Liberal media lynches Covington high school kids for wearing MAGA hats

Loading


 
This story is simply astonishing. The wrong visited on the kids involved is disgusting. This is the future of the liberal media- destroy you and pile on before the facts come out even if you’re a kid. BuzzFeed does it again:



A Kentucky Catholic school may take disciplinary action against their students after a group of the MAGA hat–wearing teenage boys taunted a Native American elder at the Indigenous Peoples March in Washington, DC, on Friday.

Several viral videos show the young men, nearly all of whom are white and wearing pro-Trump gear, chanting at and mocking the man on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial.

One of the teens can be seen standing face-to-face with the elder, smirking and saying nothing, while the man sings and beats a drum.

The indigenous protester was identified by Indian Country Today as Nathan Phillips, a member of the Omaha Nation and a Vietnam War veteran. He reportedly hosts a ceremony each year honoring Native American veterans at Arlington National Cemetery and is also the keeper of a sacred pipe.

The NY Times jumps in

Maggie the Hack Haberman piles on without bothering to vet the story:

There’s a problem. It’s a complete lie. A despicable lie. Watch as Phillips approaches and harasses the kids

Another view

Phillips’ version?

Phillips told the Washington Post Saturday that he had been singing an American Indian Movement song that serves as a ceremony to send the spirits home when he noticed that tensions started to escalate.

“It was getting ugly, and I was thinking: ‘I’ve got to find myself an exit out of this situation and finish my song at the Lincoln Memorial,’” Phillips told the paper. But after one of the teens wearing a MAGA hat stood in his way, he said, he continued to drum and sing.

“I felt like the spirit was talking through me,” Phillips said.

This is bullsh*t. The video clearly shows that Phillips was the aggressor and went after the kids. Seen on Twitter:

Here is a letter written by one of the kids

Here is a longer video

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=npX801xLSFY&feature=youtu.be

And here is a 2 hour video

Want to see the real bigots? They are the Black Hebrew Israelites

And yes, the kids are being doxxed. High school kids. Kids who have done nothing wrong. Nathan Phillips antagonized those kids. He got in their faces and tried to intimidate them. He put that drum in their faces.

Then he lied about it. Oh, by the way

Phillips has a history.

These kids are guilty of nothing more than wearing MAGA hats.

You’d think that the liberal media, coming right off the Cohen embarrassment, would actually vet a story before condemning anyone, let alone some innocent kids.

You’d be wrong. They wanted this story to be true.

What we are seeing is the future of the left wing media. It will be singling out Trump supporters and attempt to destroy them, facts be damned. You might wonder why the media failed to report the harassment of the kids by the Black Hebrew Israelites, who were calling the kids “faggots.”

I don’t. The liberal media is disgusting.

 

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
297 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

@Deplorable Me:

Also odd that no liberal is interested in knowing HOW Wikileaks came to come into possession of those emails, other than blame Trump. Only due to Hillary having them illegally on her private, secret, unsecured server

Wrong server I know hard to keep track of hacked systems, The server for the DNC was either hacked or a whistle blower on inside gave the emails to Assange. We will never know as the server was given to a private company for examination, an examination that told the DNC Russian fairy tale by a company with close connections to her lawyers that made up the dossier. The FBI just accepted the findings without question.
The bathroom server she used to communicate with the president and transmitt in real time to China was given a different treatment, like with a cloth bleachbit.
Which has nothing to do with the Pakis hired by DWS that were given access to congressional computers some on intelligence committees.

@Deplorable Me: It’s Trump plain and simple.
People have strong feelings about him personally and see wearing hat as support for him —little middle ground. Those who disliked Clinton or RR might have acted similarly to wearers. Hopefully not.

Glad Govt .back up—let’s see if they can reach agreement that keeps it open and makes both sides happy–doable but not easy–Moderates from both sides must sit down—Trump and Pelosi should stay out.

@Greg:

Mueller wasn’t tasked with the investigation until May 2017. It hasn’t even been 2 years yet. When he has finished, we will find out what all there is to show for it. At this point there has already been quite a bit. Ask any of those who have been indicted. It’s all related to the central question.

And exactly what was the original “central question” of the Mueller investigation? And what exactly is the “quite a bit” there is to show for it? What charges have been brought against anyone who can support the claim of “collusion”?

Mueller’s job was to show crimes that were committed BEFORE he began his investigation. Instead, all we have seen is process crimes that happened AFTER his investigation was started. Not one damn thing Mueller has done shows any “collusion” between the Trump campaign and the Russians, but we sure do know that Hillary’s campaign, her lackys at Fusion GPS and her paid for phony Steele dossier was all to try to damage the candidate of her opponent. Deny that, you idiot.

@kitt:

The server for the DNC was either hacked or a whistle blower on inside gave the emails to Assange

The DNC server was hacked. What got less press coverage (surprise, I know) is that around the same time there was an attempt to hack the RNC server but a firewall prevented it. Seems the RNC had better security than the DNC.

@kitt:

We will never know as the server was given to a private company for examination, an examination that told the DNC Russian fairy tale by a company with close connections to her lawyers that made up the dossier.

Oh, we know. If there was nothing to hide, there would be no reason not to trust the liberal-friendly FBI with the server. Some secrets can’t be kept and the DNC was not willing to trust to too many eyes. Had to make sure the part about killing Rich was all deleted.

No, the left accuses Wiki of having Hillary’s emails, too.

@Richard Wheeler: Excellent admission. Yes, no matter what Trump supports and no matter if Democrats had supported it previously and no matter how ardently they have supported it, Democrats will automatically oppose it no matter how it harms the nation.

People have strong feelings about him personally and see wearing hat as support for him

So, they are bigoted, prejudiced and, often, racist?

Those who disliked Clinton or RR might have acted similarly to wearers. Hopefully not.

No, not hardly. Back then, civility and adult behavior were important to people. Now, when SOME people don’t like SOME one, shouting people down, throwing bodily fluids, hitting with chains and clubs, shooting them, trying to ruin their jobs, business or futures is approved. Back then, such behavior would have been denounced and, thus, not encouraged.

If anyone thinks Trump is backing off the wall/fence/barrier, they had best think again. Now, let’s watch and see how the Democrats react to an olive leaf extended. We’ve seen their reaction to it before, we can see if they act differently now. In our newfound spirit of civility and niceness here, I’ll withhold speculation.

@retire05, #253:

And exactly what was the original “central question” of the Mueller investigation?

Whether or not Trump’s campaign organization colluded with the Russians in a covert, coordinated effort to alter the outcome of the 2016 presidential election, and what leverage the Russians might now have over their favored candidate as a result of that effort, as a result of concealed financial transactions, or as a result of their possession of other material or information that could be used for blackmail purposes.

I was under the impression that everyone had a clear understanding of the central question.

@Greg: Well, it’s hard to keep track of since the only people to date found to have engaged in that activity have all been Democrats.

@Deplorable Me: Bigoted, prejudiced and racist—NO THEY JUST DON’T LIKE THE GUY PERSONALLY–haven’t you ever met someone you feel that way about? Think of him–now would you want him to be POTUS.?
KISS

@Deplorable Me, #257:

If Flynn had remained, we would have a compromised National Security Advisor.

What if Paul Manafort had gone unexamined? What influence would he be wielding at this point?

Why do you think Trump lied about the Moscow Project? How many times have the stories changed on any number of suspicious contacts? Do you think nothing else has been hidden?

Sometimes I wonder if people who would simply ignore all of the suspicious activities, warning flags, and unanswered questions have lost their minds. Ignoring it all seems irrational.

@Greg:

Whether or not Trump’s campaign organization colluded with the Russians in a covert, coordinated effort to alter the outcome of the 2016 presidential election, and what leverage the Russians might now have over their favored candidate as a result of that effort, as a result of concealed financial transactions, or as a result of their possession of other material or information that could be used for blackmail purposes.

And after almost two years, and $30 million later, there has been nothing, nada, zip, zero that can prove any of those claims are even remotely true. And Mueller has shown nothing, no crime, he has brought charges against that happened prior to the onset of the investigation. IOW, Mueller continues to show NOTHING in conjunction with his original reason for existence.

@Richard Wheeler: Yes we have BHO but impeachment despite many unconstitutional actions was not persued. It is difficult to negotiate with those that will not showup for meetings or take a huge wishlist as an offer and the shut down will cost hundreds of billions but still wont give him 6 billion. Seems they wish to force him into enacting the emergency so they can wail and gnash teeth. There are emergencies in effect right now.https://www.pri.org/stories/2019-01-11/us-currently-31-other-national-emergencies-heres-what-means
Seems someone really used this power almost to the extent of abuse.

@Richard Wheeler:

NO THEY JUST DON’T LIKE THE GUY PERSONALLY–haven’t you ever met someone you feel that way about?

You feel that way and you have never met Trump PERSONALLY. How do you justifying no liking someone PERSONALLY you have never met.

I did not like Clinton or Obama’s policies and political view points but I would bet that I would like both of the PERSONALLY.

You just expressed what is wrong with liberal thought. It’s irrational.

Thought for the day—–Trump wanted to be Prez for a long time—he would have run under any parties flag. After all I believe he’s been a Dem, Indie and Refom at different times.
He was friends with the Clintons—saw Dem nom a lock for HRC. Would not have beaten her for Dem nom nor would he have wrestled it from BHO—-obviously to win as reform or indie nom basically impossible as shown by Perot–though hell of a good try.
Repub. nom was wide open—Jeb obviously weak front runner–he picked off the others one by one–with help from Christie getting him by the most formidable Rubio
Repubs after 8 years DESPERATE for a win grudgingly accepted his win and got behind him as needed—Timing is perfect as HRC worst Dem nom since Dukakis. DT thread the needle with hard work and strategic last minute push in Pa. Mich and Wisc,
To be perfectly clear people who dislike him personally would not have supported him as a Dem or anything else.

Trump’s politics have changed like the New England weather—as needed. His personal qualities have not changed over 70 years–you like em or you don’t. Majority of Americans don’t.–never have and most likely never will

@Richard Wheeler:

His personal qualities have not changed over 70 years–you like em or you don’t.

Nor has Clinton’s and the left worships him.

Like I said; liberal thought is irrational.

@Richard Wheeler: Correct he is not a politician, not of any stripe. IThink you are right about most dont like him, he was an any body but choice. Guess they hated Hillary more in states most devastated by Democrat policies and trade deals. The coasts just cant get over they dont rule the country, just happens to be where most large media is based.
So now what do we have, low unemployment, lower taxes, GDP growth, manufacturing stronger, better jobs, wages going up naturally rather than forced.
Trade deals renegotiated fewer regulations (laws not passed by congress)
It hasn’t been a bad result not nearly the disaster predicted by some. 2 year curve my retirement fund is still in the green.

@Richard Wheeler: But, wait… is not the application of the characteristics you hate upon a person based upon how they look not the very definition of prejudice? Is not hating a group based on what a few might do bigotry? And how about the extra serving of hate applied because such a cap is worn by a WHITE kid. Yep; that’s racism, alright. That’s pretty much why Martin Luther King, Jr. was shot; people weren’t listening to his words. They just looked at his skin color and the influence he had.

No different.

haven’t you ever met someone you feel that way about?

I probably have, but I haven’t wanted to kill them or influence anyone else to kill them.

To be perfectly clear people who dislike him personally would not have supported him as a Dem or anything else.

Running on a platform of economic expansion, deregulation, ending illegal immigration and strengthening America would not have gotten him many Democrat votes. Republican or Democrat, Trump has always held those same views. There are videos available to prove it. Yes, if Democrats believed in those things still, he might have run as a Democrat. Whatever affiliation he might have, if he was in office doing what he is doing now, I would support it.

@Greg:

If Flynn had remained, we would have a compromised National Security Advisor.

No he wouldn’t have. Nothing of a sort. The left would still pick at him, but he had done nothing wrong and was not compromised in the least.

Manafort was out of the campaign early. His actions of a decade ago would have had nothing to do with the administration. Did Obama worry about Hillary’s dirty past when he selected her as his Secretary of State or declared her “the most capable person to ever run for President”? Damn, talk about COMPROMISED! What if SHE had won? Uhhhhhhh……

Why do you think Trump lied about the Moscow Project?

No, I don’t. I think it was a project in its infant stages that was under consideration, along with many others, probably. He didn’t abandon it because, as you well know, he was projected to lose handily. I think Cohen is merely afraid to go to jail. He is worried about his delicate pooter.

@retire05:

And after almost two years, and $30 million later, there has been nothing, nada, zip, zero that can prove any of those claims are even remotely true.

More than that, we have found out that there was never even enough real evidence to warrant SUSPICION.

@kitt: Consider the fact that most of the animus directed at Trump is over things the media SAYS he said or SAYS he did. If only they could see how idiotic they look.

@retire05: Clinton and Obama, as you said earlier, are pretty damn easy to like personally.
Trump is not.
What is irrational about that?

Bill—We were never talking about shooting kids or Trump or anyone else. We were talking about you voting for POTUS someone you distained personally. Could you do that? I couldn’t in spite of economics
BTW—The media has nothing to do with how I feel about him—-I see him live on Fox and CNN–I see his tweets—see the people he “hires” Kelly and Mattis great–others IMO definitely not.– nuf said

Being said I’ll start today to look for something–anything to like about him and refrain from negativity as best I can.
Tap Webb for Sec Defense would be good start.

@Richard Wheeler: No we aren’t. We are talking about liberals projecting their vile, irrational hatred of Trump on kids wearing caps because they lost an election. No matter how you phrase it, that’s what this is about. Scroll to the top and see if I’m not correct.

And, it also exposes all those things I stated. Just think about it and see if I am not correct about that as well.

Just like with Obama, if the media turned Trump into a god, you would praise him, just like they did when Hillary ran against Trump after they had vilified her when she ran against Obama. Only with UNBIASED accounts can you make a fair judgement. I look a their achievements, not their press.

Believe me when I say the media could not make me like DT or HRC no matter how they were treated—TAKE THAT TO THE BANK.

btw Bill The qualities I dislike about DT have little to do with how he looks.

What did Trump get today that he could not have gotten 30+ days ago?—why the shutdown?—why is he reopening now with NO wall funding?

@Richard Wheeler:

Clinton and Obama, as you said earlier, are pretty damn easy to like personally.
Trump is not.
What is irrational about that?

That is NOT what I said, liar. Read what I said and stop trying to change my words. You need to learn to be honest. So far you’re still failing on that.

@Deplorable Me: Politicans hardly ever have business sense. Hey look at Barry what a guy perfect personality. He sure has alot of contacts with the competition, making decisions running us out of business going bankrupt fast but what a hell of a guy huh?
Anyone that thinks Hillary has a sparkling personality and is well loved must pop out of a clock on the hour every hour. On her campaign trail she could barely draw flies but that happened at the debate.
Only dressed fashionably part-time otherwise looked like she tossed on a vacuum cleaner bag cover or horse blanket. May be not her fault designers dont know how to design for older women or someone of Michelles frame.
Don does have a looker for a wife and she is intelligent as well, dressed to the nines, if nines were tens, always.
Yes its PR perception, accomplishments mean nothing. They could demonize a puppy.

I believe Bernie won so did those fenced out of the DNC convention. He is a disaster and the dems would have never had taken the house.

@retire05re Clinton and Obama: you said ‘I bet that I would like both of them personally,” you call me a liar for my read on that in #271? LOL

Kitt–seems you got a lot of good things to say about the wife not much for HRC or Michelle —how bout Don is he a puppy easy to like or take seriously? Why did he reopen with no wall?

@richard wheeler:

Kitt–seems you got a lot of good things to say about the wife—how bout Don?

See #265. He has a magic wand. He has nice suits too.

@kitt: nice suits That’s it?? Concur How bout those ties covering that — No I’m gonna be nice today—-he’s had 3 lookers for wives–will there be a 4th?

Where’s the wall funding?

@richard wheeler:

If you are going to quote me, quote me accurately and do NOT spin what I said. I said I bet I would like them. I did NOT say I liked them. There is a chance I could lose that bet.

@Richard Wheeler: Trump seems to be bending over backwards waiting for the Dems to keep their oath of office and the 2006 50 billion dollar promise. He now appears to be the compassionate one getting those poor workers paid. He is going to get the SOTU address, bring in some of those Angel Moms to stare at Pelosi from across the chambers.
There will be those that will wig out, those that celebrate, it is a little early for both sides. Sure he is having his emergency order to build the wall combed by every legal constitutional expert he can find. They have 3 weeks tick tock.
Very well tailored suits hides the bullet proof vests and any extra lbs. handsomely.
Not going to get a divorce out of the Catholic she will easily out live him. Sure the prenup and the will has everyone including exes covered.

@retire05: All Mueller has done has convince me that when a Dimocrat gets elected a Republican independent prosecutor should be hired to spend 4 years indicting everyone that every talked to the slug. Even though I fully knew and understood that J. Edgar Hoover was a full fledged crook, I thought it was only because he had been in the job so long, from it’s creation til his death. But maybe I was naive to believe he was likely non denominational and was just crooked for his own interest. A lot of it having to do with keeping his sexual proclivities secret. I didn’t understand that to be a sign that all heads of the FBI are/were crooks, but now I’m kinda a believer.

@richard wheeler: @richard wheeler: @richard wheeler: 270

why is he reopening now with NO wall funding?

Because evil almost always prevails over good. He basically only agreed to play acccording to the Dims rules until the 15th and prior to that time a joint committee is supposed to work out the deal for what the border needs with a lot of representation from the border people and then they’ll agree on approving that. That’s the Dims demands so we’ll get to expect the ball to be in their court to agree with what the joint committee wants. I don’t believe that you think Trump has been bad for the economy of America with full employment, low unemployment, undermining the China econ to the benefit of the US. Tell me exactly what policies is he for that you’re against. Do you fully support the Muslims in congress protesting the US?

@Redteam: Wray, the useless bag of dung, FBI assets , allowing the nazi tactics and tip off of CNN, for todays raids, this wasnt a drug cartel guy he is a political guy, opinion dude. This is a serious leak, grand jury leak, illegal leak. CNN could piece together a one part puzzle, (maybe)get emails texts ect find the leaker and prosecute for a real crime for once. Call Stone tell him to show up he was cooperating and certainly not El Chappo type.2 agents in suits at a decent hour would get this old man in jail.
CNN lies again saying the figured it all out like there are no grand jury happenings ever on Thursdays…sure so show up set up the cameras just in time.

@Richard Wheeler:

btw Bill The qualities I dislike about DT have little to do with how he looks.

They also have little to do with his agenda for the country, either.

What did Trump get today that he could not have gotten 30+ days ago?—why the shutdown?—why is he reopening now with NO wall funding?

Well, 30 days ago the only thing between him and a bill he would have signed was Schumer. Trump didn’t choose to shut the government down, Schumer did. So, the question is, what did the people who who missed their paychecks and the people who may have relied on their services for the past 30+ days get out of Schumer shutting down the government and Pelosi keeping it shut down? Absolutely nothing. Like most things Pelosi and Schumer do, the nation did not benefit in the least. But, the left can falsely claim a political victory. Yippee.

Where’s the wall funding?

I guess you should have listened to Trump’s speech.

@kitt:

@Richard Wheeler: Trump seems to be bending over backwards waiting for the Dems to keep their oath of office and the 2006 50 billion dollar promise.

Trump is negotiating with immature children. Trump has the handicap of caring about the citizens of this country while Schumer and Pelosi, as they demonstrated, don’t. They could not care less how long the government is shut down, people aren’t getting paychecks, illegal immigrants are crossing the border and US citizens are being murdered; the media will spin the tragedies for them. So, the stalemate could go on forever, as far as the Democrats are concerned; they absolutely don’t care and only care about playing political games. So, Trump caved and reopened the government, expecting to have negotiations with people who don’t care about anything but their own power. At the end of three weeks, Trump will declare an emergency and begin working on the wall. The Democrats will lose all their leverage on DACA and protections of other illegal immigrants.

@Richard Wheeler:

btw Bill The qualities I dislike about DT have little to do with how he looks.

Hmmm, qualities you don’t like……. Being a successful business man. Being smart enough to be elected President of the US. Being an exceptional family man, though he’s gone thru 3 wives, it appears it may not be his fault. Extreme loyalty to his children and grand children. Has moved the US back to the top in economy, all numbers best ever. Employment, unemployment, moving businesses back to the US. Has US at the top in petroleum production. Which of these things about him do you not like? Come up with two or three things on your own of things you don’t like.

@kitt: Yes, just heard that 27 Swat agents with side arms and AK or AR 15’s surrounded his house and put him in shackles and chains. Normal procedure would be to call his attorney and have him come down later in the day to surrender. Why did Mueller want to make such a show of this. I don’t believe, from what I’ve heard of the charges, that he will ever be convicted of anything. Let’s put it this way, if there is a Republican on the Jury, he won’t be convicted. Nothing he was charged with is as serious of the breeches from Mueller’s office. Mueller should have his home surrounded and should be arrested for major violations of the US Constitution.

@Redteam:

Which of these things about him do you not like?

He’s not Obama. Obama failed at EVERYTHING, but they love HIM. Trump succeeds at everything and wants the best for the American people and they hate him. Perhaps they should start a church with Obama as their deity where they can worship him there and let Trump run the country.

@Deplorable Me:

Perhaps they should start a church with Obama as their deity where they can worship him there and let Trump run the country.

They already have but they had to tear it down because the site they picked was temporary. Remember the pillars etc. at their 2008 convention where he was promoted as the Second Coming? Location, location, location. Notice how the thread has been hijacked to divert attention away from the lying left wing media story and the resulting death threats against the Covington kids?

@another vet: Oh, no doubt. We cannot keep them on THIS topic; they got caught. Trump lies, Trump lies, Trump lies. Ignore liberal lies which endanger CHILDREN. If I were Greg, I wouldn’t be able to post anything for a while out of embarrassment of being such an ardent supporter of this story while it was still a fresh lie. Liberals never realize all they have to do is just admit the error and pledge to try and be more cautious in the future. We aren’t like them that dance on their shame when they show good faith, but that ship has sailed for sure. They wonder why they have ZERO credibility…

@Deplorable Me:

If I were Greg, I wouldn’t be able to post anything for a while out of embarrassment of being such an ardent supporter of this story while it was still a fresh lie.

Fat chance. He’s WAY too arrogant for that just like the rest of his comrades. Notice how Word waited for the facts to come out and admitted in #33 at first he was leaning toward the MSM narrative? That’s the sign of someone with honesty, honor, and integrity, three virtues leftists don’t have as proven beyond a shadow of a doubt in this thread.

@another vet: Or Jamie Lee Curtis openly admitting her error and apologizing. That restores credibility, or at least a modicum of respect. Slowly backing off the lie and justifying it with tangential accusations while never identifying the mistake just makes that person look like a dishonest fool.

@Deplorable Me: What ever is done dont blame those that crafted the lies.

@Deplorable Me: The diocese, in their apology, stated they were pressured into making their initial statement condemning the kids. I’d like for them to tell us who pressured them that way we know they aren’t just in CYA mode because of the lawsuit and we can also find out which one of the leftist thug organizations was behind it.

@another vet: Well, @another vet: Honesty, honor, and integrity sure doesn’t apply to Greg and Rich.

@Randy: We must persue the editors of the recordings to the ends of the earth, make them accountable for the fake news they posted so boldly. Stand with the children, their school and give them moral and other support as needed.
The liberal media has crossed a line here a line they need to regret and remember for a long time.
Seems they are not above using the seriously mentally ill for their ends like Ms Ford and Mr Phillips.

@kitt: By all means, until the tactics the left uses with impunity are punished and punished severely, the consequences will only continue to get more and more deadly. I hope more attorneys attack this problem and I would love to see something like CNN be bankrupted over it.

@Deplorable Me: The Indian went directly to the media he did not have time to edit his recording and it was posted in full on facebook by one of his crew then taken down. Sandmanns parents have a good attorney I hope it is a record breaking settlement.
After the trial the source must be further punished into oblivion.
To many weak minds believe everything the see on TV or clickbait.
https://www.supremeinsider.com/newspaper-pay-melania-trump-substantial-damages-false-reporting/

@Greg: lets see if we can come up with a reply you will understand, got it, “YO MAMMA”

1 4 5 6