Desperate Democrats Try Ridiculous Hail Mary, Claiming There’s an Eleventh Hour Accuser Against Kavanaugh

And of course, she will disappear when it’s all over.
Just like Judge Roy’s accuser.
They’re going to show it just before the vote, hoping that there’s no time for anyone to examine it.
They forget that nowadays, things move at web speed.

Republicans blocked hearings on Merrick Garland’s nomination to the Supreme Court for nearly a year, insisting that they had to wait until the next election had passed so “the people could have their say.”

Now the hypocrites are trying to ram through an incompetent president’s controversial nominee before the people can “have their say” in an election that is less than two months away.

Go ahead and do it. See what follows in November, and what follows that in 2020.

There are no new rules. It just takes the old ones a while to catch up with someone like Donald Trump, but they eventually do. They eventually catch up with everyone of his sort. Their own hubris eventually brings them down, and they take a lot of other people down with them.

The FBI is refusing to bother with this accusation.
Maybe it’s the fact that he went to an all-male prep school?
Maybe it’s the fact that any “crime’s” statute of limitations has long passed?
Who knows why.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6165337/Brett-Kavanaugh-hit-11th-hour-mystery-letter-MeToo-attorney-involved.html
Brett will join in on the next SCOTUS term beginning Oct 1st.

@Greg:

Now the hypocrites are trying to ram through an incompetent president’s controversial nominee before the people can “have their say” in an election that is less than two months away.

Not voting on Garland was Biden’s idea… remember? And the current situation is courtesy of your buddy Harry Reid. Nothing is so pleasant as watching liberals squirm and whine as they have to abide by their own rules of the game.

Yet after endless investigations, costing the taxpayers millions upon millions of dollars, no one has ever managed to come up with credible evidence of any such thing

Well, actually they did. Obama and Holder ran a gun running scheme that fell apart and got hundreds of Mexicans and two Americans killed. Obama directed an IRS scheme to cripple conservative campaign support. Hillary failed to heed warnings about terror attacks in Benghazi, refused to reinforce the consulate or abandon it, refused to send aid to those under attack and then lied about what caused it. Hillary used a private, secret, unsecured email server to circumvent FOIA requests and got caught. Then she destroyed 33,000 emails that had been demanded as evidence and lied about trafficking classified information on it, which we now know the Chinese were reading in real time and the Russians almost certainly had access to. What else did you need to know?

There’s a word describing someone who embraces this sort of irrational, reason-proof belief system: delusional.

Oh, that’s been changed. Didn’t you get the memo? Now, it’s “liberal”.

@Greg:

Republicans blocked hearings on Merrick Garland’s nomination to the Supreme Court for nearly a year, insisting that they had to wait until the next [presidential] election had passed so “the people could have their say.”

There, fixed it for you. But waiting until after the mid-term election is not going to change who is president, and it will not change the fact that the current President will still nominate the next SCOTUS Justice.

You’re just butthurt that you can’t reverse the November 2016 election or have the Democrat Socialists pick a person to fill a SCOTUS vacancy.

@retire05, #11:

There, fixed it for you.

Yet what I posted appears to be unchanged.

But waiting until after the mid-term election is not going to change who is president…

Are you certain? At least Pence appears to be free of any major personality disorders, and has a set of recognizable moral values. I don’t recall him praising Vladimir Putin, or bashing our NATO allies. I don’t believe he’s been known to screw around with porn stars, or to retain a two bit attorney to hand out hush money.

…and it will not change the fact that the current President will still nominate the next SCOTUS Justice.

He can nominate whomever he wishes.

@Ajay42302:

How and why else would he go to the trouble of finding 65 women to pre-sign documents that they weren’t raped by Kavanaugh when they were in high school?

Because the democrats only use the same tired, worn out, tactics. That should show you that the pattern is known, new pattern, We Dont Care WE WIN, YOU LOSE
If a dead body showed up in Hillarys trunk with her fingerprints and DNA all over they would ask Trump why he did it.

@kitt:

Because the democrats only use the same tired, worn out, tactics

And precisely how many times have Dems accused or presented a letter that a judicial nominee has been accused of rape?

That should show you that the pattern is known,

Again, please elaborate on this so-called “pattern” you speak of.

If a dead body showed up in Hillarys trunk with her fingerprints and DNA all over they would ask Trump why he did it

Well, maybe they would or wouldn’t and I realize the “But, but, but Hillary” is always option # 1 for trump lickers, that just doesn’t apply to why Chuck Grassley, who earlier pretended to know nothing of the Kavanaugh rape issue, suddenly came off with a list of 65 women who said he was a great guy during high school and never raped anyone? Grassley’s aide stated:

“At this time, he has not seen the letter in question, and is respecting the request for confidentiality. There’s no plan to change the committee’s consideration of Judge Kavanaugh’s nomination.”

So when was it that Chuck found out that these allegations and who was it that told him? And this process to finding 65 women who knew Kavanaugh 35 years ago? And Kavanaugh was in an all boys school. WTF? And the Grassley document went on to say: “Many of us have remained close friends with him,”.

So real quickly now, name 65 “close friends” of females that you went to high school with (and this is even assuming that like Kavanaugh, it wasn’t 35 years ago at an all boy’s school).

So while Bret may or may not have attempted rape and Hillary may or may not have a body in her trunk, it’s obvious that Republicans knew of this skeleton in the closet rather than it being some Hail Mary pass from Democrats.

Now, getting back to@Ajay42302: where I said

With an understanding that critical thinking is nonexistent with the FA regular(s) and that any constructive counter-arguments are met with a hefty helping of non-sequitur word salad from the clap-trap fan club

, I really don’t know how you could have better validated that claim.

On another note, why is it that Trump keeps endorsing or nominating people where these racist, rapist, sexist, white supremacist, pedophile, etc issues keep popping up? Yes, there’s certainly a pattern. Just not the one you’re trying poorly to sell.

@Ajay42302: It appears that Chuck Grassley came armed and was even waiting in the event this eleventh hour surprise came to surface. He immediately pulled from his holster a letter from 65 women who say they knew Kavanaugh in high school claiming he “behaved honorably and treated women with respect.”

So it should be clear to anyone of reasonable intellect that Grassley knew this could be coming as he was well prepared for it. How and why else would he go to the trouble of finding 65 women to pre-sign documents that they weren’t raped by Kavanaugh when they were in high school?

Letter is dated Sept 14th.
Today.
Grassley didn’t have to pre-package these ladies.
If you went to an exclusive all-girls’ school you’d know that they networked then and continue to network to this day.
It wouldn’t have taken more than a simple email chain letter among the group of them to set up who could write and how many would sign the letter.
THE LETTER:
https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2018-09-14%2065%20Women%20who%20know%20Kavanaugh%20from%20High%20School%20-%20Kavanaugh%20Nomination.pdf

Don’t forget we don’t know when Diane shared this letter with the FBI, it was 1st shared with her by a different politician!
So, she brought her story out to the public two days ago.
I see no problem with grads from such a school putting something together by today.

@Nan G:

Diane F. was just doing political posturing.
Why else would she REDACT the name of the accused BEFORE giving the information to the FBI?

To be clear, sexual assaults and such are not an FBI or federal issue but rather handled on a state and/or local arena.

Where the feds come into play is if Bret lied anytime during his vetting or other questioning on a federal level (and yes, there are many along the years of judicial progression to be a Supreme Justice nominee), then there could be hell to pay. This falls back to how Bill Clinton wasn’t impeached for getting a bj but rather that he lied about it under oath. Lying under oath generally disqualifies for such a powerful position (other than of course for trump supporters only when it pertains to trump as how can they possibly suck trump butt other than to endorse his and only his lying?).

Now, I can’t say if that this “lying” under oath comes to be proven. But what I am saying which you clones as expected sidestepped is that among the Republican Senate, this isn’t something that’s unknown. They have obviously known about it for a while. They just didn’t want us to know about it. And if we did find out, they were prepared.

So, why the hiding?

And, what else are they hiding?