It’s becoming clear that baby parts are a big business for Planned Parenthood. The behavior of the employees of Planned Parenthood is nothing less than disgusting. PP harvests dead babies with an emphasis on “less crunchy” techniques to preserve the head and organs. Planned Parenthood’s legal counsel admitted fear that one of the next videos would be of the harvest and dissection of a dead baby. Planned Parenthood drools over the potential of an intact dead baby.
“Sometimes, if we get, if someone delivers before we get to see them for a procedure, then we are intact.”
and be careful with that baby!
“We’d have to do a little bit of training with the providers or something to make sure that they don’t crush” (the organs)
In the current CMP video:
Ginde and a medical assistant casually probed at baby parts from 11-12 week-old aborted babies with utensils in a dish.
At one point, a buyer asked, “What was that? A crack, was that the just the little bits of the skull?” to which they casually responded, “Mhmm.”
Ginde, later looking at the dish proclaimed, “It’s a baby” and pointed out the heart.
The medical assistant also chimed in at one point: “My fingers will smush it if I try to get it out” and laughed over the dead baby, deeming the intact parts worthy of “five stars.”
Ginde also recognized a baby brain “blasted out” with water, and noted she sometimes doesn’t use water, so that the parts aren’t as “war-torn.”
If that hasn’t made you ill, there’s this:
According to CMP, PPRM does not use digoxin or other feticide in second trimester abortions, which means “any intact deliveries before an abortion are potentially born-alive infants under federal law.”
It means these babies are alive when they are “scooped out” carefully so as not to “smush” their parts. It’s all about the parts. It’s all about the money. And PP worked out how to avoid getting caught selling the parts:
Ginde talks about how she’s very confident that Planned Parenthood lawyers had worked out the details on how not to get caught. “We talked to him in the beginning, you know, we were like, ‘we don’t want to get called on,’ you know, ‘selling fetal parts across states.’ I’m confident that our legal will make sure that we are not put in that situation.”
The White House asserts that these videos are fake because Planned Parenthood told them so.
Planned Parenthood is so determined to get its claws on babies that it provided an abortion to a 13 year old without informing the parents and then hands the child back to the assaulter.
Planned Parenthood is desperate to stop the bleeding. They’ve convinced a judge to block the release of more videos. The basis for blocking First Amendment rights is unclear. I don’t recall a single liberal complaining about the secret Mitt Romney video.
Both Cecile Richards, head of Planned Parenthood, and the White House call those who expose this horrific work “extremists.” Those who dissect whole babies for cash are not extremists, but those who raise this to the national consciousness are extremists. Richards call the video expose an “attack on women.” One wonders if killing female babies is “attacking women.”
And that brings me to the point of this post. How close are we to Planned Parenthood starting up baby farms? These farms of live babies would be sources of fairly well-developed organs and would be of great commercial value. Before you liberals get in a snit, remember a few things.
Margaret Sanger was the founder of what would become Planned Parenthood. One of her quotes:
“The most merciful thing that the large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it,”
Sanger is an idol of Hillary Clinton. More on Sanger:
Margaret Sanger, the godmother of Planned Parenthood, was the fearless voice for birth control and champion of the so-called Negro Project. She is said to have believed darker-skinned humans were inferior, along with those with mental illnesses as well as the impoverished. She believed the solution was negative eugenics – trying to keep those inferior specimens from reproducing.
Hillary Clinton has deep ties to Planned Parenthood.
But Clinton’s relationship with Planned Parenthood goes beyond a shared belief in a woman’s right to choose. The group is interwoven with a network of women’s organizations that are among her strongest backers, and Planned Parenthood leaders and activists are among her personal friends, including President Cecile Richards.
Enter Pete Singer:
An internationally known Princeton “bioethicist” and animal-rights activist says he’d kill disabled babies if it were in the “best interests” of the family, because he sees no distinction in the child’s life whether it is born or not, and the world already allows abortion.
The world already allows abortion. Ready?
Singer believes the next few decades will see a massive upheaval in the concept of life and rights, with only “a rump of hard-core, know-nothing religious fundamentalists” still protecting life as sacrosanct.
That now seems a pretty darned good prediction. Liberals already support late term partial birth abortion- right up to delivery date. It is a revenue stream for Planned Parenthood and a source of political donations to democrats.
In terms of abortions, what difference is there between the day before birth, a month before birth and a day after birth or a month after birth? Under all these conditions the baby is viable. When does life begin? Let’s cut to Cecile Richards:
JORGE RAMOS: Can I ask you a philosophical question?
CECILE RICHARDS: Sure.
RAMOS So for you, when does life start? When does a human being become a human being?
RICHARDS This is a question, I think, that will be debated through the centuries, and people come down to very different views on that.
RAMOS But for you, what’s the point?
RICHARDS It is not something that I feel like is really part of this conversation. I mean, to me, we work with women – I guess the way I’d really like to I think every woman has to make her own decision. What we do at Planned Parenthood is make sure that women have all their options for health care, and they have the option to have a healthy pregnancy, they have the option to put a child up for adoption if they decide to carry the pregnancy to term, or they have the right to make a decision to terminate a pregnancy.
As for Planned Parenthood…
The really hot question is, “When does being a person begin?” Most medical authorities and Planned Parenthood agree that it starts when a baby takes its first breath.
Which is complete bullsh*t. Life News asks:
If a newborn baby is completely outside of her mother’s body but has not yet taken her first breath, is it morally permissible to kill her? What say you, Cecile Richards?
When does a baby have rights? One school of thought:
Well, there ya go. Babies gain human rights when they become sufficiently human. Simple enough, right?
Here’s another opinion:
Ultimately though, to have a “right to life” requires that one be an individual capable of living an independent existence. One must “get a life” before one has a “right to life.” A fetus is not a separate individual—it lives inside a pregnant woman and depends on her for its growth. In fact, the biological definition of “parasite” fits the fetal mode of growth precisely, especially since pregnancy causes a major upset to a woman’s body, just like a parasite does to its host. I’m not trying to disparage fetuses with the negative connotations of the word parasite; in fact, parasites and their hosts often enjoy mutually supportive relationships, and this obviously includes most pregnancies. However, the parasitic relationship of a fetus to a woman means that its continued existence requires her consent—if she continues the pregnancy unwillingly, her rights and bodily integrity are violated.
A parasite. The author adds:
This is not to say that human life doesn’t have value. Of course it does, but only the value that we ourselves bestow on it—in biology, life is cheap, life is wasteful, and death is vital.
Let’s summarize the left’s stance- life is cheap, it doesn’t begin until a baby takes a breath, a baby is a parasite, and only “a rump of hard-core, know-nothing religious fundamentalists” will believe life is sacrosanct, and baby parts are commercially important. To that end, babies may be scooped out intact and dissected pretty much at any time during a pregnancy.
So why not right afterward? Why not harvest babies and keep them “alive” ( if you will) until their organs grow to a truly ripe, functional and really valuable size commercially? Sound crazy? Maybe it is, but I didn’t conceive it. Planned Parenthood is in favor of post birth abortion:
A lobbyist for a regional division of Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion business in the United States, says a doctor and a mother should be allowed to decide to kill a newborn who survives an abortion.
The stunning position echoed statements made by Barack Obama while he was in the state Senate in Illinois, and repeatedly opposed a proposed law that would have obligated physicians to provide care to a baby surviving the abortion procedure.
In fact, post birth abortion enjoys the support of Barack Obama, who voted four times to allow abortion surviving babies to die. But why let them die? Why not keep them alive in the baby parts farms?
Baby parts farms designed to be sources of organs are the natural extension of the pro-choice movement. Handing her baby- at whatever age-over to the processors of Planned Parenthood is the ultimate in choice for a woman.
The financial motivation is there. The will is there. The Dr. Mengele’s are there. So, how far away from this are we really?
But if we talking about a dead lion instead of dead babies….that’d be a horse of a different color. Had he hunted and killed babies instead of a lion, Dr. Palmer would scarcely have raised left wing eyebrows.