Why was it necessary for Hillary to go to such desperate lengths to delete yoga routines and wedding plans?

By 36 Comments 2,985 views

hillary i am not a crook

 

The FBI is now in possession of Hillary Clinton’s private email server. Let us be clear- she did not “hand” it over as is widely reported. The FBI took it. It is suggested that the sever may cough up more than just the emails. We shall see.

What did she claim was on that server? What was it she deleted?

Clinton said she “chose not to keep” the messages and said she expected people would understand her need for “privacy.”

“We went through a thorough process to identify all of my work-related emails and deliver them to the State Department,” she said. “At the end, I chose not to keep my private, personal emails. Emails about planning Chelsea’s wedding or my mother’s funeral arrangements. Condolence notes to friends, as well as yoga routines, family vacations: the other things you typically find in inboxes.

It’s not clear whether Team Clinton actually opened and read all the deleted emails:

Time didn’t disclose how it determined that each email wasn’t opened individually, but says it seemed to be consistent with a written explanation provided by Clinton’s spokesman after the news conference this week. During the news conference, Clinton did not go into the details of how the review was conducted, but said it was “thorough” and that she went “above and beyond” what she was required to do in turning over many of her emails to the State Department.

It is a Clintonian axiom that scandals are mocked, belittled and delayed as a means of keeping them at bay. This is no different. Clinton signaled that she plans to entertain no questions about this mess:

“Here’s what I won’t do: I won’t get down in the mud with them … or dishonor the memories of those who died. I don’t pretend this isn’t about politics.”

This is the same woman who stood over the bodies of the Benghazi dead and lied to their families about a video. She also said she would not hand over the server until the FBI came knocking. I will bet she’ll start taking questions once the noose tightens just as she started allowing the bourgeois to approach her as her polls began to erode.

With each day Clinton takes on a more Nixonesque appearance:

The Washington Post’s Bob Woodward laid it out Monday: “You’ve got a massive amount of data. It, in a way, reminds me of the Nixon tapes: thousands of hours of secretly recorded conversations that Nixon thought were exclusively his.”

The server handed over to the FBI was professionally “wiped.”

Anyone with half a brain needs to ask: Why would someone want or need so desperately to destroy every binary shred of evidence about yoga routines and wedding plans?

It doesn’t add up.

There’s much more to this. I would wager a lot of money that it has to do with Clinton handing out favors courtesy of the United States in return for cash donations to the Clinton Foundation. I hope the forensic analysis will be fruitful.

 

She knew doing this was wrong.

 

Bonus:

hillary for prison

DrJohn has been a health care professional for more than 30 years. In addition to clinical practice he has done extensive research and has published widely with over 70 original articles and abstracts in the peer-reviewed literature. DrJohn is well known in his field and has lectured on every continent except for Antarctica. He has been married to the same wonderful lady for over 30 years and has three kids- two sons, both of whom are attorneys and one daughter on her way into the field of education. DrJohn was brought up with the concept that one can do well if one is prepared to work hard but nothing in life is guaranteed. Except for liberals being foolish.

36 Responses to “Why was it necessary for Hillary to go to such desperate lengths to delete yoga routines and wedding plans?”

  1. 26

    Bill

    @Greg: If Romney had only released ONE year of returns showing he paid taxes it would prove Reid a liar (as if, like with Hillary, further proof was necessary); he released 5. And Romney paid millions in income taxes. So, is Reid a definite liar?

    And, Hillary indeed had Top Secret Intel on her server.

  2. 27

    Greg

    Are you aware that the 2012 election is over?

    It hasn’t been established that Clinton had any Top Secret information on her server.

    One of the four instances the intelligence community IG cited turns out to involve a document that was previously declassified and released to the general public. They should be more careful about their claims.

  3. 28

    Common Sense

    @Greg: You do realize that 2010 election and the 2014 elections are over as well. You do realize that sense Obola became President Democrats have lost the House (in historic fashion) in 2010 and took the Senate in 2014. You do realize that 2016 there is another election and Hilldabeast is the best the Democrats can do??

  4. 30

    Nanny G

    While the department is now stamping a few dozen of the publicly released emails as “Classified,” the details included in those “Classified” stamps — which include a string of dates, letters and numbers describing the nature of the classification — appear to indicate that some of Clinton’s emails from her time as the nation’s most senior diplomat are filled with a type of information the U.S. government and the department’s own regulations automatically deems classified from the get-go — regardless of whether it is already marked that way or not.

    This sort of information, which the department says Clinton both sent and received in her emails, is the only kind that must be “presumed” classified, in part to protect national security and the integrity of diplomatic interactions, according to U.S. regulations examined by Reuters.

    It’s born classified,” said J. William Leonard, a former director of the U.S. government’s Information Security Oversight Office (ISOO).”

    http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/08/21/us-usa-election-clinton-emails-idUSKCN0QQ0BW20150821

  5. 34

    Me

    Greg, you seem incapable of understanding anything, much less the written word. You describe legitimate inquiries into the attack on our consulate in Benghazi as “bulllshit? Four dead, including our ambassador, officially, demonstrably falsely and laughably blamed by the administration on a youtube video nobody had seen, and declare any scrutiny to be “bullshit”?

    I’d love to see the color of the sky in the parallel universe you inhabit. For the rest of us, Madame Secretary’s personal email server through which it strains credulity that official, national security sensitive and secret information, (to repeat the Secretary of state’s stock in trade) did not pass is of profound interest.

    Keep deflecting, though. It is fun to watch the shapes into which those who have marinated in the Clinton Kool-Aid are willing to twist themselves and the truth.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *