obama moves to seize control of the 2016 Presidential election

By 29 Comments 3,188 views

obama stalin

 

“The people who cast the votes don’t decide an election, the people who count the votes do.”

– Joseph Stalin

What could go wrong?

Paul Bedard:

Even before the FBI identified new cyber attacks on two separate state election boards, the Department of Homeland Security began considering declaring the election a “critical infrastructure,” giving it the same control over security it has over Wall Street and and the electric power grid.

The latest admissions of attacks could speed up that effort possibly including the upcoming presidential election, according to officials.

“We should carefully consider whether our election system, our election process, is critical infrastructure like the financial sector, like the power grid,” Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson said.

“There’s a vital national interest in our election process, so I do think we need to consider whether it should be considered by my department and others critical infrastructure,” he said at media conference earlier this month hosted by the Christian Science Monitor.

The justification?

DHS describes it this way on their website: “There are 16 critical infrastructure sectors whose assets, systems, and networks, whether physical or virtual, are considered so vital to the United States that their incapacitation or destruction would have a debilitating effect on security, national economic security, national public health or safety, or any combination thereof.”

 

This is fabulous. The regime that brought you Fast and Furious, IRS targeting of conservatives, that depended on the stupidity of grubers, that lied about obamacare and lied about the Iran deal now seeks to control the 2016 Presidential election.  This reminds me of obama wanting to put all medical records online. That assures they can be hacked.  It’s the same for electronic voting machines. They and their databases can be hacked. Stealing the 2016 election has been described as “child’s play.”  Thi administration has claimed that the Russian have at least twice hacked voter databases.

Hackers based in Russia were behind two recent attempts to breach state voter registration databases, fueling concerns the Russian government may be trying to interfere in the U.S. presidential election, U.S. intelligence officials tell NBC News.

The breaches included the theft of data from as many as 200,000 voter records in Illinois, officials say.

The incidents led the FBI to send a “flash alert” earlier this month to election officials nationwide, asking them to be on the lookout for any similar cyber intrusions.

Are we sure it was the Russians? Because “U.S. intelligence officials” say so? We’re told it was the Russians by the same people who told us “You can keep your plan and your doctor no matter what.” The same people who laughed at stupidity of the American people for swallowing obamacare and who were boastful of playing the press and the people for fools with regard to the Iran deal .

In an astounding New York Times piece by David Samuels, senior White House officials gleefully confess they use friendly reporters and nonprofits as public relations tools in the selling of President Obama’s foreign policy — and can do it almost at will because these tools are ignorant, will believe what they’re told, will essentially take dictation and are happy to be used just to get the information necessary for a tweet or two.

This country is so f*cked up right now it’s astonishing. We live under a maniac who releases illegal alien criminals into our streets threatens Americans who would uphold the law. Wait- the FBI is investigating?

After the Hillary debacle, that inspires nothing. Besides, the obama regime has had practice at this already:

A Pennsylvania electronic voting machine was taken out of service after being captured on video changing a vote for President Obama into one for Mitt Romney, NBC News has confirmed. Republicans have also said machines have turned Romney votes into Obama ones.

All obama has to do is cast the elections into doubt and he will control the result. He will count the votes. If you believe anything he says you are an idiot, but I think someone already said that.

DrJohn has been a health care professional for more than 30 years. In addition to clinical practice he has done extensive research and has published widely with over 70 original articles and abstracts in the peer-reviewed literature. DrJohn is well known in his field and has lectured on every continent except for Antarctica. He has been married to the same wonderful lady for over 30 years and has three kids- two sons, both of whom are attorneys and one daughter on her way into the field of education. DrJohn was brought up with the concept that one can do well if one is prepared to work hard but nothing in life is guaranteed. Except for liberals being foolish.

29 Responses to “obama moves to seize control of the 2016 Presidential election”

  1. 1

    Redteam

    “The people who cast the votes don’t decide an election, the people who count the votes do.”

    And Obozo wants to make sure he is deciding who is doing the counting. Should we go ahead and declare him the dictator?

    All obama has to do is cast the elections into doubt and he will control the result. He will count the votes. If you believe anything he says you are an idiot, but I think someone already said that.

    Does anyone with a brain doubt what is going on here? Why should we let someone that can barely read a teleprompter tell us who we voted for? He wants it set up so the votes are counted before they are cast. They won’t even have to sit up late on election night, they can program the results a week ahead of time.

  2. 2

    Spurwing Plover

    I see Obama the fink is going over the heads of congress again to force america to abide by the Unconstitutional Global Warming yeah listen to this scumbag the #1 worst presidents in amerixan history and life in prisons to easy for this bottom dwelling muck sucker he deserves to be banished for all eternity into the Phantom Zone just like in Superman comics

  3. 3

    bwax

    Paper ballots, counted by teams from both parties! It may take longer but it is verifiable.

    I for one know that electronic votes can be manipulated. It happened to 2 of my friends in Charlotte in 2008! McCain votes were electronically switched to Odumbo, only my friends caught the error and pointed it out to the election official who said ‘Oh, yeah, I know how to fix that’. The party in office at the time selects the voting machine company, the damnocrats were in power at the time.

  4. 5

    Richard Wheeler

    Rigged POTUS elections –don’t buy it.
    But with “w” in office 2004 election came down to winner in one state–Ohio’
    God, guns and gays brought out Repub. vote but there was clearly shenanigans in vote counting in Repub. strongholds. Change of 100,000 in Ohio and Kerry was Prez.
    How bout Repub. controlled Fla. in 2000? 500+ votes makes Gore Prez.

    This works both ways. Trump’s problem is the way the E.C. sets up. He could win popular vote and lose election—MUST win Fla, Ohio and N.C PLUS N.H or Pa.–very tough. task.

  5. 6

    Nanny G

    Bwax, good point.

    Just save a lot of money and suspicion: go back to all-paper ballots.
    All these layers of highly paid gov’t oversight?
    Who needs it?
    And, recently the FBI noted these hacks as if they (the FBI) are a ”monitoring” business instead of an ”enforcing” business.
    Reminds me of those commercials with the termite monitor and the security monitor.
    Heck, I’m unpaid, but I, too, can monitor!
    http://map.norsecorp.com/#/

    PS, looks like we give about 1/2 as good as we get.

  6. 7

    MOS #8541

    Department of Homeland Security is a joke. so how many terrorist threats have they stopped? the director of dhs is a obama puppet. he is not qualified for this job much less a crossing guard.
    a civil war is about to occur. but the ass hole isis pres and his beard wife will be in Hawaii.

  7. 8

    Bill

    Indeed; revert back to paper ballots. Done.

    Odd those who can’t see voter fraud when it is happening now want to exert control to prevent what we are told is a hacking threat.

    Anything to compensate for the failure of liberalism.

  8. 10

    Richard Wheeler

    @Bookdoc: Vote turned in my home county of HEAVILY Jewish Palm Beach where many hundreds, confused by ballot, got counted for Buchanan rather than intended Gore.
    Trump should just keep plugging, stay on message. If he loses it will be his temperament that beats him–not crooked counting. E.C WIN VERY DIFFICULT FOR HIM—BIG DAY for him in Mexico and Arizona.

  9. 11

    Randy

    @Richard Wheeler: If people can not read English well enough to know how to vote, maybe they should not be voting? Now it looks like this administration is going to allow those who can not read or speak English to be citizens.

  10. 12

    Spurwing Plover

    Hey Obama the Fink your dear Uncle Joe(Stalin)from his place in hell is appluading your abuse of power so is Lenin,Kruschev & hitler and Mao they to usurped the power for themselves

  11. 13

    Greg

    Donald Trump just took on political operative David Bossie as Deputy Campaign Manager. Presumably Bossie will be in charge of coordinating all Clinton smear tactics between now and the election, since he’s very good at that and known for little else.

    America should brace itself for an increasingly offensive stink of excrement and week-old garbage over the next two month. This guy has never been known for raising the level political discourse, and the Trump campaign set the bar at a very low level to begin with.

  12. 14

    Bookdoc

    @Greg:
    Boy, the libtards are freaking out now that we’re using their own tactics against them. BTW greg, look at how Palin, mccain, Romney, and every other Republican has been smeared by the dimocrats and the minions in the lsm-hurts when we do it back doesn’t it? Especially since ours are true.

  13. 15

    Redteam

    @Greg:

    Presumably Bossie will be in charge of coordinating all Clinton smear tactics

    like pointing out that Hillary doesn’t have a functioning brain? Or that Hillary has slammed the women that hubby Bill raped. You mean like that kind of smear?
    Maybe he’ll even be in charge of enumerating the long list of Bill and Hillary cohorts that are no longer amongst the living. Maybe he’ll tell us about how Vince shot himself in the mouth without a gun.
    Come on Bossie, give us the good stuff.

  14. 16

    Redteam

    @Greg: Greg, you might want to ‘like’ the Citizens United page on facebook, that’s Bossie’s site and he’ll keep you informed on all the excrement on Hillary. If that’s possible since she stays in such deep doo doo.

  15. 17

    Greg

    No one with a properly functioning brain would want to elect a vainglorious reality television show host to an office where the fate of the world can depend on having an actual, in-depth understanding of reality.

    What Trump understands is how to manipulate a reality television audience—a skill applicable only to convincing people to vote for him, not to doing the job of a president. For the job itself, he’s a complete mismatch. He’s totally unfit; so much so that he would be a serious danger to the safety of the nation. This isn’t hyperbole. It’s a statement of fact. Putting such a man in the Oval Office would have been an entirely survivable error in an earlier era, but it might not be now, when total catastrophe can be brought about literally in a matter of minutes. All it would take is one bad, impulsive decision, made by someone whose ego or lack of understanding has gotten in the way of clear thinking. Donald Trump fits the profile of a person who could do that. If you think not, you’re either not paying attention, or you’re operating on the same level of limited understanding that he is himself.

    The Trump campaign isn’t promoting the merits of Donald Trump or of his constantly changing positions. They’re trying to make the election a national referendum on Hillary Clinton, devoting their full attention to cranking up a decades-long defamation program. Why do you think they’re doing everything in their power to keep voters from having a moment to reflect on Donald Trump’s “qualifications?” The answer should be obvious.

    Clinton would be 4 more years of Obama? Hey, 4 more years of slow but steady economic growth without any major geopolitical disasters sounds just fine to me. Turning a nearsighted bull loose in a china shop does not.

  16. 18

    Redteam

    @Greg:

    Clinton would be 4 more years of Obama? Hey, 4 more years of slow but steady economic growth

    92 million people have left the work force. Unemployment approx 25%. More government jobs than private sector jobs. High percentage of new jobs in bars and restaurants. But one thing Hillary wouldn’t have to worry about, there’s no chance she or anyone else will ever be a worse president than Obozo.

    What Trump understands is how to manipulate a reality television audience—a skill applicable only to convincing people to vote for him,

    Oh, so now you’re worried that Trump is so good at getting folks to vote for him that he will be the winner. At least then we wouldn’t have to be concerned about who the next cohort of Hillary to die will be.

    He’s totally unfit; so much so that he would be a serious danger to the safety of the nation.

    No, Obozo has proven that is not a worry, no one can be more incompetent than he has been and we’ve survived. So you can take that off your list of things to worry about.

    devoting their full attention to cranking up a decades-long defamation program.

    What has crooked lying Hillary been defamed about? What has been said that’s not true? She did or did not attack the women that Slick raped? She did or did not create Whitewater? She did or did not fire the white house travel staff? She did or did not have Vince silenced? She did or did not sit silent and un-acting while Benghazi was attacked? She did or did not lie about her role in it?
    Tell me just one thing that Trump has said that would defame Hillary. I actually think it would be much harder to think up something flattering to say about Hillary. In fact, why not do that, tell me something true and flattering about Hillary.

  17. 19

    Greg

    Total new job creation has been much greater during the Obama administration than during the Bush administration.

    More new jobs were created during Jimmy Carter’s single term than during both of George W Bush’s terms put together.

    New job creation during each of Bill Clinton’s terms of office exceeded them all. Clinton presided over the greatest 8-year period of new job creation at any time since 1941.

    Those are the facts, as opposed to the right-wing propaganda fantasy you appear to have swallowed hook, line and sinker.

    Another fact is that the last 2 years of the Bush administration were an economic disaster that the Obama administration successfully reversed. Still another is that high-paying, low-skill jobs are never coming back—because the corporate powers and capitalist investors the right holds in such high esteem can and do make a lot more money by moving and keeping such jobs overseas. Those would be the same people Donald Trump’s tax scheme would provide with the biggest tax cuts; tax cuts running into millions of dollars per year each for the very wealthiest, compared with the chicken feed working people might receive. It’s the same damn thing we saw with the Bush tax cuts, and it would ultimately have the same damn consequence—a lot more debt. Both left- and right-leaning tax experts estimate the total cost to be around $10 trillion added to current projections.

    So, why isn’t a person a complete idiot for supporting Trump? Assuming, of course, that you’re not among the wealthiest class of taxpayers… Once again, republicans are buying a bill of goods. They seem to be totally incapable of learning from past experience. A little blame shifting and they’re ready and eager to jump at the next sales pitch, no matter that nothing about it adds up.

  18. 20

    Nanny G

    SERVER BREACHED…
    P0nogrpahy PHISHING SCHEME…
    SHE CLICKED ON
    IT!
    MORE…
    CLINTON SIGNED FOR RECEIVING CLASSIFIED TRAINING — SAID SHE DIDN’T…
    LOST CELL PHONES WITH SENSITIVE INFO…
    THOUGHT CLASSIFIED MARKINGS WERE ‘ALPHABETICAL PARAGRAPHS’…
    WITHHELD 17,500 EMAILS…
    LIST: THINGS SHE ‘COULD NOT REMEMBER’…

    It’s been 272 days since Hillary Clinton’s last press conference. But Clinton’s lead press secretary, Brian Fallon, vowed that if elected, “Hillary Clinton will hold press conferences.”

    Also, Hillary doesn’t seem to have any supporters among voters, only among donors:
    http://16004-presscdn-0-50.pagely.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/Trump-vs-Hillary-Attendance-8-31.png
    She’s either lazy or sickly.

  19. 21

    Redteam

    @Greg:

    New job creation during each of Bill Clinton’s terms of office exceeded them all. Clinton presided over the greatest 8-year period of new job creation at any time since 1941

    He was fortunate to have a Republican majority in both houses to bail him out..

    as opposed to the right-wing propaganda fantasy you appear to have swallowed hook, line and sinker.

    quote where I said something different.

    If there are 10 people that want a job. 5 have one, 4 have give up looking because after not finding one for the last 3 years, they’ve decided to let uncle sam give them funds and one is still looking that makes a 10% unemployment rate. right? That’s Obomanomics. I would say unemployment was 50% in that situation. There are many more folks that have given up and are no longer looking for a job because there aren’t any so the real unemployment rate now is close to 50%. You are just fooling yourself.

    Another fact is that the last 2 years of the Bush administration were an economic disaster

    True.

    that the Obama administration successfully reversed.

    Pure fantasy.

    Another is that high-paying, low-skill jobs are never coming back

    Certainly not if the Dims stay in control.

    So, why isn’t a person a complete idiot for supporting Trump?

    Because he has a chance of success. Hillary, who has no brain left, can only fail.

    They seem to be totally incapable of learning from past experience.

    Kinda like the libtards that believe in Obama?

  20. 23

    kitt

    Why the hell are the Democrats so terrified of the Russians, didn’t they laugh at Romney for saying Russia was the biggest threat? Didn’t Hillary herself press the re set button? Voting for someone that is too senile for various health reasons to recognize that C isnt for Cookie. She was FLOTUS, a Senator and Secretary of State yet still is too stoopid to know that drone strikes are a secret?? Totally brain damaged. Hiding from the public this close to the election…really??
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ye8mB6VsUHw

  21. 27

    Greg

    @Bill, #25:

    Bush had practically full employment. Sheesh.

    That would be part of the fantasy referred to in post #19. It’s the right’s alternate history, which is a very different thing from events as they actually occurred and were reported in the time they occurred:

    From the Wall Street Journal, Jan 9, 2009: Bush On Jobs: The Worst Track Record On Record

    Here’s a look at job creation under each president since the Labor Department started keeping payroll records in 1939. The counts are based on total payrolls between the start of the month the president took office (using the final payroll count for the end of the prior December) and his final December in office.

    Because the size of the economy and labor force varies, we also calculate in percentage terms how much the total payroll count expanded under each president. The current President Bush, once taking account how long he’s been in office, shows the worst track record for job creation since the government began keeping records.

  22. 28

    Redteam

    @Greg: .

    It’s the right’s alternate history, which is a very different thing from events as they actually occurred and were reported in the time they occurred:

    it depended then as it does now, on who is doing the reporting. I’m sure the Bush admin claimed good employment numbers, just as Obozo’s does now. However if the persons that post the actual truth, it would be quite different. Anyone that thinks ’employment’ is good now is living in a fantasy world. It is extremely hard for anyone to get a new job today that pays a decent wage. If we take the standards, as created by Obozo, since everything that has happened during his admin is Bush’s fault, that means if he has created jobs , it is because of Bush. That means that if jobs went way down under Bush, it was Clinton’s fault. Did you forget the rules as created by Obozo? :

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *