Liberals exploit Las Vegas tragedy to bash Trump

They are bothered only when it happens all at once.

They are bothered when it doesn’t happen often enough. The left NEEDS these high-profile tragedies to exploit to pursue their gun control agenda. As stated, they do NOTHING to prevent this from happening every week in Chicago.

These tweets reveal perhaps the best argument AGAINST this being anything but a leftist terrorist attack. WHO do they all assume most of the victims to be? Hmmm?

I wonder if you keep up the narrative of 50% 0f the people being hateful Nazis and the Antifa are the good guys fighting facists, then assume everyone that enjoys country music is a Trump Supporting facist nazi. Do this day, after day, after day.

Liberals always like to find scapegoats t blame if their not blaming Global Warming/Climate Change on everything from ISIS to Burnt Toast then their blaming the NRA or Gun Makers like after Sandy Hook becuase liberals are too dumb to think without a remote in their hands and Chris Mathews yammering to them on the boob tube

Liberals have been recommending…. DEMANDING… we replace prayer with ideological government intervention.

@Ajay42302:

qulifies

?

It’s actually something reasonable to think about,

Sure. For an idiot.

Now HERE’S something reasonable to think about… and answer.

What is your substantiation for calling Trump a racist?

Can you show us an incident when conservatives overreacted to a tragedy and accused the wrong responsible party?

Coward.

@kitt:

Now AJ deeply feelz that all these people that rejoice in the blood and mayhem are great folks.

How you interpreted that from me is as dishonest and delusional of that of your cloned cohorts. No where in my comment even implies that. Nor is it there that I sympathized with the shooter.

What is in your response is the usual solphmoric dishonesty that’s so prevalent at FA.

@kitt:

You accused me of rejoicing in the slaughter which I did not. You claim I sympathized with the shooter when I did not. You make other childish comments of adhering to Antifa which is baseless.

Simply put, you’re just another bigoted liar.

@kitt: Other than being just another obvious plant, why is it that you stray off topic with incoherent false accusation and 2nd grade level satire pop shots at me (obviously, much like Bill, to be no more than a distraction to me pointing out DJs flawed predudice) yet attempt to chastise me for going off topic?

I understand that for the FA ilk, the parameters of hypocrisy are, well, nonexistent, but it would seem you’d at least try to be a tad less obvious. If for nothing else, just for sport.

Hollyweird is chirping out, you know the stars that promote safe driving and responsible gun ownership in all the movies they make millions on. Thank goodness they have armed body guards, Kimmel just increased his security.
http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2017/10/03/celebrities-ramp-attacks-gun-owners-following-vegas-shooting-gun-control-now/
I dont consider this a personal attack, I just love the series like Orange is the new Black and others that shine favorable light to good old fashioned family values.

SHUT UP HOLLYWOOD YOUR HYPOCRICY IS SHOWING

@Common Sense:

OK let’s start with border enforcement and late term abortion. You OK with reality??

Regardless that you’re obviously following the Bill’s playbook of distractions and even with the assumption that my response will be once again ignored and you’ll follow the Bill’s playbook that I didn’t answer, I’ll play along and answer.

I’m all for and an advocate for boarder enforcement and I’m also not only against late term abortions but against early term abortions as well, even In cases of incest and rape.

So if you would, please explain the relevance of your question along with when, where, or how I implied otherwise.

By the way for fear you didn’t catch it, you’re kinda like off topic.

You do realize that Clinton didn’t use the word in question, don’t you? The open microphone story is pure unadulterated horse manure, originally posted by a parody website called Land of the Free. They state on their About Us page that they post things having no basis in reality.

This reminds me of the response from the Thermians in the movie Galaxy Quest when they’re asked about Gilligan’s Island.

@Ajay42302: At the beginning of my response and the article was about out of bounds and ridiculous liberal responses especially by hilldabeast I did mention and stand by my comment that highlights her ignorance as well as indicate that if silencers where employed by this animal then more would have likely died. Totally on point and I feel accurate. I am enlightened to know your position on abortion and border enforcement and we are in agreement. My point for bringing up these two topics was to identify other avenues that could be taken to save American lives just as those needlessly lost in Las Vegas. Yes this would be a political compromise on both sides with benefits for all Americans. You can argue the merits of bump stocks and saving of American lives but so bet it and let’s proceed. You can NOT and I see your position on abortion, and can clearly argue how our most innocent of American lives would definitely be saved and in much larger numbers than the politics of bump stock and our 2nd Amendment infringement. Border wall will save lives and revenue which could be applied towards Americans. I appreciate you comeback and my comments are my own and NOT owned by, Bill, I believe you said.

@Common Sense:

To clarify 1 point, I never indorsed a boarder wall albeit I am all for boarder enforcement.

If you are going to bring other life saving policies into this argument, maybe we can touch on not sending the uninsured home to die.

As for the entire gun issue, I might also ad that I’m an avid defender of the Constitution including the 2nd Admendment. However there are valid arguments as to what limit or what quantity or caliber of arsenal an individual should have. Yes, you have and should always have the right to bare arms. Rocket launchers that can take a jet out of the sky or an A-bomb or 2? Not so much. The conversation of common sense compromise for a reasonable distinction shouldn’t be silenced by the NRA and their paid so-called legislators for some conspiracy theory lunacy that “they’re coming after your guns”.

@Common Sense:

Several points there that I doubt we’d ever find common ground on but I’ll address them.

Using the 12 foot wall and 12 foot ladder rule, there will always be the need of boarder patrol and enforcement if you want to seriously stop the flow. And realistically, patrol and enforcement is your only logical answer. With today’s advanced monitoring technologies, that really shouldn’t be that hard.

Sorry but your “just go to the ER” falls way short of making my argument moot. Granted, you’ll get your flesh sewn, your bones set, and that baby delivered but that’s a far cry from getting a heart transplant, oncology treatments, or that $12000 pill needed to keep you alive.

This concept of the “left going after the NRA” was pretty much put to rest when the SCOTUS appointed Bush over Gore. That pretty much made the NRA untouchable and yes, I do hold them as the culprit of obstructing common sense gun regulation particularly on back ground checks. The GOP is at the mercy of their nod of yes or no to any gun legislation. I think you actually know this.

And I’ll agree that we will never stop mad and insane people from going postal. But that doesn’t mean we should not consider many of the rational proposals such as better defining a “business” vrs “personal” sales for online purchases, maybe a harder look at folks on the terrorist watch list, or how many rounds spent in how many seconds.

As far as a “real discussion on welfare”, how about starting with the banking industry, motel chains, food industry, foreign contractors, et al, actually setting up training seminars to teach their employees how to qualify for government assistance, using tax payers like me to subsidize their labor rather than paying them a livable wage?

@Common Sense:

You may have missed my argument on welfare. The “way of life” for welfare is now more of the corporate level rather than the workers. Corporate has utilized and maintained cheep labor by depending on government to subsidize their workers basic needs. In other words, more full time workers are receiving government assistance than ever before. Today’s GOP leaders appear to be rather content with that.

I’ve argued the voter ID gig for sometime and the ultimate goal of that is to disenfranchise certain classes of voters. Sure, you can give me the same old “ID needed to buy cigarettes” song and dance but that doesn’t account for the many many other obstacles enacted (many which I’ve listed here on many occasions) under the premise of voter ID along with illegal voting being pretty much a nonexistent problem. But this is a rather worn out argument.

It’s no secret that the NRA isn’t on the Dems Christmas card mailing list but what I’m saying is that they gained considerable clout with Al Gore’s defeat and it pretty much scared the crap out of Dems who sort of threw in the towel at that point. Hell, even Obama was one of your more gun friendlier presidents as he signed legislation allowing guns in national parks and then again on Amtrak trains. So I’d say Dems have been more walking on eggshells rather than this “going after” them as you suggest.

@Ajay42302: I would say hour corporate welfare comment is driven partly by Obolacare. The unemployment figures are very skewed based upon a lot of factors including defining full time work as 30 hours. Also Obola created a lot of jobs by converting Defense contractors to full time DOD, my wife was one of those in the health care industry. It was a total scam to say look I created jobs. None the less we will agree to disagree about the idea that a Voter ID somehow disenfranchises anyone. I have never heard a good argument to support that claim but rather just the suggestion that this would happen. BTW illegal vote here in California and you can’t win that argument because of my own personal observation living here in San Diego County. They register to vote when California gives them a drivers license. The argument is 100% valid, if you disagree then why not allow it to be proven either true or false. Trump wanted to do this and the demoncraps shut him down, wonder why??

@Ajay42302:

As a rule, if your arguments stand to scutany, it isn’t nessasary to inject childish retorts such as “Odumbo”, “democraps” or whatever similar name calling you use. If you notice, I refrain from using “repute’s” and such.

Also, as a really hard and fast rule, if you have substantiation for your arguments (as opposed to petty, silly, sore-loser centric wild accusations), you are anxious to answer questions about the validity of those arguments. For instance:

What is your substantiation for calling Trump a racist?

Do you denounce those who are rejoicing in the slaughter in Las Vegas and using it for obscene political gain?