If there weren’t any guns, how could it have been an “armed insurrection”????

Loading

 

FBI Counterterrorism Official: No Firearms Recovered During Jan. 6 Capitol Breach

 

An FBI official on Wednesday testified at a Senate hearing that she has no knowledge of any guns being recovered from suspects who were arrested during the Jan. 6 Capitol breach.

When asked by Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) about whether firearms were recovered or if any suspect was charged with firearms offenses, FBI counterterrorism official Jill Sanborn responded: “To my knowledge, none.”

But in the hearing, Sanborn also said that before the Jan. 6 incident, “We knew they would be armed, we had intelligence that they would be coming to DC, but we did not have intelligence that they would be breaching the Capitol.”

“I believe that the only shots that were fired were the ones that resulted in the death of the lady,” Sanborn also testified, referring to the officer-involved shooting of Ashli Babbit.

Johnson previously told news outlets that the term “armed insurrection” used by some Democratic officials, including House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), and mainstream news outlets is incorrect as no guns were recovered.

More at the Epoch Times

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
3 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Oh, but by “armed insurrection”, they meant the stuff they picked up at the Capital. Great plan, huh? Forage for weapons to take and hold the Capital against armed police. Well, Democrats are stupid enough to believe that shit.

The very same way the murder of a Don man 9 months ago in Portland was, “a peaceful protest”!

For 70 years liberals have done one thing very well. * LIE *

It was a “reichstag fire”.

Now with HR1 passing, that’s it. Nail in the coffin.

Civil War or subjugation is the only option.