Posted by DrJohn on 18 September, 2018 at 7:01 am. 17 comments already!



There is a lot of funny stuff going on right now with regard to the Ford-Kavanaugh brouhaha. Prior to going public with her accusations against Kavanaugh, Ford scrubbed her social media. Today we learn that her high school has wiped clean the yearbook from Ford’s attendance there.

But the thing that really caught my attention was a statement from Ford’s lawyer Debra Katz.

A California psychology professor who has accused Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexually assaulting her in high school wants to cooperate with federal lawmakers considering the nomination, but doesn’t want to be part of a Washington “bloodletting,” her attorney said on “Good Morning America” Monday.

Christine Blasey Ford wants to speak to investigators about her allegations, but she is afraid of becoming the next Anita Hill, Ford’s attorney, Debra Katz, told ABC News Chief Anchor George Stephanopoulos on “GMA.”

In other words, she wants Kavanaugh destroyed over an extremely vague and thin accusation but she doesn’t want to get hands dirty. She doesn’t want her reputation jeopardized while she eviscerates his.

She is a democrat donor (albeit not a major one) and she is virulently anti-Trump.

Her accusations are vague, to say the least.

Ford’s therapist’s notes are a clue:

Ford reported being attacked by students “from an elitist boys’ school” who went on to become “highly respected and high-ranking members of society.”

“The notes don’t name Kavanaugh, and they say four boys were involved, not two. Ford told the Post this was the therapist’s error — there were four boys at the party, she said, but only two in the room,”

She didn’t name Kavanaugh’s name until it became a political asset.

Let’s recap.

Ford can’t remember the year, the month, the house, the town, whose house it was, how she got there, how she got home, why she went upstairs, why she told her therapist four males were involved, whose party it was, who else was at the party, and she told absolutely no one about it- NO ONE, until Brett Kavanaugh’s name came up in 2012 when it became politically useful for her. There is not another single female accuser and there are countless supporters who were actually his classmates. There were two alleged witnesses and both deny her account.  Would you not expect such a traumatic event to be burned into one’s mind? Would you not expect someone to remember such an event in exquisite detail?

So now we’re to ruin Kavanaugh’s life over this crap and she doesn’t want to be part of the “bloodletting”? Pilate would be proud.

She could have gone to Grassley or the FBI. She didn’t. She went to Feinstein. Feinstein held this until after the close of the hearings. Like it was a plot – something that neither Kavanaugh nor the GOP could respond to properly. Kavanaugh was willing to testify in response today. democrats want it delayed until after the FBI investigates the alleged incident. Thing is, the FBI has already said it won’t be investigating. See how democrats work? Kavanaugh has been vetted six times by the FBI already.

I hope they rip her a new one. I hope they do to her what she’s trying to do to Kavanaugh.


0 0 votes
Article Rating
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x