Over the years I have heard the word “tribalism” used consistently as a way to deride and attack conservative groups with political stances outside the boundaries of globalization. Many readers have been exposed to this propaganda recently as “tribalism” becomes the go-to denouncement of the Trump Administration. From The Atlantic to CNBC to The Washington Post and beyond, tribalism is used almost as often as the fascist label, and there are very specific reasons for this.
Tribalism (like nationalism and populism) has slowly but surely been falsely associated with totalitarianism, as if the two are synonymous. The use of “tribalism” as a dismissal of sovereignty concepts is a distinctly globalist and leftist habit; clearly, they hate the very notion of it, so much so that they have sought to turn it into a four letter word. But why?
The fact of the matter is, tribalism revolves around sets of principles; meaning, some people hold principles that are completely incompatible with other people’s principles. Some principles simply cannot be reconciled with other principles, and they cannot coexist. Groups tend to form around principles, and thus, certain groups cannot live in close proximity with other groups. When they do live in close proximity, one will invariably absorb the other or destroy the other.
This is more likely to occur when two groups have diametrically opposing views rather than minor deviations and disagreements.
For example, the mass injection of millions of Muslim immigrants into European nations has in a very short period of time resulted in the steady decline of Western ideals and even the decline of legal frameworks in the areas where the immigrants concentrate. Sharia law is a direct antithesis to traditional Western values such as religious freedom, free speech, freedom of association, individual rights, economic independence, free markets, etc. (It is interesting to note that western socialists and communist ideals run parallel to Muslim culture when it comes to the desire to dismantle sovereignty.) The effects of this clash of principles are quite obvious at this point.
Sharia-based groups have been transplanted into the Western sphere in what I consider a deliberate Cloward-Piven strategy of cultural destabilization of Europe.
These groups do not assimilate, they devour the surrounding culture and turn it into something that sublimates in accordance with their principles. This is why the leftist and globalist call for “multiculturalism” is nonsensical. You cannot have two or more diametrically opposed cultures within the same society — one of them has to take precedence over all the others. Globalists in particular KNOW this is the reality, and they use multiculturalism as a means to undermine nations specifically built upon traditional sovereign values.
Leftists are in most cases merely useful idiots that promote multiculturalism as a means of “penance.” That is to say, they believe that traditional western culture should be punished for past transgressions and in due course, phased out completely in exchange for a new utopian system.
Both leftists and globalists will often try to argue that if tribalism was not prevalent there would be no ill will between Muslims and Westerners or any other groups for that matter. But, as stated earlier, what they are glossing over is the inevitability of groups separating based on principals. The only way for all groups to coexist in close proximity in the multicultural paradise we are being sold is for ALL value systems to be eliminated except for one. And perhaps that is the point.
Globalists prefer an outcome in which traditional values are erased and replaced with a “new world order” mindset; a system that is rooted in collectivist suppression of individual liberty, where freedom is exchanged for “harmony;” one global tribe worshiping one global god — the state.
The existence of tribalism might lead to conflicts if opposing cultures are deliberately mashed together, but it also makes the formation of a single overarching tyranny very difficult. Globalists seek to irritate existing divisions and trigger chaos between groups because ultimately, they want to demonize the very concept of tribalism and make way for a one world ideal that fits THEIR agenda.
Leftists are decidedly less self aware on why they fight so hard against tribalism. They see cultural division of any kind on the part of the west as inherently evil. Ironically, when it comes to so called “victim groups” like Muslims, social-justice warriors will argue that their aggressively divisive behavior is off limits to criticism because you have to be “from that culture to understand it”. So, tribalism on the part of designated victim groups is beyond reproach, and tribalism on the part of westerners is a cancer that must be eradicated.
Leftists and globalists seem to skip over the part where they allow Islam to do their dirty work (of destroying the West) for them then magically those Muslims submit to their globalism???
When will they realize the tiger they think they’ve got by the tail has turned on them and is devouring them?
Islamists are NOT globalists, in the sense that liberal globalists are.
They are not “green,” for instance.
(Recall how Saddam blew up hundreds of oil wells in Kuwait?
Look at how Muslim-controlled lands look…..not clean, not green.)
There is an old essay (2004) about how Leftists in Philippines welcomed their Islamist “partners” to go up against the gov’t.
Then the leftists saw the folly of teaming up with the Islamists.
Worth a read.
All of it relevant to today.
After a deep explanation of how this wasp lives off its host, Richard Fernandez concludes:
To all those fools with their LET THEM IN signs and protests what are you going to do when one of these so called refugees breaks into your home and ransacks it will you approach them with a disarming smile and get your throat slit or you stupid disarming smile knocked off your silly little snowflake face with a fist
Hold tight to your tribe whoever may be in it, care for them, protect them. They dont hate tribes they hate successful strong tribes, ones not under their thumb.
Aaaaand on cue, some stupid Twitter post calls for ending St. Patrick’s Day, because celebrating this holiday is “white pride” that “otherizes” those not white. (Despite their being no requirement to be melanin-deficient to participate in St. Patty festivities.)
But Cinco de Mayo is ok…
Kwanzaa is ok…
Ramadan is ok…
Black Panthers are ok…
LULAC is ok….
La Raza is ok…
Black History Month is ok…
The Congressional Black Caucus is ok…
I guess if racist leftists didn’t have double standards, they’d have no standards at all, would they?
Liberals dont like certian holidays like MEMORIAL DAY,MOTHERS DAY,FATHERS DAY,4th of JULY,VETERANS DAY,THANKSGIVING DAY,CHRISTMAS DAY’GEORGE WASHINGTON’S AND LINCOLNS BIRTHDAYS(PRESIDENTS DAY) the only holidays they celebrate is EARTHDAY,KWANZAA,CINO DeMAYO CESAR CHAVEZ DAY and HARVEY MILK DAY