Today is the hottest day in the history of the universe.

Loading


Today is the hottest day in the history of the universe. And so was yesterday. And the day before that. And the day before that.

The hottest day ever. The hottest week ever. The hottest year ever. Ever. Hotter even than the big bang. The picture above is allegedly the latest picture from NASA/NOAA showing the effect of global warming.

This is an extraordinary claim. As they say, extraordinary claims demand extraordinary proof. What is one to do so that one wants to make extraordinary claims and the extraordinary proof is how to come by?

One gets creative, and that’s what those rascals at NOAA/NASA apparently have done. First, we find out that NASA/NOAA recorded record levels of heat in Africa.

 

 

Thing is, NASA/NOAA doesn’t have any sensors in those areas

 

 

And the satellite data says something else:

 

This kind of  chicanery might lead a cynical person to suspect that this was being done for a reason. Apparently that’s not a far fetched notion.

The Mail on Sunday today reveals astonishing evidence that the organisation that is the world’s leading source of climate data rushed to publish a landmark paper that exaggerated global warming and was timed to influence the historic Paris Agreement on climate change.

A high-level whistleblower has told this newspaper that America’s National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) breached its own rules on scientific integrity when it published the sensational but flawed report, aimed at making the maximum possible impact on world leaders including Barack Obama and David Cameron at the UN climate conference in Paris in 2015.

The report claimed that the ‘pause’ or ‘slowdown’ in global warming in the period since 1998 – revealed by UN scientists in 2013 – never existed, and that world temperatures had been rising faster than scientists expected. Launched by NOAA with a public relations fanfare, it was splashed across the world’s media, and cited repeatedly by politicians and policy makers.

This paper was nicknamed the “Pausebuster.” It was intended to be a political tool for obama and other leaders to use as a tool to bludgeon opponents of global warming and their ongoing globalization effort. The results of the study cannot be verified by someone else because NOAA couldn’t be bothered to archive them (i.e. the dog ate it):

NOAA not only failed, but it effectively mounted a cover-up when challenged over its data. After the paper was published, the US House of Representatives Science Committee launched an inquiry into its Pausebuster claims. NOAA refused to comply with subpoenas demanding internal emails from the committee chairman, the Texas Republican Lamar Smith, and falsely claimed that no one had raised concerns about the paper internally.

The whole paper, the process and consequently the warming argument could properly be described as a clusterf**k.

 

 

 

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
12 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Tomorrow will top it!!

The biggist sources of Hot Air come from AL GORE,DAVID SUZUKI,GREENPEACE,LEONARDO DiCAPRIO,EDF,OBAMA,HILLARY and all the eco-weenies on their dumb bicycles

Global warming is caused by the sun.

The computer models, when missing data, simply defaults to, “AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!”

Its raining where i live and theres snow in the mountians and its cold and these crooks from NOAA are blabbering about GLOBAL WARMING? frankly their faking the whole thing and trump needs to totaly trash the Paris Accord and defud these various eco-freak groups and duact tape Al Gores yap shut it would go a long way to stop all that HOT AIR and lets strand the eco-wackos in the wilderness they so want lets see them when they meet a bear with cubs a hungry Moutian Lion a pack of wolves and let the buzzards squabble over the remains

This is nothing new if anyone cares to check the actual location and siting of monitoring stations around the World. Also, anyone with an ounce of sense should also look at the length of time each monitoring station has been operational. There can only be one conclusion that NOAA uses a lot of WAGs (Wild Ass Guesses) to acquire their data.

That same leftists rag TIME that was blabbering about GLOBAL WARMING in the 1990’s was blabbering about GLOBAL COOLING back in the 1970’s more proof its a hoax and a con job by crooked politicians(Gore)and unscruplous enviromental groups(Greenpeace)and various Hollyweed wanks

Climate change? It was 56 last night and is now 74, so, yes, the climate changes.

Climategate 2: Whistleblower Confirms That Federal Climate Data Is Fake

The Mail on Sunday provides more confirmation that the global warming data churned out at taxpayer expense by the federal government is fraudulent:

A high-level whistleblower has told this newspaper that America’s National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) breached its own rules on scientific integrity when it published [a] sensational but flawed report, aimed at making the maximum possible impact on world leaders including Barack Obama and David Cameron at the UN climate conference in Paris in 2015.

The report claimed that the ‘pause’ or ‘slowdown’ in global warming in the period since 1998 – revealed by UN scientists in 2013 – never existed, and that world temperatures had been rising faster than scientists expected. Launched by NOAA with a public relations fanfare, it was splashed across the world’s media, and cited repeatedly by politicians and policy makers.

But the whistleblower, Dr John Bates, a top NOAA scientist with an impeccable reputation, has shown The Mail on Sunday irrefutable evidence that the paper was based on misleading, ‘unverified’ data. …

His vehement objections to the publication of the faulty data were overridden by his NOAA superiors in what he describes as a ‘blatant attempt to intensify the impact’ of what became known as the Pausebuster paper. …

Dr Bates accused the lead author of the paper, Thomas Karl, who was until last year director of the NOAA section that produces climate data – the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) – of ‘insisting on decisions and scientific choices that maximised warming and minimised documentation… in an effort to discredit the notion of a global warming pause, rushed so that he could time publication to influence national and international deliberations on climate policy’.

The motivation for producing propaganda and lies in place of science is obvious:

Official delegations from America, Britain and the EU were strongly influenced by the flawed NOAA study as they hammered out the Paris Agreement – and committed advanced nations to sweeping reductions in their use of fossil fuel and to spending £80 billion every year on new, climate-related aid projects.

It boils down to seizing more control over the economy and more of our money, while advancing liberal enviromentalist ideology by deliberately lowering our standard of living.

The government had reliable data from buoys and unreliable data from ships. It doctored the former to bring it in line with the latter. As for land temperatures, the dataset used “was afflicted by devastating bugs in its software,” so that the findings were “unstable.”

NOAA not only failed, but it effectively mounted a cover-up when challenged over its data. After the paper was published, the US House of Representatives Science Committee launched an inquiry into its Pausebuster claims. NOAA refused to comply with subpoenas demanding internal emails from the committee chairman, the Texas Republican Lamar Smith, and falsely claimed that no one had raised concerns about the paper internally.

Now the cat is out of the bag, and people know that pause has not been busted after all, making a mockery of leftist theory, which dictates that temperature must rise in tandem with CO2 levels.

Al Gore is a Con Man and he writes putrid a putrid poem

Your map is a con. You can find the stations throughout Africa from this site moron:

https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cdo-web/datatools/findstation

@The Truth Giver: Follow your citation and everyone can find all eight temperature measurement sites. for all of Africa. The rest of Africa temperatures are estimated. Makes for good solid data, right? Actually, using 8 sites to measure African temperatures can not result in a 95% statistical validity. Your referral shows even more how fraudulent are the data from NOAA.