Corsi Unleashed: Mueller and His Lawyers Are “Political Criminals” Who Used KGB Style Interrogation Tactics Against Me

Loading

Conservative journalist, Dr. Jerome Corsi was in plea negotiations with Robert Mueller after being questioned by the special counsel for over 40 hours about his ‘inside sources’ at WikiLeaks and alleged advance knowledge Julian Assange was going to release John Podesta’s emails.
Since Mueller cannot bring charges on the Russian collusion hoax, he has targeted Corsi for making a ‘false statement’ after putting the best-selling author through hell interrogations.

Dr. Corsi subsequently retained counsel and is preparing to sue the Justice Department and Special Counsel Robert Mueller for prosecutorial misconduct in his case.



“I have retained attorney Larry Klayman to assist David Gray in my defense. In a memo to my attorneys, I have instructed Klayman and Gray to file with Acting AG Whitaker a criminal complaint against Mueller’s Special Counsel and the DOJ for prosecutorial misconduct in my case,” Dr. Corsi said in a tweet Wednesday.

https://twitter.com/jerome_corsi/status/1067871073407049728

What is shocking to hear is the KGB style interrogation tactics the FBI and Mueller’s team used to get Corsi to “remember” a meeting with Russians in Italy that never even happened.

One America News reporter Jack Posobiec broke the story Wednesday.

POSOBIEC: FBI and Mueller team coerced 72-year-old Jerome Corsi to undergo regressive memory therapy techniques during interrogation to “remember” a meeting with Russians in Italy that Corsi was adamant never happened

Read more

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
104 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

It would have been faster if they used electrodes attached to sensitive areas, 40 hours? They know they are running out of time, else they would have lawyer fees him to the poor house like Flynn.

I suspect the same thing is behind Mueller’s accusation that Manafort is lying to him; he keeps asking him to give him the answers he NEEDS to the questions he asks; not the truth.

Is there any further proof needed to prove Mueller is at the end of his rope, has found NOTHING the left is going to be happy with and he is desperate for something new to leak?

November 28, 2018 — Trump says Manafort pardon not ‘off the table’

“It was never discussed, but I wouldn’t take it off the table. Why would I take it off the table?” Trump told the New York Post.

Because publicly holding out the possibility of a presidential pardon to a man who has already pleaded guilty and entered into an agreement to become a cooperating witness in an investigation of your own administration is obstruction of justice, for which you can be impeached.

You must be out of your mind. You cannot get away with putting a pardon “on the table” and then publicly acknowledging that it’s there.

@Greg: Why would Manafort ever expect a pardon to be “off the table”? Bill Clinton and Obama pardoned far, far worse. Of course, for them, they must be drug dealers, cop killers or America-haters.

Unnamed sources say Manafort is completely innocent, so it must be true.

@Deplorable Me, #4:

It can’t even be hinted that a presidential pardon is “on the table” when the person it would benefit is thought to have undisclosed information that could become evidence against the president—particularly when that person had already agreed to cooperate with investigators. Consider Trump’s comment along with recent news that Manafort apparently broke the terms of the agreement.

Trump’s legal advisers are probably resisting an impulse to shoot themselves.

@Greg: Who didnt know? Who didnt know that Trump could pardon him? Who is dumb enough to think this nothing burger you are flipping is wasnt always an option on the table, and that he could fire Mueller if he wants? Trump has many options its if he decides to exercise those options, that is the question.
You mad that Muellers targets are telling him no I wont lie for you?

It’s certainly an option if Trump wants to provide a strong argument for his immediate impeachment. The only reason for doing something that dangerous would be to try to cover up something even more dangerous.

@Greg:

It can’t even be hinted that a presidential pardon is “on the table” when the person it would benefit is thought to have undisclosed information that could become evidence against the president—particularly when that person had already agreed to cooperate with investigators.

So, has Trump EVER just come out of the blue and mentioned pardons? Has he made it a point to make clear that he keeps a pardon on the table for Manafort? A QUESTION was asked him (a STUPID question) and he answered, and answered correctly; why WOULD a pardon be off the table?

Trump made no “hints” but everyone understands that a pardon is ALWAYS possible. Hell, Obama pardoned terrorists and drug dealers; why would anyone expect someone that may or may not have cheated on his taxes?

Maybe your idiot self-aggrandizing “journalist” shouldn’t have asked a question you don’t want to hear the answer to? Ever consider that ?

It’s certainly an option if Trump wants to provide a strong argument for his immediate impeachment.

Your whiny butthurt is not grounds for impeachment and that is all you have.

The only reason for doing something that dangerous would be to try to cover up something even more dangerous.

The only reason he did is because a moron asked him the question. He didn’t just make a declaration of it. Stop being such a fool.

@Deplorable Me: Poor MSM coerced testimony is all they got, if they have that. Nothing in any of the charges has anything to do with Trump linked to Russians. But IG reports of bribery, bias, perjury hang over 2 important investigations.
Larry Klayman is from Judicial Watch, yes he will know documents and what to search for, both to file suit against Mueller and provide great defense if needed.

Manafort’s lawyers keeping Trump’s lawyers up to date with inside info on Mueller probe.
Stone is the major target right now.–E-mails show him in contact with Assange–this guy even looks the villain

Trump is losing the coalition that gave him electoral win—educated Repub women are leaving 55% to 35%—he’ll struggle to hold working class whites if Dems run a decent candidate–may be as many as 12 vying to take on DT.

RT—WELCOME BACK did you think IRISH would be 12-0?

@Richard Wheeler: Can you link to 1 email that shows he knew in advance what the contents of the Emails were? None of these emails provide any evidence or proof that he knew in advance about the source or content of any of the allegedly stolen or allegedly hacked emails published by WikiLeaks. Being in contact with Assange not a crime not then not now. They have nothing. Stone speculated the leaks were going to be about the Clinton slush fund, he was totally wrong what we got was Podestas DNC communications, where he shared Hillary was a smelly old bat that acts retarded, damn nothing really new. 3 meetings that could not have happened debunked before the ink dried.
I smell panic, fear and desperation from DC rats, and their drooling media mouth pieces.
HRC being forced to testify Dec 16th which follows Huber on Dec 5th …
Watch the media flip these nothing burgers.

@kitt: HRC testify—Defeated Repubs Hail Mary as they leave The House.
Stone is as crooked as he looks—-Guess push to shove Cohn wouldn’t actually take a bullet for Trump’
Mueller finishing up–no idea what he’ll have but it will be high drama

Panic you say?—that could be fomenting in the air to Argentina
The people want the truth—main reason Dems picked up 40 seats.

@Richard Wheeler: 1 email was the request, 1 charge the Mueller has brought that has a link to DT and election tampering. Drama this has all been Drama it has all been a distraction from that Dec 5th testimony I will have my popcorn, and Streaming C-Span.
How has Stone been crooked? You make accusations and have nothing to give them any meat on the bone. Oh MSNBC and CNN say so, they have nothing to back the statements they just blurt out garbage other MSM repeat it, so it must be true.
Former FBI Director James Comey filed a motion today to avoid a congressional subpoena requiring testimony on December 5th to a joint House committee. wassup with that he has nothing to hide riiiight?

If the liberal liar elected in ’00 had never made Mueller FBI chief this would never have been a problem. Voting for progressive GOPe is bad!
BTW the same immoral guy promoted: Brennan, Clapper, Comey as well as L. Lerner and Rod! Immoral GOPe are the worst folk to have in any office! Democrats are bad but the GOP left is far worse As Mueller and Lerner prove!

@kitt: So, you clearly see how liberals regard national security. While they want Trump publicly hanged for imaginary collusion (uh oh… was that RACIST?) they want Hillary to walk free for providing all the State Department emails to at least 6 foreign actors (the Chinese were reading them in real-time). All she worried about was AMERICANS seeing her State Department business; she didn’t care if the Russians did.

What do you want to bet the penalty for Cohen “lying” to the Senate is the same penalty as Hillary, Comey, Ohr, McCabe, Brennan and Clapper got; ZIP. Cohen is getting leniency for reneging on his earlier testimony and lying to throw Mueller a bone.

And as we see, it’s a big nothing-burger, all about a deal that never happened BEFORE Trump was President. Mueller doesn’t want TOO big a bombshell because he doesn’t want Trump to fight back too hard; just something to feed the ravenous ignorant left that they can all believe is a smoking gun. Remember, they are easily duped idiots.

Oh, another thing; Rich doesn’t answer questions. But, then again, neither does any other liberal. They don’t have the guts to answer them here and I’ve found they don’t have the guts to answer them on other sites, either. So, while he lacks the courage to answer questions, Rich is really no worse than any other liberal.

You Trumpeteers are eerily similar–where did I say there was evidence of DT’S involvement? How bout where I said Stone knew the contents of Assange E-mails?
didn’t say either
You just blather on incessantly about Mueller having nothing.

That, you Trump lemmings, is Highly unlikely. We’ll find out pretty soon.

Meanwhile,here at FA, we got an admitted coward calling Viet Nam vets cowards–how laughable is that?

@Richard Wheeler:

Stone is the major target right now.–E-mails show him in contact with Assange–this guy even looks the villain

Is that just hot air like your sources of news?
Why post it without any other point but the one on your head.

Guess push to shove Cohn wouldn’t actually take a bullet for Trump’

What is that? What is illegal about building a hotel in Moscow? At that time Trump was a private citizen that was doing business, the deal evaporated what nuthin burger are you eating?
Mueller has NOTHING or this wouldnt be in the news for morons.
Meeting with Vlad might still be on, guess the war mongers might have to try something else.

@Richard Wheeler: When did I admit to being a coward? Provide the evidence where I admitted such a thing.

So, you are saying there is no evidence thus far of Trump’s involvement in… whatever?

I just have to wonder how, if you are such a brave Vietnam vet and all, you have such a fear of answering simple questions? Try this one; Greg is deathly afraid of it: would it be bad if the media was lying to the public?

Since the FBI agents that interviewed General Flynn say that the General never lied, do you thing it unfair that Mueller went after him, almost bankrupted him and threatened his son with like persecution, and forcing him to plead guilty to lying? Is that proper treatment of a dedicated military man?

Now, if you think I’m playing some mind games or trying to trap you somehow, let me know and I’ll try to modify the questions so they aren’t so scary.

@kitt: Because liberals are so desperate for that magic bullet that is going to rid them of Trump (either literally or metaphorically; they support either, like the “good Americans” they are) the can’t recognize Mueller’s desperation the stunts he pulls or the games he plays. It’s all so pitiful and sad… not to mention expensive to the American taxpayer.

@Deplorable Me: The whole thing and the reactions to the most mundane crap that the media turns into the outrage of the day. The good stuff that their media ignores. Why Comey wants to control the venue he testifies in and why. With all the NGO money to set up the caravans they cant give them toilets and showers, Diseases in the camp rampant.

Deplorable—You said you decided not to join during war time–your brother reminded you your fellow Americans were actually being killed and wounded- while other’s on here did join and fight for our country–that is cowardly.on your part.

As far as answering questions,I’ve asked you many times to give an example of a question by you that I haven’t answered–CRICKETTS. You just start asking
more and expect me to answer unilaterally–that’s stupid.
BTW when I’ve asked you questions===your repeated response–no not until you answer mine–stupid game and why I’m rarely here.

One thing is certain—American voters spoke loud and clear in mid terms. They want the truth and don’t feel Trump’s been giving it to them. He does not represent the majority–why he loves his preaching to the choir rallies so much.

@Richard Wheeler:

You said you decided not to join during war time–your brother reminded you your fellow Americans were actually being killed and wounded- while other’s on here did join and fight for our country–that is cowardly.on your part.

Apparently, you don’t know what you are talking about. When did I say my brothers reminded me of my fellow Americans being killed? In actual fact, I said both my brothers, one Army (who served in Vietnam, at his request) and one Air Force, advised me to absolutely NOT volunteer. So, once again, you lie. Seems to be a habit or psychosis.

As far as answering questions,I’ve asked you many times to give an example of a question by you that I haven’t answered

And yet these simple questions I just posed go ignored. Do you INSIST on repeatedly proving my point?

Look, I’m trying (again) to start fresh. So, either answer those questions or admit you are afraid to.

Listen—you’ve accused me on numerous occasions of not answering previous questions–“being cowardly” but you can’t show a single example— and use that as a reason for not answering my questions–isn’t that ridiculous? No reason to start fresh with you controlling the discussion–ya think?
Exactly -your brother’s advised you not to serve so you took the cowardly out. Whether one brother or two you confirm what I said.

@Richard Wheeler: So most of these victims are accused of lying about things that are not even illegal.
The FBI comes and takes you in you tell them you love meat should you go to jail for that?

@Richard Wheeler: You don’t answer questions. I just asked some and you don’t answer them. It’s a little too early to claim you did answer them. You have to wait until several posts have past and it’s hard to remember which ones you dodged the questions on, not the same post where I can just scroll up and see you never answered them.

When did I say my brothers said not to serve? Show me, or admit you are lying. They said don’t JOIN. If you remember, there was an active draft and people were drafted, far more than joined. So, are you wrong or are you intentionally lying to try and cover up the fact that, for “whatever” reason, you can’t bring yourself to answer simple questions. That one WILL require an answer.

@Deplorable Me: Like I said– I answered all your questions while you answered none of mine—then you went off the rail–
This is truly foolish waste of time
I prefer Saints vs Cowboys on Fox

@Richard Wheeler:

Like I said– I answered all your questions

Does that claim include the questions on #18? Just wondering.

@Richard Wheeler:you asked this question of deplorable:

You said you decided not to join during war time–your brother reminded you your fellow Americans were actually being killed and wounded- while other’s on here did join and fight for our country–that is cowardly.on your part.

Maybe I just don’t get your definitions, but let me ask. I joined the Navy in 1957, I was sworn in on the day following my 17th birthday. I served for 4 years. There was no war during that time. Does that make me ‘heroic’ or ‘cowardly’? I have never thought about or felt that serving in the US military forces as heroic or cowardly. I considered it to be the highest honor to me to allow me to wear a US military uniform. But that’s what it was to me, an honor, not a ‘heroic’ act. There are, I’m quite sure, various reasons that people do not serve. My father did not serve, when WWII came along he had 4 children under 6 years old. But he did work in a shipyard building liberty ships for the war effort. Being a ‘hero’ or a ‘coward’ is a result of acts that persons perform. Such as the ‘collaborating with the enemy’ of the Hanoi songbird. McCain did a very honorable thing to serve in the US Navy, but he was a coward when he collaborated with the enemy. I wasn’t in his shoes, I don’t know what I would have done under the same set of circumstances. I might have been singing also, Lord knows he had tons of injuries. But don’t call him a hero just because he was captured. I certainly think your service was honorable, only you know if it were ‘heroic’ or not.

@Richard Wheeler:

One thing is certain—American voters spoke loud and clear in mid terms.

So the Dims picked up how many Senate seats? You consider that to be loud and clear that the country wants a Republican senate? The Dims picked up the smallest number of seats in the House in midterms in over 30 years. That seems to be loud and clear that the people are not clamoring to get more Dims in office. Maybe we do agree that the people are not anxious to get more Dims in the Congress.

@Redteam: They added a lot more Dems than Repubs—that’s a fact we can agree on.
Never mentioned the word hero or heroic. THANK YOU FOR SERVING
DP has continually called me a coward— very insulting coming from someone who chose at 18 not to serve his country-during wartime—wouldn’t you agree?

How bout The Irish shoud get Clemson first unless Ga beats Alabama.

@richard wheeler: Can’t help but notice, though, that you still haven’t answered my questions. What DOES drive that?

Would you agree that Trump bucked the midterm trend by adding seats in the Senate? (question has been screened for scariness).

@richard wheeler: These are the good guys fighting nazis and kkk? https://www.redstate.com/alexparker/2018/11/29/antifa-attack-marines-philadelphia/
You shouldnt wonder why the Proudboys walk with patriotic gatherings, these little shitstains need to get an awakening when they attack.

@kitt: So in the future, if someone is confronted by an ANTIFA gang, would they be justified using a violent preemptive attack in self defense? ANTIFA is like a rabid dog; the past actions of rabid dogs justifies them being put down wherever they are encountered. As their own description of the rally shows, they first have to INVENT the “fascism” they want to fight, then they sucker-punch the victims. ANYONE that does not emphatically and unambiguously denounce ANTIFA and everything it does and stands for has no love or concern for this country in the very least. Scumbags. Trash. Slime. Cowards.

@Deplorable Me: Never go looking for trouble but be ready to handle it if it comes looking for you.

@kitt: Notice that when this little weasel threw his punch the guy’s head was turned. That is the “brave warriors” the left employs to get their point across. It is quite indicative of their overall character that the Democrats and the left do not resoundingly denounce and expunge such trash. But, they don’t; they encourage it.

@Deplorable Me: He wasnt a college educated Antifa no billy club to swing, was just a mouthy little kid and was treated as such.
Now this dangerous lil crap-pants

@kitt: How they should be met each and every time. Sadly, here in Texas they don’t pull that crap, so I never get to see or experience it. Someone swinging a club at me is going to get a lethal dose of .380 or .45.

I’d say anyone who doesn’t denounce Richard Spencer and his white supremacist er nationalist movement is an anti Semite racist.
I’ll once again denounce his movement as well as Antifa—-both groups are radicals and have no place in American society.

Should be easy to agree on that.

@Richard Wheeler: Sorry will not denounce the nationalist movement and end up with NWO no borders country. As far as being jew haters the left doesnt hide that movement. Farrakhan, Linda Sasour, Marc Lamont Hill, each side of the political spectrum has its issues but only one side has to denounce things, over and over and over. It is rampant on college campuses totally dominated by progressives.
Trying to blame someone else for farting in the elevator much?
Most conservatives hate separation by race give no advantage to any gender,color, religion,social status, educational level or sexuality. Equality for everyone.

@kitt: “equality for everyone” Spencer and his white supremacists don’t buy that. You have said a couple of times you’re OK with him and his anti Semetic , racist views.
I got it.

@Richard Wheeler:

I’d say anyone who doesn’t denounce Richard Spencer and his white supremacist er nationalist movement is an anti Semite racist.

I denounce him, white supremacy and anti-Semitism. That’s easy.

I DO NOT denounce nationalism because it is neither racist or anti-Semitic. It is nationalist; supporting our country above all others. I find it hard to believe anyone that actually loves this nation is not a nationalist.

Since you denounce anti-Semitism (you do, don’t you) do you denounce Louis Farrakhan and those who support him?

From all the way back at #18: Since the FBI agents that interviewed General Flynn say that the General never lied, do you thing it unfair that Mueller went after him, almost bankrupted him and threatened his son with like persecution, and forcing him to plead guilty to lying? Is that proper treatment of a dedicated military man?

I view anyone that does not denounce this unethical and unfair treatment of a distinguished military leader is a traitor to the military and to this country. Would you agree?

@Richard Wheeler: You go back to any of my posts and find I am ok with anti semitism or white supremacists just copy and paste you champange, limo, liberal progressive bigot.
I said I dont know him only what the lying MSM says about him, how long did they cover for Antifa and I am suppose to believe them or any progressive? They seemed to be ok with BLM hunting and executing cops too, had them to the White House.
You are just fine with Mueller making up crimes as he goes along.

@Deplorable Me: If Flynn didn’t lie he shouldn’t have pled guilty. That’s simple. Trump must be calling him a “weakling” like Cohen
Got no love for Farrakhan

Spencer is a racist white supremacist who calls himself a white nationalist.
I’ve got no problem with actual nationalists.

Kitt–You’ve basically said TWICE you are OK with Spencer. Why not just denounce him and his STATED beliefs–as DP and I have? should be easy
Never been in a limo though I do like champagne–UNDER $10 a bottle is fine.

@richard wheeler:

Never mentioned the word hero or heroic.

I won’t do a search to see if you did or not, but using the word cowardly is just the other side of that same coin. If you agree that there may be at least hundreds of reasons why someone might choose not to serve at a particular time, being heroic or cowardly probably shouldn’t be on that list. For you to say he was cowardly for not joining is the opposite of saying he was heroic for joining. I don’t believe anyone joins or doesn’t because the are heros or cowards. How can you possibly know the ‘real’ reason he chose not to join at that time. Suppose his fiance’ was undergoing intensive treatment for some deadly disease and he wanted to spend whatever time he could with her. Maybe it was his mother or father dying and he didn’t want to leave at that time? As I said, there could be an endless list of reasons, none having to do with ‘hero’ or ‘coward’. I don’t think you were a ‘hero’ for going to Vietnam, but I think it was a very honorable and patriotic thing to do. Whether you did or did not do heroic or cowardly acts while there is up to you to decide. Do you think John McCain serving in the Hanoi Hilton was a ‘heroic’ act? I don’t think he had a choice and we sure can’t know what caused him to do some acts that he was likely very ashamed of while there. 98% of persons in his situation might have done the same things he did. In all midterm elections for the last 30 years, the out party picked up more seats than the Dims did this year. The in party picked up senate seats this year, the first time that’s happened in forever. and you think the Dims had a good election year? I think they feel devastated that they didn’t get the House and Senate. I had a good laugh when it came out that Obama spent days behind the scenes trying to get the Dim elected in Ms and Trump spent one day with two rallies and blew them out. In every race where Obama and Trump actively campaigned for a candidate, Trump won every one and Obozo lost every one.

@Richard Wheeler: I said I know nothing really about him there is no Spencer website, how powerful can this dude be? The left finds 1 guy demonizes the hell out of him and says he is our leader and that we all follow everything he thinks? You being the bigot you are believe it. Please link where this Spenser says he is a WHITE Nationalist, I think that term was invented by leftist media to demonize Trump.
There are those that would like to segregate themselves from all other races they are not always white. thefederalist.com/2018/08/31/campus-identity-politics-leadi…
Are these students also being taught racism on campuses?
Your personal wealth or lack there of doesnt matter its the hollywood attitude dude.
We will teach those dirty flyover voters we will impeach for no cause even if we have to make up a law from thin air!
Flynn could no longer afford to defend himself in court, lawyers are not free and Muellers bunch have no budget.

@kitt: You can’t be that stupid or uninformed Kitt–I don’t believe it. I read up on ANTIFA you can do the same on Spencer and his Organization.
Hollywood attitude–lol

DT—You like making stuff up for others? Waste of time
Trump only campaigned in states he won-was that cowardly? 235-200-PICK UP OF 41 SEATS– Nationwide vote – was 53.3% Dem – 44.9% Repub–BLOWOUT
Thoughts on NCAA playoffs?

btw It was deplorable who first started throwing the ‘C” word.

@Deplorable Me:

When did I say my brothers said not to serve? Show me, or admit you are lying.

If you were an Obamamite, this would be a non-issue and it never would have come up. If wasn’t for the double standard, those on the left would have no standard.

@Richard Wheeler: I asked for a link I found plenty of left wing propaganda I could not find a site for him or these so called followers.
I wouldnt follow anyone that called for anything but constitutional law.
They interrogated Corsi for 40 hours top rate lawyer is above 1000 an hour thats fourty thousand dollars add in research and filing fees ect ect

@Richard Wheeler:

I’d say anyone who doesn’t denounce Richard Spencer and his white supremacist er nationalist movement is an anti Semite racist.

Believe it or not, until I read this statement, I have never heard the name Richard Spencer, so he must not be all that big of a deal. But I will say you have to be careful of words that you use, because it is evident that Dims and Reps have different definitons for the same words. I personally think that anyone that is an American should be an American nationalist, or get the hell out. Why would anyone be a citizen of the USA and not want it to succeed as the best in the world.? But when someone, such as Pres Trump, recently said he was a nationalist, the lefties immediately added the word ‘white’. Most people in the US are not racist and would not add the word White to the statement. But racists would do that. I personally do not know why any American would be an anti-semite. What have the Jews ever done that was detrimental to the US? The US constitution is not a religious document, but anything added or subtracted to support sharia law would make it a recognition of a ‘religion’ which is prohibited. So, what should this Spencer guy be condemned for?

Antifa, means Anti-Fascists. the fascists are the NWO bunch, so anyone should be against them, but somehow, those very fascists chose the name antifa which means the exact opposite of what they are. Surely no one disagrees with that.

1 2 3