Democrat Civil Rights Leader Drops Race Card Bomb on McCain-Palin

Ummmm….

I’m confused.

George Wallace was, wait for it, A DEMOCRAT

George Wallace was endorsed by the NAACP because his DEMOCRAT opponent in the primary was endorsed by the KKK.

Yet, George Wallace is being compared to McCain/Palin?

Seems to me Congressman Lewis, George Wallace is more like YOU and YOUR PARTY than anyone else.

Heck, he WAS one of you.

Shall I list for you some of the other infamous racists on the DEMOCRAT side?

Congressman, that’s a hornet’s nest you really, really don’t want to stick your arm into.

People in glass houses shouldn’t ….

You get the idea.

Don’t you?

Remember when referring to Democrats and the Democratic party it is just that.
The party is Democratic and individuals are Democrats.
when you refer to the Party as Democrat you are invoking Joseph McCarthy who spouted this remark..
It is like calling San Francisco ” Frisco” or using the N word to African Americans.

The Democrats were the party of segregation. However after they embraced the Civil Rights cause, Republicans filled the void with the Southern Stategy adopting racism as an unspoken party plank. Republicans have dominated national politics ever since.

Fit Fit, go read your ‘real’ history again. Repubicans freed the slaves and republicans pushed through (over the democrats objections everytime) every civil rights bill and the voting rights act. Democrats did nothing but keep blacks on welfare (aka in slavery). Want to live without working, vote democrat. “The poor have been voting democrat for 50 years and they’re still poor”. Charles Barkley, NBA

You no longer have to wonder why everyone on here laughs at and maked fun of FIT FIT. He lies even about things he has to know the truth about, right in line with Hussein O.

Osama and Obama have a lot in common. They both support and finance terrorists who bombed the pentagon.

Hussein O and S Hussein have more in common. They both tried to kill as many American Soldiers as possible. A Hussein with a gun and Hussein O by backstabbing America while visiting Iraq. An act that should put him in prison, now the white house.

I’m Canadian and I know more about your country than poor little Fit Fit.

Hey, FitFit, gets some education, by reading this:

POPULAR IN AFRICA: BUSH HAS GIVEN MORE AID THAN ANY OTHER US PRESIDENT http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/africa/popular-in-africa-bush-has-given-more-aid-than-any-other-us-president-783387.html

And here is another one:

BOB GELDOF SPEAKS ON THE PRESS AND PRESIDENT BUSH
http://psychophil.wordpress.com/2008/02/20/bob-geldof-speaks-on-president-bush/

Mr. Geldof praised Mr. Bush for his work in delivering billions to fight disease and poverty in Africa, and blasted the U.S. press for ignoring the achievement.
Mr. Bush, said Mr. Geldof, “has done more than any other president so far.”

a freind just emailed me that exact article. i was pissed. so i sent him a reply and the only thing he could come at me with was if i thought abortion should be illegal. funny, he a freakin lawyer. cracks me up, he is also jewish. gotta love the folks on the left anyway.

“Hey Craig, for extra credit, why don’t you tell the class what he’s famous for and what party he switched to right around the time this Southern Strategy began to take shape.” (Fit Fit)

Who the hell are you talking about?

@Fit fit:

EPIC FAIL!

You are no student of history are you?

That’s more likely the induction ceremony for Senator Robert Byrd (D-WV), also Grand Kleagle of the KKK.

In fact, Thurmond actively opposed the white supremacy movement which makes your assertion even more ridiculous.

Strom Thurmond started out in politics as a Democrat.

He converted to the Republican party and moderated his views on race.

In fact, he was the first southern Senator to hire a black person as an aide.

So, what was your point again?

You don’t really want to get into a discussion with me about the history of the Democratic Party regarding race do you?

No, let me restate that.

You really don’t want to get into a discussion about the Democratic Party and it’s sordid history in regard to racial issues.

@Craig: You should read the book “Slavery by Another Name” by Douglas A. Blackmon!
You may understand better the race relationship as it is today in the South!

Gerry,

Don’t worry, I know everything about the slavery History in the States and all over the World. I am very well documented on the subject. Did you know that African people trade their kids for goods?

I will let Pierre Scaruffi explain it to you, since my english writing is not that good:

The Origins of the African slave trade:

“….The civil rights movement of the 1960’s have left many people with the belief that the slave trade was exclusively a European/USA phenomenon and only evil white people were to blame for it. This is a simplistic scenario that hardly reflects the facts.”

“… “For moralists, the most important aspect of that trade should be that Muslims were selling goods to the African kingdoms and the African kingdoms were paying with their own people. In most instances, no violence was necessary to obtain those slaves. Contrary to legends and novels and Hollywood movies, the white traders did not need to savagely kill entire tribes in order to exact their tribute in slaves. All they needed to do is bring goods that appealed to the kings of those tribes. The kings would gladly sell their own kins.”

“…This explains why slavery became “black”. Ancient slavery, e.g. under the Roman empire, would not discriminate: slaves were both white and black (so were Emperors and Popes).”

To read the full article:
http://www.scaruffi.com/politics/slavetra.html

He then figured out that the Republican party was the true party of racists, mysogynists and pedophiles and joined!

Wow… another one of those hypocrites who say they belong to the party of “tolerance”, tossing out blanket racist accusations.

Ah… let’s hear it for the dumbing down of America. Thanks for that demonstration of not only America’s failed government controlled curriculums, “Kool-aid”. But just what your party’s all about.

Hey Kool-aid, did you read my post #22?
Africans were Ok with slavery. Just go and read it.

Kool-aid, I always have a problem with such offensive “blanket” statements of people.

I also have a problem with younger people today, passing judgment on a different era of culture. And it’s not a culture that I think is a proud moment for humanity, mind you. But then, the history of man is filled with those… and most certainly not confined to America.

But you can not take todays more inclusive standards, and apply those to generations of citizens who were raised in a different time. Blacks and whites today have completely different attitudes because we are accustomed to a melting pot. Back then, segregation for not only black, but different nationalities was the way people were raised from childhood. My father was raised in a Ukrainian village, my mother in a Hungarian village. They were not welcome in many places outside. That’s not a defense of that culture. It’s just a fact.

But your statement goes beyond that. It’s rather absurd to include all Republicans in your racist judgment that “the Republican party was the true party of racists, mysogynists and pedophiles and joined!” when the Democrats could boast Robert Byrd as a Democrat in the same era.

Shall I label all the DNC racist for his inclusion?

Dang, Mike’sA… we’re tripping over each others thoughts again, dude…. LOL

I didn’t “cast aspersions” on you, Kool-aid. You embarrassed your own a$$ as a narrow minded bigot. You didn’t need my help at all.

There are racists in humanity, and in all parties of the US… including yours. Is the GOP the party of racists? No. Quite in fact, it appears most of the race oriented discussion is coming from members of your camp. So I’d say you and some in your party are the ones fixated on racism.

How much Kool aid will it take you to get this right? Have some more… lots of more. Go ahead… drink, drink, drink!

- They are so mysoginists that they have chosen a female for their VP.

- They are so racists that they have given Condoleezza Rice one of the most important fonction of the Government: Secretary of States.

- As for pedophiles, I don’t know, but I know of Bill Clinton affairs with Monica, and Frank’s gay lover at Fannie Mae.

OK, I’ll see your Robert Byrd and raise you in the following categories

Racists
Strom Thurmond
George Allen
Conrad Burns
Jeb Bush
Trent Lott
Barry Goldwater
Richard Nixon
GHW Bush

Mysoginists
Conservative Polical Action Conference
John McCain
Newt Gingrich
Rudy Guliani
Any “Pro-Live” organization
Rush Limbaugh
Glenn Beck
Bill O’Reilly

Pedophiles
Mark Floley
Robert A McKee
Scott Muschany
Dennis L. Rader
John R. Curtin
Edison Misla Aldarondo

This is really TOO easy.

Feh, your arguments are lame and barely comprehendable as English.

Keep drinking your Kool-Aid and keep practicing your cognitive dissonance, everything will be fine!

Oh, and Craig, I don’t think you know what a pedophile is based on your response.

Good night!

Kool aid,

I know what a pedophile is, but I don’t know any Republican pedophile. And if you are so smart, why don’t you answer me in French?

BTW, pedophile is the same in French: Pedophile.

Why don’t YOU answer me in English? That’s a better question!

Tee Hee, you are so funny! Uninformed and uneducated, but hey, I’ll give you a C+ for operating a computer without shocking yourself or burning down your trailer!

Gosh Mike, what part of my list was ABSURD?

To help focus the argument, I’ll even give you the actual definition of absurd…

1. ridiculously unreasonable, unsound, or incongruous
2. having no rational or orderly relationship to human life

Do you care to dispute any of the names on my list? Facts are always helpful when trying to make a point. You should try to use some! And I totally agree that John Lewis is a MAJOR racist, making statements and such. How horrifying! He said mean things! That’s so_much worse than being a hypocritical turd, who fathers and supports the product of an extra-marital black/white relationship while making a name for himself as a segregationist and civil right opponent. I see your point completely.

And I didn’t really mean to pick on Craig for his poor English skills. The majority of the “replies” to my posts have been barely comprehensible. There, feel better now?

Keep trying!

Oh, please Mike! Please ban me! Please, please, please!!!

God forbid anyone with dissenting opinion should invade your comfy little circle jerk! Who gets the cracker tonight? Do you take turns, or is it every “man” for themselves?

Jeez, Aye Chihuaha, you win the daily double! You are both stupid AND intellectually incurious.

Where are your facts there KA?

Where are they?

Are you completely unable to support your list of names with an actual factual argument?

Well?

Anytime now will be fine.

Oh, by the way, I didn’t see your list of answers to the test.

Kool aid,

Voilà une supposition colorée mais fort improbable. Votre longue liste semble issue d’un malentendu qui repose sur une méprise née d’une confusion.

Je reste hébété devant l’insolence de vos accusations gratuites. L’intellect obscurci par des horions sans prestige, vous restez sourd aux arguments les plus sensés.

Je vais vous exposer l’astuce de la chose dont vous ne pourrez malheureusement pas subodorer toute la valeur.

Voici en quelques traits incisifs: Je crains que vous ne barbotiez à grand bruit dans l’erreur la plus totale. Vous n’êtes qu’un inculte en plus d’être un lamentable pendard. Il serait préférable que vous n’insistassiez plus pour ne pas permettre une aggravation permanente de votre infirmité mentale.

Me fais-je comprendre? Si vous ne comprenez pas, faites semblant.

Rocky_B,

Don’t worry about it. French is very complicated. Besides, I have a special writing style; I was a French teacher in high school for a few years. I have no problem reading English. But it is so much more difficult to write it. I get so frustrated here, because I can’t really express what I really want to say. But I guess I’m making some progress.

I’m glad you’ve got the essential of my post. I would like to translate it, but I couldn’t, it would lose all of it sparkling effects… lol

wonder if America is ready for a black president, or will it show the true racial legacy of the icemans inheritance

After Palin finished her remarks this morning, the man holding the stuffed monkey seemed to notice that a video camera was pointed at him, at which point he removed the Obama sticker from the doll’s head and crumpling it up in his hand. He then handed the doll to a young boy who was watching the rally from his father’s shoulders. The boy’s parents later told CBS News that they weren’t acquainted with the man who gave their son the stuffed monkey.

That’s a very odd clip; and I can’t tell that the man noticed a camera was on him prior to his taking the sticker off the doll. Perhaps an Obama supporter ? Plant? Whatever he is, he looks to be a douchebag.

So what was your point?

wonder if America is ready for a black president, or will it show the true racial legacy of the icemans inheritance

Torrance Stephens’ post is part of the racial divide problem.

So, if America doesn’t elect Obama, it’s because of “the Bradley Effect”? Puh-lease….

From townhall.com: On Friday during a town hall-style meeting in Lakeville, Minn., a supporter told McCain that he feared what would happen if Obama were elected. McCain drew boos when he defended his rival as a “decent person and a person that you do not have to be scared of as president of the United States.”

In another exchange, a woman told McCain that she didn’t trust Obama because “he’s an Arab.” Shaking his head and taking the microphone from her, McCain replied: “No, ma’am. He’s a decent, family man, citizen, that I just happen to have disagreements with on fundamental issues and that’s what this campaign is all about.”

Basically, McCain had abdicated the race as far as I am concerned. Apparently he never read “The Case Against Barack Obama”, et al, and the fact of the matter is Obama is a scary individual.

Palin is the only one of the ticket pushing to show some earnestness in trying to overcome whatever lead Obama has with just a few weeks before the election.

John Lewis is one of the biggest racists in the Congress, trust me,I know, I live in Atlanta. The MSM are pulling all the stops as are black democrats: Question Obama on the legitimate points and its all ‘racist’, ’stroking the fires’, etc, etc.

Hope Obama wins, lets these freaking idiots who want him in so badly bend over and watch themselves get a new one drilled. They don’t have a clue. Rage? You bet I got some, I have no patience for morons.

Then again…maybe McCain knows more that he is letting on and what worries me is maybe he is correct: I don’t have to be scared of Obama being president…yeah…I have a lot more to fear of those controlling Obama…..and McCain. Does it make any difference who is elected?

Rawdawg;
To answer your question. Yes we are ready for a black president, but certainly not “this candidate”. Did you hear racial prejudices being spouted by Republicans when Condolisa Rice was given a cabinet position or Collen Powell? No. Did you hear any from the independants? No. Did the Clinton’s or Carter put any blacks in positions of political power? No.

I’ve heard Republican’s say if the McCain-Palin ticket had been a Powell-Rice ticket, they would have supported them just as readily.

The fingers are sadly being pointed at the wrong party.

As has been pointed out above and as history shows, it has always been the Republicans who supported “Blacks”. The Civil War was started by Republicans against the Democratic South which was financially backed by Southern Democrat plantation owners. Southern Democrats were the ones that were importing slaves. They liked the status quo just as it was, with their Black slaves under their complete power and control and dependent upon them for their every need.

During the Civil Rights movement, Southern Democrats were in control of Congress and LBJ, a Southern Democrat, from Texas was president. LBJ supported the Vietnam War and a draft that sent thousands of our countries young blacks to fight a war they neither supported, nor understood. Nixon, a Republican, got us out of that war.

Most Liberal Democrats are the old Southern Democrats and their ideals under a different name. Their socialism agenda goes back to post Civil War reconstruction. The South was in a deep depression long before 1929. BTW Blacks were not the only slaves in our society. My own heritage is that of ancestors who were of indentured servitude status, which did not end with the Emancipation Proclamation. It wasn’t until 1927 when that was lifted. FDR came in with his New Deal, which created socialist entitlement programs. That re-established the government as “Massah”, lording power and control over the poor who sucked at the government teat and became comfortable and complacent in their poverty while the primarily Democratically controlled government did whatever the hell they wanted. Very few were or even are still willing to take charge and do what they need to do to lift themselves by their own bootstraps to make their own lives and those of their children better. Many of the poor see welfare checks as a right, not a privilage and only vote for those who will funnel more unearned money into their hands. Contrary to modern Democratic rhetoric during this campaign, most Republicans are not ignorant “trailer trash” as they would like everyone to believe. The “trailer trash” welfare sucking cross-sections of our society support them.