As you probably know Maricopa County in Arizona is conducting a recount and analysis of the 2020 Presidential election. democrat opposition has reached a fever pitch for some unknown reason. As a researcher I was never afraid of someone trying to duplicate my results when I published a paper. I would repeat tests over and over to establish confidence in the results and then when challenged I would simply say “bring it on.”
In a stunning display of insecurity Stacey Abrams claims that the recount effort in Arizona amount to a “continuation of the insurrection.”
Left wing hysteric stooge Anderson Cooper framed his question in a mocking manner
“First on the news, given all your work on voting rights, when you see this so-called audit in Arizona with cell phone jammers and UV lights, and conspiracy theories about bamboo ballots brought in from Asia, what is happening there?”
To which Abrams shrieked
“It’s a continuation of the big lie, but more importantly and more concerningly, it’s a continuation of the insurrection, of this attempt to disenfranchise voters and to dismiss the legitimacy of our elections.”
That’s not someone confident in the results and that makes me wonder what’s going on in Maricopa County. There is plenty afoot to make one have doubts.
Karen Fann, the President of the Arizona State Senate sent a letter to Jack Sellers, the Chairman of the Maricopa Board of Supervisors with a number of concerns:
To date, attorneys for Maricopa County have refused to produce virtual images of routers used in connection with the general election, relying on a conclusory and unsupported assertion that providing the routers would somehow “endanger the lives of law enforcement officers, their operations, or the protected health information and personal data of Maricopa County’s citizens.”
Separately, Maricopa County has refused to provide the passwords necessary to access vote tabulation devices. Its attorneys’ insistence that the County does not have custody or control of this information is belied by the County’s conduct of its own audits, which, if they were as comprehensive as they purported to be, almost certainly would have entailed use of the passwords to examine the tabulation devices, and it strains credulity to posit that the County has no contractual right to obtain (i.e., control of) password information from Dominion.
There apparently is no documentation of chain of custody
1. The County has not provided any chain-of-custody documentation for the ballots. Does such documentation exist, and if so, will it be produced?
2. The bags in which the ballots were stored are not sealed, although the audit team has found at the bottom of many boxes cut seals of the type that would have sealed a ballot bag. Why were these seals placed at the bottom of the boxes?
3. Batches within a box are frequently separated by only a divider without any indication of the corresponding batch numbers. In some cases, the batch dividers are missing altogether. This lack of organization has significantly complicated and delayed the audit team’s ballot
processing efforts. What are the County’s procedures for sorting, organizing, and packaging ballot batches?
4. Most of the ballot boxes were sealed merely with regular tape and not secured by any kind of tamper-evident seal. Is that the County’s customary practice for storing ballots?
5. The audit team has encountered a significant number of instances in which there is a disparity between the actual number of ballots contained in a batch and the total denoted on the pink report slip accompanying the batch. In most of these instances, the total on the pink report slip is greater than the number of ballots in the batch, although there are a few instances in which the total is lower. What are the reasons for these discrepancies? For your reference, please see several illustrative (i.e., not comprehensive) examples in the table below
We have recently discovered that the entire “Database” directory from the D drive of the machine “EMSPrimary” has been deleted. This removes election related details that appear to have been covered by the subpoena. In addition, the main database for the Election Management System (EMS) Software, “Results Tally and Reporting,” is not located anywhere on the EMSPrimary machine, even though all of the EMS Clients reference that machine as the location of the database. This suggests that the main database for all election related data for the November 2020 General Election has been removed. Can you please advise as to why these folders were deleted, and whether there are any backups that may contain the deleted folders?
None of this is confidence inspiring. Anyone truly confident in the result would not be throwing every conceivable roadblock in the way. Anyone truly confident in the vote would love to see vindication. It would be entirely reasonable to have your own observers watching the process. This is an opportunity for Abrams and her ilk to see the results confirmed.
Back to the shrieking Abrams:
“Not only is there a hypocrisy, but it’s gaslighting. They are saying aloud that there’s nothing wrong, and at the exact same time, they’re pushing forward legislation to fix something they say is broken. Either they’re lying then, or they’re lying now. And the reality is the lie that continues to weave its way through our democracy is one that turns this issue of partisanship, this naked partisan grab.”
Like I said, this is really a golden opportunity for Abrams and the left.
So what are they afraid of?
Also- something is afoot in New Hampshire