by RICK MORAN
Democrats are outraged that Republicans are planning on objecting to the certification of electoral votes. It’s “conspiracy and fantasy,” says Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer.
“The effort by the sitting President of the United States to overturn the results is patently undemocratic,” the New York Democrat said. “The effort by others to amplify and burnish his ludicrous claims of fraud is equally revolting.”
“This is America. We have elections. We have results. We make arguments based on the fact and reason—not conspiracy and fantasy,” he added.
There’s only one problem with Chucky’s “argument based on fact and reason.” Democrats have been challenging the electoral vote certification for 2 decades.
The last three times a Republican has been elected president — Trump in 2016 and George W. Bush in both 2000 and 2004 — Democrats in the House have brought objections to the electoral votes in states the GOP nominee won. In early 2005 specifically, Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., along with Rep. Stephanie Tubbs, D-Ohio, objected to Bush’s 2004 electoral votes in Ohio.
Illinois Senator Dick Durbin appears to be even more incensed at Senator Josh Hawley’s plan to object to the electoral college vote.
“The political equivalent of barking at the moon,” Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., said of Hawley joining the challenge to electoral slates. “This won’t be taken seriously, nor should it be. The American people made a decision on Nov. 3rd and that decision must and will be honored and protected by the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives.”
Brave Sir Dick seems to forget he was singing a different tune in 2005. Then, it was Democrats questioning the results of the Ohio vote which went narrowly for George Bush.
Durbin had words of praise for Boxer then:
“Some may criticize our colleague from California for bringing us here for this brief debate,” Durbin said on the Senate floor following Boxer’s objection, while noting that he would vote to certify the Ohio electoral votes for Bush. “I thank her for doing that because it gives members an opportunity once again on a bipartisan basis to look at a challenge that we face not just in the last election in one State but in many States.”
In fact, the Ohio electoral vote challenge was only the beginning. Rumors and conspiracy theories swirled around the outcome on election night that saw Bush winning Ohio by a close, but the surprisingly comfortable margin of 120,000 votes. So why are so many of these headlines familiar to us today?
Mother Jones: “Recounting the Election: Was Ohio stolen?”
New York Times:“Glitch Found in Ohio Counting”
They even included some voting machine controversies.
National Election Defense Coalition: “PARTISAN TECHNOLOGY FIRM IS IMPLICATED IN JOHN KERRY’S IMPLAUSIBLE LOSS IN OHIO 2004
NBC News: “Machine Glitch Gave Bush Extra Ohio Votes”
Another Democrat laid into Hawley for his challenge but had nothing but praise for Boxer in 2005.
The Democrats just can not take losing why else do they want t he Electerol Collage Abolished
The Democrats have Joe.
Yeah, there was a time when crying about election misfortune was normal and customary with Democrats. They don’t even need to have any credible examples to point to; Kerry was SUPPOSED to win, so something is fishy! Why, it’s almost as if the Democrats KNOW they have the game rigged and are shocked and surprised when they don’t win!! Like 2016… illegal immigrants and the dead voting in droves and Hillary STILL loses.
Trump will take back the election. there is a reason for not transferring intelligence information. a career pedophile and criminal for pres. and a whore for vp., does not get any better.
@MOS#8541: Its the best the Democrat party have to offer.
Add this to a list of their accomplishments
https://www.waynedupree.com/2021/01/joe-biden-jill-achievements/
@kitt: They didn’t cover that in dokter skule.