Hillary Clinton: Anti-Trump protesters are “threatening our democracy.”

By 17 Comments 2,127 views

hang-trump

 

The anti-Trump protests continue for another day, now complete with rocks and bottles being hurled at the police:

Police hurled flash grenades and used tear gas on protesters on Saturday night as anti-Trump demonstrations continued across the country in the fourth night of unrest since his shock election victory.

Seventy-one people were arrested in Portland, Oregon, where crowds threw burning road flares at officers.

Hundreds gathered outside City Hall in Los Angeles to face off against riot police after a daytime march with drew 8,000 people.

Other rallies took place in Atlanta, Salt Lake City, Washington DC, and Phoenix, as the anti-Trump backlash continued to grow.

In Indianapolis the vermin have taken to hurling rocks while yelling “kill the police.”

And don’t you just love the irony in the picture above?

The anarchists driving and funding the protests have names that are all to famliar: George Soros, Al Sharpton and Michael Moore.

Those protesting the results of a fair election are threatening democracy, says hillary clinton:

“Wednesday night, Donald did something no other presidential campaign has ever done,” Clinton said Friday afternoon. “He refused to say that he would respect the results of this election.”

“Now, make no mistake, by doing that, he is threatening our democracy. He is basically saying, hey, we’ve been around for 240 years, and we’ve always had peaceful transitions no matter who won and who lost. Look,if you lose an election, I’ve lost elections, you don’t feel very good the next day. But we know in our country the difference between leadership and dictatorship, right? And the peaceful transition of power is one of the things that sets us apart.”

Yes. It’s the difference between a leadership and dictatorship. Right now we see protesters for what they are. They are not anti-Trump. They are anti-American. They are a threat to democracy.

And the peaceful transition of power is one of the things that sets us apart.

Right. Except for the anti-American hillary bloc:

Opponents to Donald Trump’s presidency are planning large-scale demonstrations in the nation’s capital in January when the Republican president-elect is sworn in on Inauguration Day, with police apparently expecting tens-of-thousands of protesters.

Trump’s surprise win Tuesday over Democratic rival Hillary Clinton has already sparked smaller protests across the county. However, demonstrations being planned for Inauguration Day weekend, which includes the Jan. 20 swearing-in on Capitol Hill, have the potential to be much larger.

One protest is being organized by the group ANSWER, for Act Now to Stop War & End Racism.

 

 

What we don’t see is hillary or obama. They are nowhere to be seen. Neither has issued a call for calm. Neither has asked that the protesters accept the result of the election, and that is a tacit endorsement of the violence. That’s bad

Hillary supporters are vehemently and rabidly anti-American, which made Trump winning absolutely critical. It is truly frightening to think the country could some day wind up in the hands of the wretched rabble who support clinton.

 

 

DrJohn has been a health care professional for more than 30 years. In addition to clinical practice he has done extensive research and has published widely with over 70 original articles and abstracts in the peer-reviewed literature. DrJohn is well known in his field and has lectured on every continent except for Antarctica. He has been married to the same wonderful lady for over 30 years and has three kids- two sons, both of whom are attorneys and one daughter on her way into the field of education. DrJohn was brought up with the concept that one can do well if one is prepared to work hard but nothing in life is guaranteed. Except for liberals being foolish.

17 Responses to “Hillary Clinton: Anti-Trump protesters are “threatening our democracy.””

  1. 1

    Nanny G

    Seventy-one people were arrested in Portland, Oregon

    You gotta check out all their photos!
    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3932876/PICTURED-71-protesters-arrested-fourth-night-violent-anti-Trump-protests-Portland.html
    Does it look like any one of them has missed a meal?
    Not the lack of diversity, too.
    6 out of 71 are minorities.
    Less than 10%.

    Now, who are these people?
    These are NOT ”spontaneous” uprisings.
    They are bused into these hot spots by Soros.
    Here’s the video of some buses that brought ”rioters” (paid for at $35/hr) to create chaos:
    http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-11-13/blocks-anti-trump-protest-buses-caught-tape
    “I have a video of 5 city blocks on the West side of Chicago lined with busses from Wisconsin (Badger Bus Lines) bringing in protestors. The Sears tower is visible in the background.”

    The video was taken at 3:30pm on South Canal Street in Chicago on Saturday. As our reader points out, hundreds of the participants that took part in the downtown Chicago protests from November 12 were bused in using these vehicles.

  2. 2

    Spurwing Plover

    Look at all those useful idiots rampaging through the streets acting like spoiled little brats frankly the ones to orgazise and finance these whining little brats need to leave the country and take their squaling little snots with then

  3. 3

    enchanted

    In Austin TX the DNC was caught busing in the protestors. On a craigs list ad, snowflakes and other malcontents are being sought to protest. hillary clinton and george soros are funding these riots. No, they are not protests, they are riots. During her speech after being holed up in her room for four days crying her eyes out, she told her supporters to ‘keep on fighting’.

    Two men were dosed with gasoline by clinton ‘protestors’ and lit on fire. If these two men die, hillary clinton is an accessory to murder. Another man was drug from his car and beaten severely by a group of men, left in the street and his car was stolen. A young girl and young man in school were beaten up by clinton protestors. This is where our country was heading. A state of lawlessness.

    I am thankful that those who threatened Mr. Trump are now being rounded up and arrested. One of those was a CEO of a company that needs to max – 20 years in prison. As they are considered domestic terrorists by the patriot act, they need to ship their asses to gitmo for a long long time.

    While on a roll, these people who are being arrested for rioting, and threatening the president elect and/or his wife do not understand this felony arrest will follow them their entire life. I don’t even think they will be able to work at burger king. stupid, ignorant and unintelligent snowflakes. (three categories)

    Oh and where is that sorry excuse for a sitting president? This past week-end, he spent the entire two days on the golf course. Not a word out of his sorry ass.

  4. 4

    Bill

    In his 60 Minutes interview, Trump was asked about the handful of attacks allegedly carried out in HIS name. He denounced them… emphatically.

    That’s the difference.

  5. 5

    July 4th American

    @enchanted:

    The left is embracing this. The left always accuses others of what they in fact do. Which tea party rally over the course of the many is identical to what is happening now? The answer, not one.

    Violence and lawlessness resides solely on the left.

  6. 6

    Enchanted

    Hillary clinton and george soros are funding these riots. They have committed treason and sedition. They need to be arrested and held accountable.

  7. 7

    Artfldgr

    1) its a republic not a democracy though soviets want it to be what they called themselves which was a sovereign democracy

    2) the suprise that communists want to end a republic or a democracy or an autocracy, or whatever, and replace it with what they want, isnt a surprise… 100 years of such we should be acclimated…

  8. 8

    Artfldgr

    @Enchanted: Hillary clinton and george soros are funding these riots. They have committed treason and sedition. They need to be arrested and held accountable.

    the definition of treason in the US has specific meanings that you will find do not include what Hillary did…

    And Soros is a nationalized citizen, but what has he done that is treason? we may not like it, we may think its aweful, we may think a lot of things, but its not treason (yet)

    Section 110 of Article III. of the Constitution:
    “Treason against the United States shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort. No person shall be convicted of treason unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on confession in open Court. The Congress shall have power to declare the punishment of treason.”

    In 1790, the Congress of the United States enacted that:
    “If any person or persons, owing allegiance to the United States of America, shall levy war against them, or shall adhere to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States, or elsewhere, and shall be thereof convicted on confession in open Court, or on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act of the treason whereof he or they shall stand indicted, such person or persons shall be adjudged guilty of treason against the United States, and SHALL SUFFER DEATH; and that if any person or persons, having knowledge of the commission of any of the treasons aforesaid, shall conceal, and not, as soon as may be, disclose and make known the same to the President of the United States, or some one of the Judges thereof, or to the President or Governor of a particular State, or some one of the Judges or Justices thereof, such person or persons, on conviction, shall be adjudged guilty of misprision of treason, and shall be imprisoned not exceeding seven years, and fined not exceeding one thousand dollars.”

    JAMES MADISON in the 43d number of the Federalist says:

    “As treason may be committed against the United States the authority of the United States ought to be enabled to punish it: but as new tangled and artificial treasons have been the great engines by which violent factions, the natural offspring of free governments, have usually wreaked their alternate malignity on each other, the Convention has with great judgment opposed a barrier to this peculiar danger by inserting a Constitutional definition of the crime.”

    Chief-Justice MARSHALL said:

    “To constitute that specific crime for which the prisoners now before the Court have been commuted, war must be actually levied against the United States. However flagitious may be the crime of conspiring to subvert by force the Government of our country, such conspiracy is not treason. To conspire to levy war. and actually to levy war, are distinct offences. The first must be brought into operation by an assemblage of men for a purpose, treasonable in itself, or the fact of levying war cannot have been committed.” * * * * * * * “It is not the intention of the Court to say that no individual can be guilty of this crime who has not appeared in arms against his country. On the contrary, if war be actually levied, that is, if a body of men Be actually assembled for the purpose of effecting by force a treasonable purpose, all those who perform any part, however minute, or however remote from the scene of action, and who are actually leagued in the general conspiracy, are to be considered as traitors. But there must be an actual assembling of men for a treasonable purpose to constitute levying of war. Crimes, so atrocious as those which have for their object the subversion by violence of those laws and those institutions which have been ordained in order to secure the peace and happiness of society, are not to escape punishment because they have not ripened into treason. The wisdom of the Legislature is competent to provide for the case.”

    In the case of The United States vs. FRIES, Mr. Justice CHASE said on the trial, and stated the opinion of the Court to be,

    “That if a body of people, conspire and meditate an insurrection to resist or oppose the execution of any statute of the United States by force, they are only guilty of a high misdemeanor; but if they proceed to carry such intention into execution by force, that they are guilty of the treason of levying war; and the quantum of the force employed neither lessens or increases the crime — whether by one hundred or one thousand persons is wholly immaterial;”

    In the case of the United States vs. AARON BURR, Chief-Justice MARSHALL said:

    “There is no difficulty in affirming that there must be a war, or the crime of levying it cannot exist; but there would often be considerable difficulty in affirming that a particular act did or did not involve the person committing it in the guilt and in the fact of levying war. If, for example, an army should be actually raised for the avowed purpose of carrying on open war against the United States and subverting their Government, the point must be weighed very deliberately before a Judge would venture to decide that an overt act of levying war had not been committed by a Commissary of purchases who never saw the army, but who, knowing its object, and leaguing himself with the rebels supplied that army with provisions; or by a Recruiting-officer, holding a commission in the rebel service, who, though never in camp, executed the particular duty assigned to him.”

    18 U.S. Code § 2381 – Treason

    Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.

  9. 9

    Spurwing Plover

    And with the inogeration in Janary 2017 will the demac-RATS bus in more malcontemps and snowflakes to riot in the streets block traffic vandalize and set fires? and how much dose the sinister George Soros have to do with it all?

  10. 10

    enchanted

    @Artfldgr:

    yes treason and sedition

    18 U.S. Code Chapter 115 – TREASON, SEDITION, AND SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES
    § 2381 – Treason – Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.
    (June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 807; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(2)(J), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2148.)

    § 2384 – Seditious conspiracy – If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.
    (June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 808; July 24, 1956, ch. 678, § 1, 70 Stat. 623; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(N), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2148.)

    § 2385 – Advocating overthrow of Government Whoever knowingly or willfully advocates, abets, advises, or teaches the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying the government of the United States or the government of any State, Territory, District or Possession thereof, or the government of any political subdivision therein, by force or violence, or by the assassination of any officer of any such government; or
    Whoever, with intent to cause the overthrow or destruction of any such government, prints, publishes, edits, issues, circulates, sells, distributes, or publicly displays any written or printed matter advocating, advising, or teaching the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying any government in the United States by force or violence, or attempts to do so; or
    Whoever organizes or helps or attempts to organize any society, group, or assembly of persons who teach, advocate, or encourage the overthrow or destruction of any such government by force or violence; or becomes or is a member of, or affiliates with, any such society, group, or assembly of persons, knowing the purposes thereof—
    Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both, and shall be ineligible for employment by the United States or any department or agency thereof, for the five years next following his conviction.
    If two or more persons conspire to commit any offense named in this section, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both, and shall be ineligible for employment by the United States or any department or agency thereof, for the five years next following his conviction.
    As used in this section, the terms “organizes” and “organize”, with respect to any society, group, or assembly of persons, include the recruiting of new members, the forming of new units, and the regrouping or expansion of existing clubs, classes, and other units of such society, group, or assembly of persons.
    (June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 808; July 24, 1956, ch. 678, § 2, 70 Stat. 623; Pub. L. 87–486, June 19, 1962, 76 Stat. 103; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(N), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2148.)

  11. 11

    Artfldgr

    @enchanted:

    yes, but its not who YOU think we are at war with its who the congress DECLARED war with.. and since they dont declare war…

    formal:
    War of 1812
    Mexican–American War
    Spanish–American War
    World War I
    World War II

    the others like vietnam and iraq are “Military engagements”
    and korea is a Military engagements authorized by the United Nations

    that leaves out 18 U.S. Code Chapter 115, as we are not at war with anyone.. and no one is a declared enemy… not even cuba… same with § 2384

    § 2385 doesnt apply because they are not advocating the overthrow of the US, they are instead using legal and dirty means to change the state through its legal channels… they are trying to get their winner elected and that winner then changes pushes and contorts things, but at no time is this the same as someone yelling gather up ye wepaons girls, and lets storm the bastille and take over.

    so you dont get the treason you want, because that is the law..

    you must now be thinking that they thought of this…
    and your right… the KGB years ago realized how to do it, and been applying that all through the states, name changes, deals and so on… with one of the first being the removal of the anticommunist laws, which you mugbht have had more chance with IF the constitutional conservatives and what is today nevertrumpers did their jobs and prevented it.

    the last one the left liberals and such removed was california… these are the laws that prevented the teachers from teaching communism as the future in terms of changing the state not informing students of history.

    i been talking about this stuff for decades, but no one listens to things like this because they dont play chess… unless its going to bite them now, or in very short while, they dont think it will ever bite them. but one by one these laws fell and that then allowed things like unions in federal government, which unlike private areas which are limited by bankruptcy of the firm, they are unlimited..

    they still call it the red scare, but turns out mccarthy was right, lattimore who coined the term mcarthyism did turn out to be a spy, the CPUSA was run by russia, etc.

    The Communist Control Act (68 Stat. 775, 50 U.S.C. 841-844) is a piece of United States federal legislation, signed into law by President Dwight Eisenhower on 24 August 1954, which outlaws the Communist Party of the United States and criminalizes membership in, or support for the Party or “Communist-action” organizations and defines evidence to be considered by a jury in determining participation in the activities, planning, actions, objectives, or purposes of such organizations

    but since the dems set the precidence that they get to choose whether a law is enforced or not, its just not enforced and precident says it wont be.

    those innoucous things they did 30 years ago are now in application
    unless you could see that far ahead and not use the period it wasnt used to claim it wont ever be used… your SOOL on preventing what you guys think of preventing. even more so since no one lsitend to the people who knew better and had names flinged at them and said, screw it if thats the way you welcome the information

    your going to find out that lots of innocuous and unconstituitaional laws passed, but since they are not used, they cant be challenged…. but the minute the state changes, they are all in force and cant be repealed. fun fun fun… but if you talk to smart people in the republcan party, they dont see making unconstitutional laws that are not used is a problem..

    but there are tons of them having ot do with speech, and travel and so on.

  12. 13

    MOS #8541

    all actions have consequences. sharpton, more, jackson soros and the clintons will pay a price. if you observe most of the bused in protesters unshaven individual, no education, no job and really a drag on this social structure. look at all the assholes that were gong to leave this country-geroge step, a elitist whore for the clintons, woopi the mprbidily obese t race baiter, most all of the drugged out actors. the limited response in “just kidding”
    and robert denero-so stressed out-find another country.
    the federal indictments will come this spring when the ties to the money is established and cities will sue for damages.

  13. 14

    Nanny G

    @Artfldgr: that leaves out 18 U.S. Code Chapter 115, as we are not at war with anyone.. and no one is a declared enemy… not even cuba… same with § 2384

    § 2385 doesnt apply because they are not advocating the overthrow of the US, they are instead using legal and dirty means to change the state through its legal channels… they are trying to get their winner elected and that winner then changes pushes and contorts things, but at no time is this the same as someone yelling gather up ye wepaons girls, and lets storm the bastille and take over.

    Yet Alexander Hamilton wrote:

    When a foreign nation declares, or openly and avowedly makes war upon the United States, they are then by the very fact, already at war, and any declaration on the part of Congress is nugatory: it is at least unnecessary.

    These rioters are anything BUT going ”through legal channels,” Art.
    They are paid provacatours leading useful idiots.
    They are committing crimes for cash.
    Their unseen puppet masters intend to destroy this country.
    They are NOT ”for” Hillary Clinton.
    Listen to them!
    They are against the entire representative democracy that our republic peacefully changes leadership via every so often.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *