Overturning Roe v. Wade: Will Democrats Instigate Another George Floyd Summer?

Loading

By J. Robert Smith

If the U.S. Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade, desperate Democrats hope they’ve found their next George Floyd.
 
In 2020, a presidential election year, Floyd’s death while in the hands of Minneapolis police “sparked” protests (AKA bloody riots) in Democrat-run cities across the country.  Democrats may angle for something similar should Justice Alito’s draft majority opinion overturning Roe v. Wade be issued.
 
Leaking Alito’s draft upending Roe v. Wade was suggested as a rogue left-wing law clerk’s attempt to scuttle the opinion’s issuance.  Don’t buy it.  The leak was orchestrated to impact the 2022 midterm elections.  At the very least, Democrats to fire up their feminist base.
 
Facing disaster in the midterms, Democrats aim to fall back on their 2020 playbook: manufacture fear and uncertainty.  Lie — and lie a lot — in that ending Roe v. Wade, they’ll claim, denies a woman her “sacred” constitutional right to kill the baby whom she acted to make.  And stoke unrest — belligerent protests and, perhaps, havoc — hoping voters will cast ballots for Democrats to sue for peace.  Security fencing has already gone up around the Supreme Court.  Protests materialized there instantly.
 
Remember when Senate majority leader Chuck Schumer made this threat about abortion cases coming before SCOTUS?

I want to tell you, Gorsuch. I want to tell you, Kavanaugh. You have released the whirlwind and you will pay the price! You won’t know what hit you if you go forward with these awful decisions.

On Tuesday, Schumer’s remarks made it clear that Democrats intend to turn Court decision ending Roe against Republicans.  Schumer branded the Court’s conservatives as “extremists” and “far right.”  From Fox News, May 3:

Make no mistake, the blame for this decision falls squarely on Republican senators and the Senate Republicans as a whole, who spent years pushing extremist judges, spent years confirming three far right justices to the Supreme Court, but who claimed somehow this day would never come[.] … But this day has come and we will fight it all the way.

Democrats won’t just make life hell for the justices who strike down Roe and for Republicans.  They’ll make hell for the rest of America to demonstrate that opposing “progressive” aims comes with heavy costs.  Civil unrest related to Roe v. Wade might broaden out.  We may see mobs materialize to oppose a range of conservative positions (guns, climate, school sex indoctrination) and notable persons (Trump and DeSantis).
 
Alito’s opinion, if issued, won’t end ghoulish abortion on demand in America.  It’ll simply devolve the issue to the states.  As was the case pre–Roe v. Wade, states will craft their own laws on abortion.  Federalism at work translates to state-based abortion laws that may impose prohibitions or restrictions or permit unfettered abortion.  But facts don’t matter to Democrats, who’ve turned against our founding, becoming, to varying degrees, Leninists. 
 
What matters to them is the narrative, which is tailored to shape perceptions and outcomes.  What Democrats want is abortion on demand — and the power to brook no opposition.  Government is to facilitate — indeed, subsidize — that “right.”  Government should compel religious-affiliated health care institutions and insurers to provide abortion procedures and coverage.  Opposition to supporting and participating in abortions is to cease; abortion takes precedence over constitutionally safeguarded acts of conscience.  The Little Sisters of the Poor will be rudely shoved aside, along with their constitutional guarantees.
 
Isn’t that where Democrats are going, abridging Americans’ constitutional rights to favor their ideology and agenda?  Their unremitting attacks on our founding (1619 Project); our history (racist); our institutions (racist); and, finally, the Constitution (the construct of a privileged white patriarchy) occur because all are considered roadblocks to “resetting” America.  The nation must eventually acquiesce to a globalist cabal’s schemes.
 
First, constitutional guarantees, checks and balances, and federalism must be bulldozed.  Absolute consolidation of power in Washington is a requisite step.  As the Democrats’ agenda from January 2021 forward amply demonstrates, their aim is the unrestricted imposition of a leftist (unfree) worldview on Americans.  You will submit or be canceled.
 
To that end, perhaps Homeland Security’s new, creepy “Disinformation Governance Board” will brand arguments for life and against abortion as disinformation worthy of censorship?  After all, killing a baby in the womb is an unalienable right.  Democrat-aligned social media will be in the vanguard.  Pro-life expressions are to be restricted to places of worship and homes.  Public expression of pro-life support will meet with penalties.
 
Perhaps pro-life demonstrators will be tarred as insurrectionists, subject to arrest and incarceration?  Why wouldn’t Democrats finally act to brand speech advocating for life and peaceful assembly against abortion as “threats to democracy”?
 
Nowadays, does any of that seem far-fetched?  What would odd Nina Jankowicz say in an unguarded moment?
 
The George Floyd riots in the summer of 2020 were orgies of destruction, looting, and bloodshed.  The cost in property destruction was upwards of $2 billion.  The costs were the worst in U.S. history.  Thirty-five people were killed.
 
[the_ad id=”157875″]
 
Corporate media, always eager to shill for Democrats and the left, spun the riots and bloodshed as “mostly peaceful protests.”  Many of the riots — if not all of them — were stoked by BLM and Antifa.  Democrat mayors and city councils stood down police as mayhem and terror ruled the streets.
 
The riots served a critical purpose for Democrats, 2020 being an election year.  Donald Trump had to be defeated.  Trump was the problem.  Doddering Joe Biden was the solution.  The riots, along with the COVID pandemic scare and related draconian shutdowns, were means of injecting voters with fear and anxiety.
 
Authoritarians to totalitarians — and Democrats are somewhere on that spectrum — see fear, disruption, and conflict as tools in their quest for power.
 
Bad news for Democrats is unrelenting.  There’s literally no major issue where Biden and Democrats enjoy the confidence of an American majority.  Newt Gingrich believes that Democrats could lose up to 70 U.S. House seats.  Four or five Senate seats could swing the GOP’s way.
 
If Democrats lose Congress, their only alternative is to push the White House to govern aggressively by executive order, meaning fiat.  Constitutional limitations be damned.  The U.S.-Mexican border is a clear example of the Biden administration governing against laws as it wishes.

Read more
 

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
81 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

It is a losing proposition. Those behind the floyd uprisings will avoid the negative backlash in the midterm election summer.

Nothing was accomplished that summer other than death and destruction. The Marxist democrat left can accomplish that without employing the likes of antifa and blm

The Left is violent, and insurrectionist.

The Right is not.

The trial balloon of abortion rights outrage was a bust.
Only 200 to 300 people even showed up at the Court.
And they were young, out-of-work white children of privilege.
Then came the primaries.
No bump in dem voters.
All Trump’s candidates won.
So, look for the puppet master behind joe to find another subject to light up to outrage levels.

I’ve already heard new covid lockdowns are being threatened.
I’ve already heard free speech will be policed by joe’s people.
Teacher’s sex lives and crt are being taught in schools.
Trannies are competing with (and beating real women) in school sports.
There are attempts at saying our food supply is under attack via fires at fertilizer plants, railway cutbacks, processing plants.
What will work? Apparently none of it.

It’s pretty funny to hear that Young Turk Ana Kasparian woman screeching about Democrats, saying the exact same thing conservatives say about RINOs. She’s finally figured out a Uni-party runs America.

Every argument I’ve seen decrying the SCOTUS decision is completely irrelevant to the reason Roe v Wade is unconstitutional. It would have been so great if RBG was still on the court to vote with the majority.

Last edited 1 year ago by Meremortal

I herd that this morning on warroom. The Marxist democrat left has more than an uphill battle for the November midterms. The economy is the front and center issue for the midterms. We will be deep into a recession with the biden regime floundering with no economic plan to correct the economy.

One of two things will most likely happen, many democrats will stay home because they sense their vote to be
meaningless or they may vote MAGA Republican.

Either way, it will be a bloodbath for democrats

Matt DePerno, right-wing moron, claims abortion is NEVER medically necessary to protect the life of a woman.

Abortion Can Be Medically Necessary. So says The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, who know more than Matt DePerno, a republican candidate for the office of Attorney General of Michigan.

Another source: Fact Check-Termination of pregnancy can be necessary to save a woman’s life, experts say

Last edited 1 year ago by Greg

The whole house of cards comes down for idiot Democrats if they don’t harp on the outliers.

Overturning Roe is good law. Congress can then make a permanent law.

Just shut up. You don’t even understand what you are talking about…unless you’re actually trying to start a real insurrection?

comment image
Whoopi Goldberg on Who Makes a Decision to Have an Abortion: “My Doctor, Myself and My Child!” (VIDEO)
Interesting that she is able
to consult with the child about it being aborted. Must be a left over trauma from having done that ghost movie.

Now, how is she able to get a picture of herself to her unborn child? Answer that and I could believe a fetus demanding to be aborted.

This is the Marxist democrat left doing what it does best. Cheerleaders like greg think this is just fine

DePerno is a moron. Women will die unnecessarily if this lying, Trump-endorsed jackass is elected. That’s what ENDORSED BY DONALD TRUMP means, in the case to this effin’ idiot.

If you had a life-threatening condition, would you go to a doctor for help, or consult some crackpot tax lawyer?

Last edited 1 year ago by Greg

Roe was a badly ruled case. Even RBG said that. Overturning Roe V Wade would allow a new Federal Law to actually be passed, and states to keep doing what they are doing.

This is all for theater. The average Leftist is uninformed and primed to go monkeyshit whenever the media tells them to.

No one is talking about Perno. Only you. This your new paid talking point?

DePerno is an example of the devil behind the details. His opponent, the current Michigan Attorney General, has two living sons ONLY because one of the triplets she was carrying was surgically aborted. Without that procedure, ALL THREE would have died.

It’s ALL about individual cases, and dangerous stupidity going unchallenged.

“This law is dangerous. This law effectively strips women of their dignity and bodily autonomy, and in some cases, of their lives. I will not enforce it, and neither will I defend it. I will take no part of driving women back into the dark ages and the back alleys,” Nessel said.

“I will not utilize the resources of my department to endanger the lives of million of women in my state. I will not defend (the state law) unless or until ordered to by a court.”

Last edited 1 year ago by Greg

What is wrong with joe bidens economy?

What is wrong with joe bidens economy?

Idiot Biden is running (ruining?) it.

It isn’t Joe Biden’s economy. It’s the economy that Joe Biden has to deal with. We’re probably heading into another global recession. Putin and the effects of COVID are the main reasons.

Nationally, we can either raise interest rates—which should have been done several years ago—or watch the dollar become worthless, so there’s really no choice there.

Last edited 1 year ago by Greg

Wrong, completely wrong

It is entirely bidens economy

Last edited 1 year ago by TrumpWon

Reality doesn’t whether you deny it or not.

23% are the stupid, propaganda-addled morons that actually voted for this idiot.

Remember when Carter’s and Clinton’s Community Reinvestment Act-induced massive recession hit at the end of Bush’s term? That was BUSH’S economy; it cost McCain the election. Remember when China sent us COVID and the “experts” recommended Trump shut down the economy? That was TRUMP’S economy.

They were the guys in charge; it’s THEIR responsibility, whether they caused it or not. The ignorant public assigns the blame to the person in charge.

So, there’s that, and you yourself have done it as well. BUT, in addition to that, idiot Biden has taken control of the economy and reversed every Trump policy he could get his hands on. Disaster, as predicted, as WARNED, has ensued. Idiot Biden caused it and he seemingly did it on purpose.

If you don’t like it… TOUGH SHIT. That’s how it is.

It’s Biden’s economy. The buck stops with him, remember?

Shut your dumb f*cking mouth and go do something useful. What a locust you are.

I guess none of you want to talk about what a moron Matt DePerno is.

Oh tell us all about him.

In fact, TRUMP’S cognitive functions have been so diminished by COVID that he believes Attack of the Killer Tomatoes was a documentary film.

Last edited 1 year ago by Greg

Silly.

Biden has dementia and can’t function. To have such a demented fool with the keys to our nuclear weapons is truly reprehensible.

Tell it to Vladimir Putin.

In fact, TRUMP’S cognitive functions have been so diminished by COVID that he believes Attack of the Killer Tomatoes was a documentary film.

Provide ONE example of Trump showing any cognitive decline whatsoever. You won’t. You can’t. Hell, idiot Biden is so diminished, he thinks he is President.

That’s because violence and intimidation is their game.

I guess none of you want to talk about what a moron Matt DePerno is.

I guess not, peckerhead.

It isn’t Joe Biden’s economy. It’s the economy that Joe Biden has to deal with.

It is an economy that was energy independent, growing, healthy, low-inflationary that the idiot Biden intentionally destroyed every aspect of. It IS idiot Biden’s economy.

There are many living triplets, “this law” it isnt a law it is a decision does nothing except kick the issue back to the States. This gruesome and murderous proceedure feeds an illegal market for aborted children or their parts. I guess it was illegal to expose that cause when it was, the guy that did went to jail not the perps. The prosecutor? None other than our childless VP. Cameltoe colluded with panned parenthood https://www.foxnews.com/politics/kamala-harris-colluded-abortion-providers

There are many living triplets

True. But Dana Nessel would have lost three children, if one fetus had not been aborted. That’s what would have come of DePerno’s no exceptions position.

The decision should always be between a woman and her doctor.

Last edited 1 year ago by Greg

I certainly agree if the mothers life is in danger, but I would get a second opinion maybe a third. Once this decision is released, Wisconsins only provision is just that. But it wont be done in some filthy poorly inspected clinic that has no admission rights.

What about the other 63,000,000 abortions?

Gee, Greggie… you sound somewhat frantic. And pathetic.

Rick Scott’s Proposal—aka, The Same Old Bullshit.

Hey, we can cut taxes even more! And cut funding to IRS enforcement!

Socialism is un-American and always leads to poverty and oppression. We will stop it. We will shrink the federal government, reduce the government work force by 25% in 5 years, sell government buildings and assets, and get rid of the old, slow, closed, top-down, government-run everything system we have today. 

Alternatively, we could vote you idiots out of office, realizing that you simply want to decentralize everything so local locusts funded by special interests could flood into the vacuum and set up their own little authoritarian feudal kingdoms.

Last edited 1 year ago by Greg

Does joe have a plan?

Do the democrats have a plan?

Do the democrats have a plan?

Destroy everything, replace it with good, old socialism.

Dems have the House, the Senate (sort of), and occupy the WH.

Going to “vote out” more? Are you admitting you want a marxist one-party police state with no discussion, no dissention, and no opposition?

You do.

Our government is always our enemy, in the best of times. Now, it’s a totalitarian force that needs to be opposed and dismantle, as we restore Constitutional Rule.

Pushing the Democrats into a corner will yield more lies and violence; it’s all they have left. Now they’ve openly exposed the Justices themselves to violent intimidation. What they can’t control, they will destroy.

The word of God makes the Devil scream, and it’s a beautiful sound. Ana Kasparian I’m looking at you, heheheheh…

Abortion is nothing more than the Golden Calf for the religion of the left. Dead babies? Meh!!!

Of course, those hypocrites like Comrade Greggie will claim it is because they are so worried about women’s “rights.” Comrade Greggie is worried that the reversal of Roe “strips women of their dignity and bodily autonomy, and in some cases, of their lives.”

Shall we count the number of times that Comrade Greggie has complained about how the hard fought for Title IX has been ignored allowing biological men to participate in women’s sports? Or how girls have been exposed to the ignorant left who thinks it is OK for a man to use the women’s rest rooms as long as he claims he felt like a woman that day? Their lives? Remind me again of the many times Comrade Greggie has shown sympathy for the family of Karnamaya Mongar, or any of the other women who have lost their lives due to abortion. I guess calling women “birthing persons” is rational to Comrade Greggie and not what most women consider an insult.

When the Roe announcement came out, within a half hour there was a crowd of infanticide supporters protesting at the USSC. Odd how those in the crowd seem to be either very unattractive women or gay men.

Of course, it also seems to be OK with Comrade Greggie, who refuses to answer my question about what his favorite method of abortion is, that USSC Justices are now being threatened by more than just Chuck (The Schmuck) Schumer. And can someone please get Elizabeth Warren to the ER and have a psychiatrist talk to her?

Bottom line; Comrade Greggie, and his fellow Democrat Marxists, do not want this issue to go before the voter because he, and they, know it will fail. Most Americans do NOT agree with second/third trimester abortions and that is what the Golden Calf demands.

The Democrats want to keep blacks enslaved and since that can’t be done, they convince blacks to kill their own prodigy. If the Democrats are so certain that abortion is readily accepted by most Americans, let them show videos of abortions to every high school freshman, instead of the “Drag Queen Hour” they promote.

But Gregs GF has put her hoof down!
comment image

05/07/22 – Jewish communities react to the possible overturning of Roe v. Wade, which could violate their First Amendment rights

  • The Jewish faith allows abortion and even requires it if the health of the mother is at risk. 
  • Jewish organizations say restricting abortion access would violate their religious freedoms.

As the country responds to a leaked Supreme Court opinion that indicated the sitting justices are prepared to overturn Roe v. Wade, Jewish organizations say a possible ban on abortion would violate their First Amendment rights.

 

“I think for too long, we’ve allowed a small group of loud voices from the religious right to dictate the narrative in this country about faith and abortion, but it is simply not true. People of faith support abortion access and people of faith support compassionate healthcare laws,” Sheila Katz, the CEO of the National Council of Jewish Women, told Insider. “And in this case, it would be a violation of our religious freedom to not have access to abortion.”

On May 2, Politico published a leaked opinion written by Justice Alito indicating the Supreme Court may be prepared to overturn the federal right to an abortion without undue government interference established by Roe v. Wade in 1973.

If the justices ultimately overturn Roe, at least 12 states will immediately impose near-total bans on abortion.

Supporters say an abortion ban would protect unborn children, a belief largely shaped by Christian religious views which claim life begins at conception. For Jews and others who don’t share the religious view that life begins at conception, a total abortion ban may not only prevent access to necessary medical care but also violates religious freedoms guaranteed by the First Amendment to practice one’s faith without government intervention.

“We are proud that Jewish tradition regards abortion as essential health care, not only permitting the termination of pregnancy, but even requiring it when the life of the pregnant person is in danger,” Rabbi Hera Person said in a statement following the Supreme Court leak. “Restricting access to reproductive health care impedes the freedom of religion granted by the First Amendment, including a Jewish person’s ability to make decisions in accordance with their religious beliefs.”

Katz added that Jews “feel really strongly about reproductive freedoms.” To them, abortion falls at the cross-section of economic justice, racial justice, healthcare access, and religious freedom, she said.

“So in the Jewish community, all of those issue areas are deeply Jewish for many different reasons, but the notion that the Supreme Court might dictate when life begins according to only one religious tradition is deeply problematic and concerning to us,” Katz told Insider, adding that she was “devastated, outraged, and sad” about the possible overturning of Roe.

83% of Jewish people believe abortion should be legal in most or all cases, according to a study by the Pew Research Center, compared to 61% of the total US population. A full 70% of Americans surveyed by Pew Research do not support the overturning of Roe v. Wade. 

While the Court emphasized that the leak does not represent the final decision in the case, Katz said the NCJW is “exploring every possibility of what it looks like for us to fight back against” the leaked opinion on the grounds of religious freedom. 

“We’ve known that this is a real possibility that Roe v. Wade is getting overturned, but seeing it in writing made it all the more real. And for us, for the National Council of Jewish Women, just one person being forced to be pregnant is one person too many,” Katz told Insider.

“Our moral values compel us to ensure that people aren’t forced to be pregnant or forced to give birth.”

Expect a law suit based on the infringement of the Jewish community’s guaranteed First Amendment rights in short order.

Murder isn’t a right.

05/10/22 – Texas Paul REACTS to GOP Criminalizing Contraception Next

“They’re forcing a theocracy on our country.”

Last edited 1 year ago by Greg

Opposing murder is not a religion. For the left, fear mongering and worshiping murder apparently is.

The claim of “murder” is based on a FUNDAMENTALIST pronouncement of when personhood begins. Murder is the intentional killing of an existing person.

Opposing murder is not a religion. 

So tell us, you racist Nazi turd, when does “personhood” begin?

So tell us, you racist Nazi turd, when does “personhood” begin?

It begins, coincidentally, at the moment of convenience, usually just AFTER the murder.

For many Jewish believers, personhood begins at birth. For many Christians, it begins when the first breath is drawn. For others, it begins at the point of “quickening”. For myself, it begins when consciousness might be present.

To think a person exists at the point of conception not a widely held view. There’s really no logical argument supporting the idea that a zygote is “a person”.

To mandate that pregnancy continue when a woman’s life or health is endangered by it is contrary to the Jewish religious principle that protecting the woman’s life is required. Fundamentalists are infringing upon a Jewish woman’s First Amendment rights by legally mandating that a dangerous pregnancy continue. They’re interfering with the religious duty of her conscientious Jewish doctor. One could argue that doing so is murder, since someone who is unarguably a person could die as a result.

At what point did you become hateful and rude?

Last edited 1 year ago by Greg

I’m not Jewish and I don’t agree with them. And your “many” Christians comment; what percentage constitutes “many?”

And now you want to spew that tired, old rhetoric about “a woman’s life or health” when the science has left you in the rear view mirror long ago. Why is a woman not responsible for what she has created when you want to neuter men who refuse to support that progeny?

At what point did you become hateful and rude?

When you became a sick, evil Nazi who supports those who would kill the Jews you gleefully reference if given a chance. Or do you really think because those Azov Nazis are good Nazis because they are in the Ukraine? You are nothing more than a one person death squad.

I’ve told you for years; you’re a coward and disgrace to the human race. And an idiot. Hell, you refuse to answer questions posed to you so you actually have no reason to be here as you can’t even participate in useful dialog. All you know how to do is post whatever your handlers tell you to post.

If you don’t like being called what you are, a turd, then leave this forum. I promise you, you won’t be missed.

Your rude, trollish behavior has driven off nearly everyone but hard-core Trump cultists already. Who will you have to argue with when there’s no one left but yourself?

You’re still here, Comrade Whacks His Chicken.

Break my heart. Leave this forum. Think how miserable I’ll be when you’re not here for me to argue with. And you will have much more time to whack your chicken.

You haven’t actually argued a point for years. You state your positions, and then throw manure at anyone who points out what little sense they actually make.

Of course you’re not Jewish. If you were, you would understand that the First Amendment is there to protect everyone’s religious freedom—not only that of right-wing Bible thumpers who imagine Jesus supported open carry, bigotry, lying politicians, and greed.

Last edited 1 year ago by Greg

You haven’t actually argued a point for years. You state your positions, and then throw manure at anyone who points out what little sense they actually make.

You clearly were looking in the mirror when you wrote that. Basically, you do nothing but make some commentary that you can’t back up and when questioned on it, you run like a scared rabbit to another thread to wash, rinse, repeat. Or if you do give an answer, it is such a hot mess of psycho babble bullshit it is incomprehensible.

Now you give the Jewish credit for being the only ones who can understand the First Amendment when, if given the opportunity, you would slaughter them as did your Nazi idols.

Christ did support open carry. Otherwise, Peter would not have carried a sword, atheist idiot. Once again, you show what a fool you are.

Greg’s entire position is based on the left’s belief that life doesn’t begin until they say it does, and that moment is based on their own convenience.

Here it is again the Trump line there are those that follow him like some odd cult but they are really not the majority that voted for him. Perhaps someday the Democrats will figure out why they have to resort to treason to install criminals into political positions.

comment image

Last edited 1 year ago by kitt

At what point did you become hateful and rude?

Probably around the time you started supporting delivering babies so you could kill them.

The claim of “murder” is based on a FUNDAMENTALIST pronouncement of when personhood begins. Murder is the intentional killing of an existing person.

It’s based on snuffing out a human life. The left has no regard for human life, they just care about their own.

05/10/22 – Texas Paul// REACTS to GOP Criminalizing Contraception Next â€“

Who the hell is “Texas Paul?” Never heard of him. Certainly no one with any clout in the State of Texas. And congratulations, Comrade Goose Stepper, for linking to one of the most racist screeds I have ever has the absolute stomach churning displeasure of listening to.

But no surprise that you, who support the Ukranian Nazis, would support a racist.

Curt, please, remove this racist video. It is one of the most disgusting pieces of crap Comrade Nazi Goose Stepper has ever posted.

Why don’t you EXPLAIN how what Texas Paul says is “racist”? Given that it isn’t, I don’t believe you can.

Curt, please, remove this racist video. 

I just watched the boobtube video of the fat lazy bastid that cant paint the trim on his crumbling domicile. He has a demonic blood lust for murdering the unborn and allowing 16 year old daughters to whore around. He really is just an anti christian nobody, he should look up the definition of big words like theocracy before he uses them in a mindless rant.
No vacations, he needs to spend a few bucks on a gallon of paint and get off his fat ass and use his hands for something besides forking food into his bigoted face.

Last edited 1 year ago by kitt

Yeah, there’s an explanation of Paul’s “racism”.

You didnt ask me for any explanation, Pauls just one of those that keep women chasing their own tails keeping the womens movement circling human sacrifice. A useless old fart not unlike yourself.

Haha. This idiot “texas paul” is the usual “blame Trump/Republicans of doing what the Left/Democrats just did on tape” kind of simp weakling that has no power and no influence.

And yes, he is RACIST. Racism is denigrating a group of people based on their race, and strangely enough, idiots like this who are white attack white people for being white…and not supporting a Democrat Agenda that decidedly uses black Americans to pick votes now instead of cotton.

You can even HEAR “texas paul” using the N-word when he speaks.

What a pathetic joke.

Last edited 1 year ago by Nathan Blue

A pathetic joke?

Q: If there was legislation brought to you to ban contraception, would you sign it?

A: Gov. Tate tap-dances around the question, and then off the stage, waving his hat.

As Texas Paul points out, such legislation is already being discussed by “sorry sons-of-bitches republicans” in Idaho.

The Idaho Lt. Governor has called on the Governor to call a special session to remove exceptions for rape, incest, and saving the life of the mother from their trigger law banning all abortion in the state.

Maybe she ought to be removed from office. Who the f*ck does she think she is? Who the hell do any of these meddlesome a**holes think they are, to be imposing their will on AMERICAN citizens?

05/17/22 – GOP Senate candidate Blake Masters wants to allow states to ban contraception use

05/21/22 – Contraception ‘Should Not Be Legal,’ Says Trump-Backed Candidate Eubanks

It wasn’t until 1965 that the Supreme Court of the United States declared state laws prohibiting the use of contraceptives by married couples unconstitutional. Prior to that decision, 26 states also had laws forbidding the use of contraceptives by unmarried women. If Roe v. Wade goes, Griswold v. Connecticut could go as well. Both were based on the same privacy considerations.

A some point, the “sorry sons-of-bitches” Paul speaks of are going to get violent and richly deserved push-back. It’s almost like they want to find the limit, so they can whine about the reaction. They’ll push a little too far, and their recent “culture war” efforts will get burned to the ground. If that happened, I wouldn’t shed a tear. These little authoritarian bastards are the threat, not a solution.

Last edited 1 year ago by Greg

GA-7 Candidate Y.G. Nyghtstrom Calls Out Democrats For Attacking The Life Of Babies

Last edited 1 year ago by TrumpWon

Doesn’t look like you can find anyone that supports your imaginary “ban on contraception” which means you are lying.

05/24/22 – Contraception ‘Should Not Be Legal,’ Says Trump-Backed Candidate Eubanks

Jacky Eubanks, a Trump-endorsed candidate for Michigan’s legislature, said she would vote to make contraception illegal.

Concerns have mounted about the future of reproductive rights across the United States after a leaked Supreme Court majority opinion showed the court appeared poised to overturn Roe v. Wade, the decision that guarantees abortion rights.

Many Republican-led states would quickly ban the practice, and some reproductive rights advocates have warned that even more restrictive laws could be implemented.

Eubanks, who is running for Michigan’s 63rd House district, backed a ban on contraception during an interview with right-wing news outlet Church Militant.

In the interview, host Michael Voris pressed her on whether she would vote to make contraception illegal in Michigan. She argued that several issues—including a declining population and a lack of enough people to take care of society’s population—would be avoided if birth control were illegal.

“All of this could be avoided if we were actually a truly pro-life nation, which means conceiving a child is a beautiful and sacred thing. And that is why sex ought to be between one man and one woman in the confines of marriage, and open to life,” she said.

She continued that if a vote on birth control were to be brought up in the state House, she “would have to side with it should not be legal.”

Eubanks continued to blast contraception as leading people to believe in “the false sense of security that they can have consequence-free sex.” She said a ban on contraception would also convince people to wait until marriage to have sexual relations.

During the 26-minute interview, Eubanks also called for a return to “God’s moral order.”

“You cannot have a successful society outside of the Christian moral order,” she said. “And things like abortion and things like gay marriage are outside of the Christian moral order, and they lead to chaos and destruction and a culture of death.”

Eubanks has been endorsed by former President Donald Trump, who praised her for going “door-to-door in Macomb County and Detroit asking voters if they really voted” to prove his claims he only lost the 2020 presidential election due to widespread voter fraud—a claim which has not been backed up by substantial evidence.

“Jacky Eubanks has been out there, working hard, on her own. I wholeheartedly Endorse Jacky Eubanks for Michigan State Representative. She is an America First Patriot, and I have no doubt that she will have a great future in the Republican Party!” his endorsement reads.

________________________________

Doesn’t look like you can find anyone that supports your imaginary “ban on contraception” which means you are lying.

Last edited 1 year ago by Greg

I see no quotes of hers stating she opposed contraception or would ban it. I see inferences to what she MIGHT do and MIGHT think. If you will forgive me, given you and the left’s long history of outright lying about matters, I would await a direct quote of hers saying she opposes and will ban contraception before I take a position on it.