The left just keeps giving us reasons to vote for Trump

Yup So sad we are going to replace a liar with a liar a fraud with a fraud.
You embrace Donald Trump, you embrace it all. You embrace every slur, every insult, every outrage, every falsehood. You’re going to spend the next six months defending, rationalizing, evading all that. And afterwards, you come back to women, to minorities, to young people and say, that wasn’t us. That’s not what we’re about. The reality is, if you support him to be president of the United States, that is who you are, and you own it.
And then can we bash it when you knew he was a snake when you took him in?
Remember those choices we had before this dark hour
Walker, Perry, Rubio, Cruz. Hours after Kasich decided his job was done Trump gave up on his Tax plan, he couldn’t care less if pervs get into bathrooms, and his other ways to pander to the voters are just suggestions.
Unity what a wonderful word, often used in marriage ceremonies, the state of being in full agreement, I so feel like being the runaway bride, its not just his small hands, many men wish to leave Trump waiting at the alter as well. Really its not you, its me, ok I admit it it is you, you suck.
Oh but the horror of Hillary and Bill could the USA stand 4 or 8 more years of liberal rule? Wheres the guarantee it wont be that way with Trump? There are articles out there that say Trump must lose and lose badly to teach you trumpists a lesson,(it may happen) I dont like that plan. Third Party, ahhh pffft.
That leaves me undecided the lesser of two evils is still evil .
One thing for sure if Trump tries anything like the current Prez is pulling he will be the second impeached President in my lifetime, hope he picks a good VP that could soften the blow.

Temple Taggart claims that Trump once kissed her on the lips. Trump denies it, but even if he had, one would hope that Gloria Steinem would say that Trump was entitled to a “freebie” as she said of Clinton’s groping Kathleen Willey.

Note, she only claimed this now.
She never claimed it before.
LOOK how she gushed over Dnald Trump back in 1997 when she was Miss Utah:
http://www.deseretnews.com/article/541972/MISS-UTAH-TRUMPETING-OVER-TRUMPS-ATTENTION.html?pg=all
No mention of an unwanted kiss back then!

So, why now?

The LDS church, of which Miss Temple T. is a member has it in for Trump.
They wanted Cruz to take all 40 of their delegates so they cheated.
All who tried and failed to vote electronically were told they could NOT come vote in person because there was no way to verify if their vote online had succeeded or not.
BUT, election night those same Mormons started grabbing names of those who had not shown up and voted, grabbed ballots and simply padded Cruz’s totals. They had ”cover” when a person came into each precinct room and said the people whose online votes were attempted could vote in person and all online votes were being thrown out! But those actual voters were not the ones casting ballots!
It was the old Mormon men who know best.
A Cruz win as predicted of 52% wouldn’t garner all the delegates, so they bumped the tally up to 80%.

Now these Deep Red Republican Mormons are telling their followers that ”better Bernie or Hillary than Trump.”
And now this Mormon found Donald Trump to be offensive.
But not back then.
I don’t buy it anymore than Mormon Harry Reid’s lies on the Senate floor.

Liberals only have a problem with lies when their offense can be used for a political purpose. They don’t mind abuse of women as long as liberal icon is getting his nut on it. They don’t mind accumulating huge wealth as long as it is theirs and dodging taxes is just fine if they are doing it.

Trump’s ego assures he will strive for success; unlike Obama, it will not be enough to simply be able to blame someone else for the failure caused by his ideological pursuits. Success makes him look good while failure makes him look bad… you know, kind of like the real world.

So, I would not expect Trump to micromanage things out of his field of expertise and I would fully expect him to reward failure, not with retirement and full pension, but with being sacked. People under him will be pushed to succeed as well.

If (or most likely when) this politically corrupt DOJ gives Hillary a free ride for blatantly breaking the laws regarding her illegally storing, receiving, and transmitting classified documents on her unclassified email server and telling others to disregard the laws pertaining to the transmission of classified material as well, Trump (and the rest of the Republican Party for that matter) will have a huge campaign issue. It’ll fit right into Trump trying to portray himself as the outsider taking on the politically corrupt DC establishment. He’ll point to this travesty of justice and tell everyone that it’s time the political elite in DC are held to the same standards as everyone else because they are not above the law. He can promise that, if elected, his DOJ will uphold the law and indict Hillary.

Another issue lying on the backburner is the way our Sailors were treated at the hands of the Iranians. If details are “leaked” or someone sues under the FOIA to get them released, that will play right into Trump’s hands as well.

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/05/rep_classified_details_of_irans_treatment_of_captured_us_sailors_will_shock_the_nation.html

For all of you Obama sheep out there, if Trump gets elected, you will have given him to us.

@Nanny G: You bet the unions and their members are waking up to the destructive liberal policies. Seeing Hillary booed and saluted by the coal miners was sooo much fun. Trying to garner support with her BOGO Clinton deal may actually appeal to the stupidest democraps or those that were really impressed with his military prowess in 1993 it so reflects Bengahzi, she learns well. But I am sure she can best this :http://ashbrook.org/publications/onprin-v4n6-mayer/

@kitt: #6
They’re not unicorn farts, Kitt. They’re reality.
If you would read the truth about Mr. Trump’s history and past actions, instead of blindly believing what his enemies say about him, you would see that.
A higher percentage of his executives are female than just about any other Fortune 500 company.
Many of the people who have worked for him have gone on to successful careers of their own, often with his help.
Very few people who actually know him, employees, business partners or former employees have anything negative to say about him. What’s the worst thing in this article? That he may have kissed one woman? Hang the bastard!
The people who are most vicious in their comments about Mr. Trump are those who have no real knowledge of him.
But those are the ones that you are listening to, Kitt, and you’re ignoring the people who actually know him. I don’t understand you.

I’m not talking about his words, I’m talking about his actions, about the very consistent way that he’s always treated people, including women.
Try addressing that. And not with little sound bites or rare snippets that can be made to look bad.
Address the way he has behaved for the last thirty years or so. Address the fact that very few of the people who actually know the man will say anything bad about him. Address his reputation in the business world for honesty, integrity and helping others to start and be successful in their own businesses!
Address his ACTIONS, Kitt. I’m getting sick and tired of hearing people whine about “Well, he said this once”, or “He said that once”. The best way to judge someone is by examining their actions over a number of years, and you and the other anti-trumps are so blinded by hate that you won’t do that. I don’t even think that you can anymore, because if you did, you might find out that you are wrong. And like small children, you can’t ever admit that, can you?
And no, Kitt, Mr. Trump most emphatically does NOT abandon the people who help and support him. His record, which you are so anxious to ignore in favor of your fantasy, is of continuing to help them, even after they are no longer working for him.
So your prom date fantasy is just that – a fantasy.

I give up, Kitt. I give up on you and everyone else here who hates Donald Trump. None of you will address anything that I or any other Trump Realist say, you just reply with more accusations.
No, Donald Trump is not perfect, yes, he has flaws, but unlike you and the other Trump whiners, I can see the good in the man as well as the bad. All you and the other haters want to do is look at the bad.
We’ll never have a perfect candidate, the last man who was perfect got hung on a cross for his troubles.
By people who hated Him because He made them feel small. Sound familiar?
No, Donald Trump is not perfect, but he’s good enough. And his personal history proves it.
To those who haven’t let hatred and jealousy blind them.

@kitt: Trump is the least generous billionaire

Not necessarily true.
There are Christians, many of us, in fact, who follow the rule Jesus laid out to ”not let your right hand know what your left hand is doing,” as far as charity is concerned.
That means we don’t REPORT our charitable giving to the GOVERNMENT.
You don’t HAVE to, you know!
Some people do it just to ”toot their horns,” as Jesus rightly pointed out. In his day some of these actually hired men to walk in front of them with horns announcing their arrivals.
Today it is a mention on PBS or a Top Ten listing as one of America’s most charitable billionaires.

I have been quite impressed as some of Donald Trumps quiet giving has surfaced.
Great stories.
A great man who cares about people.

But you will never see that because, again, as Jesus said, you are like the swine that Christians ought not throw pearls in front of.
He’s right, too.
What’s the point?

@kitt: We are not going to be able to explain it.
I dont think we are more conservative, smarter, better, just have a different opinion.

Good for you realizing this.
Now, go back and look at the way you express your attitudes toward those you disagree with.
Like:

Really its not you, its me, ok I admit it it is you, you suck.

And:

Unicorn farts……The Crystal ball is getting cloudy now … For another 100 bucks I may be able to see more..

And:

the stupidest democraps

Also:

I am just like the mommy that knows once this one you want gets into your pants you are yesterdays conquest, and no call 4 a prom date for you.

@Petercat:

No, Donald Trump is not perfect, but he’s good enough. And his personal history proves it.

Good enough for who? And if you want to refer to his personal history, then you should also refer to the many issues he has taken a left-wing stance on.

To those who haven’t let hatred and jealousy blind them.

Oh, pardon the heck out of us who don’t buy into the carnival barker’s promise of giving us the greatest show on earth.

@iretire05: I like your analogy, the greatest show on earth has no more elephants, looks like the liberals have PCed the symbol from our party as well.

@Nanny G:

Today it is a mention on PBS or a Top Ten listing as one of America’s most charitable billionaires.

True, just look at the supposed generosity of Bill Gates. Does he give away billions? I don’t know, but I do know, from what I read about his foundations that manage what he’s giving away, it’s to causes that the world would be much better off without any contributions. I’m not gonna knock a specific one, at this time, but there are many that the world would be better without.
I don’t personally give a flip if anyone gives to charity or not. If they’re doing it for the wrong reason, then it’s a negative. And if they’re doing it and publicizing it, they’re still doing it for the wrong reason. Giving to charity should be between the giver and the tax laws and no one else.

@Greg: Greg, you’re not trying to mislead anyone are you? Has Oklahoma outlawed abortion or has it not? Since you will answer truthfully, then I’ll ask you why you posted a link saying they have? There is not a law in Oklahoma, at this time, that prohibits abortion. To imply there is, is deceitful. Oh, wait, you’re a liberal….ok so you don’t understand the difference.

@Greg: It does ban abortion with the exception to save the mother, but it has to go through the senate then get signed by the governor. It is not law yet but the left continues to deny science, that states life begins at conception.
Do we kill children for the crimes of their parents the rape argument is moot, so few of abortions are the result of rape. PP shot itself by breaking the law and selling body parts. Both men and women need to take the proper precautions to prevent unwanted pregnancies, more american children available for adoption would stop the black market foreign baby snatch and sell.
http://www.kradjabeba.org/eng/e_intern.html

@Greg: So the answer is NO.

it will have if it is signed into law,

What does the word ‘if’ in your statement mean? Is it a law or is it not a law? The correct answer, is NO it is not a law unless it is actually signed. THEN it would be a law. So the answer is, yes you are trying to mislead someone.

YES, the Oklahoma bill effectively bans abortion.

It doesn’t do anything, it has not been signed into law.
Geez, these liberals……

@Greg:

Remind me what position Trump has taken that he hasn’t at some point reversed.

Why don’t we start by you telling us something that he has actually reversed himself on. Oh, I know. Let’s start with the one where he said he was going to put coal miners out of work, then he tried to say that’s not what he meant. NO…..wait…….was that Trump?

He’s telling any audience he’s in front of whatever they want to hear at the moment.

Unlike Hillary that just lies from the beginning.

The only thing Trump is selling is Trump.

Unlike Hillary that is only trying to sell us Bill again. No. wait….. that’s still a Clinton.

Thanks, but no thanks—and I don’t believe the thought process that gets me to that point should be too difficult to follow.

That’s for sure…

@Greg:

The question is when does a self-aware human being—a person—begin.

When a woman, that is going to have her baby, rubs her stomach and feels movement, does she refer to it as her ‘baby moved’, or does she say her fetus moved.

When a baby is born, how can they tell what sex it is? Suppose it looks like a girl, but is ‘really’ a boy. Do they call it a girl or a Tranny? Suppose they go with Tranny but later find out it is really a girl, do they have to change the birth certificate from Tranny to girl?

@Greg:
Further, the Constitution tells me that the State has no business whatsoever empowering anyone’s particular religiously-informed beliefs. Your right to hold them is protected, but any right to impose them on someone else is denied. Who said anything about religion, if you are an atheist does it mean you cannot be against the murder of an innocent?
Your argument falls a bit short of making sense.
Check history there were states that officially adopted religions and the founders did not have an issue with it at all. https://www.loc.gov/exhibits/religion/rel05.html
Would like to rewrite that history wouldn’t ya. Or erase it like the confederate flag.

@Greg: To some anyone who attends church and does not deny God exists they are radical fundamentalists. Sounds really bigoted to me.Those radical nuns that the government wishes to force their views onto, no freedom for them, they just want to overthrow the government or something. Yet the SCOTUS states the government should compromise, the horror of that! What a shame they are forced into spending their time in court instead of caring for elderly.

@Bill, #40:

I see. So, when IS that moment?

Week 25 of gestation. Up until that point, the electrical activity of the brain is not sufficiently organized to indicate the presence of either consciousness or sleep. A person persistently having the same level of brain activity can be declared legally dead. Nobody is yet at home. So, 25 weeks.

Pro-life sites often misleadingly conflate any detectable electrical activity of the developing fetal nervous system with organized brainwave patterns. They’ll make statements such as this one:

Day 40: Brain waves can be detected and recorded.

No, brainwaves cannot be detected and recorded. Electrical activity can be recorded. That’s not the same thing as organized brainwave patterns indicative of consciousness. A twitching muscle produces measurable electrical activity. They’re making a dishonest statement. That is, they’re lying to further their illogical assertion. They’re lying with the objective of depriving women of their Constitutionally protected rights, and of sovereign authority over their own bodies, which they would turn over to the State. And then they’re going to get on their high horse about being protectors of the Constitution.

The Constitution needs to be protected from these people. Religious freedom needs to be protected from these people.

@Greg:
This from a site for expectant mothers,

What’s happening in week 16
16 weeks pregnant

Week 16 and your baby is doing some pretty amazing stuff!
Join Bounty.com

Your baby at week 16

Your baby is around 11.5cm long now and about the size of an avocado. All their limbs and joints are now fully formed – and they’re probably enjoying giving them all a good stretch and flex! They might also have ‘found’ their thumb and worked out how to suck it by now, too. How cute is that?

Now that their backbone has become stronger your baby will start to straighten out their head and neck more. Their nervous system is also making connections to all their muscles so you might find your baby starts to move with a little more purpose and also now has reflexes.
Your baby’s face muscles can now move, too, meaning that facial expressions are beginning to appear, although your little one doesn’t as yet have any control over them.
It’s also possible that they might grab and play with their umbilical cord as they develop the ability to grip further.
Wow amazing thumb sucking I have never heard of the brain dead sucking their thumbs.
And a smile from a newborn is only gas, so its ok to chuck the little bugger in a dumpster right?

@Greg: Thanks Greg, you cleared something up for all of us.

No, brainwaves cannot be detected and recorded. Electrical activity can be recorded.

When someone is born with electrical activity, we call them Dimocrats. When someone is born with brainwaves, we call them Republicans. That means Dimocrats can be safely aborted up through birth without it being murder.
You do know that the youngest preemie born was just under 22 weeks and she is not brain dead. In fact, is said to be very bright. Obviously not a Dimocrat.

The position that a fertilized egg or a developing fetus should be legally considered a person is a religiously-informed view. The pro-life movement is for the most part an expression of that religiously-informed view. You won’t find many non-religious anti-abortion activists. The most radical are Christian fundamentalists.

That’s somewhat bigoted to say, and very ignorant.

Instead, I’d merely say you’re a religious zealot yourself. As a fundamental Atheist, I’m not sure how you can pretend to be rational over that of a fundamental Christian.

And religion or not, what you seem to conveniently ignore is the real issue with abortion: even if you don’t consider a fetus or fertilized egg to be a person, it WILL BECOME a person…all things considered…or maybe not…but it might, so….

The question is whether we accept that fact or ignore it. Both sides have merit, but chalking the anti-view of your view up to religion is f*cking stupid.

The bright line is defined differently (conception vs. whatever-week-it-is-this), depending on what you want to believe. Libs move the line out to support their agenda, and cons move it in to do the same. They’re both wrong, and right.

Point is, you have no more scientific or moral primacy than your opponents. The left claims they are protecting women, and the right claims they are protecting children. They are both right.

Making it a religious issues (yours against theirs) is absurd.

BTW, you’re religious. Fundamental Atheism seems to be the real issue facing the moral decisions of our century, and like fundamental religious hatred before it, it’s not new, enlightened, or original. Just hateful.

One last note: you’re ignorance prove the premise of the article. One more reason to vote for Trump. You might as well get a sign for Trump and put it in your yard, genius.

@Greg:

No, brainwaves cannot be detected and recorded. Electrical activity can be recorded.

So, what is your scientific basis for determining that THIS electrical activity is different from later, more developed, electrical activity indicating the right to live? See, once you ADMIT to the fact that viable life exists at some point during the pregnancy and that abortion would be TAKING a life beyond that point, you are obligated to definitively define when that point is… EXACTLY.

As I have said before, I am no anti-abortion zealot. I have no way to figure out how to defend abortion, for I feel it is wrong, but I don’t oppose it principally. I think the use of abortion as a form of birth control and, absolutely and without reserve, oppose it (other than for health reasons) after 20 weeks. But, early term abortion is not a deal-breaker for me.

However, in reference to your belly-aching about the recent efforts making abortion illegal, you have only yourselves to blame; this is a direct result of Planned Parenthood getting caught red handed selling the body parts of the lives they have destroyed and the left’s unwavering defense of anything abortion, all the time, no matter what. Particularly in Texas, where what was supposed to be an investigation of possible violations turned into a partisan, grudge-settling attack of the messenger, it exemplifies how the left believes they are allowed to operate above and beyond the law. So, what you get is extreme counter-reaction. Tough cookies.

I doubt any of those laws will ever see the light of day, but I find it hard to sympathize with those adversely affected by them. They have brought this upon themselves by showing their inability to self-police, show some dignity and humanity regarding the lives of babies and objectively view and admit to the despicable, indefensible and unforgivable acts of Planned Parenthood; acts which are, obviously, systemic. In other words, the left has shown themselves irresponsible to wield such power.

The Oklahoma law is nothing more than Republicans using the same techniques the left uses to attack the 2nd Amendment against them on abortion. They attack the periphery of abortion, as the left attacks gun manufacturers, sellers, costs of ownership and ammunition supplies. While this goes to an extreme I think will be its doom, it is nothing the left has not attempted against what is a REAL right… the right to gun ownership and self defense, as opposed to a contrived right.

So, in my opinion, all these extreme laws will fail (I won’t say they SHOULD fail) and this will give the left the opportunity to rethink their lack of principles in defending any abortion at any time no matter what. But, just as certain as those laws will fail, the left will not reconsider their position… they are incapable of that.

If you’re going to do your best to elect a narcissistic reality TV host who’s never remained consistent on any position as the nation’s president, you should probably stop claiming that democrats aren’t very bright.

Ha. Ha, ha and ha. YOU elected a narcissistic community organizer that never held a job, never completed a term as a public representative and could not even reveal details of his past. This resulted in failure after the first 4 years, and YOU WENT AND DID IT AGAIN!! Please, do not use your judgement to tell anyone else what they should regard as a viable candidate. You simply have no idea.