Baby Parts Farms: How far away from this are we really?

By 49 Comments 2,234 views

planned parenthood baby parts farm


It’s becoming clear that baby parts are a big business for Planned Parenthood. The behavior of the employees of Planned Parenthood is nothing less than disgusting. PP harvests dead babies with an emphasis on “less crunchy” techniques to preserve the head and organs. Planned Parenthood’s legal counsel admitted fear that one of the next videos would be of the harvest and dissection of a dead baby. Planned Parenthood drools over the potential of an intact dead baby.

Sometimes, if we get, if someone delivers before we get to see them for a procedure, then we are intact.

and be careful with that baby!

We’d have to do a little bit of training with the providers or something to make sure that they don’t crush” (the organs)

In the current CMP video:

Ginde and a medical assistant casually probed at baby parts from 11-12 week-old aborted babies with utensils in a dish.

At one point, a buyer asked, “What was that? A crack, was that the just the little bits of the skull?” to which they casually responded, “Mhmm.”

Ginde, later looking at the dish proclaimed, “It’s a baby” and pointed out the heart.

The medical assistant also chimed in at one point:  “My fingers will smush it if I try to get it out” and laughed over the dead baby, deeming the intact parts worthy of “five stars.”

Ginde also recognized a baby brain “blasted out” with water, and noted she sometimes doesn’t use water, so that the parts aren’t as “war-torn.”

If that hasn’t made you ill, there’s this:

According to CMP, PPRM does not use digoxin or other feticide in second trimester abortions, which means “any intact deliveries before an abortion are potentially born-alive infants under federal law.”

It means these babies are alive when they are “scooped out” carefully so as not to “smush” their parts. It’s all about the parts. It’s all about the money. And PP worked out how to avoid getting caught selling the parts:

Ginde talks about how she’s very confident that Planned Parenthood lawyers had worked out the details on how not to get caught. “We talked to him in the beginning, you know, we were like, ‘we don’t want to get called on,’ you know, ‘selling fetal parts across states.’ I’m confident that our legal will make sure that we are not put in that situation.”

The White House asserts that these videos are fake because Planned Parenthood told them so.

Planned Parenthood is so determined to get its claws on babies that it provided an abortion to a 13 year old without informing the parents and then hands the child back to the assaulter.

Planned Parenthood is desperate to stop the bleeding. They’ve convinced a judge to block the release of more videos. The basis for blocking First Amendment rights is unclear. I don’t recall a single liberal complaining about the secret Mitt Romney video.

Both Cecile Richards, head of Planned Parenthood, and the White House call those who expose this horrific work “extremists.” Those who dissect whole babies for cash are not extremists, but those who raise this to the national consciousness are extremists. Richards call the video expose an “attack on women.” One wonders if killing female babies is “attacking women.”

And that brings me to the point of this post. How close are we to Planned Parenthood starting up baby farms? These farms of live babies would be sources of fairly well-developed organs and would be of great commercial value. Before you liberals get in a snit, remember a few things.

Margaret Sanger was the founder of what would become Planned Parenthood. One of her quotes:

“The most merciful thing that the large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it,”

Sanger is an idol of Hillary Clinton. More on Sanger:

Margaret Sanger, the godmother of Planned Parenthood, was the fearless voice for birth control and champion of the so-called Negro Project. She is said to have believed darker-skinned humans were inferior, along with those with mental illnesses as well as the impoverished. She believed the solution was negative eugenics – trying to keep those inferior specimens from reproducing.

Hillary Clinton has deep ties to Planned Parenthood.

But Clinton’s relationship with Planned Parenthood goes beyond a shared belief in a woman’s right to choose. The group is interwoven with a network of women’s organizations that are among her strongest backers, and Planned Parenthood leaders and activists are among her personal friends, including President Cecile Richards.

Enter Pete Singer:

An internationally known Princeton “bioethicist” and animal-rights activist says he’d kill disabled babies if it were in the “best interests” of the family, because he sees no distinction in the child’s life whether it is born or not, and the world already allows abortion.

The world already allows abortion. Ready?

Singer believes the next few decades will see a massive upheaval in the concept of life and rights, with only “a rump of hard-core, know-nothing religious fundamentalists” still protecting life as sacrosanct.

That now seems a pretty darned good prediction. Liberals already support late term partial birth abortion- right up to delivery date. It is a revenue stream for Planned Parenthood and a source of political donations to democrats.

In terms of abortions, what difference is there between the day before birth, a month before birth and a day after birth or a month after birth? Under all these conditions the baby is viable. When does life begin? Let’s cut to Cecile Richards:

JORGE RAMOS: Can I ask you a philosophical question?


RAMOS So for you, when does life start? When does a human being become a human being?

RICHARDS This is a question, I think, that will be debated through the centuries, and people come down to very different views on that.

RAMOS But for you, what’s the point?

RICHARDS It is not something that I feel like is really part of this conversation. I mean, to me, we work with women – I guess the way I’d really like to I think every woman has to make her own decision. What we do at Planned Parenthood  is make sure that women have all their options for health care, and they have the option to have a healthy pregnancy, they have the option to put a child up for adoption if they decide to carry the pregnancy to term, or they have the right to make a decision to terminate a pregnancy.

As for Planned Parenthood

 The really hot question is, “When does being a person begin?” Most medical authorities and Planned Parenthood agree that it starts when a baby takes its first breath.

Which is complete bullsh*t. Life News asks:

If a newborn baby is completely outside of her mother’s body but has not yet taken her first breath, is it morally permissible to kill her?  What say you, Cecile Richards?

When does a baby have rights? One school of thought:

Those in favour of abortion often suggest the debate centres upon when the foetus becomes sufficiently human to have the right to life.

Well, there ya go. Babies gain human rights when they become sufficiently human. Simple enough, right?

Here’s another opinion:

Ultimately though, to have a “right to life” requires that one be an individual capable of living an independent existence. One must “get a life” before one has a “right to life.” A fetus is not a separate individual—it lives inside a pregnant woman and depends on her for its growth. In fact, the biological definition of “parasite” fits the fetal mode of growth precisely, especially since pregnancy causes a major upset to a woman’s body, just like a parasite does to its host. I’m not trying to disparage fetuses with the negative connotations of the word parasite; in fact, parasites and their hosts often enjoy mutually supportive relationships, and this obviously includes most pregnancies. However, the parasitic relationship of a fetus to a woman means that its continued existence requires her consent[11]—if she continues the pregnancy unwillingly, her rights and bodily integrity are violated.

A parasite. The author adds:

This is not to say that human life doesn’t have value. Of course it does, but only the value that we ourselves bestow on it—in biology, life is cheap, life is wasteful, and death is vital.

Let’s summarize the left’s stance- life is cheap, it doesn’t begin until a baby takes a breath, a baby is a parasite, and  only “a rump of hard-core, know-nothing religious fundamentalists” will believe life is sacrosanct, and baby parts are commercially important. To that end, babies may be scooped out intact and dissected pretty much at any time during a pregnancy.

So why not right afterward? Why not harvest babies and keep them “alive” ( if you will) until their organs grow to a truly ripe, functional and really valuable size commercially? Sound crazy? Maybe it is, but I didn’t conceive it. Planned Parenthood is in favor of post birth abortion:

A lobbyist for a regional division of Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion business in the United States, says a doctor and a mother should be allowed to decide to kill a newborn who survives an abortion.

The stunning position echoed statements made by Barack Obama while he was in the state Senate in Illinois, and repeatedly opposed a proposed law that would have obligated physicians to provide care to a baby surviving the abortion procedure.

In fact, post birth abortion enjoys the support of Barack Obama, who voted four times to allow abortion surviving babies to die. But why let them die? Why not keep them alive in the baby parts farms?

Baby parts farms designed to be sources of organs are the natural extension of the pro-choice movement. Handing her baby- at whatever age-over to the processors of Planned Parenthood is the ultimate in choice for a woman.

The financial motivation is there. The will is there. The Dr. Mengele’s are there. So, how far away from this are we really?

Not very.

But if we talking about a dead lion instead of dead babies….that’d be a horse of a different color. Had he hunted and killed babies instead of a lion, Dr. Palmer would scarcely have raised left wing eyebrows.










DrJohn has been a health care professional for more than 30 years. In addition to clinical practice he has done extensive research and has published widely with over 70 original articles and abstracts in the peer-reviewed literature. DrJohn is well known in his field and has lectured on every continent except for Antarctica. He has been married to the same wonderful lady for over 30 years and has three kids- two sons, both of whom are attorneys and one daughter on her way into the field of education. DrJohn was brought up with the concept that one can do well if one is prepared to work hard but nothing in life is guaranteed. Except for liberals being foolish.

49 Responses to “Baby Parts Farms: How far away from this are we really?”

  1. 1


    I keep seeing Obama say, on various topics, “This is not who we are.” Yet, he defends Planned Parenthood and supports late term partial birth abortion.

    Is this, now, “who we are”? Is this who we want to become?

    “feticide” Like “insecticide”? Why would a civilized society even NEED such a term, much less conduct the practice?

    I have to commend CMP on their tactics; while it is devious to conduct these undercover videos, their strategy (or how it is working out, anyway) is clear. How many times do some of us hear the complaint, “well, why are they just now revealing this video?” It’s obvious; first, they couldn’t reveal one video while they were conducting stings on other sites; Planned Parenthood would clean up their act (temporarily) and become very suspicious of anyone coming in shopping for baby hearts with Benjamins in their hands.

    Next, and this is the deliciously devious part (which I REALLY like), after each video, Planned Parenthood and their political partners in crime roll out their excuses and rationalities. Almost as if they anticipate the response, the next video destroys the previous explanations, only to be met with fresh excuses which, like a carefully developed plan, the next video dispels.

    Currently, the only excuse the left is clinging to is that the videos are “edited”. However, when questioned as to how the editing has altered the essence of the narrative…. crickets.

    Singer believes the next few decades will see a massive upheaval in the concept of life and rights, with only “a rump of hard-core, know-nothing religious fundamentalists” still protecting life as sacrosanct.

    “Death panels”; what a silly and ridiculous notion.

    RAMOS So for you, when does life start? When does a human being become a human being?

    RICHARDS It is not something that I feel like is really part of this conversation.

    The LAST thing the left wants to determine is whether or not their IS a pre-birth moment when life begins or when that moment is. KNOWING that might prove problematic as knowing what, exactly, you are killing might be emotional.

    A fetus is not a separate individual—it lives inside a pregnant woman and depends on her for its growth. In fact, the biological definition of “parasite” fits the fetal mode of growth precisely, especially since pregnancy causes a major upset to a woman’s body, just like a parasite does to its host.

    So, by that argument, we could just go out and kill those living on welfare without any means of self-support for themselves or others. Right?

    Liberals would like to kill anything that hasn’t gotten a Social Security number yet. For then, and only then, can it begin to be indoctrinated and bribed to vote for Democrats.

  2. 2

    Nanny G

    As a principle the Hebrew Scriptures give us or Creator’s view of when life begins to be something we are accountable for: Exodus 21:22 “If two men are fighting and they strike a pregnant woman and her children are born prematurely…..If there is harm, then you are to require life for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot, burn for burn, wound for wound, and bruise for bruise.

    America is not a Christian country in that it doesn’t hold its citizens up to such Biblical standards.
    What it does do is base its judicial system on the rules from the Judeo-Christian rules in trials.
    (For example the need of TWO witnesses, of set ways of trying cases, of weighing circumstantial evidence, and so on.)

    In America it is legal to both abort one’s baby as well as perform abortions.
    What that means is that any punishment for such acts only comes after one’s death.
    Non-believers seem good with this.

    Occasionally PP hires a person whose conscience hasn’t been totally seared to numbness.
    That’s when we hear about the lies PP tells their ”clients,” such as that these babies feel no pain.
    Also the way PP is trying not to crush the heads or chests of these babies is wrong:

    Bioethicist Art Caplan of New York University says altering procedures to get the best tissue is a “big no-no,” telling CNN that “your sole concern has to be the mother and her health,” not preserving fetal organs.

  3. 3

    another vet

    Perhaps this is just another control issue for them. The left loves controlling others. That’s why all dictators are leftists. Think about what they advocate: big government, heavy taxation, Obamacare, gun control, man made global warming, the Fairness Doctrine, regulation of the internet, Political Correctness (especially being taught in schools), union thuggery, Keynesian economics, snubbing of the Constitution, revisionist history, and the list goes on. What do all of those have in common? Increased control over others. Unrestricted abortion is sacred to them because it involves controlling life and death over a “pile of cells”. The fact that the “pile of cells” just so happens to have a central nervous system and other human organs is immaterial. Perhaps many of them are just projecting their desired control of people, conservatives in particular, onto the killing off of the fetuses.

  4. 4


    I will take Dr J’s OUTRAGE !!! more seriously when he gives up his admitting privileges (and the income that goes along with them) from hospitals that offer abortions to women

  5. 5


    It should be kept in mind that people who secretly record video tapes by lying about who they are, and then edit the recordings with the deliberate intention of distorting the meaning of the exchanges that occur are anything but trustworthy sources.

    Of course you also thought James O’Keefe was practicing honest journalism and revealing the truth, and have persisted in believing that even though it was subsequently established that everything he “revealed” was a fabrication. There’s not much hope you’ll figure this particular smear out either. That’s because you really don’t want to. You prefer the slander.

  6. 6



    It should be kept in mind that people who secretly record video tapes by lying about who they are, and then edit the recordings with the deliberate intention of distorting the meaning of the exchanges that occur are anything but trustworthy sources.

    If doing a sting investigation was conducted by some liberal, to catch a Republican in wrong doing, you would be singing their praises. (Remember how giddy the left was over the fake Bush 43 military documents that cost Dan Rather his job?) But you fail to accept one fact: those videos, complete and unedited, are available on CMPs website. The unedited videos have also been turned over the Attorney General Ken Paxton’s office and are now currently being reviewed, in their unedited version, by the Texas Congress.

    You want to deny your own eyes that can clearly see baby parts (arms, legs, etc) on the videos. But then, you have constantly argued that those aborted babies are nothing more than a clump of cells. Goop. Nothing more. One problem, Greggie Goebbels, goop doesn’t have a liver, a heart or a brain.

    For the left, babies have no value except for their resale value.

  7. 7


    @Greg: Please show how any of the editing changes the content one iota.

    Note that I stated that the last excuse remaining to the dishonest and corrupt liberal is, “waa… they edited it…. waa”, yet when asked, there is never an explanation of how the editing changed any of the facts.

  8. 9


    Lol! Listen to you guys! “…The left loves controlling others. That’s why all dictators are leftists….For the left, babies have no value except for their resale value….Liberals would like to kill anything that hasn’t gotten a Social Security number yet…”

    Morons all.

  9. 10


    “Sometimes, if we get, if someone delivers before we get to see them for a procedure, then we are intact.”

    Did someone at Planned Parenthood admit that if a baby is born before they can perform an abortion, that they kill it anyway so that they can still harvest the parts?
    Post-birth abortion.

  10. 11


    The disingenuous claptrap about the editing of the videos is easily debunked by the fact -which the pro-abortion supporters deliberately ignore – that the unedited videos have also been released, showing clearly there is no alteration to the context whatsoever.

    It is completely arbitrary to argue that an individual is not human based solely on his or her 3 dimensional location in relation to the uterus from which said individual originated. It is flawed logic to claim that an individual in the fetal stage of development is not human because it is dependent on the mother to survive, as a term neonate that has, by definition, escaped the womb, is totally dependent on an adult human to feed, change, clothe, protect, and in all ways care for the infant, as it cannot survive on its own. The defining of humanity based on being outside the womb is merely an exercise in rationalizing what is convenient for those who are farther along the human life cycle.

    The left cannot stand the light of truth shining onto the evil of abortion. The hypocrisy of abortion is on display in multiple ways:

    1. If abortion is all about protecting the rights of women, then where is the concern over the rights of female fetuses that are terminated?

    2. If the requirement to undergo a painless ultrasound to see the fetus before having an abortion is wrong, then how is it right to use ultrasound to direct the abortionist to aide in acquiring better specimens for sale?

    3. If making abortions “safe” to better assure the health of the woman having an abortion is the goal of pro-abortionists, then why are abortionists completely opposed to being required to meet the same health and safety standards that all other outpatient surgical clinics must meet?

    4. If young women under 18 years of age have to obtain parental permission to get a tattoo, or a body piercing, or plastic surgery of any kind, then how can an invasive procedure like abortion be justifiably obtained without parental consent?

    Pro-abortionists are upset over the manner in which the videos were obtained, but not over the inhuman callousness with which at least 3 different PP doctors haggle over the amount of money they want for their gruesome harvest. The twisted priorities are diabolical, to say the least.

  11. 12


    Notice the manner with which the WH spokesmouth so readily accepts the word of Planned Parenthood that the acts and words shown on the videos are wrong, and not worthy of investigation, yet we are supposed to immediately and without question accept that a man accused of rape is always guilty, no matter his denial.

    The left cannot allow something as archaic as outrage over the revulsion at the slaughter of the preborn get in the way of donations to their campaign coffers.

  12. 13


    It is long past time to bring economic pain to the supporters of the genocide of the preborn. PP realizes their weakness on this, as they took down the list of corporate sponsors after Ford and Coke publicly demanded they be removed from the list, claiming they do not donate to PP. The list can be found with a simple Google search. Stop drinking any Pepsi products, and stop going to any restaurant that carries Pepsi products. (They were still listed as corporate sponsors and have not disavowed their sponsorship of the butchers.) Make sure and let these companies know you will not do any business with them so long as they support baby killers. Let your congressional members know you demand that they vote in favor of defunding the criminals of PP, Obama’s veto threat be damned.

  13. 14



    Yesterday, at a Texas Senate hearing on Planned Parenthood, a hearing that had two Senators who are both M.D.s on it, a witness testified that PPGC’s (Planned Parenthood Gulf Coast) Houston facility was raking in approximately $120,000.00 a month on the sale of baby parts at an estimate of $100 per specimen. Think about that; 1,200 baby parts sold per month.

    The six story Houston facility, located in the primarily minority Sheila Jackson-Lee’s district, has now claimed it is no longer selling baby body parts.

    The Senate Committee had requested Planned Parenthood attend the hearing, if for no other reason that to defend themselves against the charges being made. PPGC refused, but did sent their attorney, who arrived 3 1/2 hours into the hearing. She refused to testify but wanted to submit a statement from PPGC. She had to sign in as a witness, which seemed to make the attorney from PPGC extremely uncomfortable, in order to have the statement entered into the record, but still refused to testify.

    Planned Parenthoods tactic now seems to be claiming victimhood. Poor PP, they are being persecuted by those evil pro-lifers.

  14. 16


    Greg; the issue is how far down the rabbit hole our society has fallen in the defense of creating baby farms for anatomical parts by plan parenthood. Moreover, after you have read the other posts -do you support plan parenthood and its harvesting of dead baby parts for profit?

  15. 17


    @Greg: Only a liberal socialist could think like you. Someone taking a video of someone illegally selling baby parts is the person that we need to question? It’ ok to sell the body parts but not for someone to expose it.

    James O’keefe has not been proven to have been wrong in any of his video’s he sure put a lot of crooks out of work.

  16. 18


    I think I have the solution to a couple of problems. Africa needs money, so they sell hunting permits that allow foreigners to come in and kill big game animals, including lions. They are running a little short on animals so sooner or later, they are going to have to stop selling permits. Where are they going to get money from? Let all of their female citizens get pregnant and donate their babies to the ‘local Planned Parenthood’ facility. They could harvest all of the baby parts and sell them on the open market and make tons of money. See how easy it can be to save all the valuable animals while only harvesting thousands of organs from dead babies, which no one wanted anyhow.

    Some liberal has just had a light bulb turn on……..

  17. 19



    And then there is this from 2013:

    “Planned Parenthood Gulf Coast Tuesday settled a whistle-blower lawsuit that alleged the Houston nonprofit engaged in fraudulent Medicaid billing for $4.3 million – nearly $3 million more than was announced last week by Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott.

    In finalizing the settlement, which includes total state and federal recovery, the agency claimed the allegations that it submitted more than $30 million in fraudulent bills between 2003 and 2009 were “baseless.”

    “This settlement is not an admission of guilt,” Planned Parenthood said in a prepared statement.”

    Got that? A court found PPGC guilty of Medicaid fraud, and required them to pay back $4.3 million, but they are not guilty because the charges were baseless (except according to the judge) and, you know, victimhood.

    Planned Parenthood Gulf Coast was billing Medicaid for services it did not even render.

  18. 20


    Planned Parenthood’s denials, and their feigned outrage over how these videos were obtained, is analagous to an adulterer denying the meaning of his shirt collar marks with his mistresses’ lipstick, and laughably claiming that videos of him having sex with his mistress were obtained without his consent to be filmed.

  19. 21



    Today a Federal judge ordered a temporary injunction stating that the group that made the videos could not release any more. The National Abortion Federation sued in federal court against the rest of the videos being release.

    There is no greater sacred cow for the left than abortion.

  20. 22


    @retire05: Sounds like ‘freedom of the press’ has been aborted. Is there nothing these PP folks won’t abort? Isn’t there something in the Constitution about freedom of Press?

  21. 23



    These videos need to be leaked to the British press. But Cecile Richards and her merry band of executioners will do their very best to stop any more videos from being shown.

    So while PP claims victimhood over having their crimes revealed, it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure out that any group that is willing to fraud Medicaid has no problem selling baby parts for profit. Profits is PP bottom line.

    When Texas ended abortions past 20 weeks, Planned Parenthood sued. When Texas passed a law saying that all abortion facilities had to have the same ambulatory access as any other out-patient surgical center (you know, like the oral surgeon has to have), Planned Parenthood sued. When the Texas Congress stopped all funding to Planned Parenthood, as well as funding to all women’s health care clinics that performed abortions, Planned Parenthood sued. PP lost.

    Money. It’s all about money and doesn’t have a damn thing to do with women’s health. And there is a special place in Hell for Cecile Richards.

  22. 25



    Money. It’s all about money and doesn’t have a damn thing to do with women’s health. And there is a special place in Hell for Cecile Richards.

    Right next to her harpy mother.

    The left wing strategy to defend Planned Parenthood is clear; turn it into an attack on the “right” to an abortion. On the Dallas Morning News comments, this is the meme; every leftist ignores what the actual issue is that is now prompting Planned Parenthood to be stripped of taxpayer funds… the practice of drawing out living babies, dismembering them and parting them out like a wrecked Ford.

    The left is becoming clumsy with their arguments as they find it more and more difficult to defend the indefensible.

  23. 26



    Read the responses to your links. Wow! Talk about low information voters. These people take the prize.

    If PP is not selling the baby parts, just what the hell are they doing with them? Oh, that’s right; Dr. Goznell just flushed them down the toilet or some clinics grind them up. Or better yet, throw them in a plastic bag and put them in the trash.

    Get back to us when you have a brain because you’re too stupid to know that if PP was innocent of the claims of selling baby parts, they wouldn’t be in such a panic to get the release of the videos stopped.

  24. 27


    @Ralph: And this is why the death merchants were discussing how their lawyers have informed them of their loopholes and methods of skirting the prohibition of SELLING body parts?

  25. 28



    On the Dallas Morning News comments, this is the meme; every leftist ignores what the actual issue is that is now prompting Planned Parenthood to be stripped of taxpayer funds… the practice of drawing out living babies, dismembering them and parting them out like a wrecked Ford.

    I hope you didn’t expect anything else from the idiots that read the Dallas Morning News, a left wing rag if ever there was one.

    But the problem PP has is science. Sonigrams now let us know what a baby actually looks like at 20 weeks, and it ain’t a clump of cells or a bunch of goop. It is a human being that reacts to sounds, and pain and sucks its thumb.

    But hey, if you’re a guy that was just using some woman for a good time, and you’re too stupid to make sure she doesn’t conceive, just give her the funds to kill the results of your good time. Problem solved. No child support for 18 years and you can go on your merry way. After all, it’s not like you just killed a lion, or something.

  26. 29


    @Ralph: Talk about funny, she refers to someone having two brain cells to rub together. Well, it ain’t her. then she tells about how no one is selling baby parts, then she goes into the excellent things the baby parts are being used for, different researches. Did she forget (in her one brain cell) that she just said they didn’t do that? Then she talks about attending a college class she attended. They have colleges for idiots? If PP wasn’t telling about selling baby parts, just what was it they were haggling over the price of?

  27. 31


    @Ralph: @JisterJ: How is it that two “separate people” post the exact same post?

    So, you “two” esteemed examples of liberal intellect, your concept of refuting actual audio and video of a person admitting to being aware of the laws they are breaking and how they can avoid getting caught, explicitly describing how they extract the person, living or already dead, and then dismember the corpse so as to sell the valuable remains is some sycophants saying, “nuh-uh”? Really?

  28. 33



    And you’d believe the likes of an O’Keeffe edited video. Seems you’re the dummy!

    But I am smart enough to know that shoving a Metzenbaum scissors in the back of an unborn child’s skull or ripping it apart to kill it is cruel, inhumane and just pure evil.

    The rocket scientist that wrote the blog you linked to isn’t even smart enough to know what she is talking about. Like you, she is just another indoctrinated useful idiot.

  29. 34


    @Ralph:Tell you what Ralphie, link us to an Okeefe video that you claim didn’t expose someone or some illegal/immoral act. Just one will do. He sure, single-handedly brought down ACORN.

  30. 35


    @retire05: Yes, that rocket scientist didn’t even have the two brain cells she referred to, so she didn’t have any detectable brain activity. How do people get to be so stupid. Are they born that way or do they just have to be educated by liberals?

  31. 36



    Tell you what Ralphie, link us to an Okeefe video that you claim didn’t expose someone or some illegal/immoral act. Just one will do.

    Ralph can’t do that, Redteam. All he is capable of doing is the same thing Greggie Goebbels does, parrot what the left tells them. Neither one is smart enough to find out for themselves.

  32. 38

    another vet

    Look at JisterJ #15 and Ralph #24. Same post. Same person. Not only is he one of the toughest guys out there (so he acts), he is (so he thinks) one of the smartest.

  33. 39


    @another vet: Yes, I had responded to his 24 in 29, then later was reviewing other comments and saw 15 and said ‘damn that’s exactly the same as Ralph in 24″
    That’s not the first time I’ve come across liberals posting as 2 or more persons. When the heat gets a little heavy and they disappear, someone else shows up with the same message. I can only assume they are just ‘spreading the message’.

    I guess we shouldl respond to ‘it’ as RalphJisterJ

  34. 40

    Jeff D

    “Affiliates are not looking to make money by doing this. They’re looking to serve their patients and just make it not impact their bottom line.”

    That’s an example of something Deborah Nucatola said that was edited out the Center for Medical Progress video because it contradicts the lie they’re trying to sell. Even the group’s name, “Center for Medical Progress” is a lie. The group doesn’t have an more to do with “medical progress” than they do with the truth about Planned Parenthood.

    The right lies. They lie about EVERYTHING.

  35. 41



    You are nothing but a vile propagandist hack. Your foul-mouthed spokeshag from your leftwing propaganda video is either deliberately lying, or incredibly stupid.

    The fact that you rely on such a vulgar, hateful harridan’s shrieking illogical rant as your “proof” only shows the depths to which leftists like you will sink to deny the truths you find inconvenient. That is what leftists do, in shouting and screaming like little spoiled brats “LA LA LA I CAN’T HEAR YOU!” because you cannot deny the obvious facts.

    Someday, for your sake, I hope you and your ilk grow up. Otherwise your childish selfishness and demands not to be responsible for your decisions will lead you to a place and time where reality will forcefully disavow you of your pathetic, whining self-centeredness.

  36. 42


    @Jeff D:

    Except for the fact that CMP released the entire video WITH THE NUCATOLA QUOTE YOU REFERENCE thereby destroying the leftist pro-abortionist attempt at deflecting from the context of the video. YOU are deceptively editing the context of the quote by conveniently leaving out the rest of the discussion, where Nucatola specifically talks about how PP desires the selling of baby remains to be portrayed.

    Again, I call for all people with conscience to boycott all companies that support the butchers of Planned Parenthood. It does no good if you do not make it known to companies like Pepsi (and all restaurants which sell Pepsi products), Macy’s, and the rest on the now taken down PP corporate sponsor list, if you do not make it very clear that you refuse to do any business with any company that supports the butchery of humans.

  37. 43


    @Jeff D:

    Even the group’s name, “Center for Medical Progress” is a lie. The group doesn’t have an more to do with “medical progress” than they do with the truth about Planned Parenthood.

    True, stopping a barbaric act of delivering live babies, killing them, dismembering them and selling the parts is not exactly progress; it is stopping an act that should not be happening in the first place.

  38. 45


    @rich wheeler:

    “Delivering live babies,killing them and dismembering them.”

    Are you 100% certain that statement is true?

    Have you forgotten Kermit Gosnell? He delivered live babies, killing them. He didn’t seem to sell the body parts, just shoved them in the freezer or flushed them down the toilet to the point he clogged up the sewer system.

  39. 47


    @rich wheeler:

    Did this butcher Gosnell work for PP I thought that was the subject?

    Yep. He was Planned Parenthood’s doctor of referral on late term abortions. They would not have referred pregnant women to him if he did not contract with them for the services of ripping babies out of their mother’s womb or inducing labor so that he could shove a Metzenbaum scissors in the back of the baby’s skull to kill the brain.

  40. 48

    Jeff D


    They didn’t withdraw the edited video. That’s the one they’ll use for effect. They can cite the unedited version anytime anyone points out that they’re a pack of liars. They’re appealing to the self-righteous low-brow rabble, not critical thinkers.

  41. 49


    @rich wheeler:

    Are you 100% certain that statement is true?

    No, I’m 98.85471235% sure.

    Have you not been reading the articles? Note that, from the left, their “refute” is:

    – the video was edited. Of course it was; it’s large. However, the entire video is available and is not being hidden from anyone.

    – despite what we see on the video and hear the people saying they are doing, they aren’t doing what they are saying they are doing. Liberals are pretty good as suspending disbelief when told to do so, but like the Force, it only works on weak minds. Others see and hear what is being said and that, combined with the history of abortion provided us by notables like George Teller, Kermit Gosnell and Douglas Karpen.

    -Christian zealots are trying to destroy abortion. The argument has not been about abortion, it has been about federal funding for an organization that has been CAUGHT performing despicable, inhuman acts. But, apparently, only Christian zealots object to killing babies for parts.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *