Bravo, President Trump. And bravo to his core national security team of Vice President Pence, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, Secretary of Defense Mark T. Esper, national security adviser Robert C. O’Brien and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Mark Milley.
And shame on every member of Congress and talking head who could not bring themselves to call Iranian Maj. Gen. Qasem Soleimani what he was: a ruthless killer, a terrorist, a murderer of Americans and Bashar al-Assad’s right arm in the genocide of thousands of innocents in Syria. Gone is the mastermind of countless terrorist acts by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps’ elite Quds Force for the past four decades.
Soleimani was the right arm of an evil theocrat and the sword of a despotic, rogue regime that had murdered hundreds of its own citizens in the final weeks of 2019 and ordered its proxies to mow down hundreds of Iraqis in the weeks before the strike that ended Soleimani’s run. Soleimani was behind the death of an American working as a contractor in Iraq late last month. The leader of the Shia militia responsible for the attack on the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad was personally close to and operated alongside Soleimani, and was operating under his direction to step up attacks on Americans. It is inconceivable that the assault on our embassy occurred without Soleimani’s blessing. Then Trump acted.
Trump’s red line isn’t written in invisible ink the way President Barack Obama’s in Syria proved to be. Trump and his team do not believe in appeasement as did Team Obama; they believe in peace through strength, and the message delivered on a road near the Baghdad airport has been received in Tehran.
When Iran launched its missiles Tuesday, United States was prepared to launch a massive retaliation at Iran had another American been killed or wounded. The New York Times reports that the national security team had advance warning of Iran’s plans, which meant our troops and contractors were moved to highly secure, protected places. No one was wounded. No one was killed.
It seems likely to me that there are those within the Iranian government who might have assisted our intelligence agencies in making sure the wrath of the United States did not fall on Iran’s infrastructure and its many military targets. They might have believed that Trump was prepared to “move up the ladder of escalation,” as former senator James M. Talent (R-Mo.) put it, if more Americans had been killed or wounded. “They had immunity in the past when they attacked through proxies,” Talent said. “That is gone now. ”
Former military officials, including Adm. James Stavridis and Lt. Gen. David Deptula, praised the way the episode concluded. “The outcome probably could not have been much better,” Deptula said. The threat of massive retaliation by Trump doubtless played a role: A regime that reportedly had to murder a thousand or more of its own citizens in the past two months knew it could not have survived such a counterstrike. So, the mullahs backed down.
The attack on Soleimani is a reminder that we are at a crossroads on our conduct of foreign policy. Americans face a choice between the hardheaded line of Trump and the appeasement caucus of the Democratic Party that left Iran’s missile program completely unrestrained by the 2015 nuclear agreement (now abrogated by Trump) and forked $1.7 billion in cash to Iran that did, as Trump charged Wednesday, pay for the missiles that hit Iraqi bases hosting U.S. troops Tuesday. Such are the wages of appeasement.
Democrats either don’t know or don’t care what success looks like. Trump made Iran look weak and frightened. He killed dozens of terrorist agents, including the world’s more renown terrorist. Iran threatened to retaliate and Trump warned them what would happen if they did. In the end, they popped off a few of their faulty missiles, lied to their own people and begged Trump not to hit them back.
Notice you don’t see the Iranian navy out challenging US warships anymore. Don’t be surprised if you don’t see them again anytime soon, either. Oh, Iran will try to attack, if they can be sure to be able to deny being involved. But, they make any attack at great, great risk and they know it.
And GUESS which side the Democrats are on?
Let me think…………………thinking………………thinking…………
Oh, I know…the enemy’s side.
@retire05: Yep. Every time.
Trump is channeling Reagan without the backstabbing CIA head as VP.
Starwars er Spaceforce, crippling sanctions, and a bit different take on a wall. Not interested in war but damn ready should someone pick a fight.
They didnt understand Reagan and even less Trump.
WAPO Curt Please I dont want them or NYT clicks not that you can read the lies without a subscription. At least give us a disclaimer before Read more.
The dove needs a escort these days with all the Islamic Vultures out there
Has the WaPo changed, or, did it simply allow Hugh Hewitt to pen an editorial?
Has the very long process of rehabilitation begun to take place there?
Or is the set of lawsuits by Covington HS students, led by Mr. Sandman scared them into this?
WaPo is one of their targets.
@kitt: The big difference between Presidents Trump and Reagan is that Trump won’t believe congress’s lies about immigration legislation.
@Petercat: He sees the track record of Congresses promises. Even when we had both houses, promises broken.