Corsi Unleashed: Mueller and His Lawyers Are “Political Criminals” Who Used KGB Style Interrogation Tactics Against Me

Loading

Conservative journalist, Dr. Jerome Corsi was in plea negotiations with Robert Mueller after being questioned by the special counsel for over 40 hours about his ‘inside sources’ at WikiLeaks and alleged advance knowledge Julian Assange was going to release John Podesta’s emails.
Since Mueller cannot bring charges on the Russian collusion hoax, he has targeted Corsi for making a ‘false statement’ after putting the best-selling author through hell interrogations.

Dr. Corsi subsequently retained counsel and is preparing to sue the Justice Department and Special Counsel Robert Mueller for prosecutorial misconduct in his case.



“I have retained attorney Larry Klayman to assist David Gray in my defense. In a memo to my attorneys, I have instructed Klayman and Gray to file with Acting AG Whitaker a criminal complaint against Mueller’s Special Counsel and the DOJ for prosecutorial misconduct in my case,” Dr. Corsi said in a tweet Wednesday.

https://twitter.com/jerome_corsi/status/1067871073407049728

What is shocking to hear is the KGB style interrogation tactics the FBI and Mueller’s team used to get Corsi to “remember” a meeting with Russians in Italy that never even happened.

One America News reporter Jack Posobiec broke the story Wednesday.

POSOBIEC: FBI and Mueller team coerced 72-year-old Jerome Corsi to undergo regressive memory therapy techniques during interrogation to “remember” a meeting with Russians in Italy that Corsi was adamant never happened

Read more

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
104 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

@Richard Wheeler:

: If Flynn didn’t lie he shouldn’t have pled guilty. 

He was being bankrupted by his defense and Mueller was threatening his son. The FBI agents that interviewed him said he didn’t lie. So, was that fair treatment of a distinguished military man or not?

Not loving Farrakhan is not the same as denouncing him. Are you hedging? Will you not declare him despicable because of his numerous Democrat friends… like Obama?

@Redteam: None of that was the case. I simply waited to be drafted and fully expected to be, though the war and draft was winding down. It’s merely Rich trying to lash out at me for hounding him for not answering questions about his positions.

People like Rich have latched onto Spencer because he supports Trump, as if that is the same as Trump supporting him. Note, however, his flaccid “denunciation”, if you can even call it that, of Farrakhan, a RABID anti-Semite.

@another vet: I could very well have lied about my military service, like so many others have, but chose to be honest. While in hindsight I wish I HAD served, I am in no way ashamed I didn’t. As I said, that was just Rich trying to get at me. Yes, I started the “coward” thing because I find it gutless when someone poses questions all over the place but won’t answer them to defend their positions. Hopefully we’re past that.

@Deplorable Me:

As I said, that was just Rich trying to get at me.

Larry Weisenthal,who used to post here, didn’t serve either (unlike the other lefties here, he was pleasant to debate with because he wasn’t like mad Maxine like all the other lefties who post here). Unlike your situation, he was of draft age when the war and draft were ramping up not down and he was anti-war. RW never ONCE ridiculed him for it because he was a self identified liberal. He’s just trying to bully you.

How is it possible that any politically informed person can not know who Richard Spencer is?—or at least take the time to Google him and his hate filled organization? Do you Trumpists believe any more than what DT tells you?-SAD–I’ll take the free press over the crap he spins –every time
For the record last 10 midterm elections only twice have House losses been 41 0r more 1994 and 2010—8 times less– Clinton actually gained 5 in 98 and W gained 8 in O2. This was truly an anti–Trump vote

I’ll condemn Farrakhan in a heartbeat

AV I miss DR. Larry who lives not far from me –great spokesman for the left–don’t think he ever called me a coward as Deplorable admits Originally throwing at me.

@Richard Wheeler: Ok you couldnt find a thing you dont even name his “organization” your free press sure gives you all the info.
Spencer is a nobody never was never will be anybody except RWs boogeyman quick look under the bed, or is he the monster in your closet.

@kitt: Stop being a Trump lemming and open your eyes to what is going on politically across the spectrum—I really expected more from you. There is much to learn.—looking forward to Mueller’s report as is The Donald .I’m sure.

RT #49 Spencer advocates for ” a peaceful ethnic cleaning” of non whites from America. Now that may seem fairly reasonable to you and Kitt—but I doubt if guys like AV, Deplorable and Word buy in to that.

@Richard Wheeler: You have nothing no links no verification other than a lying progressive media that hires ex spooks that tried to turn this country into a banana republic.
What DT should do is have a little live fireside chat and read the declassifed documents that Mueller and the dems that have seen them fear.
Take your talking down to me and cram it…oooh “I expected more from you” what a pile of horse pucks.
Prosecutors are suppose to use evidence to prosecute a crime, not force confessions of a mistaken time line to be a lie. Not to write reports.
take time to read this stuff and the criminal stuff allowed by the previous admin

https://www.bloomberg.com/research/stocks/private/person.asp?personId=42230760&privcapId=30714157

https://anhamcorp.wordpress.com/tag/huda-farouki/

I. http://www.unitedagainstnucleariran.com/company/anham-fzco
Any wonder why they will not confirm DTs picks for certain positions, so many things to bury or shred, wipe like with a cloth.

@kitt: Lying progressive media vs Trump truths–give me a break Kitt—I truly hope you haven’t fallen that far.
Fireside chat–laughable–Trump has the empathy of a warthog. He’s lost the support of over 65% of women voters in this country—can he make it up with radical males like himself–not likely

@Richard Wheeler: Not even listening to Trump following JW and CSPAN hearings, DJT doent have anything but tweets. I also like Bonginos podcasts, Levins radio show, Conservative Review, the Federalist
What sources do you listen to?
Other than my grandsons shows I haven’t had the TV on, occasion when he is napping I will watch an old western.
I’ll repeat what your mom might have said, turn that thing off it will rot your brain.

@kitt: Bongino–3 time loser in Congressional runs-huge Trump supporter as is Levin who is a clone of his best bud Hannity–totally one sided commentary–crude.
For straight news I like Shep Smith who is fair and balanced and Wolf Blitzer–both are gentlemen which I appreciate.
If I want an intelligent basher from the left–nobody better than Chris Cuomo
I read WSJ and my local papers like OC register for sports and entertainment—love the movies and great rock and roll concerts GO IRISH

@Richard Wheeler:Levin is as much like Hannity as Kimmel is to Einstein. So your sources are CNN and FOX, Yes Bongino failed at his political office attempts, he is highly successful at his podcasts, sources all his information no un-named sources. You will never hear them fawn over Trump, they have both interesting insider knowledge, from doing the jobs.
Bongino: a Cop for NYC, and SS agent
Levin: Levin worked in the administration of President Ronald Reagan and was a chief of staff for Attorney General Edwin Meese. He is chairman of the Landmark Legal Foundation, Broke the FISA abuse and unmasking scandal was called a conspiracy guy lol, it isnt a theory if you have proof.
All your sources have never ever ever been anything but talking heads, reading scripts.
Did you know the WSJ changes headlines depending on if its a red area or blue area?
My local paper has always been a rag, only good for soup coupons on Sunday. Liberal Arts College town go figure.
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/wsj-different-trump-headlines/

@Richard Wheeler:

Richard Wheeler
How is it possible that any politically informed person can not know who Richard Spencer is?—or at least take the time to Google him and his hate filled organization

First, RW, I’d say that I am at least as politically informed as you are and I said I have never heard the name Richard Spencer until I read it in your post above. I did google it and checked WIKI, neither of which I actually trust, but all they did was give the CNN -MSNBC version of who they ‘think’ he is. After reading about him, I still don’t know anything about him and wonder why you are attempting to associate him with DT. I see no ties with Trump admin and neither of the articles I read about him mentioned any ties to Trump. If there is something specific about him I should know, pass it on. but it seems as if most of the other conservatives on here know very little about him either. Is he a plant of the Dims? Footnote: Just heard of the death of GHWB tonight. The CIA leader of the hit on JFK has gone to his reward.

@Richard Wheeler:

For straight news I like Shep Smith who is fair and balanced

I just can’t resist: you do realize that ‘straight’ news is something Shep is not capable of. He hasn’t ever been straight. He would fit right in with your gay marching crowd out there on the west coast. Nope, two words that don’t fit in one sentence is straight and Shep Not only that, he’s the only anchor on Fox that I change the channel when he comes on. Can’t stand his slobbering.

@Richard Wheeler:

RT #49 Spencer advocates for ” a peaceful ethnic cleaning” of non whites from America. Now that may seem fairly reasonable to you and Kitt—but I doubt if guys like AV, Deplorable and Word buy in to tha

RW, I realize this is a feeble attempt for you to try to tie me to someone that may not be a good person. I can’t pass judgment on the guy because I only have your perspective on him and I find it hard to have a whole lot of respect for someone that runs around in assless chaps with gay guys in their gay pride parades.

@Redteam: No surprise you got a problem with Shep Smith– him being gay–though you’re the guy consistently talking about assless chaps—I’ve always wondered why you do that. You got some kind of fetish?

As for Richard Spencer I’m simply quoting his beliefs–I’ve denounced him as has Deplorable. You and Kitt haven’t done so. All you got is “he may not be a good person” ya think?

Surprised you don’t change channel on Hannity–a closet gay I’ve heard.

Bashing GHWB on his deathbed–very classy RT

You’re still silent on Notre Dame being 12-0 In a way. sorry LSU lost 3 after being a playoff contender. Would have enjoyed seeing The Irish whip em again.

btw—how politically savvy can you be saying Dem pickup of 41 seats was the smallest in decades –see again #53

@Richard Wheeler: For dems Obama was crushedcomment image&exph=360&expw=557&q=dems+seats+gained+smallest+in+decades&simid=608052623176696304&selectedindex=6&ajaxhist=0&vt=0

@Richard Wheeler: Correct me if I’m wrong, but your entire obsession with Spencer is that you are alluding to or accusing a connection to Trump. Is this not the point?

@Deplorable Me: In #33 you called for a denouncement of far left ANTIFA which I’ve done.
In #38 I called for a denouncement of radical white supremacist Richard Spencer which you have done. in #4I—-Spencer and his reactionary National Policy Institute are certainly Trump supporters but I do not believe DT supports their stated beliefs.

My overall point is that Americans should have no use for either of these hateful fringe people/organizations.

@Richard Wheeler: There you admitted it a fringe group not a popular movement not widespread. Not even posing a danger to the populous unlike this Antifa movement, attacking our servicemen police, prayer groups, patriot gatherings these ritalin damaged kids allowed to take over Portland and run amok in the streets are a true problem, like shitty parents, the police and judges didnt crack down on the masked thugs let them walk armed into peaceful gathering and begin riots. Those gathering for a rally to support anything related to God or Country were disarmed as they got off he shuttle busses or entered the area.
Even taking self defense items like mace from elderly women. Yes those dangerous blue haired old ladies and gents such fascists handing out pocket constitutions, and new testaments, how dare they voice their support for the President, Country and Flag.
This Spencer guy has every right to rally, bring tiki torches if they want, if left alone nothing happens he yells into a blowhorn, they are not going to gather any momentum with “normal” people to peacefully or otherwise remove any other citizens from the country.
I have heard much more dangerous things come from Comeys lawyers, telling Judges not to judge the law but to “Make a law.”
Its a progressive thing to grill a Trump associate til they get them to slip up on an event time line then force them to sign confession papers just so they are not bankrupted with attorney fees. Leave them and their families live in peace.

@Richard Wheeler: Another point would be that the overall left and their leadership do not share that view of yours. They will not recognize ANTIFA for what it is and denounce it. Rather, since it serves their purpose and need, they ignore it. What is that phrase about silence being consent?

No doubt you’ve seen the photos, which the left tried to keep hidden from public view, of Obama, Watters, Ellison, Lee and others gladhanding and hugging it up with Farrakhan. Obviously, they KNEW that was wrong, yet they showed Farrakhan their support and lent legitimacy to his anti-Semitism by their photo-op endorsements. So, how does that float with you? That’s not Farrakhan expressing his opinion of support for someone; these people are supporting HIM. Then, of course, there are these same characters with Sharpton, another anti-
Semitic race-baiter. So, for all the racist lawn-darts thrown at Trump and Republicans, this racism and anti-Semitism runs deep and wide within the Democrat part.

YOUR party. The party YOU support. How’s that work, exactly?

I’ll condemn Farrakhan in a heartbeat

You WILL? Sometime… at some point in the future? Or… what? Not to nitpick or put too fine a point on it, but that’s hardly a resounding denouncement of such a scumbag, particularly from someone that demands clarity from others.

@Deplorable Me: I agree with you that a silence to condemn Spencer may well connote acceptance/consent.

For the record–First I heard of Spencer was first I heard of Antifa–Charlottesville.

Nitpick–who you?lol

Kitt Seems you may be concerned DT’S written answers don’t match up with Cohens’ sworn statement .Seems little doubt we got a he said/he said coming up–liar vs liar I’d call it.

@Richard Wheeler: You didn’t address the elephantine anti-Semite in the room. HOW can you support a party that has such revered “leaders” that support the likes of Farrakhan and Sharpton? Farrakhan is a national figure, getting a national stage to spit his hateful venom; he isn’t permanently banned from Twitter like Loomer, who criticized his anti-Semitism. Like the others, I had to look Spencer up and, finding next to nothing, based my judgement on the Wikileaks page, which reads like Sharpton himself wrote it. But, he doesn’t have to give Nazi salutes or denounce Jews; his white supremacy is enough for me to condemn. However, unlike ANTIFA, he is not violent. He doesn’t promote, incite or carry out violence. When it comes to political blindness, the fact (if it is) that you only learned of ANTIFA when they attacked Spencer speaks volumes. ANTIFA, promoted by Bernie, Hillary and Soros, were attacking Trump rallies during the primaries. Get yourself different sources of information; the liberal media hides things like ANTIFA, leftist racism and anti-Semitism and corruption from you. Thus, it results in you looking extremely foolish.

I agree with you that a silence to condemn Spencer may well connote acceptance/consent.

Where the hell do you think you live the EU where its against the law to speak against Islam?
I stand by everyones freedom of speech and the right to ignore stupid speech, when it crosses the line of limiting anyones Constitutional rights THATS ILLEGAL.
If that hurts your feelings…tough.
I do not have to agree or disagree with anything I dont have knowledge of based on someone elses OPINION.
The yellow vest protests in France are spreading, tells me this isnt about gas tax, the state police are being called in to force these people to shut up and go home.
No voice 4 you shut up and pay up.

@kitt: Easy-Kitt-I was simply agreeing with what Deplorable opined.
I am in absolute agreement with Eirst Amendment Rights—Current POTUS Screaming Fake News daily—not so much.

People want to ignore what Spencer and his ilk actually say–go ahead but it makes them appear either woefully uninformed—-OR re read #70 first sentence.

@Richard Wheeler: You insist that not hearing of this Spencer guy that lives rent free in your head is being uninformed, I insist that your sources of information took a guy and elevated him. I see nothing of him in any of the sources I use for information so he has no conservative or even Republican voice, none, nada, nil. As I have never even seen so much as an interview in my one sided news I cant make a judgement. I ask for a link where ONE of your sources has interviewed this most dangerous voice you dont have it. If you have never seen an interview or been to one of his rallies or can link to a website of his people why are you making a judgement? How are you more informed? Al Capones Vault? Finding Bigfoot?

@kitt: Your sources–lol You’ve said you read only right wing sources—of course they only report what favors the right
You found him on google search–you just choose not to believe what you read— that’s the problem—if it doesn’t come from the right you don’t believe it

I choose to watch right and left news. —seems logical to me
Did you believe Dems House gains were the smallest in many years?

@Richard Wheeler:

I am in absolute agreement with Eirst Amendment Rights—Current POTUS Screaming Fake News daily—not so much.

One of those numerous unanswered questions, IF the media lied to the people, would that be bad? I cannot seem to get an answer to that question, which MEANS that the left considers the media lying is just fine, as long as it supports the liberal agenda.

@kitt: Actually, when Spencer led his protest against the destruction of historic monuments, he WAS in the news because he was newsworthy. However, neither his personality, his views or his organization rises to the level of obsession Rich seems to assign him. As he revealed, nothing he views or reads ever mentioned ANTIFA attacking attendants at Trump rallies, hitting women with eggs, clocking people upside the head (from the back, of course) with bicycle locks, burning buildings, cars and public property, intimidating and shouting down anyone not speaking to the liberal cause and so on. I call that willful ignorance; you don’t see what you don’t want to see. And that lack of coverage (which he admits has been lacking) is the indictment on the left (media, Democrats, social media) that proves their tacit approval of political violence.

@Deplorable Me: If the media or the POTUS lie to the people of course it’s bad–IMO answer so obvious question doesn’t need to be asked.
Your response to Kitt is also a no brainer—right reports only what it wants you to hear–as does the left.

All that means is you are best served to listen to views from both sides, as I do, or if you prefer one side or neither—as in ignorance is bliss–or dangerous

BTW I certainly realize this is a right wing blog.–enjoy commentary from Word—-most others I enjoyed and respected are long gone,,

Finally– “Obsession” with Spencer–think not–just one of many screw ball white supremacists
Fighting Irish winning it all–obsession

@Richard Wheeler: I posted the link to a chart and you can see for yourself. How does that vote harvesting work anyway?
Post an interview or speech from this guy or charge the rent.
I choose to pay attention to those that matter.

@Richard Wheeler:

@Deplorable Me: If the media or the POTUS lie to the people of course it’s bad–IMO answer so obvious question doesn’t need to be asked.

Well.. yeah. However, when the media MISQUOTES Trump repeatedly, accusing him of saying “The MEDIA is the enemy of the people” when, in reality, what he said was “The FAKE MEDIA is the enemy of the people”, i.e., LYING, something you admitted was a bad thing, is dishonest. Removing that word “fake” is, in fact, LYING, which again, you admit is wrong.

By the way, great job of answering the question. No one else could face it, it was so awful and terrible.

We’ve seen protests over Trump “threatening the media” when, in fact, they are protesting what the MEDIA (not Trump) has said. So, those protests, sometimes violent, are incited by the MEDIA, not Trump.

All that means is you are best served to listen to views from both sides, as I do, or if you prefer one side or neither—as in ignorance is bliss–or dangerous

Nothing could be more true. So, when the liberal media suppresses news (like ANTIFA, their violence, their backers) and conservative points of view, would you agree that is a violation of “listening to views from both sides” and a form of LYING?

@Deplorable Me: I have no doubt the left wing media withholds info and lies sometimes.
I’m sure you are smart enough to know the right wing also withholds and lies. Our POTUS lies with impunity.
Sure you’d agree this is not reason to shut down either side or the POTUS but simply to be aware.

Much of this is common sense—-IMO Radicalism and lying are always bad.
People knocking GHWB today—sickos.

@Richard Wheeler: The last POTUS lied with IMMUNITY… immunity from a liberal media calling him out on it. However, there is NO excuse for the above mentioned lie about the fake news media, or lying that he says “immigrants” are criminals when he clearly said, citing FBI data, that many ILLEGAL immigrants are criminals, which incites violence and accusations of racism. I think a clear and open-minded examination of his “lies” will reveal a vast number that were/are misrepresented by the media, purposely to incite unrest and overtly support the Democrats.

Both parties spins information. However, when Republicans do it and get caught, the media, as it should, calls them out. When Democrats do it, they get a pass. In fact, the liberal media will HELP them do it. This is why someone like Obama can say something like he was responsible for the increase in our energy production and get away with it; the media simply will not expose his lies or, when President, his corruption.

Yesterday morning on Fox and Friends, Steve Doocy called Kid Rock out for saying, “Screw that Behar bitch”. Doocy did not condone it and made Rock apologize for it. He did all he could to maintain civility and decorum (even though Behar IS a filthy, lying, racist bitch). Ever see anyone on MSNBC, CNN, ABC, CBS or NBC call out someone for calling Trump a racist, criminal, traitor or sexual predator? I’ll save you the answer… NO, you haven’t.

Do you think the media supporting one political party over another is detrimental to our Republic?

Yes, visit the NYT Facebook pages and read some of the liberal comments on Bush. But, that’s YOUR party.

@Richard Wheeler: You know whats sick is those that had nothing but bad to say about the man when he was serving in office suddenly turn around and make like he was their guy walked on water. Same crap the did with Mac and Reagan. To them the only good republican is a dead one or one hates hates a current one.

Back to the subject at hand, Corsi is going to file a complaint saying Mueller tried to coerce him into making false statements. The liberals might get their bombshell… it just won’t be the one they wanted.

https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/jerome-corsi-robert-mueller-russia-wikileaks/2018/11/29/id/892544/?fbclid=IwAR1FN9wHn0EAry7Ong161z36yWXWO_8JLmAs9qAbbtbzZGdnxl0ojJuoZWw

I’m glad someone has the money to withstand this KGB shit. Mueller is despicable.

I am under the impression he has hired Larry Klayman, Corsi described as a conspiracy theorist and Klayman a nutbag,
So if Corsi is some weird conspiracy guy with wild ideas why do they bother with him, Klayman is right out of Judicial Watch, knows how and where to dig through the maze of Government secrets.
The MSM is already running cover for Mueller just use a search engine and check out the flack flying already.
https://www.rawstory.com/2018/11/conspiracy-theorist-jerome-corsi-hires-pathologically-litigious-lawyer-even-roger-stone-thinks-moron/

Corsi is a piece of work–I’ve watchet him on Hannity over the years where he can claim whatever the hell he wants–Sean loves him
What I remember–he’s a 9/II truther
Claimed BHO a non citizen–DT LOVED THAT–and a homosexual–RT LOVED THAT.
Swift Boated Kerry-Conservatives loved that—-there is more craziness I could look up.

I believe Mueller is trying to amass evidence that DT and his associates may have been cultivating the assistance of WikiLeaks in the bitter 2016 contest

I’d agree it’s time to finish up and show us what he’s got.

btw It is claimed Manafort’s attorneys have given info to Trump’s attorney’s about Mueller, questioning of their client. If true, is that ethical?

@Richard Wheeler: Hillary started the birther question and, though I don’t really care, it is still up in the air. One wonders why Obama tried so hard to keep it unresolved… why ALL of his past is kept shrouded in secrecy. Maybe to keep us from loving him too much?

The primary question is if Mueller is coercing witnesses to testify what he
WANTS testified as opposed to what is the truth. That seems to be his MO, from General Flynn to Manafort to Papadopoulos (14 days in jail!) to Cohen to Corsi. Filing a complaint opens one up to much legal trouble, if false. It’s not just a random accusation.

Let us not forget that Mueller ran away flailing his arm and squealing like a little girl when the first Russian indicted showed up for a court trial. THAT’S how solid his case is.

@kitt:

He said he was asked by US government officials not to reveal their names to “avoid compromising their identities or nexus to intelligence and law enforcement work.”

Why would such vital assets be used to target Trump without an investigation being open? Trump simply needs to declassify the documents. He can use the threat of the embarrassment of that revelation to halt any NEW investigation from dogging his administration, but that won’t stop them from continuing what they are doing endlessly and indefinitely, using the taint of the investigation to continue to imply guilt of some sort. Just release it and let the British and Australians (and whomever else) suffer the consequences of interfering with our elections.

Liberals concerned about legality and ethics? That’s a riotous belly laugh.

@Deplorable Me: You see Corsi is a “piece of work”, but to give his “wild stories” credibility, Mueller goes after him.
Yes I say screw those that tried to tamper in a Presidential election, So they are not Russians does it matter…really? Those in this country if it comes to light need to be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law no matter who they are it is the only way to restore trust in our government.
The 2 tier justice system must be destroyed, along with the facilitators.

@kitt: Red State-lol–about as reliable as Red Team –
Talk about wild conspiracy theories.

Mueller believes Corsi and or Stone were in touch with Assange to get dirt on HRC and help there beloved DT. Cohn Trump lovefest sure went sour.

Corsi claims he had Assange figured out without actually having any contact with him–superior telepathic abilities perhaps.

@Richard Wheeler: What ever, he wasnt wire tapped, there was no spy, no fisa warrants, everything totally unbiased, Unmasking what unmasking ,how many more things denied were proven true? Seems crow is a chef specialty with YOUR media sources.

@Richard Wheeler: What if they were trying to get dirt on Hillary? Hillary was doing the same thing, only she was PAYING Russians for anything, true or not. I don’t know about you, but that sounds like the collusion we’ve all been looking for.

The DNC was paying for it. They would also would not allow the FBI to examine their “hacked” server. Sounds like they were colluding, too.

Obama stopped efforts to block any Russian meddling because he was afraid trying would muddy the waters of Hillary’s victory (you know, what they are accusing Trump of doing now). HE was guilty of colluding with the Russians; standing aside (being “flexible”) so they could do what Russians do.

Corsi claims he had Assange figured out without actually having any contact with him–superior telepathic abilities perhaps.

Hell, man, as soon as the news of Hillary’s email server, how easily hacked it was an the fact that ALL her State Department emails went through it, I knew everyone with the capability had her emails. It doesn’t take Sherlock Holmes to figure THAT out. That’s why Trump made the joke that if they want the 33,000 emails Hillary obliterated as soon as their were subpoenaed, ask the Russians. EVERYONE knew it. The existence of her secret, private, unsecured server was spilled by a HACKER!

The overall view of this mess shows NO indication… not the SLIGHTEST indication of Trump or any of his associates having any involvement with any foreign party to do anything in the election. The whole thing is a silly waste of time, trying to detract from the fact that Hillary, Comey, Strzok, Ohr, Brennan, Clapper, McCabe and a host of others should be under indictment.

@Deplorable Me: Lol his guess was wrong he thought Assange had information on the Foundation, as Slicks aide Justin Cooper was caught loading spyware into their computers. He really had no Idea it would be Podestas/DNC emails.
No honor amoung thieves.
Even if Mueller could prove that members of the Trump team had colluded with Julian Assange to use material that Assange had unlawfully obtained, that, too, would not be a crime.

Merely using the product of an already committed theft of information is not a crime. If you don’t believe me, ask the New York Times, the Washington Post, the Guardian and other newspapers that used material illegally obtained by Assange with full knowledge that it was illegally obtained.
Even Wretched Madcow had a page from Trumps private tax returns and used it on TV ya that was awesome.
Hero of the left, Al Sharpton sells his life story rights for $531,000 — to his own charity

@kitt: Yeah, that tax return was another one of them “bombshells” that was going to hole Trump below the waterline. Obviously, Madcow didn’t even look at it before she went on the air, figuring there was SOMETHING they could spin into a smoking gun. About as big a dud as her last heterosexual date.

@Deplorable Me: Dems will get tax returns which may be no more than a big embarrassment for Trump–be damn sure there is something there he doesn’t want known.
IRS should have been disbanded as promised back in the late 40’s

Believe in The Fair Tax

Sharpton a hero in his own mind–certainly not of the left.

@Richard Wheeler: Well, here’s a bombshell for you… I would bet they’ve already looked at his returns. Legality and privacy laws wouldn’t stop them. What they want is to know everyone he does business with so ANTIFA turds can go after all his associates and try to dry him up. Sorry… that how the left works.

Sharpton a hero in his own mind–certainly not of the left.

Really? REALLY? Every Democrat candidate has to kowtow to him and he was invited to the Obama White House like a hundred times, even though he owes state and federal income taxes, not to mention being one of the foremost race baiters. Not a leftist hero my goat-smelling ass.

@Richard Wheeler: Why didnt Comey recuse himself from the Clinton investigation?
His brother Peter was or is a Clinton Foundation Lawyer, conflict much?
Seating order at Franklins funeral Farakahn, Sharpton, Jackson, Slick all front and center.

@kitt: Why? Because if he had, someone that would not write up Hillary’s exoneration before the investigation began might take up the case. That’s why. Only Republicans are ever expected to recuse themselves.

I’ve noticed a number of homophobes among our FA posters—didn’t think that came with being a Conservative.
Am I wrong on that?

@rich wheeler: Damn, where in hell is THAT coming from?

@rich wheeler: Conservatives really do not care about a persons sexual preference , we dont like the prancing around shoving it in our face and pushing it at our kids. LGBT wxyz not normal Pedophiles not normal.
Normalizing mental illness is a left thing. Any other dumb questions aimed at putting people in boxes and causing division? Got to have everything labeled for you, cant figure it out for yourself? Confirmed Bachelor, her traveling companion there used to be polite terms and people could be discreet then along came the attention whores.