California’s Chief Justice: Enforcing Immigration Laws Goes Against The Rule Of Law

Loading

Since when is moving to another country against the law? And since when do we enforce the laws we have on the books? I thought I knew, but I’m not a judge like this lady is, so I guess I was wrong.

Derek Hawkins, WaPo:

Tani Cantil-Sakauye, California’s chief justice, is fast emerging as one of the Trump administration’s most vocal critics in the judiciary…

Cantil-Sakauye used her annual State of the Judiciary address to argue that the rule of law was being “challenged” amid the administration’s immigration crackdown.

Without mentioning Trump by name, she told the state’s lawmakers that “the rule of law means that we as a people are governed by laws and rules, and not by a monarch.”

 

More of this lunacy at The Daily Caller

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
2 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

there are laws and it would appear that Ca. a sanctuary state, makes up the laws to fit the demorat philosophy for demorats only and republicans are judged by whatever the judge feels like using
no cure for stupidity.

Moonbeam Brown can anyone remember when he wanted Hanoi Jane(Fonda)on his arts commision even after her infamous trip to support the enemy(Veitycong) and we up here in the State of Jefferson(Northern California,Southern Oregon)will still want to be part of the USA even if the rest of the state of Stupidfornia decides to suced