Right: Now What?” in a 2009 book about the original study.
He said in an interview with The Washington Post that the findings in the new report indicate that even as African Americans clearly enjoy more opportunity today and that the black middle class has grown, the challenges that undermine sustained and widespread economic prosperity remain stubborn. Chief among those challenges, Haskins said, is the disproportionate share of black children living in single-parent homes.
“We have scores of studies that show that kids that grow up in single-women-headed families don’t fare as well, are more likely to do poorly in school and to drop out of school, to be arrested, to become single parents themselves,” he said. “These factors reinforce the economic disadvantages that these kids face and impact the larger black community.”
He said the problems will remain and possibly worsen until the numbers of children in black, Hispanic and white families living in two-parent homes increase.
There is a very simple solution to this:
finish high school, get a full-time job and wait until age 21 to get married and have children.
But instead of embracing it, liberal elites will paint you as a racist for daring to say it. The only conceivable reason for that is to prevent the poor from improving their lot and keeping them dependent on the state and more likely to vote democrat. And blacks do tend to vote heavily democrat. It’s the triumph of hope over reality.
Jason Riley wrote of the tragic legacy that obama leaves for blacks:
As Kanye West might say, I’m starting to wonder if the president much cares about the well-being of poor blacks.
Mr. West was remarking on the George W. Bush administration’s response to Hurricane Katrina, a natural disaster, but the current administration seems keen on facilitating man-made varieties. At the urging of labor unions, President Obama has pushed for higher minimum wages that price a disproportionate percentage of blacks out of the labor force. At the urging of teachers unions, he has fought voucher programs that give ghetto children access to better schools.
Both policies have a lengthy track record of keeping millions of blacks ill-educated and unemployed. Since the 1970s, when the federal government began tracking the racial achievement gap, black test scores in math, reading and science have on average trailed far behind those of their white classmates. And minimum-wage mandates have been so effective for so long at keeping blacks out of work that 1930, the last year in which there was no federal minimum-wage law, was also the last year that the black unemployment rate was lower than the white rate. For the past half-century, black joblessness on average has been double that of whites.
obama is commuting the sentences of thousands of inmates so that they might return to crime in their neighborhoods:
A 2002 federal report tracked the recidivism rate of some 91,000 supposedly nonviolent offenders in 15 states over a three-year period. More than 21% wound up rearrested for violent crimes, including more than 700 murders and more than 600 rapes. The report also noted the difficulty of identifying low-risk inmates. Auto thieves were rearrested for committing more than a third of the homicides and a disproportionate share of other violent offenses.
Riley also sees the consequences of liberal policies:
The socioeconomic progress of black Americans in the Jim Crow era before the civil-rights movement is a neglected area of media interest. Yet the pace of black advancement during this period—in poverty reduction, educational attainment, entering skilled professions and other measures—has never come close to being duplicated, not even in the decades following the landmark political victories in the 1960s and the launch of the war on poverty.
Racial barriers to black progress in the first half of the 20th century obviously were much more forbidding than they are today, but black communities then were also much safer and thus more conducive to social and economic progress.
In 1965 when blacks gave 80% of their votes to the democrat party, none other than Malcolm X called them “chumps” :
Yet Democrats, said Malcolm X, failed to deliver on a promised and much anticipated new civil rights bill, knowing the party could still count on their blind support in the next election.
“You put them first,” said Malcolm X, “and they put you last. ‘Cause you’re a chump. A political chump! … Any time you throw your weight behind a political party that controls two-thirds of the government, and that party can’t keep the promise that it made to you during election time, and you are dumb enough to walk around continuing to identify yourself with that party — you’re not only a chump but you’re a traitor to your race.”
History is in the process of repeating itself. Illegal aliens are the new crop to be harvested and made state dependent by democrats. Twenty years ago both Hillary and Bill Clinton sounded a lot like the Donald Trump of today.
Today Hillary promises amnesty within 100 days.
So what happened?
Today Hillary promises amnesty within 100 days.
So what happened?
The same thing that happened 60 years ago. The realization that somewhere down the line democrats plan to offer amnesty to illegals and make them voters. They represent the next significant voting bloc and democrats are racing to make sure they establish the same dependency they created before. The first drug dose is always free. If Hispanics have half a brain, they will realize voting democrat will take them down the same road blacks have traveled. Blacks should also consider Trump. Wht ahve they to lose? Republicans lifted blacks out of one kind of slavery only to have democrats trap them in another. It absolutely terrifies the democrat elites that instead of giving them fishes Donald Trump might actually teach blacks and Hispanics to fish.
Besides, why vote for a documented liar who sleeps through meetings and is “often confused”? Who can she help, other than herself?
DrJohn has been a health care professional for more than 30 years. In addition to clinical practice he has done extensive research and has published widely with over 70 original articles and abstracts in the peer-reviewed literature. DrJohn is well known in his field and has lectured on every continent except for Antarctica. He has been married to the same wonderful lady for over 30 years and has three kids- two sons, both of whom are attorneys and one daughter on her way into the field of education.
DrJohn was brought up with the concept that one can do well if one is prepared to work hard but nothing in life is guaranteed.
Except for liberals being foolish.
Where precisely are all of these historical Democrats you speak of today?
Answer: They are today’s Republicans.
POLITCIANS ARE THE LOWEST FORM OF LIFE ON EARTH LIBERAL DEMACRATS ARE THE LOWEST FORM OF POLITICIAN. GENERAL GEORGE PATTON
That Hillary did a 180′ on illegals should not surprise anyone who’s listening to her.
She studies the wind and goes with the flow.
How Hillary and the rest of the Dems are treating Black Lives Matter is very orchestrated.
In the link is a page from the DCCC (Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee)
It advises candidates like Hillary to have a point person for communicating with the BLM…..so they feel included and listened to.
It advises Obama’s ‘leading from behind” strategy with BLM.
Make them take the lead, and become the target.
Heh.
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/file/dccc-blm
@Ajay42302: It’s true. After passage of Civil Rights Act in 1964 racist Dems like Strom Thurmond simply became racist Republicans—as did their followers.
Nan G. Fox poll shows only 19% of Americans approve of mass deportation of 11 million illegals–seems about half of then are FA–ERS LOL
You’ll hear no more from DT about mass deportations–he wants to win so he’s softening his positions and his rhetoric’
Both HRC and Trump massively disliked by the voters 46% DISLIKE BOTH-That’s my Party. I’ll vote my conscience Humane Party Clifton Roberts–not a chance in hell but so what.
@Ajay42302: Answer: you could not be more wrong. They were Democrats, they stayed Democrats and they are Democrats today. Democrats use race as a political weapon and that is all they care about it.
In 2007, an immigration reform bill was agreed upon. I didn’t like it, but it was a compromise and sought to solve some of the problems. Obama and Schumer inserted a poison pill to effective kill the compromise because, for Democrats, having a contentious issue is better than solving a problem.
Sen Obama killed 2007 immigration reform
http://battlegroundwatch.com/2012/06/11/who-killed-the-2007-immigration-reform-bill-senator-barack-obama/
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2010/04/29/obama-helped-kill-immigration-reform-2007-will-media-remember
Then, under Obama, the Democrats talk reform but drag their feet to keep the issue alive. Obama makes excuses about why he can’t grant amnesty but then, when his failures were beginning to bite him in the ass, he turned around and signed an executive order illegally granting what Congress denied… twice.
Yes, Democrats are the racists and now they have a new bloc of people to condemn to perpetual poverty in exchange for their votes.
@Richard Wheeler:
To hear you Democrats tell it, Democrats in the South fled their party in droves after the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Nothing could be further from the truth as the truth is, only three Democrats switched parties; Strom Thurmond, Jesse Helms and Mills Goodwin.
And it really makes a lot of sense to change your affiliation and join a party that you totally disagree with, doesn’t it? Seems to me that the three men listed above were more opportunists than party loyalists.
But the real history of blacks becoming Democrats started in the ’30’s when the Roosevelt allowed ward bosses total control over New Deal projects. If you were a black man, fleeing the Dust Bowl, or the Depression that made farming unsustainable, not being able to make a living on a measly few acres, you fled the South for the industrial cities of the North and Midwest, all controlled by ward bosses. If you wanted a WPA job, you had to become a registered Democrat and even pay into the Democratic Party from your paltry wages and work to recruit other blacks for the Democratic Party. And that was three decades before the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
The subsequent high concentration of blacks in the industrial cities (still true today) was a major contributor to blacks becoming Democrats when they were [after the War of Northern Aggression] traditionally Republicans.
The sad part is that comments like yours are taught in our failing public schools.
@retire05: “The War OF Northern Aggression” Spoken like a true Southerner who thinks Nixon’s Southern Strategy never happened.Agree on Blacks into Dem. Party through union recruitment in major cities-Thanks
Welcome back–Your thoughts on the new “Presidential” softie DT
@Richard Wheeler:
#1) What would you call it when the North invaded the South? Was it aggressive, or not?
#1) Perhaps you should re-read my post. Where did I [ever] say that the Southern Strategy never happened? Or are you hearing voices?
This election? No good choices. Either way, we’re screwed. One is a known disaster the other is an unknown disaster. I’m sure Washington, Jefferson, Adams and Madison are rolling over in their grave.
@Richard Wheeler: All too often, immigration polls are not designed to get at what Americans really think about immigration, but instead are written to create a certain narrative. Many polls are financed by activist groups who simply want to create the appearance of widespread public support for amnesty. The advocates have two main goals: (1) provide lobbyists with polling data that they can use to browbeat politicians into supporting their cheap-labor, open-border agenda; and (2) encourage the media to write headlines that don’t really reflect the findings, but nevertheless advance the notion that Americans love open borders.
The Pew Research Center has done just that with a new poll.
Pew asks: “All in all, would you favor or oppose building a wall along the entire border with Mexico?”
I would oppose that.
So would Donald Trump!
He has made clear he has no intention of building a wall along the ENTIRE border with Mexico.
Of the 2,000 miles only 1,000 will need a wall.
The rest has natural barriers like mountains and deserts.
So, if you see headlines saying:
Realize those who took the poll weren’t responding to Trump’s proposed wall. They were asked to respond to a proposal of a wall across the entire southern border, something no candidate has proposed.
You didn’t even bother to link to your ”poll.”
Was it like this?
Most likely.
The Southern Strategy Myth And The Lost Majority
@Curt:
There’s a great deal your link omits.
The past decades of GOP strategy has seemed to rely on simply sayin “guns, God and gays” and of course “that black guy is stealing your doughnut” all while transferring the wealth from the middle class to the top wealthy.
Did you ever catch how GWB would say “gays are threatening traditional marriages? I’ve been traditionally married 33 years and have never encountered such threats. What the hell? And now Trump is chanting that Hillary is going to single handedly abolish the 2nd Admendmemt. Again, what the hell? And then there’s the Lee Atwater admission of “decoding” and being “abstract” in articulating how the black guy is out to take away the white mans rights which was the purpose of keeping the birther movement alive.
And not to miss a beat in the GOPs distractive con game, we now have Mexicans crossing the boarder not for a better life, not for better paying jobs, not that they can aquire better opportunities for their families, but because they want to murder you, sell drugs to your kids, and then rape your women.
And Trump lickers are actually swallowing it hook, line, and sinker.
Ajay: DT did say all the illegals need to go but only in Rachel Madcows drooling fantasies did the rounding up door to door tearing mommies away from screaming anchor babies ,have a voice, and it was repeated until even they thought it was the truth.
It is this administrations fault that DT has traction on the dangerous, criminal previously deported illegal.
Watching a bit of MSLSD last night Donald was “talking in code”, just because they could not use direct quotes against him, desperate they know they are losing badly with 3rd parties more likely to take votes from Hillary. And the thought of her in the office driving disgusted Republicans to vote DT.
When enforcing laws that exist on the books is hate speech, when securing our border and creating more jobs doing so is bigoted, those that are swallowing that line need to check their koolaid intake.
@Ajay42302:
I’m still recall this photo. See the joy in that child’s eyes?
http://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/news-columns-blogs/fabiola-santiago/article76775897.html
@Ajay42302: I guess if you were restricted to telling only the truth, you would have much less to say.
No, actually that is only how the left characterizes anything that exposes their failed agenda. You cannot back any of that up with facts (and it is pointless to ask a coward to do so) and the middle class has suffered more under Obama than ever before while the wealthy have gotten richer. So much for his concern about ” income disparity”.
No, I didn’t… provide a link (oh, there I go again… expecting a lying coward to substantiate his lies). I do recall Bill, Hillary and Obama defending traditional marriage. Hell, Bill even passed a law in defense of traditional marriage. Remember that?
No liberal has the guts to take on the 2nd Amendment head on… they are far too cowardly (like someone else we know) to be up front and honest about their agenda. But, taking into account their propaganda attack on the right, “Fast and Furious”, the hoarding of ammunition, the gun bans, the magazine bans and Operation Choke Point… an entire agenda based on lies… what the left intends to do to the 2nd Amendment is quite apparent.
You are a liar.
i guess the author doesnt know his history… 60 years? HA!
try 140 years of the same games… below is the EVIDENCE..
After read wiki and see if any of this is mentioned…
you want an example of scrubbing history?
There is tons more in the actual book, and the excerpt is CONGRESSIONAL TESTIMONY…
I wonder what todays blacks voting democrat would say knowing that below is the reason why..
and thats 140 years ago reason why, not recent 60 years ago continuance…
Full text of “The Hayes-Tilden disputed presidential election of 1876”
https://archive.org/stream/hayestildendisp00hawo/hayestildendisp00hawo_djvu.txt
these were commited by the knights of the white camelia, the kkk was the poor mans democrat group, while the knights were the wealthy mans…
a tiny bit more next post…
This next and last section shows the idea that would give birth to the NRA, and then other things and false arguments and who did what…
however, the more you read the book, the more you read that the democrats were NEVER much different than they are now, manipulative greedy self serving amoral… [and its clear the idea of throwing any and every excuse or made up justification is common and their way of seeing what sticks.. like when they throw their dirty underwear at the wall]
in fact, if you look at what party controlled the presidency, the house and the senate, up to 1933 and FDR, the Democrats barely were able to gain offices compared to the republians…
United States Presidents and control of Congress
[note the chart starts in 1855]
78 years between 1855 and 1933
Dems had the senate 16 years, republicans 62 years
Dems had the House 24 years, republicans 54 years
[president is harder to calculate but mostly republican except those killed]
the civil war ended in 1865 and lincoln was assasinated
the hayes tilden was 1886
the 15th amendment was 1870
AFTER 1933, the dems dominated in reconstructing all of the united states into an administrative state a la philip drew and the progressives… while the satanist sex fiends moses harmon, and his daugher, and sanger, all started a eugenics movement… if you cant stop them from voting agaisnt you, dead people dont vote and the exterminated dont vote.. ergo, to this day population is collapsing, sex is the drug to lure women, importing new people to “hide the decline” is the way, and so on…
ie. without these attacks and murders and mutilations, it was doubtful that african americans would have gotten sufferage!!! the NRA solution was to make sure that all freemen could have guns too… after all, who would protect them in the parishes? no phone, no real police, and the Democrats were sending armed contingencies of very nasty violent white AND black men to torture, mutilate and terrorize blacks and poor whites… (in other parts of the book you find out that where there were wealthy whites and so on, the Dems threw BBQ and picnics and all were invited for a good time, black and white)
if you take a look the democrat dominated (now) NAACP lynching stats start AFTER this period:
http://www.chesnuttarchive.org/classroom/lynchingstat.html
From 1882-1968, 4,743 lynchings occurred in the United States. Of these people that were lynched 3,446 were black. The blacks lynched accounted for 72.7% of the people lynched. These numbers seem large, but it is known that not all of the lynchings were ever recorded. Out of the 4,743 people lynched only 1,297 white people were lynched. That is only 27.3%. Many of the whites lynched were lynched for helping the black or being anti lynching and even for domestic crimes.
what happened to the Democrats wholesale murder of thousands of blacks in the south?
convenient they start their date 10 years after this stuff, eh?
@Ajay42302:
actually not, thats a democrat talking point which if you read the history i just put up and the others, shows that the republicans from their birth onwards were always the party that helped blacks.. [they just didnt deem giving welfare a benefit, so the dems say they hate them for not giving them freebies from the public till to buy blacks… ]
you have a lot of missing history to read sir.
@Mully: @Ajay42302:
I’m still recall this photo. See the joy in that child’s eyes?
oh.. photo time… 🙂
remember those dogs and hoses obama referrs to? he is referring to this:
Democrat Theophilus Eugene Connor, known as Bull Connor
https://blackhistorycollection.org/2014/08/04/1954-bull-connor-lead-paperweight/
ANY of you dems ever take the time to see who wrote the laws that you claim to hate today?
On December 1, 1955, in Montgomery, Alabama, Parks refused to obey bus driver James F. Blake’s order to give up her seat in the colored section to a white passenger, after the white section was filled. Parks was not the first person to resist bus segregation
then
it was at the Highlander Folk School in Grundy County where early civil rights strategy was mapped out. At Highlander, white and black activists — including as Martin Luther King Jr. and Rosa Parks — regularly met in the 1950s and talked about how they might change the South, and here that many people trained for the Civil Rights Movement.
now you can read that the school was closed by white supremecists against the movement, but thats not true… it wast closed due to communist subversion..
FBI — Highlander Folk School
https://vault.fbi.gov/Highlander%20Folk%20School
funny thing is the the communist couple that was running sears were also funding the syphilis study.. when they pulled their money out, those men were untreated and whites in america were to blame… the kicker with highlander the people writing the cover story for, was that the people running it (not financially supporting it), were making history. how? well they would pose as a young white couple… buy a house, and come moving day, a black couple would move in…
but when the residents didnt care, they then came back, lit crosses on the lawn and blew up the house with the people they put in it to create the race hate…
ergo, they closed the school…
like hayes tilden, this is not known any more
its been scrubbed… but if you read the older books and such not the newer histories like communist Zinns peoples history, you will find the details and much more detail than todays rvisionist history has, because the more detail you add the easier it is to find the lies.
example:
it wasnt a rule.. it was a law
the dems law created the legal onus on the bus companies
like the TSA searching you for drugs instead of the state, the bus drivers were forced to keep the law… you can bet that this caused problems, but people didnt look to where these laws and such came from, they only look at the actors in front of them. so the Dems get a free ticket in making rules and laws which cause issues, but the people stuck in the issue are the ones to blame for following the rules/laws
so the websites all say rule – putting the onus on those evil white bus drivers and owners of bus companies.
but Browder v. Gayle (1956) was the suit that ended the LAWS
Browder v. Gayle
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Browder_v._Gayle
what caused the law to be overturned was not the protest on the bus, that just triggered focus, the cause of action was brought under Reconstruction-era civil rights legislation, specifically 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1983
Second Enforcement Act of 1871
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Enforcement_Act_of_1871
Introduced in the House as H.R. 320 by Samuel Shellabarger (R-OH) on March 28, 1871
agreed to by the House on April 19, 1871 (93–74)
by the Senate on April 19, 1871 (36–13)
In January 1871, Republican Senator John Scott of Pennsylvania convened a congressional committee to hear testimony from witnesses of Klan atrocities. In February, Congressman Benjamin Franklin Butler of Massachusetts introduced his anti-Klan bill, intended to enforce both the Fourteenth Amendment and the Civil Rights Act of 1866. Butler’s bill was narrowly defeated in the House, whereupon Rep. Samuel Shellabarger, of Ohio, introduced a substitute bill—only slightly less sweeping than Butler’s original. This bill brought a few holdout Republicans into line, and the bill narrowly passed the House, sailed through the Senate and was signed into law on April 20 by President Ulysses S. Grant
notice how parks gets credit, but the white republcians that put the law to be used to abolish the laws the dems put up for the bus companies are all but forgottn by the public (but not the records!!!!!!!!!)
Under the Klan Act during Reconstruction, federal troops were used rather than state militias to enforce the law, and Klansmen were prosecuted in federal court, where juries were often predominantly black. Hundreds of Klan members were fined or imprisoned, and habeas corpus was suspended in nine counties in South Carolina. These efforts were so successful that the Klan was destroyed in South Carolina and decimated throughout the rest of the former Confederacy, where it had already been in decline for several years. The Klan was not to exist again until its recreation in 1915. During its brief existence, however, the “first era” Klan did achieve many of its goals in the South, such as denying voting rights to Southern blacks
The Ku Klux Klan first appeared in Alabama following the Civil War, when many Confederate veterans and Democratic Party supporters formed the group to oppose the extension of citizenship and voting rights among former slaves and to end Republican Party control of the state government. This hate group disbanded during the early 1870s and remained inactive until 1915, when Alabama native William J. Simmons founded a new incarnation on Thanksgiving night atop Stone Mountain, Georgia.
Simmons’ planning took place during a period which coincided with the lynching of Leo Frank, on August 16, 1915. Frank, a Jewish northern industrialist, had been convicted of murdering Mary Phagan, one of his young factory workers. When Frank’s death sentence was commuted to life imprisonment by the outgoing governor, the public was outraged. Frank was taken from prison and lynched by a mob, calling themselves the Knights of Mary Phagan.
The imagery of the burning cross, which had not been used by the original Klan, had been introduced by Griffith in The Birth of a Nation. The film, in turn, had derived the image from the works of Thomas Dixon, Jr., upon which the film was based. He had been inspired by the historical practices of Scottish clans, who had burned crosses as a method of signaling from one hilltop to the next. The image also occurs in Lady of the Lake, a long poem by Walter Scott. Simmons’ later account of the founding included a dramatic story of “a temperature far below freezing,” although weather records showed that the temperature had never fallen below 45 degrees that night on Stone Mountain
so the republicans destroyed the KKK and then it was resurected by southern dems, who then got power again, and proceeded to make the laws we now blame republicans for, which you can easily look up and see most never sided with, while most dems did
simmons lost favor in 1921 and was replaced by Hiram Wesley Evans… a Democrat party member… https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hiram_Wesley_Evans
Education Vanderbilt University
Occupation Dentist
Employer Ku Klux Klan
Title Imperial Wizard
Political party Democratic Party
when someone can talk to me knowing all this history beyond grade school revision, then i will start listening to the bs as i know this in detail.. hit me up on russian history too, latvian history, indonesian history, british history, german history too.
He [Hiram Wesley Evans] quickly rose through the ranks and was part of a group that ousted William Joseph Simmons from the position of Imperial Wizard, the national leader, in November 1922. Evans succeeded him and sought to transform the group into a political power.
Although Evans had led the kidnapping and torture of a black man while leader of the Dallas Klan, as Imperial Wizard he publicly discouraged vigilante actions, fearing that they would hinder his attempts to gain political influence
now this new klan was the new klan that margaret sanger of birth control review, visited to give a speech.. she writes about it in her autobiography… she also published the work of ernst rudin, the man who invented and created the holocaust… her negro project as she called it was to exterminate the black population (she wasnt too fond of chinese either)… but the democrats and feminists cover her story… but if you read the original texts and stuff and not the later stuff, you know clearly what she was all about as she collected lots of money for her project (and keeping the sources hidden)
Klan literature spoke highly of politicians such as Woodrow Wilson, William Jennings Bryan, and Grover Cleveland
Evans borrowed numerous concepts from the writings of Lothrop Stoddard and Madison Grant, American writers of the period who promoted eugenics and scientific racism,
ergo their inviting sanger…
He worked with Planned Parenthood founder, Margaret Sanger’s American Birth Control League in the following capacities: he was on the National Council, the fifteen-member Board of Directors, and on the conference committee of the First American Birth Control Conference and by publishing eugenicist articles in the Birth Control Review (for example, in the December 1921 issue).
Lothrop Stoddard was a famous racist who wrote The Rising Tide of Color Against White World Supremacy, which became a best-seller. The text contained such inflammatory statements as the following: “‘Finally perish!’ That is the exact alternative which confronts the white race…. Just as we isolate the bacterial invasions, and starve out the bacteria, by limiting the area and amount of their food supply, so we can compel an inferior race to remain in its native habitat…” (Lothrop Stoddard, The Rising Tide of Color Against White World Supremacy [New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1926],
at no time is the actual historical line of these thigns broken where the party members switch places… silly if it wasnt the only way for dems to preserve their ego and not leave the party.
or to quote bill maher: how could you belong to an organization with that history? (spoken to a catholic and ignoring the history of what he belongs to)
i have to go
everything i put up can be looked up and confirmed
sorry but one of my posts seems to have been deleted by someone… it was up, and now its not..
sorry if its long, but its hard to show history no one remembers and be short and not have the power to say without backing up.
@Artfldgr:
Aside from your questionable understanding of a “talking point”, a rebuttal to your history lesson can be summed up in my #1 comment.
That was thin. This is now. Today’s so-called conservatives and Republican Party just don’t have room in their plutocratic agenda for black folks. Just the cold hard thuth.
We’ve been hearing the dog whisles from race baiters like Dr. John for years. Now with Trump, its loud and clear, nothing there to guess at. If Lee Atwater were alive today, he’d tell Trump to tone it down, code it, be abstract.
But Trump has to be Trump, exposing the GOP for what they have become which is what’s sending so many of them in a panic.
Hey kids do we care that the trolls think we are racist , about as much as they care that we know they are actually the racist bigots that the dem party has always been.
I watched the comedy of MSLSD today turning themselves inside out about the horror of the law that might be enforced. How can they use this to get the latinos on El Rancho, which is in the same neighborhood as the Plantation, and down the street from the Caliphate. The lure of come let the government take all responsibility and pride away just vote for us to keep power, and you too can remain in hopeless endless poverty but we will give you a phone.
@kitt:
Yes Kitt, we all caught the MSLSD zinger in your first monstracity of a diatribe and we were all left awestruck by your superior wit.
There’s that old “tap tap of the shoulder” that the black guys stealing the doughnut again (or getting a free cell phone or lobster with food stamps etc).
But what precisely has this black man loving GOP done? No job bills, refusal of wage hikes, busting unions (“union thugs” being right up there with “guns, god, and gays), unfriendly on educational opportunities, even proposing legislation to end overtime pay, advocating cutting or ending social security, cheering at the concept that the sick “go home and die”- all while demanding more tax breaks for their rich contributors.
So please tell, other than the weak tea lip service from the bigoted and sexist whoremongering con man, what specifically have they done to help give the black community an equal playing field. And more importantly, what precisely is their game plan to do so?
@Ajay42302): Well, here’s your problem: Republicans have NO racist past and the only linkage there is between Republicans and racism is the accusations of lying liberals. In fact, Republicans have historically stood for equality and equal rights.
Not so with Democrats. They INVENTED racism in the Unites States, promoted it, protected it and transformed it into a political weapon. As we see, the Democrats haven’t supported equal rights when it canbe useful politically.
So, how is it that liberals can stoop to accusing ANYONE of racism?
@Ajay42302): Every single point you have made is beyond, Oh yes the old “code ” crapola. What jobs bill has ever decreased unemployment numbers? Except work for welfare, and that does nothing for the men. We have never spent more on education in history, but the trades programs in the High Schools are gone, how is high school training youth for any entry level job or trying to get them into journeyman programs? Liberal education leaves them incapable of filling out an application.
Wage hikes are supposed to be earned, show up, do a good job, get a promotion and a raise in pay.
Pray tell what have the democrats done for the Black man? 60 years of no family structure, cause babies mama is married to the government and he is no longer needed.
Who is for ending SS? Name a Politician one you liar.
Whats the plan, how much more than 20 trillion can be spent to battle poverty? Enlighten me on the path … there is no plan, the war is lost, no more war bonds for our kids to pay, please stop helping them.
Por bby did I “trigger” you? lol
@kitt: Do you and Bill compete for a stupid award?
No, seriously!
@Ajay42302: So, in the sh!t for brains world of AJ, stating historic facts and reality is stupid? That explains a lot.
No, seriously.
@Ajay42302: No its an appointment job lifetime and you have the corner on the market of dumb no answers to questions typical lib just name calling guess what… Greg is smarter than you, what about those answers????
Simple reason — Planned Parenthood has been so successful in their stated purpose of wiping out the “sub-human races”, as they referred to them, the liberals need warm bodies to take their place, so they want to import them….
@Ajay42302:
Perhaps you can give a specific example? Where is today’s Robert C. Byrd, Democrat and Klansman. Where are today’s Bull Connor; Orval Faubus?
.
“And blacks do tend to vote heavily democrat.”
The Democratic Party is, after all, the open and inclusive political party; welcoming people. The ‘elites’ of the party are people of color working for the advancement of _all_ people.
The demographics of USA show a positive influx of people from around the world. Which political party should they join?
“It has become de rigueur in democrat circles to paint the Republican Presidential candidate as a racist every four years, despite all evidence to the contrary.”
Of course, it does not help that the RepubliCan’T Party candidate, Drumpf has a public record of discriminating in his business dealings against people of color. Add to this, that today the KKK is fully endorsing Drumpf.
So go ahead, tell USA why people of color, new immigrants, Asians, and women should vote for Drumpf.
___________________~
Trust, but verify. Where are Drumpf’s tax records?
Drumpf: Making Amerika Grate Again.
.
.
.
… Thanks Obama …
Ema Nymton
~@:o?
.
@Ema Nymton: If Trump’s racist record is so well documented, why don’t you provide some verification?
.
# 30
@Bill:
“If Trump’s racist record is so well documented, why don’t you provide some verification? ”
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/24/opinion/sunday/is-donald-trump-a-racist.html?_r=0
Regardless, tell USA why people of color, new immigrants, Asians, and women should vote for Drumpf.
___________________~
Trust, but verify. Where are Drumpf’s tax records?
Drumpf: Making Amerika Grate Again.
.
.
.
… Thanks Obama …
Ema Nymton
~@:o?
.
@Ema Nymton: Why should people of color vote for Trump? Because economic growth and expansion is the ONLY way out of poverty. The Democrats have clearly demonstrated they intend to keep those in poverty IN poverty and dependent on Democrats for handouts to survive; it doesn’t get more racist than that.
http://www.politico.com/media/story/2016/07/observer-publisher-donald-trump-is-not-anti-semitic-and-hes-not-a-racist-004647
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/06/hermain-cain-trump-not-racist-224370
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/african-american-businessman-donald-trump-is-not-a-racist-guys/2016/04/16/466d319c-00eb-11e6-9d36-33d198ea26c5_story.html
Trump is no racist and has only been accused as such since he has been a threat to another failed liberal administration.
“You’re poor. You are incapable of helping yourself. You are weak. It’s not your fault, you are oppressed and always have been. You have no power. You come from a broken home. You can’t build a positive future for yourself on your own. Only big government can help you. Only WE can help you. Big government will protect you from those people. We understand why you take drugs, they make you forget that those people oppress you. We’ll protect you. We’ll tax them hard and give you some. We’ll redistribute. We care about you. See how we fight to give you free abortions? It’s your right. We care about you.”
Repeat. . . .
And THIS is how Clinton works hard on convincing the black vote to come out and support her. Only multi-millionaires need show up.
The rest of you don’t get to watch and definitely don’t get to ask QUESTIONS.
@Ema Nymton:
I won’t even consider replying to some who uses the standard liberal proressive Democrat tactic of of “Drumpf”.
Meanwhile, I’m waiting for the other to tell us where today’s Republican Robert C. Byrd, George Wallace, Bull Connor, &c are.
@Bill:
Let’s not forget Lyndon “Great Soceity” Johnson (back in the 1960s): “I’ll have those [black folks] voting Democratic for the next 200 years”
@James Raider:
The progressive Democrat left is using the immigrant almost exactly the way they used the blacks back then.
@Ajay42302: Didn’t know Byrd was ever a Republican!! Please prove your point!!
@Richard Wheeler: Was or is Robert Byrd a Republican?? When did that happen??
@Richard Wheeler:, @Ajay42302: : You missed my point (O could have ben crearer).
Meanwhile, I’m waiting for the other to tell us where today’s Republican equivalents to Robert C. Byrd, George Wallace, Bull Connor, Lester Maddox, &c are.
@ZZMike: The South was solidly Dem through early 60″S -against the Party Of Lincoln. The South was against the passage of CRA. Blacks registered Dem. in droves. Whites switched over to vote Repub. as they’ve continued to do the last 50yrs + Dems became the minority Party in the South Nixon’s Southern Strategy worked in 68.
Priceless posting.
In fact, Democraps today could not care less about ANY human being, other than theirs, when they do!
They NEVER< EVER use Their money, but burglarize others towards their agenda. Democraps are in true predators and mostly sociopaths.
And, they think of themselves as a sort of superior specie, from where their sense of entitlement comes from.