You supported Obama. He knew you were stupid. He counted on you being stupid. He was right.

By 67 Comments 3,833 views

Obama voters dunce

“Let me say it as simply as I can: Transparency and the rule of law will be the touchstones of this presidency.”

Barack Obama, January 2009.

See him say it for yourself.

This is HUGE. It proves that Obamacare is premised on lies. And it proves more than that.

Obamacare architect Jonathan Gruber:

“This bill was written in a tortured way to make sure CBO did not score the mandate as taxes. If CBO scored the mandate as taxes, the bill dies. Okay, so it’s written to do that. In terms of risk rated subsidies, if you had a law which said that healthy people are going to pay in – you made explicit healthy people pay in and sick people get money, it would not have passed… Lack of transparency is a huge political advantage. And basically, call it the stupidity of the American voter or whatever, but basically that was really really critical for the thing to pass… Look, I wish Mark was right that we could make it all transparent, but I’d rather have this law than not.”

Here’ that video again:

So how does it feel, Obama voters? How does it feel knowing that Obama counted on you being stupid and that you came through?

Over at The Hill Elise Viebeck characterizes it this way:

“The clip is generating significant attention in conservative media.”

No shit. The question is, why isn’t all of the media interested in this?

Answer? Because they are stupid. They are useful idiots.

Candy Crowley? VERY useful idiot:

Romney: Yeah, I — I certainly do. I certainly do. I — I think it’s interesting the president just said something which is that on the day after the attack, he went in the Rose Garden and said that this was an act of terror. You said in the Rose Garden the day after the attack it was an act of terror. It was not a spontaneous demonstration.

Obama: Please proceed.

Romney: Is that what you’re saying?

Obama: Please proceed, Governor.

Romney: I — I — I want to make sure we get that for the record, because it took the president 14 days before he called the attack in Benghazi an act of terror.

Obama: Get the transcript.

Crowley: It — he did in fact, sir. So let me — let me call it an act of terrorism — (inaudible)

Obama: Can you say that a little louder, Candy? (Laughter, applause.)

Crowley: He did call it an act of terror. It did as well take — it did as well take two weeks or so for the whole idea of there being a riot out there about this tape to come out. You are correct about that.

Jeff Dunetz notes:

Indeed Romney was correct.The day after the terror attack in Benghazi, President Obama gave a Rose Garden Speech of 801 words. He mentioned the word terror once near the end of his speech but not in reference to the horrible attack.

During that brief statement, President Obama referred to Benghazi as; An attack on our diplomatic post in Benghazi; this outrageous and shocking attack; attack; terrible act. Obama called the people who perpetuated the attack “the killers who attacked our people.” He did not call them terrorists.

Crowley rescued Obama and the lie that night and then CBS sat on the exposé. The result was that Mitt Romney was made to look foolish and both Crowley and CBS were accomplices in the malfeasance and quite possibly changed an election.

Obama counted on them being both dishonest and stupid and they came through.

Matt Lauer, another stupid Obama useful idiot:

Opposing the President’s policy is not a policy.

Yeah, Matt, it is when it’s all based on lies.

You Obama supporters- you can’t say you weren’t warned. We warned you repeatedly:

Why you’re an idiot to believe anything Barack Obama says

More of why you’re an idiot to believe anything Obama says

Barack Obama is the biggest liar ever to stain the Presidency of the US

Barack Obama Is A Big Fat Liar

And, of course:

DrJohn’s Law

Whatever Obama says is a lie. The opposite is the truth.

You voted for Obama? You are stupid. They knew it. A lot of us knew it. And now you know that not only are you stupid, you get to know that your hero, your god, knows you’re stupid.

This video proves one more thing:

The press is a ass

Obama could never have pulled this off without a docile, compliant and yes, stupid media.

DrJohn has been a health care professional for more than 30 years. In addition to clinical practice he has done extensive research and has published widely with over 70 original articles and abstracts in the peer-reviewed literature. DrJohn is well known in his field and has lectured on every continent except for Antarctica. He has been married to the same wonderful lady for over 30 years and has three kids- two sons, both of whom are attorneys and one daughter on her way into the field of education. DrJohn was brought up with the concept that one can do well if one is prepared to work hard but nothing in life is guaranteed. Except for liberals being foolish.

67 Responses to “You supported Obama. He knew you were stupid. He counted on you being stupid. He was right.”

  1. 51

    Richard+Wheeler

    @retire05: One last time. I said it matters not the exact definition given by the Founding Fathers since it is today 12 Nov 2014 a Democratic Republic. I repeatedly explained why. Then I asked you, since you’re so concerned, to show me exactly where they called it a “Representative Republic.” Can you please do that.

  2. 52

    retire05

    @Richard+Wheeler:

    I said it matters not the exact definition given by the Founding Fathers since it is today 12 Nov 2014 a Democratic Republic.

    You now say that because, once again, you let your mouth write a check your ass can’t cash.

  3. 54

    retire05

    @Richard+Wheeler:

    I’ve continued to say the same thing and even asked you please to confirm your claim.

    Oh, no you don’t. You don’t put the onus on me when it was your comments I responded to. So you just run away, little rabbit. Guessing at football games is about all you’re good for, anyway.

  4. 55

    Richard+Wheeler

    @retire05: I don’t care what your beloved founding fathers called us in the late 18th century. I only care what we are today.
    Are you really too dense to understand that o5?
    Do you understand the significance of the 17th Amendment?
    Actually, I’m not that good at picking football games, and neither is RT. But thanks.

  5. 56

    retire05

    @Richard+Wheeler:

    I don’t care what your beloved founding fathers called us in the late 18th century.

    Of course you don’t. You lean heavily toward Socialism which they would have found abhorrent.

    I only care what we are today.

    I’m sure you do. That is why you support Socialist-lites like Nancy Pelosi, Barbara Box, Maxine Waters, et al.

    Are you really too dense to understand that o5?

    ROTFLMAO. I’m not the one dodging the question.

    Do you understand the significance of the 17th Amendment?

    Yep. Shoved through by a man who had absolutely no respect for the U.S. Constitution and one of the worst presidents this nation has ever known as well as being a virulent racist who hated blacks.

    Actually, I’m not that good at picking football games,

    I noticed. Seems you are pretty inept at many things.

  6. 60

    ThunderGod

    Meh. Dick Spinner and Greggie are just playing Winston Smith from the Ministry of Truth. Don’t like reality? Redefine the words that describe it.

  7. 62

    Aqua

    Don’t mean to interrupt, but I just wanted to throw this out there.
    @Richard+Wheeler:

    I said it matters not the exact definition given by the Founding Fathers since it is today 12 Nov 2014 a Democratic Republic.

    We’re not a democratic republic. That would put us in the same category as the Congo, Vietnam, and the now defunct GDR.

    Article IV Section 4, of the Constitution “The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion”

    “Hence it is that democracies have ever been spectacles of turbulence and contention; have ever been found incompatible with personal security or the rights of property; and in general have been as short in their lives as they have been violent in their deaths… A republic, by which I mean a government in which a scheme of representation takes place, opens a different prospect and promises the cure for which we are seeking.” James Madison, Federalist Papers No. 10 (1787).

    “Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote!” Ben Franklin

    @Richard+Wheeler:

    Do you understand the significance of the 17th Amendment?

    The 17th Amendment didn’t change us from a representative republic to the GDR, although it seems we’re getting close with the glorious leader deciding which laws he will and won’t enforce.
    The 17th Amendment just took away the representation of the States. Although some Senators still take their role as ambassadors seriously. The only true victims of the 17th Amendment are smaller States. Just think how many times an unfunded mandate would be passed in the senate if we didn’t have the 17th Amendment.

  8. 64

    Ditto

    @Aqua:

    The 17th Amendment didn’t change us from a representative republic to the GDR, although it seems we’re getting close with the glorious leader deciding which laws he will and won’t enforce.

    Harry Reid aided in Obama’s intended transformation by changing the rules of the Senate to remove minority party representation.

    “Progressive” socialists have been endeavoring to “fundamentally transform” this nation since Woodrow Wilson. Unfortunately they have had many successes, the most insidious has been transforming our MSM and education systems into “progressive” indoctrination/propaganda ministries. It is no surprise that since a Democratic held Congress and Carter created the US Department of Education that our public school system has resulted in a dumbing down of America’s children. Before it’s establishment the US had the highest level of education in the world, and look where we are now.

  9. 65

    Richard Wheeler

    @Aqua: Call me crazy I like the concept of a democratically elected House and Senate with a Prez. elected through the electoral college and a judicial nom. and confirmation process. I call that a Democratic Republic or RDR. I understand the 17th amendment was not anticipated by the founders, but there it is.
    I do not believe in a pure democracy. Some say a benevolent despot the best form of govt. but where do you find one. lol Power corrupts———-ABSOLUTELY. No question
    What’s in a name.There was nothing Democratic about the GDR.
    Your “interruptions” are always appreciated.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *