Is the obama regime setting the stage for invalidating a Trump election victory?

By 22 Comments 1,881 views

obamas-justice-department-640x488

 

First things first. One must bear in mind that the Justice Department is utterly and completely corrupt. It began with the DOJ scuttling the investigation into the Black Panther voter intimidation case.

There was outrage over the decision among Congressional Republicans, the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, and in the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division—especially after it was learned one of the defendants who walked was Jerry Jackson, a member of Philadelphia’s 14th Ward Democratic Committee and a credentialed poll watcher for the Democratic Party last Election Day.

Then the Washington Times reported on July 30 that six career lawyers at Justice who had recommended continuing to pursue the case were overruled by Associate Attorney General Thomas Perrelli—a top administration political appointee. One of the career attorneys, Appellate Chief Diana Flynn, had urged in an internal memo that a judgment be pressed against the defendants to “prevent the paramilitary style intimidation of voters” in the future.

Eric Holder stonewalled the investigation into Fast and Furious

Holder’s problem is that most Americans will see the difference between 7,600 and 140,000. Somewhere in those withheld documents are answers to the questions Issa keeps asking: Who authorized this program? Who in Washington approved these ill-advised and possibly illegal tactics?

Who’s accountable?

It’s clear those answers won’t come from the attorney general, even as he expresses regret for the deaths of Terry and the hundreds of Mexicans killed by Fast and Furious weapons. Holder’s statements on what he knew and when have evolved repeatedly as new documents disproved previous sworn statements.

The IRS admitted to targeting conservatives in the 2012 election, yet absolutely no one was held accountable for it. It was found that the IRS Chief Counsel was involved and still nothing. obama met with Wilkins two days before the enhanced targeting criteria for conservatives were instituted. The DOJ saw nothing wrong with any of this.

obama has repeatedly declined to enforce the existing laws of this country:

Conservatives were angry when Janet Napolitano announced the administration would stop deporting certain undocumented immigrants, but they should have seen it coming. On issue after issue — gay rights, drug enforcement, Internet gambling, school achievement standards — the administration has chosen to achieve its goals by a method best described as passive-aggressive.

Rather than pushing new laws through a divided Congress to enact his agenda, Obama is relying on federal agencies to ignore, or at least not defend, laws that some of his important supporters — like Hispanic voters and the gay community — don’t like.

“If the president says we’re not going to enforce the law, there’s really nothing anyone can do about it,” University of Pennsylvania constitutional law professor Kermit Roosevelt said. “It’s clearly a political calculation.”

Curt wrote a post about this in 2011. The Department of Justice sees nothing wrong with a President failing to execute his oath of office.

The Department of Justice shook down big banks for their alleged involvement in the housing scandal, but rather than reimburse the victims of the scandal the obama regime diverted the money to various left wing groups such as La Raza.

Judicial Watch:

“In effect, the government has ordered the nation’s largest bank to create a massive slush fund for Democrat special interests,” states the editorial which reveals that radical Democrat activist groups stand to collect millions from Holder’s record deal with Bank of America. “The recession has dried up funding for such groups. But Holder’s massive bank shakedown could rebuild their war chests in a hurry.” The piece also points out that Holder has brokered other similar deals that will provide more back-door funding for the Democrat groups. They include a $13 billion agreement with JPMorgan Chase and a $7 billion deal with Citibank.

Under Loretta Lynch the DOJ has waded even deeper into the muck. She met with Bill Clinton just prior to James Comey announcing that he would recommend no charges be brought against hillary clinton- based on a fatally compromised investigation that was stymied by Lynch.

“The FBI went to Justice Department earlier this year asking for it to open a case into the foundation, but the public integrity unit declined,” CNN breaking news writer Daniella Diaz reported Wednesday.

The DOJ ordered the FBI to stand down in its investigation of the Clinton Foundation.

Let us be clear. The DOJ is corrupt and has been since the day obama took office. With this background let’s see what’s materializing. Ominous clouds are forming over election day.

First up, an Al Qaeda threat:

U.S. intelligence is warning of a possible terror threat for the day before the election next week, CBS News reported Friday.

Intelligence officials have told joint terrorism task forces about the possibility that al Qaeda is planning to attack three states on Monday, sources told CBS.

The states with the potential to be targeted are believed to be New York, Texas and Virginia.

The credibility of the threat reportedly has not been confirmed. But U.S. intelligence told counterterrorism officials of the potential threat out of caution.

“The counterterrorism and homeland security communities remain vigilant and well-postured to defend against attacks here in the United States,” a senior FBI official told CBS News.

“The FBI, working with our federal, state and local counterparts, shares and assesses intelligence on a daily basis and will continue to work closely with law enforcement and intelligence community partners to identify and disrupt any potential threat to public safety.”

Second, a cyber attack threat:

U.S. intelligence agencies do not see Russia as capable of using cyberespionage to alter the outcome of Tuesday’s presidential election, but they have warned that Moscow may continue meddling after the voting has ended to sow doubts about the legitimacy of the result, U.S. officials said.

The assessment reflects widespread concern among U.S. spy agencies that a months-long campaign by Russia to rattle the mechanisms of American democracy will probably continue after polls close on one of the most polarizing races in recent history, extending and amplifying the political turbulence.

U.S. security officials have not ruled out Russian-sponsored disruption on Election Day. In recent weeks, officials at the Department of Homeland Security have collected evidence of apparent Russian “scanning” of state-run databases and computer voting systems. “Whether they were really trying hard to get in, it’s not clear,” a U.S. official said.

Still, the decentralized nature of U.S. polling would make it extraordinarily difficult to subvert a nationwide race. Instead, U.S. officials said it is more likely that Russia would use hacking tools to expose or fabricate signs of vote-rigging, aiming to delegitimize an election outcome that Republican candidate Donald Trump has said he may refuse to accept if he does not win.

Or perhaps delegitimize a Trump victory. The DHS is eager and ready to seize control of the election.

Even before the FBI identified new cyberattacks on two separate state election boards, the Department of Homeland Security began considering declaring the election a “critical infrastructure,” giving it the same control over security it has over Wall Street and the electric power grid.

The latest admissions of attacks could speed up that effort possibly including the upcoming presidential election, according to officials.

“We should carefully consider whether our election system, our election process, is critical infrastructure like the financial sector, like the power grid,” Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson said.

“There’s a vital national interest in our election process, so I do think we need to consider whether it should be considered by my department and others critical infrastructure,” he said at a media conference earlier this month hosted by the Christian Science Monitor.

That adds up to a significant distraction. Are we being set up? Opportunity and motive are present. If obama wasn’t the galactic scale liar he is and if the DOJ wasn’t as terminally corrupt as it is this might sound far fetched even to me. Now it’s not a stretch to imagine that should Trump win obama and his DOJ could claim that the election was tampered with and declare it invalid. Especially if it’s close.

Things could get interesting.

 

 

DrJohn has been a health care professional for more than 30 years. In addition to clinical practice he has done extensive research and has published widely with over 70 original articles and abstracts in the peer-reviewed literature. DrJohn is well known in his field and has lectured on every continent except for Antarctica. He has been married to the same wonderful lady for over 30 years and has three kids- two sons, both of whom are attorneys and one daughter on her way into the field of education. DrJohn was brought up with the concept that one can do well if one is prepared to work hard but nothing in life is guaranteed. Except for liberals being foolish.

22 Responses to “Is the obama regime setting the stage for invalidating a Trump election victory?”

  1. 2

    Nanny G

    According to where the cheating is already being found, Hillary must be quite concerned with losing big!
    This week, in San Pedro, CA an elderly woman in a single (no bedroom) apartment had over 80 Absentee Ballots mailed to her address.
    When her neighbors wanted to take them to the Election Commission, the Post Office wanted them back!
    But they ended up with the Commission.
    And they were all fraudulent.
    But CA is Bright Blue!
    So, why are Dems cheating in CA for Hillary?
    Is there any danger she might lose CA?
    Her support group of dirty tricksters must think so.
    The only way Obama can affect this election is if it is close.
    Maybe it isn’t going to be close.
    WE haven’t been privy to the REAL polling.
    All we have seen are those skewed polls designed to dishearten Trump support.
    Maybe Hillary is in worse trouble than we could imagine.

  2. 3

    james raider

    There is ample evidence that this will be, on the socialist side, the most corrupted, and the most financed, election in American history.

    The big money, particularly from bankers and the too-big-to-fail companies and their leaders, are flooding all corners of the Nation with cash to ensure their continued control through the immoral Clintons.

    The MAJORITY of the CASH will not show up as cash donated to the Clinton campaign. Laws intended to maintain balance in the electoral process are being tromped on.

    The elite cannot lose control of the cash printing press, The Fed.

    They’ve sent out Obama to lie on the stump instead of doing his job. His inane accusations aimed at Trump are an embarrassment.

  3. 4

    DKK

    The establishment elite must be very very concerned about Trump. If he is elected, he really will “drain the swamp” – and they know it.

    I was commenting on an ABC “news” article yesterday, and commented to one of the many people attacking me for my views of Hillary that she was going to find herself in a heap of trouble soon. I said, “stay tuned.” When I went to respond to one of the comments that replied to me, I learned that I was “banned” from commenting on ABC News!

    We are officially the USSR in 1950.

  4. 8

    Bob

    Trump is right? We should knock the shit out of them, win states no one thought WE could or should. If he completely dominates the EC vote, he should go for broke. DOJ to investigate all. Amend the 17th amendment of the Constitution, help state/local gov regain some of its power. Pass a balanced budget and pay down the debt by selling land:http://assets3.bigthink.com/system/tinymce_assets/944/original/federal_lands.jpg?1422311293. Do away with Fiat money. Two more cops killed, soldiers still dying, blacks getting the ass hand handed to them–for generations. “A world without a good guy, is hell; Dan Miller, CDR, B-Co, 1st Inf Div.” If you have an axe to grind, don’t blame me, America, or the color of your skin. Most solutions to a problem are found in the mirror and at the end of your arms. I’ve been there and all that, Baltimore in 1962 was not a good place for a white kid in the inner city; getting to/out Carol Park was an adventure. Our kids (anyone 18-30) need to dream and pursue, IT’S AMERICA, Great Again! Someone please tell me why you could ever vote for Dem? Taxpayers are paying 3 times the bill for non-taxpayers (usdebtclock.org). Why work, the Dems say we’re gonna build 500 thou windmills/solar panels, in China, kill coal. I swear, have I missed something? What is the reason to vote for any Dem, and some Rep’s? If Trump punk’s this, his “Name” will go down as shit-FOREVER, they will see to it, have you read a high school History book? “they pledged: “For the support of this declaration, with firm reliance on the protection of the divine providence, we mutually pledge to each other, our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred honor.” Forever his NAME-FOREVER. All WE have to do, is VOTE!! Hillary can’t do what Bill did and tack to the center, that alone makes her to far left. The Dem Party is now O’s, too far left. She said she would kill coal” Hashim and Moctar Riady both found themselves with a global monopoly thanks to Bill Clinton’s Executive Order for the 1.7 million-acre Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument in Utah, over the only other known “low sulfur” deposit.” If Trump can win enough of the AF/White American vote, eliminate the need to pander but demand change and results, maybe MLK’s dream, Lincoln’s, Reagan’s and Our Founding Fathers can be “lived”, no longer bashed to be “fundamentally changed” but a Nation of WE the People. I reject Colin Rand Kaepernick’s actions, what is it you want from me? I admire your skill set. I am a happy American, vet, retired from 25+ years (1981-2006), the Dems/Reps have divided US/We. Let’s Make America Right Again -TRUMP-PENCE.
    Go Gators:)
    God Bless

  5. 9

    Spurwing Plover

    The sooner they get Obama out of the oval office and into a prison cell the better off he deserves life and even longer for his crime and the same gose to Hillary as well

  6. 12

    Mully

    @Greg:
    161,000 is below expectations. It’s a lousy number. With our population we should be 250k or more each month. Plus look into the kind of jobs or quality being created.

  7. 13

    July 4th American

    @Mully:

    This administration can not even muster a quarterly GPA of 3%, which by the way has been an economic metric reflecting median economic growth.

    The economy has for the last 7 1/2 years been anemic. Numbers manipulations have the uniformed(greg)fooled into believing that which is not.

    94.6 million working age adults not working, no they are not all retirees or under aged children….

  8. 14

    kitt

    Anyone thinking about leaving the States if Hillary is successful in stealing the Presidency is as cowardly as the Muslim men who flee their country for Europe.
    I stand my ground and fight for my country.

  9. 16

    Richard Wheeler

    What a bunch of horseshit from you reactionary right wingers..

    The election will be fair, close and decided in Fla. The loser should be a gentleman, or a lady , shake hands and walk away—we’ll see.

    Baier, almost as big a fool as pretty boy Sean, admits he made up “HRC close to indictment” story.

    This is why I can’t bring myself to vote Repub.

    After Navy ND 2nd half I’m going to Semper Fi Park to celebrate MARINE CORPS BIRTHDAY/VETERANS DAY

  10. 19

    DKK

    True @spurwing plover. The only time he told the truth was in 2008, when he said he would fundamentally transform the US. Unfortunately none of us knew he meant to change it for the worse.

  11. 21

    Greg

    @Greg J, #20:

    So far as I know, people who aren’t actively seeking employment have never been counted.

    There was a time when mothers with children at home generally didn’t hold jobs outside the home. They weren’t counted among the unemployed. If you’re not seeking employment, you’re not part of the group looking for a job but not getting one. Why someone would be in the non-seeking category is a separate question, and one that has many different answers. A person might be appallingly lazy and devoid of all ambition; a person might be a successful investor; a person might be dealing with some level of disability; a mother might be lucky enough to be able to stay at home with the kids and have decided to do so, etc.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *