James Hansen’s Supervisor Calls Him An Embarrassment

Loading

Well whatta ya know.  Dr. John S. Theon, a scientist formerly with the Institute for Global Environmental Strategies, and formerly the supervisor of the man, the myth, the legend in his own mind….Dr. James Hansen, is now calling Hansen an embarrassment to NASA:

Washington DC, Jan 27th 2009: NASA warming scientist James Hansen, one of former Vice-President Al Gore’s closest allies in the promotion of man-made global warming fears, is being publicly rebuked by his former supervisor at NASA.

Retired senior NASA atmospheric scientist, Dr. John S. Theon, the former supervisor of James Hansen, NASA’s vocal man-made global warming fear soothsayer, has now publicly declared himself a skeptic and declared that Hansen “embarrassed NASA” with his alarming climate claims and said Hansen was “was never muzzled.” Theon joins the rapidly growing ranks of international scientists abandoning the promotion of man-made global warming fears.

“I appreciate the opportunity to add my name to those who disagree that global warming is man made,” Theon wrote to the Minority Office at the Environment and Public Works Committee on January 15, 2009. “I was, in effect, Hansen’s supervisor because I had to justify his funding, allocate his resources, and evaluate his results,” Theon, the former Chief of the Climate Processes Research Program at NASA Headquarters and former Chief of the Atmospheric Dynamics & Radiation Branch explained.

“Hansen was never muzzled even though he violated NASA’s official agency position on climate forecasting (i.e., we did not know enough to forecast climate change or mankind’s effect on it). Hansen thus embarrassed NASA by coming out with his claims of global warming in 1988 in his testimony before Congress,” Theon wrote. [Note: NASA scientist James Hansen has created worldwide media frenzy with his dire climate warning, his call for trials against those who dissent against man-made global warming fear, and his claims that he was allegedly muzzled by the Bush administration despite doing 1,400 on-the-job media interviews!See: Don’t Panic Over Predictions of Climate Doom – Get the Facts on James Hansen UK Register: Veteran climate scientist says ‘lock up the oil men’ – June 23, 2008; UK Guardian: NASA scientist calls for putting oil firm chiefs on trial for ‘high crimes against humanity’ for spreading doubt about man-made global warming – June 23, 2008 ]

Theon declared “climate models are useless.” “My own belief concerning anthropogenic climate change is that the models do not realistically simulate the climate system because there are many very important sub-grid scale processes that the models either replicate poorly or completely omit,” Theon explained. “Furthermore, some scientists have manipulated the observed data to justify their model results. In doing so, they neither explain what they have modified in the observations, nor explain how they did it. They have resisted making their work transparent so that it can be replicated independently by other scientists. This is clearly contrary to how science should be done. Thus there is no rational justification for using climate model forecasts to determine public policy,” he added.

“As Chief of several of NASA Headquarters’ programs (1982-94), an SES position, I was responsible for all weather and climate research in the entire agency, including the research work by James Hansen, Roy Spencer, Joanne Simpson, and several hundred other scientists at NASA field centers, in academia, and in the private sector who worked on climate research,” Theon wrote of his career. “This required a thorough understanding of the state of the science. I have kept up with climate science since retiring by reading books and journal articles,” Theon added. (LINK) Theon also co-authored the book “Advances in Remote Sensing Retrieval Methods.” [Note: Theon joins many current and former NASA scientists in dissenting from man-made climate fears. A small sampling includes: Aerospace engineer and physicist Dr. Michael Griffin, the former top administrator of NASA, Atmospheric Scientist Dr. Joanne Simpson, the first woman in the world to receive a PhD in meteorology, and formerly of NASA, Geophysicist Dr. Phil Chapman, an astronautical engineer and former NASA astronaut, Award-Winning NASA Astronaut/Geologist and Moonwalker Jack Schmitt, Award-winning NASA Astronaut and Physicist Walter Cunningham of NASA’s Apollo 7, Chemist and Nuclear Engineer Robert DeFayette was formerly with NASA’s Plum Brook Reactor, Hungarian Ferenc Miskolczi, an atmospheric physicist with 30 years of experience and a former researcher with NASA’s Ames Research Center, Climatologist Dr. John Christy, Climatologist Dr. Roy W. Spencer, Atmospheric Scientist Ross Hays of NASA’s Columbia Scientific Balloon Facility]

Gore faces a much different scientific climate in 2009 than the one he faced in 2006 when his film “An Inconvenient Truth” was released. According to satellite data, the Earth has cooled since Gore’s film was released, Antarctic sea ice extent has grown to record levels, sea level rise has slowed, ocean temperatures have failed to warm, and more and more scientists have publicly declared their dissent from man-made climate fears as peer-reviewed studies continue to man-made counter warming fears. [See: Peer-Reviewed Study challenges ‘notion that human emissions are responsible for global warming’; New Peer-Reviewed Scientific Studies Chill Global Warming Fears ]

“Vice President Gore and the other promoters of man-made climate fears endless claims that the “debate is over” appear to be ignoring scientific reality,” Senator James Inhofe, Ranking Member of the Environment & Public Works Committee.

A U.S. Senate Minority Report released in December 2008 details over 650 international scientists who are dissenting from man-made global warming fears promoted by the UN and yourself. Many of the scientists profiled are former UN IPCC scientists and former believers in man-made climate change that have reversed their views in recent years. The report continues to grow almost daily. We have just received a request from an Italian scientist, and a Czech scientist to join the 650 dissenting scientists report. A chemist from the U.S. Naval Academy is about to be added, and more Japanese scientists are dissenting. Finally, many more meteorologists will be added and another former UN IPCC scientist is about to be included. These scientists are openly rebelling against the climate orthodoxy promoted by Gore and the UN IPCC.

The prestigious International Geological Congress, dubbed the geologists’ equivalent of the Olympic Games, was held in Norway in August 2008 and prominently featured the voices of scientists skeptical of man-made global warming fears. Reports from the conference found that Skeptical scientists overwhelmed the meeting, with ‘2/3 of presenters and question-askers hostile to, even dismissive of, the UN IPCC’ ( See full reports here; here ] In addition, a 2008 canvass of more than 51,000 Canadian scientists revealed 68% disagree that global warming science is “settled.” A November 25, 2008, article in Politico noted that a “growing accumulation” of science is challenging warming fears, and added that the “science behind global warming may still be too shaky to warrant cap-and-trade legislation.” More evidence that the global warming fear machine is breaking down. Russian scientists “rejected the very idea that carbon dioxide may be responsible for global warming”. An American Physical Society editor conceded that a “considerable presence” of scientific skeptics exists. An International team of scientists countered the UN IPCC, declaring: “Nature, Not Human Activity, Rules the Climate”. India Issued a report challenging global warming fears. International Scientists demanded the UN IPCC “be called to account and cease its deceptive practices.”

The scientists and peer-reviewed studies countering climate claims are the key reason that the U.S. public has grown ever more skeptical of man-made climate doom predictions. [See: Global warming ranks dead last, 20 out of 20 in new Pew survey. Pew Survey: Survey finds majority of U.S. Voters – ‘51% – now believe that humans are not the predominant cause of climate change’ – January 20, 2009 – Rasmussen Reports ]

The chorus of skeptical scientific voices grow louder in 2008 as a steady stream of peer-reviewed studies, analyses, real world data and inconvenient developments challenged the UN’s and former Vice President Al Gore’s claims that the “science is settled” and there is a “consensus.”

How long until the MSM picks up on this rebuke?

I’m betting never.

It’s interesting how often Dr. Hansen gets attention in the MSM while any skeptic get barely a mention, and when they do they are belittled.

But hey, the MSM isn’t biased right?

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
16 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

I’m flat amazed Al Gore wasn’t laughed out of the Hearing Room today….

the only ones that are laughing are the ones that made a killing off of global warming. Oops sorry, I meant global climate change. If sales drop try calling it something else.

Pay more in taxes to the government, so government scientists can fake the data, and pretend to control the weather. What part didn’t you get? Oh the part about the magic tax beans fixing the climate?

If the climate GCMs were worth anything, they would be validated by using the past data. Obviously since they haven’t done that, they know the GCMs are bunk.

Pretty much validates what real science has thought all along. It’s a hoax for ignorant people.

Does anyone think that Al Gore might have a slight conflict of interest here?

LOL…. it. But it messes up my plan to sell carbon credits on e bay.

Yup. Gorebal warming has officially jumped the shark. Now we need to look out for Jimmy Carter’s new Ice Age. It’s baaaack!

The warmers used to tell us that “no credible scientist” disagrees with their alarmist conclusions.

Looks like another global warming lie bites the dust.

AGW–biggest conjob of the last 20 years.

Nope, no conflict, unless you call investing in an energy company that stands to make huge profits for you and then advocating global warming fear mongering, a conflict of interest.

Regarding the elderly Dr. Theon:

From http://realclimate.org, the very best source anywhere for information about climate change, because it is open to all climate scientists — real climate scientists — from around the world for comment. Really, absolutely everything gets discussed and debated and vetted there, from the latest peer review publication in “Nature” to the latest babblings from the blogosphere. Even lay people can submit questions, as shown below, and get answers straight from credible sources, sometimes with differing points of view, more often from a consensus.

To wit:

Warm reception to Antarctic warming story

Calum Says:
28 January 2009 at 4:32 AM
Quote: Retired senior NASA atmospheric scientist, Dr. John S. Theon, 15th Jan 2009,”My own belief concerning anthropogenic climate change is that the models do not realistically simulate the climate system because there are many very important sub-grid scale processes that the models either replicate poorly or completely omit. Furthermore, some scientists have manipulated the observed data to justify their model results. In doing so, they neither explain what they have modified in the observations, nor explain how they did it. They have resisted making their work transparent so that it can be replicated independently by other scientists. This is clearly contrary to how science should be done. Thus there is no rational justification for using climate model forecasts to determine public policy.”

Anyone at Real Climate care to comment?

[Response: Dr. Theon appears to have retired from NASA in 1994, some 15 years ago. Until yesterday I had never heard of him (despite working with and for NASA for the last 13 years). His insights into both modelling and publicity appear to date from then, rather than any recent events. He was not Hansen’s ‘boss’ (the director of GISS reports to the director of GSFC, who reports to the NASA Administrator). His “some scientists” quote is simply a smear – which scientists? where? what did they do? what data? what manipulation? This kind of thing plays well with Inhofe et al because it appears to add something to the ‘debate’, but in actual fact there is nothing here. Just vague, unsubstantiated accusations. – gavin]

– Larry Weisenthal/Huntington Beach, CA

I posted a detailed comment, which got caught in spam. Couple of additional things.

I’ve written before how blogs like this and, on the other side, The Daily Kos, are echo chambers. You have a whole bunch of like thinking people all sharing little snippets of information which fit with their world view, and this becomes uncontested reality. “Global Warming has jumped the shark.” egads. What world/universe are you living in?

Al Gore just went before a Senate committee, which had both Dems and Republicans. He didn’t get jeered out of the room. The Bush administration and John McCain both “accepted” the climate change theory. If you go to

Frontpage

, you’ll find that it is absolutely true that the large preponderance of the scientific community “accepts” the climate change theory. It is a fact that US policy over the next 4 years will align with that of most of the rest of the world (including China, which already has in place more stringent emissions standards for new vehicles than the US has mandated for 2020) in instituting policies to reduce carbon emissions.

This is the real world. The parallel universe is conservative talk radio and conservative blogs, where the only things which get discussed are isolated pieces of news and information which fit their own world view and, in the echo chamber, get reinforced so much that this becomes the parallel universe reality. “Global warming has jumped the shark.” sheesh.

I hope that my earlier post does emerge from the spam filter. It addresses the credibility and importance in the statements of Dr. Theon.

P.S. Someone (probably Mike) posted a picture of some place in the Middle East where they had snow for only the second time in however many years. I note that he did not post pictures from the ongoing Australian Open in Melbourne, where yesterday it was 111 degrees. Or note that 2008 was the 8th warmest year on record. Or that the top 10 warmest years on record have occurred after 1997. Or that the new data from Antarctica, published in “Nature” (and discussed in depth on

Frontpage

— including dispatching the criticisms posted by Mike) pretty much destroys one of the cherished arguments against global warming theory).

– Larry Weisenthal/Huntington Beach, CA

@openid.aol.com/runnswim:

Just a short programming note.

I discovered that if I post while not signed in and have a link in my comment I will invariably end up in the SPAM filter.

If signed in under my log-in then it happens much more rarely.

I dug you out of the filter but noticed that all of the posts that I dug out contained links.

Perhaps a slight alteration of technique will free you up.

Now, back to your regularly scheduled programming.

Why does Larry insist on spreading discredited global warmist myths? “Or note that 2008 was the 8th warmest year on record. Or that the top 10 warmest years on record have occurred after 1997.” Luckily we have real science that discredits such charlatans. Our problem, as reflected in astronomy, is global cooling. The data point out that the world has been cooling since 1998 and all this global warmism promoted by Al Bore is a religious belief.

http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/files/080718%20oped%20bolt%20global%20cooling.pdf

MUST SEE VIDEO

Very entertaining.

James Hansen is not a meteorologist but an astronomer. How in the world did he get the ob of global warming?

Global warming/climate change is code word for more government-less freedoms…the latest cult.

@b1jetmech:

“James Hansen is not a meteorologist but an astronomer”

You got that right!

Hansen’s CV says of his training
B.A., Physics and Mathematics, 1963, University of Iowa
M.S., Astronomy, 1965, University of Iowa
Ph.D., Physics, 1967, University of Iowa
http://www.giss.nasa.gov/staff/jhansen.html

On the other hand, Dr.John S. Theon’s training is a bit more rounded AND to the point
B.S. Aero. Engr. (1953-57); Aerodynamicist, Douglas Aircraft Co. (1957-58); As USAF Reserve Officer (1958-60),B.S. Meteorology (1959); Served as Weather Officer 1959-60; M.S, Meteorology (1960-62); NASA Research Scientist, Goddard Space Flight Ctr. (1962-74); Head Meteorology Branch, GSFC (1974-76); Asst. Chief, Lab. for Atmos. Sciences, GSFC (1977-78); Program Scientist, NASA Global Weather Research Program, NASA Hq. (1978-82); Chief, Atmospheric Dynamics & Radiation Branch NASA Hq., (1982-91); Ph.D., Engr. Science & Mech.: course of study and dissertation in atmos. science (1983-85); Chief, Atmospheric Dynamics, Radiation, & Hydrology Branch, NASA Hq. (1991-93); Chief, Climate Processes Research Program, NASA Hq. (1993-94); Senior Scientist, Mission to Planet Earth Office, NASA Hq. (1994-95); Science Consultant, Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (1995-99); Science Consultant Orbital Sciences Corp. (1996-97) and NASA Jet Propulsion Lab., (1997-99).

James Hansen's Former NASA Supervisor Declares Himself a Skeptic – Says Hansen 'Embarrassed NASA', 'Was Never Muzzled', & Models 'Useless'