Stephen F. Hayes & Thomas Joscelyn:
Less than 24 hours before the official end of the Obama presidency, while White House staffers were pulling pictures off the walls and cleaning out their desks, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) posted without fanfare another installment of the documents captured in Osama bin Laden’s compound during the May 2011 raid in Abbottabad, Pakistan. The press statement that accompanied the release made an unexpected declaration: This batch of newly released documents would be the last one. “Closing the Book on Bin Laden: Intelligence Community Releases the Final Abbottabad Documents,” the statement was headlined. According to a tally on the ODNI website, this last batch of 49 documents brings the total number released to 571.
For analysts who have paid attention to the Abbottabad documents, the numbers immediately caused alarm. For years, the Obama administration told the American people that the haul from the bin Laden compound was massive and important. In an interview on Meet the Press just days after the raid, Barack Obama’s national security adviser, Thomas Donilon, said the material could fill “a small college library.” A senior military intelligence official who briefed reporters at the Pentagon on May 7, 2011, said: “As a result of the raid, we’ve acquired the single largest collection of senior terrorist materials ever.” Sources who have described the cache to THE WEEKLY STANDARD over the years have claimed that the number of captured documents, including even extraneous materials and duplicates, totals more than 1 million.
Can it really be the case that this release “closes the book”? The short answer: No, it can’t.
“[Director of National Intelligence James] Clapper and the old administration may want this to be closed, but it’s far from closed,” says Representative Devin Nunes, chairman of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI). “Now the truth will begin to come out. It’s just the beginning.”
The documents have been at the center of an intense, five-year political battle between Republicans on Capitol Hill and the Obama administration, and an equally pitched bureaucratic battle between the Central Intelligence Agency and ODNI on one side, and U.S. military intelligence agencies on the other. The Obama administration and the intelligence community leaders who have been loyal to the president argue that the document collection provided valuable intelligence in the days after the raid that killed Osama bin Laden, but that what remains is unimportant and, in any case, supports the Obama administration’s approach to al Qaeda and jihadist terror over the past eight years. Republicans and military intelligence officials have a different view: Used properly, the document collection can serve as an important tool in understanding al Qaeda and other Islamic radicals—their history, their ideology, their structure, their operations, and even, five years on, their plans—not only for U.S. intelligence officials, but for lawmakers, historians, and the American public.
Republicans on Capitol Hill have pushed to have the documents declassified and released as part of an effort to hold the Obama administration accountable for its relentless politicization of intelligence on al Qaeda and threats to the United States and its interests. Based on his conversations with analysts who have worked on the documents, Nunes believes that many of those not yet released will contradict Obama administration claims about al Qaeda, its relationships, and its operations.
In 2014, Nunes fought to include language in the Intelligence Authorization Act requiring the declassification and release of the bin Laden documents. The law mandated the release of all documents in the collection that could be disclosed without hurting U.S. national security. The intelligence community was required to specify any documents deemed too sensitive to release publicly and offer an explanation justifying that decision. Nunes says he has not yet received such an explanation for any of the tens of thousands of documents withheld from the public.
Why do the documents still matter? Over the course of eight years, President Obama and his advisers repeatedly downplayed the jihadist threat
So much for Obamas scanal free squaky clean presidency yeah sure woo hoo liberal fools tell me about it
It will reveal that obama supported and still supports the islamonazi troglodytes. The former presdient was and is still an enemy of America.
With the blessing of GOD almighty, the national suicide initiated by the left has been thwarted.
It is more than obvious that the iron triangle; the activist groups, the leftist politicians and the leftist media, do not want America to be what America was founded to be.
told you all he is a muslin terrorist
When community organizing would not work to control and defeat al Qaeda, Obama was at a complete loss. So, he fell back on the main tactic every liberal has to resort to when they fail; lying.
Many could tell the difference between having al Qaeda “on the run” and a vastly expanding network of terror attacks, but simply calling night day seemed to work among liberal lemmings. So, he lied and fumbled, cozying up with the Iranians (known world wide for their honesty).
Now all this is dumped in the lap of Trump, along with domestic and economic messes.
And this IDIOT has the nerve and gall to criticize Trump and offer advice.
We haven’t heard the last of the failure, he thinks he can stir the fire of outrage for a President that may actually keep campaign promises.
I believe DT will keep working hard and not apologize for doing exactly what he said he would do. It is what Governor Walker did, and the liberal dems still have their panties in a wad.
An open letter from the admin should read, Protesting is allowed, rioting will get you a term in jail no bail. Pick up after yourselves ya slobs.