The Schutzstaffel lives on. It’s known as the Wisconsin Democrat Party

By 34 Comments 4,020 views

wis justice


The Schutzstaffel was among other things, the political police of the Third Reich.

The SS expanded from a small paramilitary unit to a powerful force that served as the Führer’s bodyguard, the Nazi Party’s “Protection Squadron” and a force that, fielding almost a million men (both on the front lines and as political police), managed to exert as much political influence in the Third Reich as the Wehrmacht, Germany’s regular armed forces.

Today the SS lives on in Wisconsin. It has been renamed the Democrat Party. They have hated Scott Walker pretty much since the day he was born. The tactics employed by the democrats in Wisconsin are about as un-American as you could imagine. These are awful, awful people. I’ve written about the travails of Scott Walker who has been the target of endless John Doe probes which have been conducted in secret and come up empty. Now it’s time for you to know the execrable treatment being meted out to his colleagues.

National Review today published an article on the home invasion of Cindy Archer:

Cindy Archer, one of the lead architects of Wisconsin’s Act 10 — also called the “Wisconsin Budget Repair Bill,” it limited public-employee benefits and altered collective-bargaining rules for public-employee unions — was jolted awake by yelling, loud pounding at the door, and her dogs’ frantic barking. The entire house — the windows and walls — was shaking. She looked outside to see up to a dozen police officers, yelling to open the door. They were carrying a battering ram.

She wasn’t dressed, but she started to run toward the door, her body in full view of the police. Some yelled at her to grab some clothes, others yelled for her to open the door. “I was so afraid,” she says. “I did not know what to do.” She grabbed some clothes, opened the door, and dressed right in front of the police. The dogs were still frantic. “I begged and begged, ‘Please don’t shoot my dogs, please don’t shoot my dogs, just don’t shoot my dogs.’ I couldn’t get them to stop barking, and I couldn’t get them outside quick enough. I saw a gun and barking dogs. I was scared and knew this was a bad mix.”

And it went downhill from there. Rights? Republicans in Wisconsin have no rights.

As if the home invasion, the appropriation of private property, and the verbal abuse weren’t enough, next came ominous warnings. Don’t call your lawyer. Don’t tell anyone about this raid. Not even your mother, your father, or your closest friends. The entire neighborhood could see the police around their house, but they had to remain silent. This was not the “right to remain silent” as uttered by every cop on every legal drama on television — the right against self-incrimination. They couldn’t mount a public defense if they wanted — or even offer an explanation to family and friends.

The witch hunt was led by the highly partisan democrat Milwaukee District Attorney John Chisholm who decided it was his prerogative to stop Scott Walker by any means necessary.

If the first series of John Doe investigations was “everything Walker,” the second series was “everything conservative,” as Chisholm had launched an investigation of not only Walker (again) but the Wisconsin Club for Growth and dozens of other conservative organizations, this time fishing for evidence of allegedly illegal “coordination” between conservative groups and the Walker campaign.

Read the entire sordid story at NR. That will be a appetizer for the rest of this disgusting travesty. MD Kittle of has done a remarkable job in following this terrifying abuse of the law. There are 194 parts so far. Don’t miss the story of Kelly Rindfleisch, against whom Chisholm trumped up a case and is going to jail because she wouldn’t lie about Scott Walker.

Rindfleisch, was convicted in 2012 on a nebulous charge of misconduct in public office for answering campaign emails while serving as an aide to Gov. Scott Walker when Walker was Milwaukee County executive.

The charge, like the prosecutors’ sweeping search of Rindfleisch’s computers and smartphones, appears to have been expansive and ill-fitting her “crimes.”

But Milwaukee County District Attorney John Chisholm, a Democrat, and his assistants wanted the Walker aide to play ball and deliver something they could use, possibly to ensnare Walker — the Republican candidate for governor in 2010.

She didn’t, she couldn’t, so they charged her with a felony.

There’s lots and lots more. I have been following this for a long time and today’s article set me off. It also set off Rush Limbaugh (via Glenn):

The innocent in Wisconsin were guilty because they were conservative. The left in Wisconsin was losing everything. They were losing their union domination and control. Scott Walker was decimating all the systems they had put in place.

They literally lashed out in panic, anger, and you name it to punish people who had voted for Walker, who had raised money for him, who they thought had voted for him. It was the kind of thing that Vladimir Putin does and we all laugh about because that’s what we expect in a tyrannical dictatorship like the Soviet Union or Russia. We find out that it can happen here and has happened here, and there was no mechanism to stop it. The prosecutor’s name is Chisholm, John Chisholm, and I hope his name is never forgotten. . . .

The judge, without whom this case could not have happened, is Barbara Kluka, K-l-u-k-a, and I’ll tell you what she did. She came along in the second John Doe investigation, and she approved every petition, every subpoena, every search warrant in the whole case in less than one day’s work. She enabled law enforcement to raid these innocent citizens’ homes. She’s since recused herself from this, but not before she enabled all of this to happen in the second phase of the John Doe 2 case here.

In the second John Doe case, the DA, John Chisholm, had no real evidence of wrongdoing by anybody. It didn’t stop him. Conservative groups were active in issue advocacy, which is protected by the First Amendment. It didn’t violate any campaign finance laws. Issue advocacy is politics 101. These people were targeted because they’re conservatives and liberals. As I say, what happened here in not only the treatment Scott Walker got, but everybody else, this is liberalism run amok without any checks, without any opposition, without anybody pushing back, and in its own way California is the same example.

Despite the fact that there were no violations of the law in any away, the DA, Chisholm, convinced “prosecutors in four other counties to launch their own John Does, with Judge Kluka overseeing all of them. Empowered by a rubber-stamp judge, partisan investigators ran amok. They subpoenaed and obtained (without the conservative targets’ knowledge) massive amounts of electronic data, including virtually all the targets’ personal e-mails and other electronic messages from outside e-mail vendors and communications companies. The investigations exploded into the open with a coordinated series of raids on October 3, 2013. These were home invasions,” including the ones that I have detailed previously in this half hour.

If you didn’t actually read this you’d never believe something this execrable could go on in the United States of America yet it did and it’s all pure, pure democrat malevolence.

DrJohn has been a health care professional for more than 30 years. In addition to clinical practice he has done extensive research and has published widely with over 70 original articles and abstracts in the peer-reviewed literature. DrJohn is well known in his field and has lectured on every continent except for Antarctica. He has been married to the same wonderful lady for over 30 years and has three kids- two sons, both of whom are attorneys and one daughter on her way into the field of education. DrJohn was brought up with the concept that one can do well if one is prepared to work hard but nothing in life is guaranteed. Except for liberals being foolish.

34 Responses to “The Schutzstaffel lives on. It’s known as the Wisconsin Democrat Party”

  1. 26


    At the risk of stating the obvious, in 2014 people didn’t feel so compelled by the sense that the economy was going to hell in a handbag. There’s always a higher turnout when more voters don’t like where things are headed and believe that a change is in order. In addition to that, midterm election turnouts are almost always lower than presidential election years.

    The GOP wants to claim victory by a narrow margin in an election with the lowest turnout in 72 years as a sea change in the political landscape, and as a call to double-down on policies that most Americans have rejected in the past. If they nominate a candidate on that basis, Hillary Clinton will most likely be the next president. This should also be obvious.

  2. 27


    @Greg: So, you liberals are so stupid as to think that if the do not get out and vote, they can still maintain their liberal utopia which the love so much? Or, is that they were so disgusted with the failure of “Hope and Change” and all the lies they were told that they just quit like the quitters liberals are?

  3. 28

    Herr Hitler

    Thank you for continuing to blame liberals for what we right wing nazis did in the past. The longer we can confuse the public, the longer they won’t realize we locked up liberals, socialists, union leaders, and academics.

  4. 30

    Common Sense

    @Greg: Greggie Greggie Greggie, did Democrats elect NOT to vote because they where so pleased with the wonderful job Slimy Harry and his losers in the Senate where doing?? Now that’s one of the dumbest excuses I have ever heard Greggie!!

  5. 32


    @Bill, #27:

    I always wonder how people who say such things would fare without Social Security, Medicare, and other components of the “liberal utopia” that they constantly complain about. They never seem to have much difficulty rationalizing whatever benefit they receive from “socialist” programs themselves.

  6. 33



    I would fare quite well if the government would let me choose to invest what I am forced to pay into social security into my 401k, rather than limiting me to $18,000 per year for such an investment. I am getting 6 to 8 percent ROI over the last 3 years on my 401k, and based on my SS annual statement I will barely receive a 1% ROI for what is taken from me in SS tax – and that is IF I get anything at all.

    What you leftists refuse to admit is that taxes are taken from what an individual EARNS. The leftist view of taxation is a bizarre ideology that defines income as what the government should allow you to keep of what you earn, applied in a marxist based “progressive” tax system that punishes hard work and success, while stirring up economic jealousy, class warfare, and a pathetic entitlement mindset in those whose votes are bought by government handouts.

    You wail and moan about the alleged unfairness of economic inequality while cheering on a despicably dishonest harpy practitioner of corrupt crony capitalism. Why should I feel it is fair, beneficial or morale to enslave myself in the mental chains of envy because Bill Gates, Tiger Woods, or Stephen King have amassed more wealth in their endeavors than I ever will? I should be happy for the financial success they have achieved, and be glad that their efforts encourage others to succeed. Punishing such successful people via confiscatory taxation for the purpose of buying off the mobocracy can only lead to a collapse of the wealth generation such success engenders. When there are no more “rich” people from whom the government can steal to feed the mobocracy, what do you think will result from the current entitlement zeitgeist?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *