Let’s hear what you have to say about tonight’s debate! It ought to be entertaining. I am really curious to see how Donald Trump behaves in an environment he cannot control and he can’t bully anyone who disagrees with him.
His head could explode.
So what do you think?
DrJohn has been a health care professional for more than 30 years. In addition to clinical practice he has done extensive research and has published widely with over 70 original articles and abstracts in the peer-reviewed literature. DrJohn is well known in his field and has lectured on every continent except for Antarctica. He has been married to the same wonderful lady for over 30 years and has three kids- two sons, both of whom are attorneys and one daughter on her way into the field of education.
DrJohn was brought up with the concept that one can do well if one is prepared to work hard but nothing in life is guaranteed.
Except for liberals being foolish.
@Rich Wheeler:
carnist
A name coined by vegans to refer to meat eaters. Where veganism is the philosophy that humans aren’t better than animals and shouldn’t be exploited, carnism is the philosophy that animals are inferior to humans and it’s fine to eat them, test on them, use them for entertainment and the like.
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Carnist
Actually, “carnist” is a derogatory term used by radical vegans. That would be you, Rich.
Funny how you claim it is not a derogatory term when all the on-line dictionaries say it is.
So if you’re not an animist, then you are a cultist. Just as bad.
And you continue to dodge my questions. Guess it doesn’t bother you that you donate to a cult of animal worshipers, lead by a queer, as he bilks you out of your money and gives no explanation on how he supports himself. No surprise. You’re like Greggie Goebbels and George; when the questions are uncomfortable, you ignore them and try to play the subject shell game.
Typical of frauds.
@retire05: You continue to be a fraud 05. Probably the biggest fraud at F.A–Your tag team partner is just a sad clown.
ANIMIST- World view that non human entities such as animals. plants and inanimate objects possess a spiritual essence. Not me Guess you admit you’re wrong on that one.
Carnist The definition you gave is true-why would truth be derogatory?
you say I’m a cultist– ridiculous — I’ll tell you who is looking like cultists—Trumpists
I know you and RT enjoy your gay bashng–leave me out of that sick game–Thanks
@Rich Wheeler:
How so? I care for animals, hence I adopt them and make a life time commitment to them to feed them, provide them with veterinarian services and keep them safe in a good home. Unlike you who buys two dogs from a breeder.
So back up that claim, bozo.
So you are admitting that animals do not have souls? Yes, or no?
Do you deny that you have [consistently on these pages] put animals in an order of importance equal to, or perhaps even higher, than humans?
If not, how do you explain that you do more for animals than unborn human babies?
But you are a cultist. One that continues to dodge questions about the leader of the MFA cult you belong to. Only a fool would donate to an organization and not know how it spends its money. But then, the old axiom that a fool and his money is quickly parted is true.
So I await your answer about how Runkle supports himself.
@retire05: I’ve never said animals have souls and I would never place animals above humans. Say what you want about animals–I think they’re wonderful creatures The more I’m around them the better I like em. Better than humans sometimes
They definitely feel pain and loss. They have no voice.
I’ve got no problem with Runkle.–nice guy who lives a simple life. After 40 years in stocks and R.E I’ve worked with my share of rich greedy people who were simply money driven Many have passed on. Don’t get those ugly vibes from MFA.- It’s a pleasure working with these compassionate young people whose primary concerns are the animals they love.
I worked for Merrill Lynch, Cushman and Wakefield and several other medium to large companies. A financial world often driven by greed and big big egos. My life is much simpler now and I’m enjoying myself a lot more.
@Rich Wheeler:
Then I would think that someone who believes that humans should be placed before animals would contribute their time, and their money, to saving unborn humans, not live animals. Guess not.
How simple a life do you have to have in order to work for an organization 50 hours a week and not have any income? Does he have a cot under a bridge? Live off welfare? How does he clothe/feed himself? Does he mooch off MFA? Does the organization pick up his living expenses?
You follow Runkle’s lead but have no clue about how he supports himself? How asinine is that? You give thousands and thousands of dollars to a group that uses none of that money to actually save animals?
And your comments about greedy people and who you worked for are not germane to the discussion or the questions I asked. It only shows more braggadocio on your part.
Now, do you want to try this again? Here are the questions:
How does Runkle support himself if he works for MFA 50 hours a week and takes no salary?
How am I a fraud since I have personally done more for animals by actually taking care of them than you ever thought about doing?
@Rich Wheeler:
The results of a single poll is not reflective of anything but those who answered that particular poll.. You are still playing the evasive lefty and refusing to answer a simple question. I answered your questions now I expect you to answer mine. If it came down to Donald Trump or Bernie Sanders, who among those two do you think would win the election? (Pick one)
(A) Bernie Sanders
(B) Donald Trump
No more running away. or diversions Just answer (A) or (B).
@Ditto: He doesn’t have the cajones to answer that question.
@Rich Wheeler:
Here is how I would measure level of ‘dim witted’. A person that would donate money to a gay organization with a gay leader that has no salary but lives off of the donations and that requires that members participate in rainbow flag waving parades has got to be pretty damn far down the totem pole.
@Rich Wheeler:
Gay bashing? Only talking about you and the friends you keep and the parades you participate in while waving rainbow flags. You are quite proud of that, aren’t you, so why is it ‘bashing’. I think we’re trying to be complimentary of your choices in friends.
@Ditto: I answered your question before in #195–there is NO path to a Trump presidency.
@Redteam:On your lurking visits to my wife’s and my facebook pages you should see that over 80% of our time with MFA is spent showing Farm to Fridge to primarily young people.–very effective in making them aware of modern day factory farming. About 15% time spent leafleting–couple of parades a year–no dancing or waving of banners- You’re the guy who’s become the self proclaimed ass chaps expert.
I give a good deal of time but less than $500 a year to MFA–
You call them a gay organization—-Runkle is gay but over 80% of the employees and volunteers I’ve met are not gay. You– I’m really not sure about.
@retire05: If you or your friendly Congressman wanna ck.out MFA or Runkle you might go to Animal Charity Evaluators.That’s what they do full time in order to help givers determine best animal rights organizations. Runkle takes no salary–has other sources of income–you’re a Conservative–is that our business?
@rich wheeler:
Why would a Congress member want to us a private group for evaluations when they have full access to MFA’s IRS 501(c)3 filings which are on line where I found it?
Actually, when a chair of a 501(c)3 claims to work for a group for 50 hours a week for no financial remuneration, it then becomes the responsibility of said chair to explain how he supports himself. Many people are chairs of non-profits but everyone knows where they are employed gainfully or have private wealth support. Bilking a 501(c)3 out of money, or even being compensated for work without reporting it on the 990, is illegal.
@Rich Wheeler:
No you didn’t. There are only two possible answers and you gave neither. You evaded the question with a chicken-sh*t answer to a question that wasn’t asked. I don’t see a path for a Rubio/Kasich RINO ticket but I still answered your hypothetical question. Now I expect you to quit being evasive and do the same for my question. It’s a simple question that shouldn’t scare away a Marine.
If it came down to Donald Trump or Bernie Sanders, who among those two do you think would win the election? (Pick one)
(A) Bernie Sanders
(B) Donald Trump
No more running away. or diversions Just answer (A) or (B).
@Ditto: For the THIRD time there is no path for The Donald to beat ANY Dem who gets the nom.
Capiche
@retire05: You are making stuff up. Send the IRS in if you want. If he’s stealing have at em. Many CEO.S work for the proverbial dollar a year.
@Rich Wheeler:
I reject your reply because it is not one of the only two possible answers allowed. Quiet being chickensh*t and answer the question
If it came down to Donald Trump or Bernie Sanders, who among those two do you think would win the election? (Pick one)
(A) Bernie Sanders
(B) Donald Trump
Just answer (A) or (B).
@Rich Wheeler:
But they have other obvious means of support.
@Rich Wheeler:
So you’re going with Bernie.
Rich for Bernie…..
Polls now showing blacks breaking for Trump. Seems as if they now realize if 11 million Latino’s get deported it will give them a better chance for a job.
They see that Hillary is headed for jail and they know that Bernie doesn’t want anyone to have a job, and they know Biden is a clown, so they have no choices left.
@Redteam:
Have never read that Runkle is from a very wealthy family where they can afford to support him while he is off bilking people like Rich out of money for not saving one animal.
@Redteam:
After the Iran deal, Kerry isn’t a choice. They may try to draft Al Gore.
Here is my question–Who thinks The Donald can win POTUS?
I’ve said 3 times what I think and since I DO enjoy wagering– suggest a fair bet.
@Redteam: Bernie?–Heck I’d take Huey ,Dewey or Louie over The Donald.
@Rich Wheeler: 211
Sorry Rich, but as famous as your wife may be, I don’t know her name so it’s unlikely that i’ve been to her facebook page? If she’s trying to get friends signed up, tell her I’m not available.
And sorry to disappoint you but I was not one of the 3 visitors to your site over the last week.
How would you know that? They wear a ‘not gay’ sign around their neck?
@Ditto: Kerry becoming a traitor back in the 70’s eliminated himself.
@Rich Wheeler: I’m quite sure that the election of Trump is about your last desire.
But you claim he’s this flaming liberal, non conservative, shouldn’t you be happy to see him running?
@Rich Wheeler: So you don’t want Bernie either? You prefer Huey, Dewey and Louie over Bernie. Agreed.
@Rich Wheeler: Ok, I’ll take the bet
@Redteam:
Seems like he is going to get his wish with Huey (Hillary), Dewey (Biden) and Louie (Sanders). Webb is a non-starter polling 1%.
@Redteam:
You really think the animal “rights” fraud will actually pony up when he loses?
@Rich Wheeler:
You have never answered my question, you have only answered to something you were not asked. Is a simple multiple choice answer too complicated for you to comprehend? Or are you too craven to answer a direct multiple choice question?
If it came down to Donald Trump or Bernie Sanders, who among those two do you think would win the election? (Pick one)
(A) Bernie Sanders
(B) Donald Trump
Just answer (A) or (B).
@retire05: He’ll never make the bet because he won’t say who he’s for. The bet is to pick the winner. Not the loser. If it was for ‘loser’ I could name about 300 million that won’t win.
@Redteam:
Rich has already shown himself to be dishonest in his claim that he answered my multiple choice question. I advise not to make wagers with dishonest people.
@Ditto: Multiple choice has 3 or more possible answers– your advice not to bet against me is wise.
@Rich Wheeler: well, I’ve already said I would bet, so tell me who you’re betting to win and I’ll tell you who I’m betting to win.
@Ditto:
Ex Marine.
He’s all mouth. Challenged us to a bet, I took him up on it. He won’t respond. Called his bluff.
@Rich Wheeler:
No, there is no rule requiring that a multiple choice question must have more than two optional answers. A Multiple choice question must only consist of a stem and a set of options. The options are the possible answers that the examiner can choose from. My question, my rule for possible answers was given. It’s an either this or that Multiple choice question Only one of two answers are possible. Now answer the question or we will have to accept that you are too craven and dishonest to.
And for the reason I stated.
@Redteam:
Even if he answers you, I wouldn’t count on Rich to pay up when he loses. He has already proven himself to be dishonest.
@Redteam: Once a Marine always a Marine oh rah.
Why do you always have to go 2nd RT—Afraid to stand up on your own?
You did pick Houston then backed off??
That is until you back a man for POTUS that smeared the name of every good Marine that fought in Southeast Asia with his testimony.
That’s pretty funny coming from a fraud.
You 3 got a little ping pong game going. Anyone of you wanna pick the Repub Primary winner? The next POTUS? World Series?
We can get a neutral party like A.V. to hold the money.
@Rich Wheeler:
Because you are the one that stated that you wanted to make a bet and for someone to challenge you. I took you up, make the bet.
Once a Marine? How often do you wear your uniform? What are the latest military events you participated in?
@Rich Wheeler:
Link me to that pick.
@Rich Wheeler:
How did you determine that AV is a neutral party?
from 223:
I’ve said bring it on, who you betting on and how much?
@Redteam: Ok
I’ll take a real Conservative–Ted Cruz to win the nomination $100.
AV is one of the true stand-up guys at F.A.
@Rich Wheeler:
Ok, how much are you putting on Cruz to win the Dimocratic nomination? We just need the amount.
@Redteam just for you rt
I’ll take Ted Cruz to win the Republican nomination.
Do you agree or would you pick someone else?
Amount bet–$100
Enjoy the day
If you would like to wager on Dem nom let me know.
@Rich Wheeler: Sorry, you don’t get to bet on the Repub nom. Your challenge that I responded to was who was going to get your party’s nom. I don’t believe Runkle would let you change parties.
As Ditto said, you are all talk. No substance.
@Redteam: Bet was always on Repub nom See #223 233 and 236 pretty clear I got Cruz–Who you got?
Afraid to say?
@Rich Wheeler: 223
The correct response would be ‘me’ or ‘not me’
From 241, this is the one we are going with. the next POTUS is the one selected.
Anyone of you wanna pick the Repub Primary winner? The next POTUS? World Series?