The newest member of the “THIS WILL NAIL TRUMP” whistleblower series has been identified as Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman. He is said to be a Ukrainian refugee who did serve in the US military. he currently serves as the director for European Affairs at the NSC.
He claims to have listened in to Donald Trump’s call with Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and became “concerned.”
On July 25, when the president called Zelensky to congratulate him on his party’s parliamentary victory, Vindman listened in on the call. He says: “I was concerned by the call. I did not think it was proper to demand that a foreign government investigate a U.S. citizen, and I was worried about the implications for the U.S. government’ s support of Ukraine.” Notably, the transcript of the call suggests that Trump did not “demand” an investigation of the Bidens.
For the record, Trump demanded no such thing.
Vindman never brought his concerns to the President. he never even spoke to Trump.
https://twitter.com/Shem_Infinite/status/1188997858009243648
He did, however, have other activities
Laura Ingraham, on her show Monday night, read a portion of the New York Times report about the testimony of National Security Council Ukraine expert Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman. Vindman plans to testify that he objected twice to the president’s July phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, in which Trump urged the foreign leader to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter.
The host pointed to a specific line in the middle of the Times report that she thought was “buried” and “found it very interesting.”
“Because [Col. Vindman] emigrated from Ukraine along with his family when he was a child and is fluent in Ukrainian and Russian, Ukrainian officials sought advice from him about how to deal with Mr. Giuliani, though they typically communicated in English,” the line she highlighted reads.
She added, “Here we have a U.S. national security official, who is advising Ukraine while working inside the White House apparently against the president’s interest, and usually, they spoke in English. Isn’t that kind of an interesting angle on this story?”
Stephen McIntyre then asks the obvious question- who gave him permission to do this?
so Vindman advised Ukrainian officials about how to deal with Giuliani, who was (according to State Dept IG) serving as Acting Legal Advisor. What was Vindman's advice to Ukrainian officials? Did he have permission from his supervisors to advice Ukraine? Documents?? https://t.co/FdzGCZOwRL pic.twitter.com/stnTVcSIPg
— Stephen McIntyre (@ClimateAudit) October 29, 2019
This is a pattern among White House diplomats
Reminder that, just like Vindman, Bill Taylor also communicated directly with the Ukrainians, telling them not to do what Trump wanted them to do. pic.twitter.com/CxbqUD57JK
— Hans Mahncke (@HansMahncke) October 29, 2019
Makes you wonder who’s working for whom. Vindman’s ostensible concern:
This would result in Ukraine losing bipartisan support? More than, say, this?
Or more than this?
Seems to me that horse has long left the barn.
One thing Vindman has done is to corroborate the transcript
On July 25 , 2019, the call occurred. listened in on the call in the Situation Room with colleagues from the NSC and the office of the Vice President. As the transcript is in the public record, we are all aware of what was said.
The bottom line is that Vindman’s mischaracterization of what Trump said is troubling and certainly suggest a partisan motive.
DrJohn has been a health care professional for more than 30 years. In addition to clinical practice he has done extensive research and has published widely with over 70 original articles and abstracts in the peer-reviewed literature. DrJohn is well known in his field and has lectured on every continent except for Antarctica. He has been married to the same wonderful lady for over 30 years and has three kids- two sons, both of whom are attorneys and one daughter on her way into the field of education.
DrJohn was brought up with the concept that one can do well if one is prepared to work hard but nothing in life is guaranteed.
Except for liberals being foolish.
@Randy:
Not just PuffingtonPost. Vox, CNN, MSNBC, and many other left wing outlets pump out, on a daily basis, exactly what Comrade Greggie comes here and posts. But, unlike Comrade Greggie, those that write for those outlets are smart. They know if they write an article pushing their far left wing b/s as truth, people like Comrade Greggie will repeat it, and repeat it and repeat it.
Funny how Vindman, who has been wearing a suit for his current job (including when he attended the inauguration of the Ukrainian president) showed up in full dress uniform escorted by four D.C. police officers. Seems the Lawfare traitors that Schiff has hired recommended that little bit of political theater. Can’t diss a military officer, you know, that is unless his last name is Flynn. I would like to know what the UCMJ has to say about an officer spying on his CinC. Maybe someone should look into Vindman’s Ukrainian contacts. Are they supporters of Russia?
The leaking, spying, lying whistle blower.
@retire05, #46:
Why would any supporter of Russia give testimony damaging to Putin’s man in the White House?
Lt. Col. Vindman is an active duty military officer who was called before Congress to testify regarding something that occurred in connection with the performance of his official duties, which also directly involves his Commander in Chief. Full dress uniform would be mandatory. Any soldier would know that. Not being in uniform would have been strikingly inappropriate and probably would have resulted in a formal reprimand.
@Greg:
Why indeed? Kinda discounts the ongoing lie of the left that Trump is beholden to Putin in any way, form or fashion. However, the way the Democrats have done EXACTLY what they claimed Russians interfering in our elections would accomplish… well, that raises LOTS of suspicions, especially considering how many Democrats signed off on Russia buying 20% of our uranium and Obama stopping officials from blocking Russian interference.
John Walker was active duty. So was Bradley Manning (whose sentence Obama commuted, he cared so much about national security). Active duty is where most spies are recruited. He provided his opinion of what Trump did with Zelensky. That’s it.
@Greg: Actually, many military personnel working in a civilian capacity often do not wear their uniforms.
@Greg:
You continue pimping the lie that is told to you by your left wing handlers.
Really? Show me the military rule that would require this clown to testify in front of Congress in full dress uniform.
@Randy:
So Comrade Greggie Goebbels, Constitutional scholar, expert on IRS statutes and psychologist is now an expert on the UCMJ and military protocol.
Aren’t we lucky to have Comrade Greggie to help us all out?
@retire05:
There are some other issues as well. Per AR 600-20, these are two of the prohibited activities that Army personnel are forbidden to engage in:
Participate in partisan political management or campaigns or make public speeches in the course thereof.
Use contemptuous words against the officeholders described in 10 USC 888.
10 USC 888 states:
Any commissioned officer who uses contemptuous words against the President, the Vice President, Congress, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of a military department, the Secretary of Homeland Security, or the Governor or legislature of any State, Commonwealth, or possession in which he is on duty or present shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.
I would assume Vindman cleared what he did with a lawyer first. The Schitt show is clearly a partisan political activity and he participated in it. He also accused POTUS of wrongdoing with zero facts to back it up other than his personal opinion. Perhaps the Chief of Staff for the Army should be called before Congress and asked if it is policy for his officers to engage in this type of activity to include looking out for the interests for a foreign government.
@another vet:
Thanks.
Comrade Greggie Goebbels weeps.
I agree. Tomorrow the Schitt Show continues and the American people are beginning to turn against him and his fellow impeachers.
@Greg:
There you go no trump ownership as you lied about in your previous post.
Now what exactly was Flynn lobbying for, its a connect the dots as why Flynn needed to be punished.
Hint
Clinton ties with Fethulleh Gülen, that go back to 1997, during the early stages of Operation Gladio B, when Gülen was brought to the United States, to serve the purposes of the CIA’s and Clinton Administration’s strategy for Central Asia, the Caucasus and the Middle East. Blanket immunity for criminal activities now 20 billion in assets. Big donor to a slush fund.
@kitt: I think Greg loves being wrong.
@Randy: Greg like the MSM that programs his weak mind, count on people that have short attentions spans, poor memories and no ability to fact check innuendo evidence.
@Deplorable Me, #54:
If he isn’t, why does he do things that seem to favor Putin’s geopolitical objectives? He has pushed Iran closer to Russia, conceded influence in the Middle East to Putin, lessened Ukraine’s confidence that we’ll support their resistance to Russian territorial incursions, weakened the cohesion of NATO, and promoted Britain’s exit from the European Alliance. He has discounted Russia’s meddling in our 2016 election and done nothing to prevent more in 2020. He has generally expressed favorable opinions about Putin himself. His now-convicted campaign manager was formerly working for Ukraine’s pro-Putin president, Viktor Yanukovych, who is presently in exile in Russia to avoid trial for high treason. There are the highly suspicious Deutsche Bank loans—the same bank that was involved in grand-scale Russian money laundering.
Is this all somehow to America’s long-term advantage? Is it purely coincidental? How can so many dots all be in a straight line, and some people still deny any possibility that they’re somehow connected? Maybe you’ve got an alternative explanation.
@kitt, #60:
Property doesn’t consist solely of land and buildings. It also consists of the profit-generating business being conducted there. Contractual ownership of a share of that was the actual purpose of the Trump Organization’s investment. The arrangement is likely structured so as to optimize returns and minimize taxes. It’s hard to know how much income the towers have thus far generated for him, since no one is allowed to see the related tax records, but estimates run as high as $17 million. It’s totally absurd to deny he’s invested in Turkey simply because his interest doesn’t take the form of a real estate deed with his name on it, however. The towers certainly have his name on them.
Trump, in 2015, to Steve Bannon on a Breitbart radio program:
@Greg:
Not that you’re a vet and have any right to know or say that, but indeed…the “how dare you say a war hero is lying” is weak tea coming from the anti-military left.
So, your party is now the Republican Party? Interesting…
The Left would support anything their party does, no matter what…never criticizing anything decision Pelosi et al make…they’d justify anything.
@Greg: So many connected dots, but you see nothing that truly connects them.
Ukraine’s pro-Putin president, Viktor Yanukovych, a duly elected president much of Ukraine speaks only Russian. Who organized the protests? The pro western puppet the corruption that was rampant. “Under Poroshenko, our standard of living lowered even more. I became a pensioner under his administration. I have 30-year work experience as a kindergarten teacher and I receive 1,600 hryvnias [$58], they recently raised it by 100 hryvnias [$3.6],” she said, tearing up.
80K a month for Bidens spawn.
“I am very unsatisfied with the current government. They are all thieves in law.”
Why are the democrats trying to spoil good relations with the new President of Ukraine? Isnt that a pro Putin stance?
NATO has never been stronger now that the freeloaders are paying more but not all what they agreed. Seems the democrats dont like Turkey anymore a NATO ally.
Viktor Yanukovych, who is now presently in exile in Russia to avoid trial for high treason. No he was found guilty, for trying to stop the protests by the puppet regime that funded them after they refused concessions.
The EU was willing to offer €610 million ($838 million) in loans, but Russia was willing to offer $15 billion, as well as cheaper gas prices. In addition, the EU demanded major changes to Ukraine’s regulations and laws, but Russia did not.
Brexit was voted for by the people of the UK.
Most of the crap you whine about happened during the previous admin. the horrid foreign policy.
Vindman could be a fine man. That’s not the question. His service, et cetera, is not in question. Not falling over at another baseless allegation is not “smearing” Vindman. It’s pathetic that they had to scrape together this guy’s “testimony” which has nothing but coached insanity written all over it.
Oh, and who is the whisleblower?
Eric Ciaramella – Leftist who has worked for lots of Dem elite, and is not credible.
@Greg: #60
No sh!t Sherlock.
Do you arrange your income to maximize taxes and minimize returns?
Most times brother your posts are so insane!
The Clintons took a tax deduction for donated underwear. bwahahahahaha
CONGRATS NATIONALS love it when the cinderfella team wins.
@Nathan Blue, #67:
Lt. Col. Vindman actually listened in on the telephone call between Trump and Zelensky. He does, in fact, have first-hand knowledge of everything that was said by both parties during the conversation.
Why Eric Ciaramella? Fiona Hill also testified today. She was Trump’s top National Security Advisor on Russia, until she abruptly resigned in August. Maybe John Bolton, who resigned in September. Consider a couple of his comments:
Bolton said he will not testify voluntarily. He’ll probably be subpoenaed to do so.
@kitt, #68:
You’re missing the point, which maybe wasn’t made clearly enough. Ownership of the land itself and buildings on it would not necessarily be the optimal way for Trump to own a share in the money-making Istanbul operation. He could have a significant investment in the project without that.
@Greg: We know what was in the call we have the transcript…so he doesnt agree with investigation of possible crimes by democrats? Let the Bidens be investigated just like candidate and President Trump was. If they are innocent then the investigation will show that just as it has with President Trump, at least we know why the Bidens would be investigated. We have to investigate the investigation of Trump.
Is there something of Damaging to National security to hide? Redact it.
He could have a significant investment in the project without that. Where? how you make statements without basis. I guess I couldnt get past the Captain Obvious giggle inducing tax remark.
@kitt: Greg is mind reading again. It could be that the only reason there is any impeachment effort at all is because the Dems lost an election and they all hate the person who won. Also, they fear that their criminal election fixing efforts that failed has the potential to make the left irrelevant for many decades when finally revealed. It also could be that the Dems have been fleecing the American tax payers for many years and that has the potential to stop. It also could be that the visit to the moon in the 60s brought back a virus that has infected conservatives that opposes the far out solutions routinely proposed by the left. Or maybe the left is making everything up! Greg, you can not even follow the yellow brick road and know when you reached Oz. You can not recognize the wicked witch of the west when you see her and you can not understand that the silly man behind the curtain is Shiftface.
Have you not been paying attention, Greg?
The “whistleblower” had at least three causes for bias according to the Intelligence Community Inspector General.
1. He was a registered Dem who had, at one point worked for the campaign of one of the Dem candidates.
(That alone leaves off Fiona and Bolton.)
2. He is a CIA analyst who at one point was detailed to the White House and is now back working at the CIA. That fits only Eric Ciaramella who left his National Security Council posting in the White House’s West Wing in mid-2017 amid concerns about negative leaks to the media. He has since returned to CIA headquarters in Langley, Virginia.
3. His entire account was 2nd and 3rd hand. Eric was not in the room, or even the WH.
He was an Obama holdover who,
https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2019/10/30/whistleblower_exposed_close_to_biden_brennan_dnc_oppo_researcher_120996.html
The same names keep coming up with associations with the coup.
@Randy: Greg like trying to make wrong seem right. That’s what promoting his ideology is all about.
@Greg:
Such as what? Producing enough energy to threaten his entire economy? Destroying his military assets in Syria? Destroying the economy of his ally, Iran (who, by the way, drew close to Russia under Obama)? I looked and couldn’t find that recording of Trump, when he thought no one could hear him, promising Putin to do his bidding… I guess I have him confused with someone else.
OBAMA brought Russia into the Syrian picture; now what is Trump supposed to do, declare war to push Russia out? To what purpose? Obama makes the messes, Trump repairs the damage. Over and over and over.
He is trying to find out what REALLY happened in 2016 and Democrats, fearing all their corruption is about to be totally exposed, are pretending to impeach him to prevent that exposure. Why did Biden extort Ukraine to stop the Burisma investigation? Why did Obama stop lethal aid to Ukraine? Why did the DNC engage Ukraine to seek dirt on Trump, even while they were getting fake dirt on Trump from Russia?
We now know this was based on the discredited “black ledger” that the Ukrainians knew was false.
You know who is aligned with Putin? You know who is supporting his geopolitical aims? YOU. You and your Democrats are doing exactly what Putin wants to do; destabilize our government and erode faith and confidence in it. For no reason but false accusations invented in their own socialist minds they are currently trying to impeach Trump; a goal their have expressed they will pursue since November 7, 2016. Putin has no greater and more dependable assets and allies than you and your seditionist Democrats.
We have the transcripts; the actual words transcribed. Ltcol Vindman says he “remembers” different words, yet no one else has the same memories. It’s his opinion, and his opinion is based on bias and a cloudy loyalty.
@Randy: Imagine Democrat thoughts of 4 more years of Trump and him being able to complete all the ongoing investigations. No wonder they all look so bitter; they all have the nervous runs.
@Nan G: Isn’t it odd that someone with such a dedication to Ukraine supported the President that just let Russia roll them over? These leftists merely oppose anything not leftist.
@Deplorable Me: Should we be investing in underwear destined for Washington DC and Blue states? Or maybe Procter and Gamble laundry detergent! With all the rest of the stock market rising, maybe this sector is due now.
@Randy: I doubt it. They don’t seem to mind wallowing in their own excrement.
Happy Halloween, The little trick or treaters will need to bundle up here its snowing.
The dems are voting to set their own rules for the circus inquisition. BOO!
@kitt: Like other vampires, they fear sunlight shining on their activities.
@Randy:
“So despite all the Democrats’ crocodile tears for the constitution and rule of law,
Vindman’s beef wasn’t really about their whole abuse of power canard. Nor did it touch upon the risible Dem/MSM nonsense that in asking a foreign government to undertake a legitimate action (an investigation of the corrupt use of taxpayers money by the former Vice President) Trump was committing a violation of U.S. election laws.
To the contrary, the gravamen of the colonel’s concern was domestic politics and the possibility that in withholding the $380 million of pending Ukrainian aid (which should have been zero in the first place) and pressing the Biden investigation, Trump would alienate Capitol Hill Democrats and leave the Deep State’s policy of using the Ukraine as an anti-Putin battering ram high and dry.
“…. I was worried about the implications for the U.S. government’s support of
Ukraine…. “I realized that if Ukraine pursued an investigation into the Bidens
and Burisma, it would likely be interpreted as a partisan play which would undoubtedly result in Ukraine losing the bipartisan support it has
thus far maintained.”
“This would all undermine U.S. national security. Following the call, I
again reported my concerns to NSC’s lead counsel.”
Folks, Lt. Col. Vindman was not elected to nothin’. If he’s a proud 20-year veteran of the US Army and diplomatic service as he claims, fine.
But his job is to implement policy as decided by the elected representatives of the
people, not to free lance in the cause of the Empire group-think in which he is obviously and hopelessly steeped.”
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/yes-virginia-there-deep-state-and-its-feeding-anti-potus-mob
Vindman’s loyalty was not to his nation and the CinC. It was to Ukraine. One has to be deaf, blind and stupid to not know that.
We were warned of the “military industrial complex” (upper echelons of the military and those who benefit from defense contracts) decades ago. Our military’s first duty is the protect the homeland, but Democrats have always found ways to involve us in wars that we should have never been involved in and spilling the blood of those who swear to protect and defend OUR Constitution. The last war we won ended in 1945. Now, all we do is sacrifice our military in wars we lose. Trump knows this and wants to end that practice.
Add to that the fact that the intelligence community has, for decades, decided that it, not the President, not the Congress, should be running the nation and it is beyond reproach. Hell, that attitude has been flourishing since the IC bungled the investigation of Billy Ayers and the Weathermen Underground causing Ayers to egotistically say “Guilty as hell, free as a bird.” The CIA, designed to help the President ONLY, now thinks it has the right to do as it wished, Constitution be damned.
The left’s policy of nation building has failed. And while they all (including Schiff) demanded we get to the bottom of Russian interference in the 2016 election, the biggest culprit was Ukraine, but the Democrats now are amazingly unconcerned about Ukrainian interference in the 2016 election.
Comrade Greggie Goebbels supports this globalist vision. He’s fully on board. It won’t be his blood spilling on some G-d forsaken sand pit or in some unimportant nation that will eventually turn on us full bore.
@Deplorable Me:
No we don’t. We have a White House reconstruction of the conversation. Vindman testified that parts have been omitted. The ellipses aren’t conversational pauses, as was claimed
But that’s beside the point. The White House version is not “a perfect conversation”. It sounds bad, and only gets worse when taken in context with what those closest to it thought it meant.
@Greg: Vindman says he thinks other things were said. He’s obviously wrong.
Yeah, Trump’s conversation sounds bad, especially the part about Democrat and Ukraine working together to interfere in the 2016 election.
@Deplorable Me: @Greg: Greg, right now, what people think are not crimes. I know that will change when the next Democrat gets elected.
@Greg: I guess Schitt forgot to leak this testimony:
https://www.nationalreview.com/news/latest-impeachment-witness-contradicts-vindmans-claim-that-key-details-were-left-out-of-ukraine-call-transcript/
Tim Morrison’s opening statement is public.
From the same article:
Yeah, that’s something Schiff would want to keep quiet, isn’t it.
@Greg: Biden killing that investigation to protect his son by extorting the Ukrainian government is certainly something the DOJ and American people need to know about. You Democrats want to keep you corruption hidden, but it is all coming out. Desperately trying to project it on Trump is not working.
There was no investigation going on into Burisma or Biden’s son for Biden to kill. That is a fact.
Vice President Biden was pressuring the Ukrainian government to fire Shokin because Shokin was not taking a hard enough stand against high-level Ukranian corruption. Biden was sent there to do that. Shokin’s removal was an official U.S. foreign policy goal. That is also a fact.
The White House’s top Ukraine official confirms there was a quid pro quo
@Greg: You’ve ignored facts so consistently, you don’t even know what one is. Biden BRAGGED about getting the prosecutor fired that was investigating Burisma, which would have led directly to his son; Hunter was there precisely for that purpose: to keep the corrupt Obama administration from looking into them. But this is only one instance where Biden used the US government to enhance coke-head Hunter out in business situations he would be unable to enter into without being a Senator’s or Vice President’s son.
THAT’S a fact.
And that’s all there is to THAT.
@Greg: Official U.S. foreign policy goal of removing an investigator. Is it often US Policy to micro manage other countries employees? Should China demand changes in our government before it lends us money? Even if it wasnt to stop his kids cash flow, the US has no business forcing other countries to change their personnel, let alone to later brag on it. Or are you trying to say that the USA wanted Bidens kids company investigated and the guy wasnt doing it? 1.8 billion missing bucks should be looked into. Seems the real solid guy that replaced Shokin also failed but drives a much much more expensive vehicle.
Shokin WAS NOT investigating Burisma. That is a fact. Shokin’s “investigation” of Mykola Zlochevsky, Burisma’s owner, had ended before Biden’s son was hired.
Viktor Shokin: The inside story on Ukraine’s ‘very good’ prosecutor at centre of Trump scandal
@kitt: Biden extorted Ukraine to cover up his own corruption (nothing wrong with that).
Trump asks Ukraine to investigate Biden extorting them to cover up his own corruption and to look into any involvement in interference in the 2016 election (impeachable high crime).
This is the Democrat’s idea of justice.
@Greg: Obama administration was warned about Hunter’s conflict of interest, but they blew it off… then Biden told Ukraine to kill the investigation of Burisma
https://hotair.com/archives/ed-morrissey/2019/10/18/breaking-impeachment-witness-says-tried-warn-ukraine-influence-biden/
Ukraine reopened Biden investigation in February… BEFORE Trump’s call
https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/item/33633-ukraine-reopened-biden-burisma-probe-before-trump-call-whistleblower-linked-to-2020-democrat-candidate
Ukraine prosecutor told to back off Bursima investigation because of Biden’s threats
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ukraine-prosecutor-biden-burisma-back-off-state-department-files?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A%20foxnews%2Fpolitics%20%28Internal%20-%20Politics%20-%20Text%29
Ukrainian prosecutor Shokin details why he got fired
Yes, he was.
Seriously? Shokin’s side of the story, presented by Sean Hannity, as told by The Gateway Pundit?
BREAKING: Solomon Bombshell — Ukrainian Prosecutor Shokin Details BIDEN’S SHAKEDOWN — WILL LIKELY END BIDEN CAMPAIGN!
This is what you’ve got instead of the mainstream media and traditional journalism?
They should print this stuff on paper, so it could be used to line bird cages and wrap garbage.
@Greg: Seriously, BIDEN’S side of it? When he’s not lying, he’s simply WRONG.
That’s what I have instead of liberal propaganda that consistently LIES and leaves out the facts. SERIOUSLY, VOX?
Biden received $900,000 from Burisma for lobbying
https://en.interfax.com.ua/news/press-conference/617936.html
BIDEN EXTORTED UKRAINE TO PROTECT HIMSELF AND HIS SON.
@Deplorable Me: Thank you as a fan of Solomans journalism I was aware of the documents and interview. No matter what solid evidence is presented to Greg he can only accept a “preponderance of innuendo” as presented by his party.
No evidence contrary to Schiffs parody narrative will be allowed in the kangaroo investigation. Physical evidence,documents and so forth will all need to be forwarded to trusted members of the senate, originals to the white house lawyers.
@Deplorable Me: arguing with Greg reminds me of a Mark Twain quote, “never argue with an idiot, they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.”
It was only a matter of time before something like this came out.
@another vet, #96:
Correct. Slanderous personal attacks are a tactic Trump and his enablers have been using since he began knocking off his republican opponents on his way to his 2016 nomination. This was entirely predictable. If you made a list of all of the good and honorable people he has done this to, you would need a very long sheet of paper. You would also need a cigar box to keep their military medals in, and it would be filling up fast.
@Greg: Slanderous? Slanderous? Facts, Why when he agrees with your own political views would it be considered slander?
@kitt:
Lt. C. Vindman, who was assigned to the White House, speaks Ukrainian and Russian.
Color me not surprised to learn that Eric Ciaramella, the leaker who coordinated his statement with Schiff staffers, andf who also recommended attorneys LawFare attorneys to the leaker, speaks Ukrainian, Russian and Arabic.
What are the odds that both men are fluent in the same languages?
Both these men need to be investigated by the DOJ.
@retire05:
Vindman and Ciaramella both speak Russian and Ukraine. They must be investigated!
How friggin stupid can you be, retire 05?