In 1995 Paula Jones sued Bill Clinton for sexual harassment and in 1999 came away with an award for $800,000.
WASHINGTON (AP) – Paula Jones is awaiting the arrival of an $850,000 cheque from President Clinton, bringing an official end to the four-year saga spurred by her allegations of sexual harassment.
Clinton mailed the settlement cheque to Mrs. Jones on Tuesday, even as he braced for the heaviest fallout yet from her harassment suit – an impeachment trial in the Senate.
You might be interested to know that the “flat broke” Clintons had a blind trust worth between $1 million and $5 million in 1999.
Clinton friend Taylor Branch, who authored the book The Clinton Tapes, recorded his conversations with Clinton. Clinton considered Paula Jones to be a “floozy.”
Bill Clinton dismissed Paula Jones in the 1990s as a “floozy” and a “nobody” who was only suing him for sexual harassment in order to have her “moment in the sun,” according to an audio diary recorded at the time by one of his closest confidantes.
Clinton’s friend and biographer, Taylor Branch, took notes on a late-night conversation he had with the president on Oct. 2, 1997, and immediately recorded them into an audio diary. The recordings were recently obtained by the Washington Free Beacon.
According to Branch’s diary, Clinton discussed the pending sexual harassment lawsuit brought against him by former Arkansas government employee Paula Jones, who claimed he unzipped his pants and asked her to perform a sex act on him in a Little Rock hotel room in 1991.
“[Clinton] said they had now changed Paula Jones’s hair style, made her look less like a floozy, and that she didn’t seem to have any visible income but was always driving a new car,” said Branch, a historian who drew from many of his diary entries to write his 2010 Clinton biographyThe Clinton Tapes.
That speaks volumes. It says much about Bill Clinton’s regard for women in general and in particular for a woman he chose to sexually harass. Perhaps he believed her to be easy pickings. There is a very amusing portion of the interview:
“I said ‘This is the 54th session of President Clinton’s oral history.’ As soon as I said ‘oral history,’ he started laughing,” recalled Branch in an April 6, 1998 recording. “And, um, it was kind of awkward. So I looked at him, and said the date, and so forth. And he was still kind of chuckling.”
“So I said, finally, ‘Well, I guess it’s awkward to say oral history,’ but then didn’t say anything else about it,” said Branch. “It was because of the whole Monica Lewinsky sex scandal. But I thought it was interesting that he laughed about it, right from the beginning.”
Well, Hillary wasn’t going to take this lying down. She made threatening overtures toward the women her husband assaulted:
“I think we’re going to find some other things. And I think that when all of this is put into context, and we really look at the people involved here, look at their motivations and look at their backgrounds, look at their past behavior, some folks are going to have a lot to answer for.”
It was all part of the “vast right wing conspiracy.” The Clintons and their dogs embarked on a mission to destroy anyone who accused Clinton of misdeeds and then also sought to try to ruin anyone who would investigate the allegations. It was, as George Stephanopoulos called it, the “Ellen Rometsch strategy.” Lauren Carroll at Gateway Pundit:
During and after the Lewinsky investigation that led to Bill Clinton’s impeachment for perjury and obstruction of justice, numerous women accusers were publicly or privately persecuted while several high-ranking Republican congressmen were exposed as adulterers for supporting Clinton’s impeachment–leading to the tumultuous resignation of Speaker-Designate Bob Livingston who was set to replace Newt Gingrich who resigned before his own adultery was exposed.
Within two years of initiating the lawsuit against Bill Clinton, Paula Jones was audited by the IRS. She wasn’t the only one.
An official with the Internal Revenue Service has admitted that legal opponents of former President Bill Clinton were singled out for tax audits, according to court documents made public this week. “What do you expect when you sue the president?” senior IRS official Paul Breslan told Judicial Watch, the Washington-based legal watchdog group that had filed 50-plus legal actions against the Clinton administration and subsequently found itself in the IRS’s cross hairs. Breslan’s quote is cited in Judicial Watch’s complaint against the tax agency, based on a host of what look to be politically inspired audits that make the worst abuses of the Nixon administration appear puny by comparison. “There were literally six witnesses in the room when Breslan told us we should have expected an audit,” Judicial Watch Chairman Larry Klayman revealed to NewsMax.com. “Four of them were lawyers.” The legal group became the target of an IRS audit in 1998, just four days after it filed an independent impeachment report against Clinton, based on years of investigation into everything from Chinagate to the Paula Jones case. But Judicial Watch wasn’t alone. Witnesses bearing damaging testimony against the president were a favorite target of the Clinton IRS. Those singled out for audits include: Clinton paramours Gennifer Flowers and Liz Ward Gracen, sexual assault accusers Paula Jones and Juanita Broaddrick, and fired White House Travel Office Director Billy Dale.
Hillary made good on her threat. Despite the outward charm of Bill Clinton and the entirely contrived “warmth” of Hillary, these are not nice people. Further, they made a mockery of sexual assault victims. Hillary’s pursuit of the Presidency has been her own version of Sherman’s March to the Sea, burning down the opposition and stomping on Bill’s sexual assault victims on her way to her ultimate goal
UPDATE
Good grief, how could I forget this?
“Today I want to send a message to every survivor of sexual assault,” Clinton said. “Don’t let anyone silence your voice. You have the right to be heard. You have the right to be believed and we’re with you.”
“There is a big divide between survivors who do not want to seek the criminal justice system for different reasons and those who want to but are not sure that it would be responsive,” Clinton said today. “So we need to do a much better job on the fairness of the response so that people feel like whichever route they go on campus or off they’re going to be taken seriously, that doesn’t mean that, you know, that there’s no process. There has to be one.”
There’s that liberal axiom rearing its ugly head again. Rules are for someone else and hypocrisy is valued above all.
DrJohn has been a health care professional for more than 30 years. In addition to clinical practice he has done extensive research and has published widely with over 70 original articles and abstracts in the peer-reviewed literature. DrJohn is well known in his field and has lectured on every continent except for Antarctica. He has been married to the same wonderful lady for over 30 years and has three kids- two sons, both of whom are attorneys and one daughter on her way into the field of education.
DrJohn was brought up with the concept that one can do well if one is prepared to work hard but nothing in life is guaranteed.
Except for liberals being foolish.
Hillary has endured far longer than I anticipated without having to actually face a probing interview or media questions. She just ignores them, yet her sycophants, of course, do not see the writing on the wall of “why is she so afraid to face questions?”.
At least Bernie had the gonads to be interviewed by Fox.
Paula Jones’s sexual harassment lawsuit against Bill Clinton was dismissed by the court without a trial, on the grounds that she had failed to demonstrate any damages. She appealed the dismissal, but happily dropped her appeal on the spot for a cash settlement of $850,000.
My take on this? It was a case of legal extortion. Jones exploited a sexual impropriety, the sanctimonious mentality of the Christian right, the lynch-mob fervor of the GOP’s witch hunters, and a tabloid-level media circus to successfully shake down Bill Clinton for the better part of a million dollars, plus court costs. Her appreciative admirers also paid for a full wardrobe makeover and threw in a complimentary nose job.
Why would Hillary Clinton—a wife who was wrongly subjected both to marital infidelity, to its public exposure on an unprecedented level, and then to a huge financial loss that added insult to injury—not be angry with Jones? Who was actually the most injured party in all of this? It was never demonstrated that Paula Jones was injured at all.
And now, after all the damage done and all the rewards reaped, Jones has been trying to push her way back into the spotlight, proclaiming that Hillary Clinton is not fit to be president.
Unbelievable.
@Greg:
Angry with Jones? She didn’t harass Bill, Greg. It was the other way around. Hillary should have been angry with Bill. Greg, you’re blaming the victim of sexual harassment. $850,000 is an awful lot of money for a trivial matter, don’t you think?
I cannot imagine any self-respecting woman tolerating this kind of marital abuse.
Unless she’d compromise anything for power.
Neither Hillary or Bill used the word ‘floozy’. You shameless sleaze merchants.
@Greg:
That’s sort of why people of power shouldn’t have inappropriate sex… but Bubba never seemed to learn that.
What kind of circus was it that took down Nixon? A respectable one? Sex was not the original focus of the investigations of the Clinton’s… it was all about money, power and corruption. And, there was plenty to investigate. However, when one is a serial-abuser, it was a mere matter of time before some of that reared its ugly head (so to speak) and caused a stain (so to speak).
While Bubba revealed himself (so to speak) as a real scum-bag, the fact that he cheated on his wife and disgraced the oval office was not MY primary concern. My concern was the abject stupidity of putting the Office of the Presidency at risk of blackmail over a bit of tail. To me, that was reason enough to kick his stupid ass out of office.
But, as is far more clear now than it was then, covering bad things up with threats, attacks and intimidation was not beneath the Clinton’s and they were quite adroit at it.
Are you serious? Really? “who was most injured”? Well, it wasn’t Hillary because she had been enabling that behavior for decades, all for the sake of her precious political career which, by the way, to this day consists of nothing but politics… no worthy accomplishments whatsoever. Yeah, worry about poor, put-upon, grieving Hillary and condemn the 15 or so of Bill’s accusers. That’s respect of women for ya… liberal style.
Hillary is not qualified to be President for numerous reasons, but for this specific reason she is not qualified to speak of women’s rights, believing the accusations of abused women or respect of women. And THAT is the primary point of how she has allowed Bill to treat women.
Did he harass her? That’s what she claimed. It was never established in court. He may have simply made advances. As most women know, it’s in the nature of some men to do so. Maybe she preyed on his easily identifiable weakness, and then exploited the results to maximum personal advantage. Are we unaware that there are such women? Jones gained a great deal from the whole business. Money, media attention and celebrity…
And we’re now supposed to shift all blame and animosity to Hillary Clinton? Because Paula Jones says we should?
@Greg: Wow Greggie and what about Monica did that happen for you?? If your logic is applied then why do you accuse Bush all the time for lying and side with Reid on Romney’s taxes. Your a real joke!!
@Greg: Greggie, why would Paula be offered $850,000 if she has NO case??
@Greg:
1. She wasn’t the only one and 2. There are 850,000 reasons to believe her.
I’d believe her over Hillary any day. After all, Hillary did promise the Lord’s vengeance to those who would dare tell the truth.
Is that what liberals call sexual harassment/assault now?
@Common Sense, #7:
To get her to go the hell away, because the damage she was doing was enormous. Clinton was maneuvered into a position where he was expected to disprove accusations, or have them be accepted as the truth.
This is the point where trumped up scandals became the right’s weapon of choice. They found a methodology allowing them to ceaselessly attack and damage their political enemies in the media without ever having to actually prove a damn thing. Having no scruples whatsoever, and a carefully cultivated, angry, receptive audience no longer able to think its own way out of a paper bag, they’ve employed the tactic constantly, ever since.
Destroying the reputation of their opponent is an essential part of their 2016 presidential strategy. They’ve got no collective record of accomplishments, and they have no candidate that a majority of voters would likely support on his or her own merits. So, we’re back to a pathetic rehash of their anti-Bill Clinton campaign, now being reconfigured to take down Hillary. They’re hoping to stone the wife for her husband’s sexual indiscretions.
@Greg: Greggie, how could she be causing damage if Slick didn’t do anything to her?? If he didn’t do anything to her why the need to pay her $850,000?? Would you pay it to me?? I didn’t do a dam thing to you !! Ignorance is strong in you!!
@Common Sense, #11:
Clinton didn’t do anything that Newt Gingrich wasn’t quietly up to himself during the impeachment proceedings, did he? Or Bob Livingston. Clinton wasn’t up to what Dennis Hastert was up to, either, nor did he make the sort of “settlements” Haster was making, which required illegal “financial restructuring.” Was it proven that Clinton’s sexual misconduct involved anything illegal? Nope.
Unlike Newt—and Donald, for that matter—Bill Clinton hasn’t dumped two previous wives, has he? The Clinton’s marriage has weathered a number of storms.
@DrJohn:
Neither sexual harassment nor sexual assault was ever proven to have occurred. There were only repeated accusations, all made in a highly public and calculated fashion, by persons who had clear personal, political, and/or monetary motives.
@Greg:
Bubba kind of maneuvered himself into the position of pasting the truth upon Monica’s dress. He had been enabled for years by Hillary’s overriding concern for her own political future rather than and measure of sanctity she placed on her own marriage or any concern for what any of Bubba’s victims might be enduring.
Well, first, there WAS proof. It WAS proven. Second, you know how to avoid having scandals used against you? Don’t become involved in scandals. Bubba hadn’t figured that out and got himself involved in about 15 scandals, of the sexual nature alone; that does not even include the financial scandals. Then, there’s Hillary… she evidently felt jealous of Bill and his long string of scandals, so she began her own legacy.
Ah. But Newt nor no one else lied before a grand jury about it, did they? Nor were they sexually harassing anyone. While their shenanigans were illicit, to be sure, they were consensual. Bill’s, with few exceptions were not.
I am sure there is a more corrupt and contemptible couple somewhere… I just don’t know who they would be.
What was proven? That Clinton engaged in extra-marital sex? Jeez. That’s got to be a first. That he lied in an effort to cover his indiscretion up? Imagine that.
Nobody had any damn business delving into such private matters in the context of a grand jury investigation. It wasn’t a matter of national importance. Doing so for political reasons was a misuse of power. The GOP was simply out to get a political enemy, by any means available.
Republicans gleefully hanging out a president’s dirty laundry for all the world to see was a far greater embarrassment, in my opinion. Particularly in light of what a number of the lynch-mob’s prominent leaders were themselves up to. They made us look like a nation of provincial idiots and jackasses. And they continue to do so, on a fairly regular basis. Worse still, their media circus distracted the nation’s attention from far more serious matters. That grand distraction wasn’t without serious consequences.
@Greg: Greegie, it was Slick who looked America in the face and said I never had sex with that woman Ms Lewinski!! He lied to America Greegie and moron’s like you try and cover for him by blaming someone else!! What an absolute clown you are!!
@Greg: Greegie are you saying he din’t do it?? Thought so, no proof but yet you are so sure Slick is innocent just like Monica eh moron??
@Greg: Greegie blaming someone else for something else is just a foolish comment but then again you do it when you are painted into a corner, just like Obola, Hilldabeast, and Slick himself!!
@Greg: No point eh Greggie!!
@Greg:
Come on, Greg. It’s Bill Clinton. He’s a predator.
It’s just me and you. Come on, admit it.
@Greg:
Ah. So, because this is William Jefferson Clinton we are talking about, harassing, raping and abusing women is OK. Lying about it is OK, because it is wrong and embarrassing… and he’s a liberal. This is what you are standing up for. A Clinton can do whatever they like to whomever and, well, of course they would lie about it because it is so despicable. Right? And, well, that’s OK because… what? They are a Clinton? Or, a liberal?
You conveniently forget how the trail led to Monica’s dress. Lies, corruption and scandal, and that wasn’t even sexual related. Stonewalling and impeding dragged the investigations out until, inevitably (since the Clinton’s are such absolute scumbags) more and more scandal surfaced. Just like Hillary. Just like Obama. They just never seem to learn because the media always enables them.
Again, you know how you avoid having scandals used against you? Don’t be a scandalous trashy scumbag. If only the Clinton’s had heeded that advice.
@Greg:
Here’s something else for you, from Vox, of all places!
@Greg:
Greg
$850,000 in 1999? That’s not a little problem. Clinton wasn’t running again. Why would they cough up that kind of change?
Unless she was afraid, eh?
@Greg: typical male response. I was sexually harassed when I worked for the Army. My boss was touching me and demeaning me verbally in front of the men ( I worked with all men). I tried to go the informal route however it didn’t work especially when the colonel ( our big boss) told him (a LTC) it was all right. for him to touch me. This was in January 1997. The LTC admitted to what he did but the Army surrounded the wagons and denied it. I went through TEN years of a sexual harassment lawsuit. It was broken into two parts; the first five years was sexual harassment which I won and the second five years was the part for the retaliation for filing the suit -which I won in July 2007 (I won little to nothing but that was not the point). However those ten years were horrific, the Army, under oath called me a slut and a whore and said I asked for it. They debased me in every which way they could. They were people like you. You are part of the problem. Come back when a female member of your family has been sexually harrassed or sexually assaulted and your tune will change. I believe her.
I see a pattern, but it isn’t that a former president of the United States is a serial rapist. It has to do with the right’s modus operandi in the matter of character assassination by way of a continuous campaign of lies, rumors, and fabricated media scandals. There’s plenty of stink, but it’s mainly coming from the people who are smearing around the manure.
@Greg: Actually, all it boils down to is that people that routinely abuse women and/or excuse their mate abusing women have no business pretending to care about women. So, Bill, the serial sexual predator, should not be campaigning but hiding out back on pedophile island and hoping for the best.
At yet it’s the GOP that’s too chicken-shit to put their party’s most recent President on display at any offical function, for fear of reminding voters of something they apparently think is best forgotten. Very odd, isn’t it?
I suggest you shove your pedophile accusation up your butt, if you can figure out which end it’s on. (Hint: Same end as your brain)
Have a pleasant evening.
@Greg: Greggie, I suggest you admit that Slick shoved a cigar up Monica’s you know what and that there is more evidence that Hilldabeast lied about Benghazi than Bush did!! Every time you get cornered for being a complete moron you try and change the subject at hand, of course you make accusations with NO proof while failing to have any credibility to even acknowledge when Obola even did that he lied about his failed healthcare plan or that Reid had zero proof about Romney and his taxes. Greggie your a poster child for libturds and the reason our country has NO credibility in the world!!
@Bill: Greggie will change the subject now that you have proven that he has NO credibility!!
@Greg: You should know BS when you hear it Greggie because your the one full of it!! The pattern is Greggie that when your proven to be a liar you change the subject and blame Republicans!! Your a joke with NO credibility!!
I remember on “the View” Barbara asked Jones to describe the incident with Bill Clinton. The look on Barbara’s face was one of astonishment as Jones described Bill’s penis on national TV.. I am sure she made that up! LOL
Folks, you simply have to understand the new Common-Core political-science ethics system that the Democrat party, MSM and Greg are trying to educate you on.
There are two sets of rules. One for the Democrat-progressive elite – who have political immunity, and another for everyone else. Once we accept the reality that Democrat oligarchs are above reproach and shall not be questioned, there is no more room for argument.
(/sarc)
@Randy:
You know, we now have to wonder if it was truly astonishment or surprised recognition of one who knows. She did have Bill on her show in 2007 (Barbara Walters interviews former President Bill Clinton for “Most Fascinating People of 2007)
@Common Sense: She wasn’t.
@Bill:
What evidence is there that any of Clinton’s encounters were not consensual? That hasn’t once been established. And why do you automatically make forgiving assumptions about Gingrich, Livingston, and Hastert, who were also secretly engaging in impropriety? Have you read their diaries? They were never subjected to the supreme indignity of being dragged before a grand jury and publicly interrogated about the smallest details of their sex lives, were they? The GOP reserved that humiliation for their Political Enemy #1. The hypocritical sons-of-bitches would gleefully do the same to Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama, while proclaiming themselves model Christians and true American patriots.
Liberals always try to use the 5 year old child excuse. “Well, every body else was doing it”. They can never man up for their actions. They never have a value system. Society made me do it! The courts decided that Clinton lied and they disbarred him. That makes him a liar. Who would believe he was telling the truth after so many lies? Only brainless ideologues.
@Greg: Greggie, who was President and who lied to a grand jury investigation?? Who was President and looked America in the face and said I never had sex with that woman?? Once again the blame game as an excuse for your ignorance and defense of the defenseless!!
How can we ever know when it comes to the underage girls on that island Bill Clinton kept flying off to?
Nobody is excusing Clinton’s sexual misconduct. I don’t approve. That doesn’t mean that I wanted the Republican version of the Committee for the Promotion of Virtue and the Prevention of Vice to hang Clinton’s dirty laundry out on the line on public display. I don’t really care to know about other people’s sexual behavior, quirks, or foibles. When the GOP thrusts someone’s dirty underwear in my face and suggests that I have a sniff, it’s the GOP that has greatly offended me, not their target for character assassination—particularly when they have plenty of dirty underwear of their own.
The whole point of bringing this all up again, of course, is that you want to somehow transfer the stink to Hillary Clinton, in hope of getting one of the current occupants of the Republican Clown Car in the Oval Office. That certainly won’t happen based on their merits or their record of accomplishments.
@Greg: Greggie, I remember Hilldabeast accusing Republicans of a vast right wing conspiracy when she knew the truth of the matter!! Also Greggie, Slick was not at home with Monica when he smoked her or should I say Monica smoked him but rather he was at work during working hours, sadly this was in the Whitehouse and he was President of the United States. Then he lied about it to America and a grand jury investigation. Believe me Greggie and you have demonstrated it on this string, if Slick would have been a Republican and did this the Demoncrats with the MSM would be doing exactly what you see now but even louder and more often. To deny this would just be another display of your ignorance.
@Common Sense: You are right! The lefties can never admit this. When your whole life is based upon a lie, one can never admit that they are wrong.
@Greg:
I take the fact that several took him to court for harassment and abuse as a pretty healthy hint, Greg.
Being taken to court is not evidence of guilt.
Juanita Broaddrick claims Clinton raped her. In her only testimony under oath, she denied that he’d even harassed her.
Kathleen Wiley claimed Clinton groped her in a hallway. An investigation determined she had given false testimony. She only escaped perjury charges because Ken Starr gave her immunity from prosecution.
Gennifer Flowers stated she had a 12-year affair with Clinton, after first denying it. Clinton acknowledged that this was the case. There was no indication of anything other than a mutually consensual relationship. Flowers pocketed $500,000 for talking about it with various magazines and media outlets.
Monica Lewinsky had mutually consensual sexual relations with Clinton. So what? We might not approve, but they’re both adults, and the only reason it became a scandal was because Linda Tripp, a supposed friend and confidant, secretly recorded private conversations with Lewinsky, and then turned them over to Kenneth Starr, the GOP’s designated head witch hunter. Lewinsky was trapped because she had denied any relations with Clinton in connection with the Paula Jones absurdity. Starr undoubtedly used that as a threat and terrified the hell out of her to gain her cooperation against Clinton.
And then we’ve got Paula Jones, an opportunist if ever there was one. You can’t tell me there weren’t monetary motives, because monetary gain was precisely what she went after. It was never established in court that Clinton was guilty of anything, other than lapses into sexual impropriety.
As pointed out, this has become the GOP’s standard modus operanti. They roll out endless rumors, allegations, vile stories, and outright lies, damaging their target’s character without ever having to prove a thing. They stink of their own manure. I have no respect for them whatsoever. When they wave the flag around, it winds up stinking as well.
The Repubs just hate to lose in this Democracy we live in. They hated to lose to Clinton –twice–and they hated to lose to Obama twice–so they blame the media for their loses. They lack grace. Along comes Trump–devoid of grace or humility and proud of it.
Good luck with that. You’re gonna lose again if you are stupid enough to nominate him.–I’LL BET ON IT–already have with mm.
@Richard Wheeler: And when Bush defeated Gore the Democrats disgraced the Whitehouse on their way out!!
@Greg: Coming from a punk like you I got to just laugh!! Greggie you continue to accuse Bush of lying and when I ask for proof I get ZERO!! When Reid accused Romney of cheating on his 2010 taxes you said Reid was correct and I asked for proof and got ZERO!! When Obola lied about healthcare and even admitted it you still couldn’t!! Your a libturd with ZERO credibility Greggie!!
@Greg:
Hillary says they (well, they who are not a threat to Bill and Hillary’s quest for wealth and power) should be believed. So, believe them.
Now, look back at your post. Read off the list of names of women, other than Hillary, that Bubba was diddling. Then, look at the relationship between Bill and Hillary. Perhaps you can see the problem, most likely you can’t or, more probably, won’t. However, the story it tells is one of a man that considers all women is personal property and a woman that knows she has no chance to achieve her goals on her own that puts all pride, self-dignity and integrity aside to cling to the coat tails of a serial abuser. THAT’s the best case scenario, IF one believes your presentation.
However, one should NOT believe your presentation because while out of scores of accusers there will certainly be some jumping on the bandwagon, there are still scores of accusers and many of those are verified.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1157708/posts
Again, the point is not Bill or Hillary’s morals, though those SHOULD be a consideration… low or the absence of morals affects other decisions other than who and whether or not to sexually abuse someone, or to look the other way while your husband sexually abuses innocent victims. The point is that Hillary promotes herself as the keeper of women’s rights when, just like any other liberal, she only cares about the rights of those who can provide some type of benefit for her. If someone does not support her, they are potential targets for the considerable power the Clinton’s can focus on enemies.
@Richard Wheeler: Some simply hate to see this nation destroyed. Some, apparently, don’t.
Keep this in mind, Greg and Richard… Hillary and Bill are scum and scum will protect and support them.
@Bill: Well said Bill. Greggie will never come to grips with reality. If he is cornered he will refocus the conversation away from topic and focus on a Republican. He still will not admit that Obola lied about his healthcare plan as 6 million lost their coverage. This was part of implementation of the individual plans. In fact the group plan implementation has not even been implemented yet and certainly more will loose their coverage. Can you imagine the need for maternity coverage for men and women over 50? On the other hand he has accused Bush of lying about Iraq but has NEVER provided any evidence to support his accusation. He also supported Reids false accusation that Romney cheated on his taxes, and of course when challenged to support his position he can NOT provide any. He believes Slick was subject to a witch hunt when he had his affair with Monica. He fails to acknowledge that Slick lied to a grand jury investigation and to America as he denied his disgusting action. My position is that the real failure is that Slick took advantage of Monica but he did his deeds during normal working hours in the Whitehouse. Any corporate CEO caught getting a hummer under his desk would certainly be out of work but not Slick. Hillary needs to be exposed for her efforts to cover up his indiscretions by of course accusing Republicans of a “vast right wing conspiracy”!! Gregg’s credibility from my view is ZERO. Your ability to respond with logic and facts are very admirable but unfortunately the recipient is a out of reality liberal with NO hope of ever living in the real world.
Perhaps the dems should nominate Monica for POTUS. She got the job done when Hillary couldn’t.