The Supreme Court Hands Down Major Gun Rights Victory

Loading

by Jonathan Turley

As predicted, the Supreme Court handed down a momentous opinion in favor of Second Amendment rights today in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen. In what will likely prove one of the most important decisions in his illustrious career as a conservative jurist, Justice Clarence Thomas wrote a 6-3 majority opinion that brought greater clarity to this and future challenges under the Second Amendment.
 
In 2008, the Supreme Court recognized the right to bear arms as an individual right in District of Columbia v. Heller. Two years after Heller, in McDonald v. City of Chicago, the court ruled that this right applied against the states.
 
This case concerned concealed-carry restrictions under N.Y. Penal Law § 400.00(2)(f) that require a showing of “proper cause.” Lower courts upheld the New York law, but there were ample constitutional concerns over its vague standard, such as showing that you are “of good moral character.” New York wanted to exercise discretion in deciding who needs to carry guns in public while gun owners believe that the law flips the constitutional presumption in favor of such a right.
 

Thomas rejected the two-part analysis used by lower courts and held that the presumption must be in favor of the individual right to possess a handgun in public like other rights in the Bill of Rights. The Court held “consistent with Heller and McDonald, that the Second and Fourteenth Amendments protect an individual’s right to carry a handgun for self-defense outside the home.” Accordingly, “because the State of New York issues public-carry licenses only when an applicant demonstrates a special need for self-defense, we conclude that the State’s licensing regime violates the Constitution.”

 
New York Gov. Kathy Hochul immediately declared “Shocking, absolutely shocking that they have taken away our right to have reasonable restrictions.” The Claude Rain moment aside, it was shocking that Hochul would be shocked. Many of us were predicting a major loss for over a year and New York, as usual, litigated a bad case and made more bad law for gun control advocates.

Read more
 

5 1 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
12 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

This has major implications regarding the recent passed Senate version of red flag laws. This case correctly states the government cannot unilaterally deny ownership or unilaterally confiscate a gun that is the property of an individual without due process. Point, set, match.

Abortion issue will be bigger, not gone. Horowitz is lost. Gun issue is never going away either, liberals don’t give up on being totalitarians, they just double down.

Just wait for t he reaction from the New York Pravda(Times)the same way they reacted when the Supreme Court struck down big time Gun Ban now all they have to do is to rule against Biden and his Gun Control Laws

Liberals are all worried about “gun violence” but why do they think it can be stopped by passing laws?

Guns can’t read.

But I did tell my teacher that my pencil failed her physics test.

Last edited 1 year ago by Meremortal

Does not matter what the DOJ says. The Supreme Court has given it decision in the case

My argument to carry would be that I frequently go outside my house where Democrats allow and encourage violent criminals to stay out of jail and ply their trade.

These are people submitting for a CHL. To do so, they must undergo training and an FBI background check. THESE are the people you WANT carrying, rather than the crack dealer a liberal “prosecutor” just let back out of jail for the 14th time. All Democrats care about is trampling individual rights.

Of course, every notable (notable for their stupidity) Democrat comes forth and, obviously with no knowledge of what the suit or ruling consists of, puts their ignorance and decisions based on emotions on display. Again, THIS is why these people should NEVER have power or influence in our government.

The criminals are going to arm themselves anyway. In the post-punishment era of liberal justice, the reluctance to violate laws wanes more and more each day. Everyday life in Democrat cities becomes more and more dangerous each day. In the Democrat view of public safety, the ideal scenario is for law abiding citizens to be disarmed, police defunded, criminals armed, prosecutors forgiving of all crimes and elections rigged for Democrats.

Two masked men tried to rob a Pawn shop/Gun Store in Georgia threted to kill the Clerk and owner if they did,nt get on the Floor owner was armed the results one robber dead the other ran away two brothers tried to rob a Pizza Place in Pennsylvania a they pistol whiped costumer who was armed the results one brother dead the other ended up in Critical Condition