Posted by DrJohn on 18 October, 2015 at 5:35 am. 31 comments already!

Hillary-what-difference-does-it-make

 

A bombshell email has been found on Hillary Clinton’s private email server, but the media, as usual, is not asking the truly gigantic question.

A bombshell White House memo has revealed for the first time details of the ‘deal in blood’ forged by Tony Blair and George Bush over the Iraq War.

The sensational leak shows that Blair had given an unqualified pledge to sign up to the conflict a year before the invasion started.

It flies in the face of the Prime Minister’s public claims at the time that he was seeking a diplomatic solution to the crisis.

He told voters: ‘We’re not proposing military action’ – in direct contrast to what the secret email now reveals.

The Daily Mail gets all hot and bothered:

Smoking gun emails reveal Blair’s ‘deal in blood’ with George Bush over Iraq war was forged a YEAR before the invasion had even started.

Here is the doc:
***MAIL ONLINE - IF RUN FULL DOCUMENTPLEASE SUN SIDE BY SIDE AND MAKE FONTS LOOK SAME SIZE *** For Tony Blair story for Mail on Sunday Politics page Email from Colin Powell Image vis Glen Owen MOS political reporter

But you’ll note at the bottom that Powell writes “should military operations become necessary.”

But really, none of this is a big deal. What’s important is why is this on her server at all? As sundance over at the Conservative Treehouse asks, why was Clinton building a database of classified documents on her private server?

Without a doubt it was about the Clintons and money.

I can’t help but wonder whether extortion was going to be one of the cards in the game.

You’ll note that the document was set to be declassified in 2012. At the bottom the document suggests it was declassified in January of 2014 but there is a box near the top right which indicates it was classified and was to be declassified 4-1-2022.

April Fools Day. Hmmm.

Why is this document on her server at all? This is one more example of the how Clintons think they’re above the law. I do not know which classification markings take precedence and I’ll wait for those who know more to comment. But this is very odd. Hillary Clinton was stocking a database with classified documents.

Why? Inquiring minds want to know.

>