Patrick Poole:
Fake statistics die as hard as fake news.
This is especially true when statistics are used to reinforce entrenched positions during highly charged political debates.
One particular false statistic — even under the most charitable reading of the data, it’s highly misleading — is trotted out after virtually every major terrorist attack in order to claim that Islamic terrorism is a big nothingburger.
I’ve had to deal with various incarnations of this here before:
FACT CHECK: Islamic Terrorists Have Killed More In Domestic Attacks Since 9/11 Than the 'Ri… https://t.co/I895dZkT3r #homelandsecurity
— PJ Media (@PJMedia_com) August 18, 2016
FACT CHECK: Jihadists Have Killed More In Domestic Attacks Since 9/11 Than the 'Right Wing' https://t.co/9VeuAfyuE6 pic.twitter.com/OlPvHEDf3I
— Patrick Poole (@pspoole) August 18, 2016
It goes something like this:
94% of all terror attacks are committed by non-Muslims
Another version:
Only 6% of terror attacks in the U.S. are by Muslims
And yet another (one that is flatly false, because the data cited is never broken out by sex or race) says:
94% of terror attacks are committed by white men
The data behind this statistic come from the FBI’s Terrorism 2002-2005 report. You can find it on the FBI’s website here.
First thing to consider when you see this statistic bandied about, realize the data is more than a decade old.
Including the data from 2006-present will give very different results (one that purveyors of these claims may not like), but since this is the data set they choose to use, I will use their preferred source.
Second, note that this statistic is counting “incidents.” The data ends up portrayed like this:
All Terrorists are Muslims…Except the 94% that Aren’thttp://t.co/PRwJ5YxJ0b pic.twitter.com/36PCmbMAQa
— The Muslim Times (@The_MuslimTimes) February 24, 2015
The problem with using this standard of measure is that it is basically useless. An ecoterrorist mailbox bomb that doesn’t injure or kill anyone is given the exact same weight as the Oklahoma City bombing or the 9/11 attacks. So how does measuring terrorism in this way tell you anything important?
this is for all the "progressive" Islamist apologist illiterate idiots that still can't read an FBI report to save their boring lives. pic.twitter.com/VjO1aYTZEB
— uberfeminist (@uberfeminist) December 10, 2016
wow yes Steven, I guess 9/11 *IS* kind of like an arson attack by 'Revenge of the Trees' https://t.co/OhYMxb43qB @StevenGraveline pic.twitter.com/TJSFH2Xele
— uberfeminist (@uberfeminist) December 6, 2016
Still, after the Charlie Hebdo attack in Paris in January 2015, Dean Obeidallah at The Daily Beast floated these numbers:
Liberals never seem to be willing to ask themselves why it is necessary to lie about their ideology to make it palatable.