Guns Aren’t Radically Deadlier Than They Were 50 Years Ago, But Our Sick Culture

Loading

by ELLE REYNOLDS

After another school shooting — this one at Robb Elementary School in Uvalde, Texas, leaving at least 21 victims dead — politicians like President Joe Biden are already capitalizing on the tragedy to push their anti-gun agenda. They’ll tell you that the vague category of “assault weapons” has no place in American citizens’ hands, or seize the moment to vilify “the semiautomatic weapons that terrorize us” (as a New York Times essay put it). But these firearms have been accessible for decades — far before school shootings were such an unfortunately common occurrence.
 
Various versions of the AR-15 are some of the popular firearms most relentlessly targeted by anti-gun lobbyists, with their semiautomatic capability (i.e., the ability to fire multiple rounds without manual reloading, while still requiring the pull of a trigger) blamed for the deadliness of many recent shootings. But Colt sold an AR-15 SP1 Sporter Rifle starting in 1964, 58 years ago.
 
As for semiautomatic handguns, one of the most iconic models dates back to 1911. (The Colt M1911 held fewer rounds than many of today’s handguns, but the 13-round Browning Hi-Power came on the market in 1935, and the 16-round Beretta Model 92 appeared in 1976.) The firearms that civilians have access to today are not significantly deadlier than the ones that were manufactured for civilian use over half a century ago. Furthermore, the number of Americans who possess a gun in their homes has overall been lower in the last 30 years than it was from the 1960s to the 1990s.
 
Yet we’ve seen a heartbreaking rise over the past several years in incidents where evil, disturbed cowards choose to target schools full of vulnerable children. Before Uvalde, there were Santa Fe High School and Marjorie Stoneman Douglas High School in 2018, Sandy Hook Elementary School in 2012, and Red Lake High School in 2005 — and those are just some of the names you probably already know.
 
Crimes committed by evil people are nothing new, of course, and schools in particular had experienced shootings and violence before these. In the 19th and 20th centuries, there were records of shooting deaths at schools caused by personal feuds, accidental shootings when guns were thought to be unloaded, arguments gone wrong, or disgruntled students or administrators seeking revenge on authorities.
 
But until the late 1980s, the concept of a mass shooter walking into a school and arbitrarily targeting people was incredibly rare, if not completely unheard of. In 1988, a 19-year-old shooter fatally shot two 8-year-olds and wounded nine other people at Oakland Elementary School in Greenwood, South Carolina. In the same year, a woman fired on an elementary school classroom in Illinois as part of a bizarre crime spree. In 1989, a gunman killed five children at Cleveland Elementary School in California. And in 1994, a 37-year-old walked into Wickliffe Middle School and killed custodian Peter Christopher.
 
[the_ad id=”157875″]
 
Other shootings were perpetrated by disgruntled or troubled students, including at Olean High School in New York in 1974; Atlantic Shores Christian School in Virginia in 1988; Lindhurst High School in California in 1992; Bethel Regional High School in Alaska, Heath High School in Kentucky, and Pearl High School in Mississippi in 1997; and Westside Middle School in Arkansas in 1998.
 
The infamous shooting at Columbine High School in Colorado in 1999 shocked the national conscience and launched the concept of school shootings further forward as a growing and tragic problem. Since Columbine, American families have faced unimaginable tragedies at Santa Fe High, Marjorie Stoneman Douglas High, Sandy Hook Elementary, Red Lake High, as well as Santana High School in California in 2001, Rocori High School in Minnesota in 2003, SuccessTech Academy in Ohio in 2007, Chardon High School in Ohio in 2012, Sparks Middle School in Nevada in 2013, Marysville Pilchuck High School in Washington in 2014, Townville Elementary School in South Carolina in 2016, Aztec High School in New Mexico in 2017, Marshall County High School in Kentucky in 2018, Saugus High School in California in 2019, Oxford High School in Michigan in 2021, and countless others.
 
So if the guns in Americans’ hands and homes haven’t radically changed in the last few years, what has? As The Federalist’s Mark Hemingway noted, we’ve seen “no big advances in firearm lethality compared to what citizens could own decades before we ever had regular mass shootings.”
 
While humanity has been fallen since Eden, the past 50 years have seen countless indicators of exponential cultural decline, not the least of which have been falling marriage rates and skyrocketing numbers of children who are denied the chance to live with both their mother and father. We’re also seeing a pandemic of mental illness, which the years of mental angst and isolation caused by Covid school closures will certainly only worsen.

Read more
 

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
5 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

We need to address the rot we’ve sown for our children to grow up in, and no amount of blaming firearms for our culture’s depravity is going to change that.

I don’t pretend to understand the mind of someone that would shoot a little child… or an innocent adult, for that matter. But I do see what I regard as some influences that might produce that mentality.

Rap music is one. Many of the “songs” don’t present the usual heartbreak, joyful experience, fun time or other common human experience that most music offers. What we hear, when we hear it, is a celebration and promotion of gang culture, having a firearm as a symbol of manhood and/or prestige, drugs, sex, defending turf, almost nothing but anti-social behavior.

Another is abortion. Abortion is not just an obscure and private medical procedure utilized in emergencies or extreme conditions; it, too, is a culture. Abortion is worshiped and celebrated and when an argument is made against it, the defense is that the convenience and culture of the “host” overrides the rights of the developing life. The fact that the embryo IS life is intuitive; that reality cannot be denied (well, not factually) but the only defense of the use of abortion to erase an error of judgement is with the deduction being that life, when it gets in the way, is expendable. Life that gets in the way of a good time, settling an emotional score or simply attracting attention can justifiably be snuffed out. Life is worthless.

The left’s destruction of civil discourse has led to the acceptance of the use of intimidation, threats or even violence to make a point or suppress another. The left has a problem generating support their ideology due to it not producing anything positive or useful. So, it is necessary for them to present the opposition as less than worthy life, dispensable, vile, racist, homophobic, an existential threat. During the Trump term, the only way sufficient hatred for him and his administration could be generated was to invent vile reasons to hate him, then promote those reasons endlessly. How much of a leap would it be to regard it a service to humanity to take any one of those impediments to the leftist progressive dream out? That was, after all, how the Holocaust was justified.

We also have the influence of COVID. Children were kept in isolation for an entire year. I don’t exactly fully understand it, but this has been considered a severe mental blow to children; but there was another element. With children video learning at home, we got a view of some of the curriculum. It turns out that in many cases, children were being taught that skin color was an indication of evil intent and actions. Now, if those teachings had been that which society has worked so hard to finally eliminate, this would be an onerous and disgusting lesson, but the tables had been turned. Children were being taught that WHITE skin color indicated a person that was intrinsically racist, oppressive, violent and hateful. It was historic and documented, they were told. We wouldn’t have even known of this without home schooling and the left as fought tooth and nail to defend it.

Taking all this into account, it is surprising these horrific crimes don’t happen more often, though in cities where Democrats control all the levers of power, it happens on a smaller scale every weekend, if not every day. But, not being as politically useful as the slaughter of innocent children, those deaths are mere blurbs in an overall news coverage, if covered at all.

Life has been rendered valueless. Loss of a parking space, being the butt of a joke, someone not realizing what “pronoun” one identifies as or lack of respect for the “right de jour” justifies murder today. I don’t know how that mentality can be changed or how long it would take to change it, but be better start working on it pretty soon. For sure, removing the REAL right of self defense from those left twisting in the wind by an impotent government is most certainly NOT the answer.

Removing GOD from everyday life has gone a long way in the cultural deterioration.

I agree with all of your points. This does not resolve itself by an act or acts of government. Government is the problem. Too many are conceptually dependent upon the government and less on themselves

Last edited 1 year ago by TrumpWon

Discounting the fact that we may have to answer for what we do here on earth in an afterlife definitely affects behavior.

Dont forget the fact that all those Hollywood Cleebeties who took part in that Demand a Plan and plead for us to push for more Gun Control laws have made movies where they used Guns

Twelve Questions to Consider Regarding Mass Shootings

To prevent more mass shootings, many demand more gun control laws. But do these laws prevent such massacres or address their root causes? Here are 12 questions to ponder.

First, why do almost all U.S. mass shootings occur in “gun-free zones”? Indeed, it’s hard to name any that have not. The 2015 Charleston mass-murderer apparently targeted a church instead of a school partly because the school had security – but South Carolina banned guns in church. Would any of us put a sign in our yard saying, “This is a gun-free home”?

Second, can an evil person using a gun to murder be stopped by anyone other than a good person using a gun? In the December, 2019 Texas church shooting, the murderer was prevented from murdering many times more than his two victims by a good parishioner with a gun who shot him in six seconds. Many other mass murders have been similarly stopped.

Third, with all the many thousands of city, county, state, and federal gun control laws we’ve had for many decades, how realistic is it that any new ones will make a difference? Very few guns used in crime are ever legally bought since, by definition, criminals don’t obey laws.

Fourth, for those who want to ban entire classes of guns, how well did America’s prohibition of alcohol from 1920 to 1933 prevent Americans from getting booze? Even with a constitutional amendment and an unprecedented national effort to completely ban the sale of this dangerous drug, “the noble crusade” was an abject failure that corrupted law enforcement on a massive scale. By far the biggest beneficiaries of prohibition were bootleggers made fabulously wealthy like Al Capone who said, “All I do is supply a demand.”

Fifth, how well has our war on drugs prevented people from getting them? This 52-year effort has spent a trillion-plus tax dollars stopping record amounts of drugs at the border and creating by far the world’s biggest prison population. Yet illegal drugs remain plentiful and widely used.

Sixth, how well have our immigration laws prevented illegal aliens from breaking into the country in recent decades? Despite presidents of both parties sending record numbers of guards to the border and deporting record numbers of illegal migrants, a 2018 Yale-MIT study showed we may have well over 20 million illegal aliens in this country.

Seventh, could the saturation press coverage prominently featuring the name and face of each mass-murderer actually encourage more such shootings? There is evidence that many mass-murderers seek such infamy. So, while reporting their crimes, why not deny these murderers the notoriety they crave and therefore reduce the temptation for other evil losers?

Eighth, can guns — or any inanimate object or substance — force anyone to use them sinfully? As the CATO Institute’s Robert Levy reported in 2011, each year the owners of 99.8 percent of American guns choose not to commit a crime with them. Indeed, do most drinkers drive drunk or commit other crimes under the influence? Since reckless driving kills about the same number of Americans each year as gunshot wounds, should we have more car control laws? Most all of us are fully equipped to be thieves, drug addicts, prostitutes, and murderers. But are we?

Ninth, how many mass-murderers have come from a two-parent family that regularly attended church or synagogue? Very few. Indeed, the data show children from single-parent homes are many times more likely to fall prey to the whole range of social pathologies. And how many folks who regularly went to Sunday School with you became violent criminals?

Tenth, is it really fair to blame mass shootings on mental illness? Does this not insult the vast majority of mentally ill folks who are never violent? So what leads a tiny minority to turn homicidal? Again, could it be the lack of a loving, two-parent, church-going home that proactively seeks prompt medical treatment for a troubled family member?

Eleventh, could it be that mass shootings are really symptomatic of deeper-rooted and far more socially cancerous spiritual, cultural, and family problems? In the 1950s, many high school students brought rifles to school for marksmanship classes – and without school shootings.

Twelfth, how effective is government at solving spiritual, cultural, and family problems? The state is quite good at building roads, bridges, schools, and warships, but what is its record at putting America’s broken Humpty Dumpty family and Judeo-Christian culture back together again? Perhaps the ultimate solution to mass shootings – and most of our problems – is for we Americans to dedicate ourselves to our own spiritual and family renewal since, as President Dwight Eisenhower understood, “Laws cannot change what is in people’s hearts and minds.”