Islamists have a friend in high places

D.J You should be thankful this admin slack on checking social media and forgiving of those who slam them.
Gotta love that First Amendment.

How long is it going to take to flush his minions from the government, I am thinking a Mc Carthy style hunt may be needed.

So how else to flush the imbedded corruption?
from CR
Sure, there are individual Muslims who are not Islamic supremacists, such as Jesser and Dr. Nidal Alsayyed, the Imam who was fired for supporting a cool-off of immigration from the Middle East. And that is exactly the point. The only way to empower these moderates is too suspend the mass migration from the Middle East and expel the Muslim Brotherhood from our midst. Yet, instead of meeting with legitimate moderates, the reprehensible political class empowers the radicals who marginalize Muslims who are truly patriotic.

How surreal that an elected Republican visits a radical sympathizer of Hamas, which kills Jews with impunity, in order to decry the “rhetoric” of Donald Trump. How repugnant that Jeff Flake would empower a man who incited violence against a true moderate Muslim patriot.

@retire05: I said you were coming–welcome–next McCarthyite pls step up.
Rush soon to endorse Cruz–make you smile?
BTW I didn’t say McCarthy was a “pathetic” drunk.
My comic routine getting better you say—Thanks Yours not too bad either.

As a Marine Officer I’ve never been a big fan of degrading a sitting POTUS. Seems only recently you’ve joined the sophomoric CIC bashing. You used to reserve your vitriol for liberals both real and imagined.

@Rich Wheeler:

That loud mouthed drunken discredited Irishman?

Racist.

Can’t you just hear Obama blurting out “It’s just not who we are”?

IF Obama defined who we are we would be living under a weird form of Sharia whereby he could still drink but he could NOT bomb any Muslims. WE, otoh, would pay the jizya to our Muslim overlords and be their targets until we either ”convert or die.”

Did you listen to Obama’s Pentagon speech?

He decided he would reveal to the great unwashed masses why it is so vital the United States not confront the terrorist caveman army directly: Because it would fulfill Koranic prophecy of a doomsday fight between “the Romans” and the defenders of Islam and the caliphate.

In other words, we are allowing a fantasy of an army of the insane to control American foreign policy.

In other words we MUST lose or else the terrorists win!

What could we do differently IF we wanted ISIS to grow and spread and become more entrenched?
I can’t think of anything.

Raymond Ibrahim condenses Obama’s viewpoint this way:

Simply put, celebrating multiculturalism and defeating the jihad is impossible.

https://pjmedia.com/homeland-security/2015/12/14/islamic-jihad-symptom-of-a-western-cause/?singlepage=true

@Rich Wheeler: Rich, sadly bashing a POTUS was perfected by Democrats during the Bush era and continues to this day. I do think when a candidate lies to America to get elected he should be called out on it. Obolacare is a prime example as he told America that you can keep your doctor and/or insurance “period”!! We have been told Iraq is stable, Al Qaeda is on their heels, ISIS is contained, ISIS is a jv team of teachers and farmers, shovel ready jobs will restore our economy, Benghazi was caused by a video, and climate change is our biggest threat. This is just a brief list of lies!!

@Rich Wheeler: .

Again I say, as a former Marine Officer, I feel the same about our current sitting POTUS—just my opinion.

I disagree with your reasoning. I joined the Navy because I wanted to. I thought it was an honor to be allowed to serve as a representative of the United States military services. I would have been terribly disappointed had I not been allowed to enlist. I feel that Americans should feel honored to be Americans and should not do things that dishonor or weaken the country. Anyone doing that should be called out. Obama does both those things and much more. Almost every move he makes is a slap in the face to the country. I can think of nothing that he has done that honors the country or it’s citizens. And I don’t believe you can name a particular act that this man has done to honor the office that he was elected to. I don’t think anyone holding an office should be ‘honored’ just because he holds the office. It will take many years for the country to regain it’s former top spot in the world. Obama is personally responsible for the present attitude toward the office.

@Greg: Greegie, do you mean ludicrous like Al Qaeda is on their heels, ISIS is a jv team of teachers and farmers, ISIS is contained, or if you like your health insurance and/or doctor you can keep them ludicrous Greggie?? You may choose to believe that crap but normal people reject it!!

It takes from 18 months to 2 year for a person to enter the United States as a Syrian refugee. Do you really think ISIS terrorists are going to get in the waiting line? They’d take a quicker route, entering as tourists or students. They’d use false documents or stolen identities. They could appear to have come from any European country. Why would they even identify themselves as Muslims?

While there’s a legitimate concern that terrorists can hike into Europe hidden in the crowds, no Syrian refugees will be walking by the thousand from Syria into the United States, or arriving in waves of tiny, overcrowded boats. The truth of the matter is that you want to focus on Muslim refugees for no reason other than the fact that they’re easy to identify and target, and thus can become a political football. Some republicans are ready to jump on any divisive, high-profile, easily exploitable issue that comes along, whether the knee-jerk “solutions” that they advocate make the least bit of real sense or not. They’ll step on some fundamental American principles in the process, which is probably a plus since many of their supporters don’t much like those principles anyway.

You aren’t likely to hear any more details or specifics on this one than you are on anything else they’ve suggested they’ll do. The devil is always in the details, but those who buy their sales pitch seldom ask questions about the particulars. Details are confusing. What they want, by God, are results.

@retire05: if we are at war with them what the hell are YOU doing? Why aren’t you in the front lines with a gun ? Better to have some old guy like you die rather than some young kid who hadn’t had a chance to live his life
Typical chicken hawk who wants someone else to fight but will not go himself

@Redteam:
The the prestige if the USA is now much higher all over the wirld than under Bush
Bush was despised as an Anerican warmonger
Look at either the Gallup polls or the Pew polls to see how much better the world likes Obama

@retire05: McCarthy died of alcoholism and was probably a closeted gay He kicked Drew Pearson in the nuts when he was accused of that
FDR? Not quite sure what your point is was it an embarrassment to the ideals of our great country virtually ALL of us our descended from immigrants
By the way McCarthy was a great friend of the Kennedy family lol

We are at war with Islam even if the empty suits in D.C. don’t want to admit it. Take a look at the most recent Pew polls and you will see that most Muslims in Muslim nations support Sharia law.

That Muslims would want Sharia in Muslim nations isn’t particularly surprising. Given that Muslims represent less than 1 percent of the U.S. population and are unlikely to reach 2 percent by 2050, Sharia isn’t even an issue here. They, too, must sell wedding cakes to gay customers. They may, however, refrain from eating pork chops.

@Common Sense, #21:

It’s also difficult to predict ahead of time which Christian will be the next to mow down a couple of dozen kids in the local public school. The signs are always much easier to see, once you’re looking back after the massacre has taken place.

Iran has test-launched a medium-range ballistic missile capable of striking Israel with a nuclear warhead, its second such test in a month.

Both violated two United Nations resolutions, including one — passed as an effective part of President Obama’s nuclear pact — compelling Iran to refrain from work on such missiles for eight years.

The American commander in chief shrugged off the first launch, saying, “I think what we’ll be doing is we’ll review, as we have in the past, any violations.” He has said nothing about the second missile, though a senior official did admit the administration is “aware” of the launch.
But did not say that the President was aware or Kerry that they are morons for dealing with a terrorist state.

@Greg:

It takes from 18 months to 2 year for a person to enter the United States as a Syrian refugee. Do you really think ISIS terrorists are going to get in the waiting line? They’d take a quicker route, entering as tourists or students. They’d use false documents or stolen identities.

You mean like the Syrians that recently tried to enter the U.S. from both Arizona and Texas who claimed to be students with Greek passports? Obviously, both you and they think alike.

While there’s a legitimate concern that terrorists can hike into Europe hidden in the crowds, no Syrian refugees will be walking by the thousand from Syria into the United States, or arriving in waves of tiny, overcrowded boats.

Had to add the caveat “by the thousand” thinking you are too cute by half. So you think it takes a 1,000 Middle Eastern people to create a real threat? Golly, gee, what were those 19 hijackers thinking? Oh, wait, it only took 19 to kill almost 3,000.

The truth of the matter is that you want to focus on Muslim refugees for no reason other than the fact that they’re easy to identify and target, and thus can become a political football

Ummm, well I guess Muslim men who have adopted Mexican identities that cause Mexico to worry is just a figment of the Mexican government’s imagination according to you. Because, you know, Muslim men are sooooo easy to identify.

Some republicans are ready to jump on any divisive, high-profile, easily exploitable issue that comes along, whether the knee-jerk “solutions” that they advocate make the least bit of real sense or not.

Maybe it’s in the Republican DNA. You know, like how that Republican president reacted with a “knee-jerk” solution to immigration in 1942.

They’ll step on some fundamental American principles in the process, which is probably a plus since many of their supporters don’t much like those principles anyway.

News flash, Greggie Goebbels; no one in the Middle East have any Constitutional right to come here.

Your stupid Marxist ideology is going to get even more Americans killed. I hope your happy when that happens. Obviously, 14 dead at both Fort Hood and San Bernardino was not enough for you.

What a sick man you are.

@retire05, #27:

Not all important American principles are a matter of Constitutional law—a point frequently lost on the right. The Constitution does not directly address matters of fairness, compassion, generosity, openness, kindness, etc. Those are things that we value as a nation which have more to with the national character than with the letter of the law.

Your stupid Marxist ideology is going to get even more Americans killed.

Actually, the GOP’s thoughtless, knee-jerk reactions every time something frightens them are far more likely to get a lot more Americans killed and to do the nation a lot more harm—for example, blundering into another potentially disastrous Middle Eastern ground war when, it’s not clear how we’d extricate ourselves afterward, or how the sacrifices involved would produce any sort of long-term stability. They seem to look at every crisis as something having a military solution, not grasping that there are limits to power and resources, and more potential dangers we must be prepared to deal with than whatever has captured their full attention at the moment.

Of course I realize that it costs the GOP nothing to flap their lips. It’s not as if they’ve actually have had to deal with all the issues the Obama administration has been juggling for the past 7 years. The fact of the matter is that they haven’t even dealt legislatively with the routine problems directly in front of them. All they do is engage in political theater, such as 50 pointless votes to strike down the Affordable Care Act. Hey, what about the President’s request to authorize the use of military force against ISIS? It’s been sitting there for nearly a year now. They’re utterly useless.

@John: If you think there is a way to reason with a liberal when they start speaking of values of the USA the melting pot a land that integrates the values of those that come here with our own and they have such a lack of understanding what a mass influx of a certain type of people would mean for our country let him answer the question John it could mean a great deal to your wife daughter or grand daughter in the future.

As a nation, over the past few decades, our political leadership has violated a principle of immigration policy that was shared by all our Founders and early leaders. They all understood that America was a better place than any other country in the world and that many regions of the world were downright repugnant to the values we champion. As such, they never encouraged immigration as a mass institution because they liked the America they had conceived and didn’t want to import the undesirable characteristics of other countries. With that said, they welcomed individuals of merit who would assimilate into our values system and benefit the country.

During the debate over the Naturalization Act of 1790, Rep. Theodore Sedgwick (Federalist-MA), who served as a delegate to the Continental Congress and later as Speaker of the House, warned that mass migration would import the values of the countries of origin. “The citizens of America preferred this country, because it is to be preferred,” said Sedgwick. Speaking of European immigrants who actually shared similar ancestry, Sedgwick feared “their sensations, impregnated with prejudices of education, acquired under monarchical and aristocratical Governments, may deprive them of that zest for pure republicanism.”

Was Sedgwick anti-immigrant? No. And this is why he desired to admit “reputable and worthy characters; such only were fit for the society into which they were blended.” But it was a no brainer to him that carte blanche importation even of Europeans would result in bringing anti-republicanism to our shores. One could only imagine what he’d say of today’s mass migration from the Middle East.

T

@Greg: Greggie how did Hilldabeast vote on the Iraq war??

@kitt: Don’t forget the unborn and magicians!!

@Common Sense, #42:

Your failed President needs NO authorization to fight ISIS moron!! Sadly though he is a chicken shit and afraid to identify the enemy!! Typical double talking libturd!!

That’s a line of propaganda bullshit I’m getting particularly sick of hearing, given the fact that Obama has been waging war against ISIS for over a year without benefit of Congressional approval, elected republicans being such cowardly chicken-shits that they won’t even take the political risks of debating his request for authorization.

If you think nothing has been done over that time, ask 10,000 dead ISIS fighters and their dead leaders. Ask Jihadi John. Or ask the American soldiers and airmen involved, some of whom died carrying out their orders.

You don’t like that the San Bernardino terrorists escaped notice? Ask the political opportunists who crippled the NSA data mining program, designed to reveal covert terrorist communications, what it was they had in mind when they did it. Some on the right wanted to give Edward Snowden a medal.

680,000 muslims to america under Obama but the DHS did not have the figures for the congressional committee as to how many are here under Visa.
my question to Greg was highly simplified to adress the level of understanding.
Without bashing the POTUS which closes his mind to all reason.

@Greg: Ok Greggie how many do you think?? What’s much worse is that our government doesn’t know!! If you dispute the number than provide evidence to the contrary!! Oh I forgot, you NEVER do Greggie!!

@Greg: according to newsmax,inquisitor, wounded warrior,free beacon,amren, jihad watch, washington examiner and others all sources seem to agree on that number of greencards issued. Have you looked at any sources at all to refute the number? And what merit do these people have what can they do for our country?