Maxwell Anderson:
Donald Trump Jr. scooped The New York Times Tuesday morning by tweeting out the email chain that has been the subject of three stories suggesting he knew that a meeting with a Russian attorney was part of Russia’s effort to assist his father’s presidential campaign.
The predictable claims that the emails are a “smoking gun” proving collusion and that such activity amounted to “treason” followed. But what the emails actually reveal is nothing of the sort. Instead, the emails depict what amounted to a really bad game of telephone (the email version, of course) and a rather ludicrous scenario onto which Democrats are latching as “proof” of “collusion.”
From the emails, and subsequent interviews, seven key figures emerge: (1) Yuri Yakovlevich Chaika, described in the emails as the “Crown prosecutor” of Russia, but, since Russia is not a monarchy, his official title is “prosecutor general”; (2) Aras Agalarov, a Russian real estate developer that licensed the then-Trump owned Miss Universe pageant in 2013; (3) Emin Agalarov, son of Aras Agalarov and Russian pop music star; (4) Rob Goldstone, a music publicist and former tabloid journalists; (5) Natalia Veselnitskaya, the Russian lawyer that attended the meeting at Trump Tower; (6) an unnamed person that Veselnitskaya said helped arrange the meeting on her end; and (7) Donald Trump Jr., son of President Trump and the person with whom Veselnitskaya met at Trump Tower.
With this cast of characters, here is how everything allegedly went down:
Chaika relayed the existence of the documents during a meeting to the elder Agalarov; Aras then told his son Emin, who then relayed that information to Goldstone, who proceeded to pass the information along to Don Jr., who said he would be willing to speak with Emin over the phone about the documents, but Emin told Goldstone to arrange a meeting between Don Jr. and Veselnitskaya, who Goldstone told The New York Times that Emin told him “has information about illegal campaign contributions to the D.N.C.,” so an unnamed associate of Veselnitskaya and Goldstone got into contact to arrange the meeting, but Veselnitskaya didn’t have any incriminating information and, according to Don Jr., instead merely made “vague” and “ambiguous” statements that “made no sense” and lacked “details or supporting information” after which she changed the subject to a now ceased adoption program that facilitated the American adoption of Russian children.
Got that?
Great.
Here’s why this whole ordeal calls into question the veracity of any allegation of actual “collusion.”
First, when “collusion” between the Trump campaign and Russia was originally discussed it had always been within the context of the Trump campaign assisting the Russians with hacking the DNC. But with these emails, that theory immediately falls apart. As I wrote on Monday, the DNC knew in May that Russia hacked its network. Don Jr. met with the Russian lawyer in June, the month afterthe hack—meaning that Don Jr. could not collude to do something that had already happened.
Second, speaking of the timeline, it is important to remember that this meeting occurred before the DNC publicly disclosed that Russian hackers penetrated their computer network and stole a trove of their emails. Don Jr. met with the Russian lawyer on June 9th. The DNC publicly disclosed the Russian hack five days later on June 14th. So meeting with a Russian national then would not have evoked the same type of hysterical response that it does now, nor would such a meeting necessarily carry the treasonous connotation it does today.
Third, if this were really a meeting with a high-level Russian official, then that official would already know that they (the Russian government) stole emails from the DNC. So the fact that emails were admittedly not discussed strongly suggests that the lawyer was not actually an official of the Russian government. Or, if she was, then she was not a high-level official. Veselnitskaya told NBC Newsthat she is not connected at all to the Russian government.
There is but one sin in this entire episode and that is that Don Jr. was told he could have some good dirt on Hillary and he went to get it. That’s it.
Now, does anyone actually believe any Democrat would not make the same trip? Before you answer, keep in mind… THEY DID. They even PAID someone to dig up… something. ANYTHING. Even that is not THAT dastardly, but the fact that they paid for and used LIES is pretty despicable.
You can tell how many of these desperate, whiny, sore loser crybaby Democrats are losing patience with stumbling across that silver bullet to take down the big, bad wereDon. So, this silliness, is “treasonous” and has already provoked a impeachment circus act.
Now, this demonstrates exactly why I don’t believe Trump should EVER release any more of his taxes than he has. Jr. has released the pertinent emails, warts and all, and faced up to what he did and what he expected. For this, he has been eviscerated, called a traitor and criminal and had the left making utter fools of themselves, trying to outdo the previous idiot with their hyperbolic rhetoric. Trump releasing any more of his tactics would evoke, regardless of what they contain, the exact same response. No, until Democrats can act like adults (and not Schumer), no taxes for you.
Compare THIS to deleting (destroying, eradicating, evaporating) 30,000 emails, claiming they were all about weddings, funerals and exercise. No, really. Or, perhaps Jr. should have vaporized the emails and claimed all he and the Ruskie talked about was grandkids and golf. For, this is EXACTLY the kind of steaming crap liberals just LOVE to whole-heartedly believe.
So, come on, crybabies. Exactly WHAT do you expect us to believe? You don’t care about fair elections, national security, honesty or principles. You don’t even WANT elections. All you care about is grasping power and destroying those who have it.
Get over it and shut up. You make me want to puke.
Liberals take up the football run the wrong way and score a touchdown for convervatives