Chief Of Iran’s Revolutionary Guard: US Has ‘No Will’ To Fight Islamic State…
Actually, Obama has no will or strategy.
The chief of an elite unit in Iran’s Revolutionary Guard has accused the U.S. of having “no will” to stop the Islamic State group after the fall of the Iraqi city of Ramadi, an Iranian newspaper reported Monday.
The comments by Gen. c the head of the Guard’s elite Quds unit, come just after U.S. Defense Secretary Ash Carter accused Iraqi forces of lacking the “will to fight” in an interview aired the day before.
It wasn’t clear whether Soleimani’s remarks came as a direct response to Carter’s, though tensions remain high between the two countries amid negotiations over Iran’s contested nuclear program.
The report in the daily newspaper Javan, which is seen as close to the Guard, quoted Soleimani as saying the U.S. didn’t do a “damn thing” to stop the extremists’ advance on Ramadi.
“Does it mean anything else than being an accomplice in the plot?” he reportedly asked, later saying the U.S. showed “no will” in fighting the Islamic State group.
Another example of how Obama’s weakness invites more aggression. How many do we need?
It’s not the US. It’s Obama. Obama wants to pretend that ISIS is a small insignificant bunch of fellows that are justified in their hatred. Why the leftist “feministas” are not protesting Obama’s indifference, and decrying this radical-oppressive chauvinist gang of thugs and it’s sexist abuse of women, …why the silence is deafening.
It’s simple, Ditto; protecting women from abuse is not their interest; political power is their interest. The same holds true for the anti-gun element; they don’t care about public safety, or else they would be pushing for stiff penalties for crimes with guns. The more crimes are committed with guns, the better the argument (in their warped minds) for confiscating guns, so they ignore all the liberal effects on increasing crime. Do you think “gay rights” is the focus of the gay activists? No, it isn’t… it is POWER. Otherwise, they would be protesting Muslim prejudice against homosexuality; they don’t because that would create an unwanted diversion from forcing individuals to forfeit their individual rights to THEIR demands.
The counter-argument to all this is that they are concerned with conditions with AMERICANS. Oh, really? Then why do they justify the invitation to millions of illegal immigrants with, “they just want to better their lives”… at our great expense. If they don’t care about how liberal policies are harming their interest groups around the world, why would they be worried about the plight of citizens of other countries who suffer for the liberal policies elsewhere?
Hypocritical quest for power; that is all the liberal is about.