Julian Assange: So, those Hillary Clinton emails, they connect together with the cables that we have published of Hillary Clinton, creating a rich picture of how Hillary Clinton performs in office, but, more broadly, how the U.S. Department of State operates. So, for example, the disastrous, absolutely disastrous intervention in Libya, the destruction of the Gaddafi government, which led to the occupation of ISIS of large segments of that country, weapons flows going over to Syria, being pushed by Hillary Clinton, into jihadists within Syria, including ISIS, that’s there in those emails. There’s more than 1,700 emails in Hillary Clinton’s collection, that we have released, just about Libya alone.
What Hillary and Obama admitted to, at the time, was arming so-called ”moderate” Islamists in Libya.
But what happened is that these ”moderates” worked hand-in-hand with ISIS.
When they wanted to arm ISIS the two groups pretended to fight and the ”moderates,” laid down their (American) arms for ISIS to have.
This happened over and over, as some in the media reported.
One time we actually saw this was when Hillary hired (with OUR tax money) the Feb 17 Martyrs Brigade to ”protect” our consulate in Benghazi.
Those men were ”so-called moderates,” but in reality murderous terrorists.
They scoped out the consulate for the attackers and sent them texts and photos of how it was arranged the night of the attack.
They were NEVER on ”our” side, not even for an instant.
But we armed them.
BTW, search for
”wikileaks searchable database.”
That link allows you to use keywords or person’s names to find what you want much more easily.
What would Hillary hand over to terrorists if she had all our resources at her disposal?
If this is true…
Napolitano: Intelligence community is furious at Clinton
Better it be the Russians than a U.S. intelligence community faction gone rogue, hacking people inside our own government, and using Wikileaks as a tool to try to alter the course of a presidential election.
@Greg: The left has been leaking information to the press for quite a long time. They even leaked the Plame info and blamed it on Libby! I would not be surprised if leaks appeared that damages Hillary’s run to the presidency. She has dissed many folks in the SS and the intel agencies.
Assange, Avowed Foe of Clinton, Timed Email Release for Democratic Convention
Got that? He thinks Trump is a loose cannon would would be totally unpredictable, but he wants to destroy Clinton because she pushed to prosecute him for stealing and publishing sensitive U.S. diplomatic correspondence. He openly admits that. Trying to sabotage Clinton and monkey wrenching a U.S. presidential election is a matter of personal revenge.
Have we forgotten what that “crackdown” involved? Or that anti-Gadaffi forces had already taken over towns and villages across eastern Libya, that Gadaffi’s overthrow was only a matter of time anyway, and that republicans were attacking the Obama administration on a daily basis for its failure to intervene on behalf of the civilians who Gadaffi’s loyalists were slaughtering?
Yep. It’s all been forgotten. It never happened. The story now is that the Obama administration overthrew Gadaffi, who was keeping a lid on terrorism.
Edward Snowden, now hiding out in Russia after stealing half of the CIA’s file cabinets, should get a Good Citizen’s Award and maybe a medal. Assange, who set him up with a house there, and is likely a conduit for the public release of documents hacked by Russian intelligence operatives, probably should as well. You know, for putting Putin’s pick in the White House.
@Greg: I am not all that surprised you leap at the opportunity to praise Assange as some sort of seer. He isn’t. He is simply a little worm that exposes other people’s information.
He just happens to currently be revealing what homophobic, anti-Semitic racists the Democrats are and more proof (as if we needed it) that Hillary is a greedy liar.
Like Obama… who proclaimed Hillary, a proven incompetent, corrupt liar, “the most qualified person in history” to be President… says Trump is “ill-prepared” to be President (as if Obama has proven himself capable), I put very little stock in the opinion of Assange. Though, Trump would definitely be a change-maker in Washington.