Donald Trump’s election saved this country. Here’s how

Loading

 

We should have listened to crazy Maxine. She warned us about it.

Earlier this year, in an interview with TV One, Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.) praised President Barack Obama for putting together a campaign database that “will have information about everything on every individual.”

“And that database will have information about everything on every individual in ways that it’s never been done before,” Waters told “Washington Watch” host Roland, referring to Obama’s “Organizing for America,” which was changed from a campaign organization to a 501(c)(4) called Organizing for Action.

Martin had asked her about Obama’s agenda in his last term.

“The inauguration represented the beginning of his second term, but it also represented the countdown to the end of his presidency. And the reality is, like anything else, you better get what you can while he’s there because, look, come 2016, that’s it,” Martin said.

“I don’t know, and I think some people are missing something here,” Waters said.

“The president has put in place an organization that contains a kind of database that no one has ever seen before in life,” she added. “That’s going to be very, very powerful.”

Martin asked if Waters if she was referring to “Organizing for America.”

“That’s right, that’s right,” Waters said. “And that database will have information about everything on every individual in ways that it’s never been done before.”

Waters said the database would also serve future Democratic candidates seeking the presidency.

“He’s been very smart,” Waters said of Obama. “I mean it’s very powerful what he’s leaving in place.”

And that’s largely what happened. Not long after taking office, Obama set things in motion:

In a stunning defense of President George W. Bush’s warrantless wiretapping program, President Barack Obama has broadened the government’s legal argument for immunizing his Administration and government agencies from lawsuits surrounding the National Security Agency’s eavesdropping efforts.

In fact, a close read of a government filing last Friday reveals that the Obama Administration has gone beyond any previous legal claims put forth by former President Bush.

Responding to a lawsuit filed by a civil liberties group, the Justice Department argued that the government was protected by “sovereign immunity” from lawsuits because of a little-noticed clause in the Patriot Act. The government’s legal filing can be read here (PDF).

For the first time, the Obama Administration’s brief contends that government agencies cannot be sued for wiretapping American citizens even if there was intentional violation of U.S. law. They maintain that the government can only be sued if the wiretaps involve “willful disclosure” — a higher legal bar.

“A ‘willful violation’ in Section 223(c(1) refers to the ‘willful disclosure’ of intelligence information by government agents, as described in Section 223(a)(3) and (b)(3), and such disclosures by the Government are the only actions that create liability against the United States,” Obama Assistant Attorney General Michael Hertz wrote (page 5).

Senior Staff Attorney Kevin Bankston at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, which is suing the government over the warrantless wiretapping program, notes that the government has previously argued that changes to the Patriot Act protected the government from lawsuits surrounding eavesdropping. But he says that this is the first time that they’ve made the case that the Patriot Act protects the government from all surveillance statutes.

Problem is, it wasn’t about keeping the country safe. Using government resources to visit damage on political opponents became standard fare for Barack Obama. And so is spying, which actually started back in 2011, with the 2012 election looming:

The Obama administration secretly won permission from a surveillance court in 2011 to reverse restrictions on the National Security Agency’s use of intercepted phone calls and e-mails, permitting the agency to search deliberately for Americans’ communications in its massive databases, according to interviews with government officials and recently declassified material.

In addition, the court extended the length of time that the NSA is allowed to retain intercepted U.S. communications from five years to six years — and more under special circumstances, according to the documents, which include a recently released 2011 opinionby U.S. District Judge John D. Bates, then chief judge of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court.

What had not been previously acknowledged is that the court in 2008 imposed an explicit ban — at the government’s request — on those kinds of searches, that officials in 2011 got the court to lift the bar and that the search authority has been used.

There was an uproar when Trump lashed out at Steve Bannon, but the media conveniently forgot when Barack Obama called out Romney donors by name, and publicized private information on them during his campaign. Call them out is not all he did. He put the IRS to work on Romney donors by painting targets on their backs:

Nixon’s private “enemies list” was bad. Barack Obama’s public “enemies list” was arguably worse. Obama had used 2010 to alert and sic the IRS on Tea Party groups. But by calling out private citizens by name on his website, he was alerting and siccing every part of his government on Republican donors. The message from the man who controls the Justice Department (which can indict people), the SEC (which can fine people), and the IRS (which can audit people) was clear: Donate money to Romney, and you are fair government game. The posting was also an APB to every liberal group and activist in the country to target those donors.

One donor was audited three times. Obama made a joke about using the IRS in 2009.

Obama also set the IRS to work targeting conservative groups. Once they were caught red handed, Lois Lerner refused to testify and the Obama regime learned to use a tool that they would later use repeatedly: they “lost” emails. When you recall what happened to Christine O’Donnell and Lois Engelbrecht you know why:

Speaking of questions: Can anyone identify a Democratic Senate candidate whose tax records were leaked, as Christine O’Donnell’s were when she was the Republican candidate in Delaware in 2010? Is it a coincidence that in January 2011, after Catherine Engelbrecht requested tax-exempt status for two conservative groups she founded in Texas — King Street Patriots and True the Vote — the Engelbrecht family business was notified of its first IRS audit?

Does James Comey wonder why (this was before he became FBI director), five months after Engelbrecht’s tax-exemption request, FBI agents appeared seeking information about attendees at the King Street Patriots meetings? Were five subsequent FBI contacts “checking in” for “updates” on the group’s activities really necessary?

Why did the Occupational Safety and Health Administration and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives show a sudden intrusive interest in the Engelbrechts’ business, which has nothing to do with alcohol or tobacco or firearms or explosives?

By September of 2012, Obama and Holde had quadrupled the number of warrantless wiretaps. Romney and his campaign staff were likely among the targets. He and his minions painted Romney as a felon, murderer and tax cheat. Nothing was too low. Once he secured his second term, obama set about making sure the next GOP candidate would lose the race for the Presidency and he procured the tool he needed- the FISC Court. The FBI shenanigans are about to blossom. Watch as the corruption of FBI evolves. Naturally, there was an email loss.

Clinton

March 4, 2015: The Benghazi committee issues a subpoena requiring Clinton to turn over all emails from her private server related to the incident in Libya.

Between March 25-31, 2015: The Platte River Networks employee has what he calls an “oh s—” moment, realizing he did not delete Clinton’s email archive, per Mills’ December 2014 request. The employee deletes the email archive using a software called BleachBit.

April 2015: Hilllary announces candidacy for President

June 10, 2015: Immunity deals for two top Hillary Clinton aides included a side arrangement obliging the FBI to destroy their laptops after reviewing the devices, House Judiciary Committee sources told Fox News on Monday. Sources said the arrangement with former Clinton chief of staff Cheryl Mills and ex-campaign staffer Heather Samuelson also limited the search to no later than Jan. 31, 2015. This meant investigators could not review documents for the period after the email server became public — in turn preventing the bureau from discovering if there was any evidence of obstruction of justice, sources said.

June 2015: Padding the way, $675,000 from Hillary and Terry McAulliffe pours into the campaign of Jill McCabe, wife of Wayne McCabe. McCabe is soon after promoted to #3 at the FBI and within a year is Deputy Director

July 2015 – FBI opens the Clinton email investigation in response to a referral from the Intelligence Community Inspector General.

Some time after that, Loretta Lynch directs Comey to describe the Clinton investigation as a “matter.”

March 2016: Asked by Page who he planned to vote for, Strzok replied: “I suppose Hillary.”

March 4, 2016: Strzok writes to Page of Trump: “Omg he’s an idiot.” He says that a Trump victory in the GOP primaries will be “good for Hillary.” “God Hillary should win. 100,000,000-0,” Strzok writes.

May 2016: A draft of a statement that then-FBI Director James Comey was preparing to release at the conclusion of the Clinton email probe was circulated among top FBI officials, including Strzok. “Please send me any comments on this statement,” wrote FBI chief of staff James Rybicki.

May 4, 2016: Page wrote: “It’s going to be a Clinton Trump race. Unbelievable.” “Now the pressure really starts to finish MYE…,” Strzok wrote.

June 10 (approx), 2016: Strzok rewrites the memo to allow Clinton to escape legal jeopardy:

Ex-FBI Director James Comey’s original statement closing out the probe into Hillary Clinton‘s use of a private email server was edited by subordinates to remove five separate references to terms like “grossly negligent” and to delete mention of evidence supporting felony and misdemeanor violations, according to copies of the full document.

Comey also originally concluded that it was “reasonably likely” that Clinton’s nonsecure private server was accessed or hacked by hostile actors, though there was no evidence to prove it. But that passage was also changed to the much weaker “possible,” the memos show.

June 27, 2016: Bill Clinton meets with Loretta Lynch. Without a doubt she informed him that no charges would be coming.

July 1, 2016: Page texts Strzok: And yeah, it’s a real profile in couragw [sic], since she knows no charges will be brought.

July 2, 2016: Strzok and Justice Department lawyer David Laufman interview Hillary Clinton.

July 5, 2016: Comey announces that he would not refer charges against Clinton to federal prosecutors.

Trump

Once Clinton was in the clear, it was time to go after Trump. Plans were already under way at the FBI.

April 2016: The law firm for the Clinton campaign and DNC hires opposition research firm Fusion GPS to investigate Trump. Fusion would go on to hire Christopher Steele, the former British spy who authored the infamous dossier.

June 2016: Fusion GPS hires former British intelligence officer Christopher Steele and his London-based firm, Orbis Business Intelligence, to investigate Trump’s ties to Russia. Steele discloses this in court filings earlier this year as part of a lawsuit he faces over the dossier. Steele said he worked for Fusion GPS from June through November.

June 20, 2016: Steele writes first memo of the dossier. It alleges that Trump used prostitutes during a visit to Moscow in 2013 and that the Kremlin was blackmailing him with the evidence. The memo also alleges that the Trump campaign was engaged in a well-orchestrated collusion campaign with Russian operatives.

Problem is, Steele never even went to Russia.

Virtually all of the credibility of the so-called Steele dossier — and the Trump-Russia collusion narrative and investigations it spawned — hinges on Christopher Steele’s vaunted reputation as a former British intelligence agent who spied on Moscow and still maintains a network of sources inside the Kremlin.

But now we are finding out from newly released transcripts that he never even set foot inside Russia to compile his dossier, and that he relied instead on an ex-journalist-turned-p.r. consultant to do much of his investigating there. In fact, this non-intelligence figure may be his main “Russian source” of information.

….

So, Gowdy pressed, “How was he able to accumulate information in Russia if he didn’t go?” Simpson claimed that Steele ran a “network of subsources or subcontractors” who traveled around Russia and gathered information for him.

But it turns out the primary subcontractor worked not for Steele but for Simpson at Washington-based Fusion GPS, and he contributed key material for the investigation of Trump underwritten by the Clinton campaign. His name is Edward Baumgartner, a British national who speaks fluent Russian and runs a p.r. shop out of London (and who spent 2016 tweeting his forceful opposition to Trump’s candidacy).

While Baumgartner was working on the dossier, he was also working for Simpson on another case to smear an anti-Putin whistleblower in an effort to help Putin-tied company Prevezon defend itself against US charges of money laundering.

During that contract, which ran through October 2016, Baumgartner worked closely in Moscow with the Russian lawyer who lobbied Donald Trump Jr. at a now-infamous Trump Tower meeting in June 2016 to help lift US sanctions on Russia. Her talking points were written by Simpson, who also dealt directly with the lawyer, Natalia Veselnitskaya.

During the case, Simpson and Baumgartner also met with her partner, former Russian military intelligence officer Rinat Akhmetshin.

And catch this:

Asked by intel panel staff if he verified Steele’s “sources in Russia” or corroborated their information, Simpson said he’s never been to Russia himself and couldn’t “evaluate the credibility of someone on the other side of the [Atlantic].” Nor could he confirm that Steele actually spoke directly with any of his Russian sources.

Simpson says he completely deferred to Steele’s expertise and did not question his findings because of his “sterling reputation.” Simpson has pumped this guy up to be the real-life 007 so deep inside the Kremlin, he didn’t have to corroborate his information, yet Steele was so far out of the hunt, his tradecraft so rusty, he apparently had to rely on a Russian translator who flacked for Putin to gather his so-called intelligence.

The only thing the FBI could corroborate from the dossier was that Page traveled to Moscow. Period.

July 2016: The FBI opens a counterintelligence investigation (signed by Strzok) into possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russian government.

August 15, 2016:  Insurance policy. “I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in Andy’s office — that there’s no way [Trump] gets elected — but I’m afraid we can’t take that risk,” Strzok wrote to Page. Andy is believed to be Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe. “It’s like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before you’re 40,” Strzok added.

Summer 2016(1): The Guardian has learned that the FBI applied for a warrant from the foreign intelligence surveillance (FISA) court over the summer in order to monitor four members of the Trump team suspected of irregular contacts with Russian officials. The FISA court turned down the application, asking FBI counter-intelligence investigators to narrow its focus. According to one report, the FBI was finally granted a warrant in October, but that has not been confirmed, and it is not clear whether any warrant led to a full investigation.

Summer 2016(2): : The FBI obtained a warrant to surveil former Donald Trump aide Carter Page last summer under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), according to a Tuesday Washington Post report. The FBI and Justice Department demonstrated probable cause that Page is acting on behalf of a foreign state in order to be granted the warrant. The FISA warrant was part of the FBI’s investigation into possible ties between Russia and Trump campaign associates, law enforcement and U.S. officials told the Post.

The fake dossier was very likely the grounds for FISA request.

Meanwhile, the Obama White House and staff are running a muck unmasking Trump and his campaign staff. March, 2017:

But at some point U.S. intelligence officials unmasked some Trump figures — a process that involves attaching their names to the private conversations. That information was then circulated within the intelligence community, Mr. Nunes said.

“I have seen intelligence reports that clearly show the president-elect and his team were at least monitored and disseminated in what appears to be intelligence reporting channels,” said Mr. Nunes, who was part of the Trump transition team.

Mr. Nunes said several dozen examples of surveillance reports were brought to him after he issued an open call for any evidence of illegal behavior. He said the material he saw appeared to have been gathered during the transition, from November to January.

But they had been spying on countless Americans for some time. After first denying it, Susan Rice admitted to unmasking Americans. Samantha Power made unmasking Americans a daily habit.

Andrew McCarthy:

Were there to be information indicating that Ms. Power was involved in unmasking American identities in intelligence reports, significant questions would be raised. As ambassador to the U.N., Power, a long-time Obama adviser, held a diplomatic position. She was not an intelligence analyst. It is not immediately clear why the U.N. ambassador would be involved in the disclosure of American identities in intelligence reports — after the agencies that collected and analyzed the intelligence had decided such identities should be masked.

But the grand prize for contempt of the law goes to the Obama administration. A little publicized report from April describes how rampant the disregard for the Constitution was. They were ordering up FISA requests and a full 85% of them were out of compliance:

Joe Hoft:

On April 26, 2017, an unsealed FISA Court Ruling unveiled a number of criminal activities that Barack Obama’s FBI and DOJ participated in during his time in office.  The report to date received little attention.  Now interest is brewing due to the recent actions of Congress and the report that is expected to be released in the upcoming weeks.

The FISA Court Ruling shows widespread abuse of the FISA mandate. According to the reportObama’s FBI and DOJ performed searches on Americans that were against their 4th Amendment rights.  This went on for years.  One paragraph in the report states that 85% of the Section 704 and 705(b) FISA searches made during this time were non-compliant with applicable laws and therefore criminal.

….

In addition, the report cites that at the same time that Obama’s DOJ and FBI were illegally searching Americans against their rights and unbeknownst to them, Obama’s FBI was providing this information to outside contractors who had no business or legal cause or claim the information.

Document here.

This is what alarmed the last and perhaps only honest man to work in the Obama administration- Mike Rogers

On November 17th, 2016, NSA Director Admiral Mike Rogers travels to see President-Elect Donald Trump in Trump Tower, New York. Director Rogers does not inform his boss Director of National Intelligence, James Clapper.

On November 17th, 2016, the Trump Transition Team announces they are moving all transition activity to Trump National Golf Club in Bedminster, New Jersey.

On November 19th The Washington Post reported on a recommendation made by Defense Secretary Ash Carter and Director of National Intelligence James Clapper in October that Mike Rogers be removed from his NSA position.

The Obama administration was spying on Trump and his transition team. Rogers tipped them off.

It is my opinion that Obama’s act to allow the NSA to share more communications was an effort to undermine the Trump administration. And once again, evidence has been mysteriously lost. What’s really interesting about that is the period during which the Strzok texts are missing ends on the day that Rosenstein appointed Mueller as Special Counsel.

Barack Obama put his finger on the scales of Justice and tipped them in favor of Hillary Clinton and against Donald Trump. He has weaponized and corrupted the IRS, the DOJ and FBI for political aspirations. There is little reason for Americans to have faith in the integrity of these institutions. Obama has presided over a gargantuan abuse of the Constitution, US law and of American ideals. It is the worst conspiracy in the history of this country. And we would have never known any of it had Hillary Clinton won as was expected. Had she won, this abuse would have become both buried and concreted by democrats into the system. Politically this country would have become the Soviet Union.

 

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
15 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

I like the way the FBI hard-nosed those Hillary aids. “OK, we’ll take your immunity, but only if you destroy all the evidence for us.” It was this tough negotiating style that secured splendid Iran “OK, you can build your nukes and build your missiles, but you damn well better take this $150 billion.”

Now would be a good time to mention that Obama said his administration was going to be the most honest, transparent and trustworthy ever to be seen by the eyes of mankind. That Obama… whatever else you say about him, at least he had a sense of humor.

So, from the moment Trump became one of the 17 Republican candidates, Obama was spying on his organization. Once he became the candidate, Obama was picking up his every move and informing the Hillary campaign of what Trump was doing and was going to do.

AND HILLARY STILL LOST!!! BWA, HA, HA, HA, HA, HA, HA, HA!!!!!

My main fear was Hillary getting ahold of the Supreme Court. Little did I know…

We had an idea, I was on the Pedicord site looking for the best ex-pat place to immigrate to, big push on Belieze at that time. Caymen up the retirement funds ect.. looks like I wont be wasting away in Margaritaville.

Mad Madame Maxine is becoming totaly unglued i tell you or as Speedy Gonzalas would say MOOCHO LOCO IN THE CAPASSA a typical liberal demacrats out of their minds totaly

We really dodged a bullet!
comment image?w=622&h=425

Liberal demacrats are dunb eniugh to beleive everything their told and everything they read in the New York Pravda(Times)and everything they hear from Al Bore Dan Blather and Tom Brokejaw

Who the heck is going to read through all of this?

@Gary Miller: You DON’T read it at your own peril.

Reading all that, is like listening to fingernails on a chalk board. I need a drink!

@Gary Miller: hey I read the obamacare law so there are people out there that will

Hearing a liberal whining high pitched voice is like fingernails on a blackboard like the whining animal rights idiots who oppose using any kind of animal products i just wish they would keep their stupid opinions to themselves instead of blabbering it out to the whole world

@Gary Miller:
There’s an easy way to get through all of the information in the article: Imagine every dirty, evil, underhanded, corrupt, illegal thing that the Dems in power could conceivably have done in the past nine years, and then realize it’s happened, and continues to happen.

The article does not even touch on Hillary’s Russian collusion in the Uranium One deal, election sabotage at the DNC, Wasserman-Schultz’s collusion with the criminal Awan family, and on and on. People “died mysteriously” over the Trump dossier per Fusion GPS’s Glenn Simpson (Seth Rich?). Donna Brazille said she was in fear of her life after Rich’s murder. We are only seeing the very tip of a gigantic iceberg of leftist Dem corruption and sabotage of America and its citizens.

@Angel Artiste: An even easier way is to listen to what the Democrats are accusing the Republicans of. THIS is what they themselves are committing.

I realy cant stand whining animal rights activists who whine we should’nt use any animal based products at all just proves a study that claimed strict vegans have shrinking brains