Hard Core Socialism – Clinton Picks-up The Banner

By 28 Comments 920 views

The foreboding word “redistribution”  uttered by Obama when he had visions of becoming President, rattled half the taxpayers in America.  The other half either did not understand it, or did not believe it, or ideologically agreed and approved with big government taking cash from taxpayers and handing it out to statist supporters.  His apologists in the MSM worked overtime to twist the truth of Obama’s meaning, and particularly his intent.  In the end, a majority of America did not fully grasp that Obama indeed intended to remake the Nation into a socialist machine whose new blueprints could only be imagined by a community organizer with roots set deep in ideologies foreign to most thinking taxpayers.


The socialist wolf outfitted in middle-of-the-road political attire lied through the reflective glass of endless teleprompters — and the lies stuck and twice provided passage over thresholds into the White House.  Lies work. Misrepresentation works. Too many voters yearn for truth, but don’t make the effort to find it.  Politics have always been tainted, however, never in America’s history has an ideological movement so antithetical to the Nation’s core values, come so close to irreversibly morphing the country and its very foundations into unrecognizable and strangely schizophrenic constructs – somewhere along a spectrum that vacillates between fascism and communism.  We have no idea what they really seek in the end game for the most powerful Nation on earth – educated guesses yes, but anything is possible.  And the teleprompters continue,  . . . .

Hillary Clinton has been on the campaign trail since she left State and has been campaigning hard.  This week, Clinton had a “redistribution” moment.  At a Boston rally for gubernatorial candidate Coakley, Clinton actually teleprompted her worshippers these incomprehensible words, “Don’t let anybody tell you that it’s corporations and businesses that create jobs.”

By all accounts, Clinton is actually American, breathes, and probably can chew gum and walk at the same time, although she and her husband have lived their whole lives off the good graces of the taxpayers. For them, government has been good.  So good, it should be good for all Americans and in fact for everybody else on earth who can walk, fly or row onto America’s shores.  Oh, and “good” means full employment, apparently.  Full employment by government.  The apologist media will have a difficult time twisting alternate meaning out of this inane statement by Clinton.

Obama isn’t the only one who hates capitalism, Clinton is showing her Alinsky roots and her statements are void of common sense.  Lies continue to work.  Now, if only her worshippers had a clue as to who Alinsky really was, and why Clinton was a “believer.”  More importantly, if only they understood that she still is a believer.  She also believes that she is Presidential material, . . . apparently.


A constituent of the vast baby boomer generation with a career which has been fortunate to know the ponderous corporate worlds, as well as the intimately pressurized, and invigorating entrepreneurial domains of high tech and venture capital, I have harvested my share of mistakes meandering through corridors of enterprise from Silicon Valley, to London and endless, colourful, sometimes praetorian points in between. The voyage has provided an abundance of fodder for a pen yielding to an inquisitive keyboard, a foraging mind, and a passionate spirit. Whether political or business or social or economic or personal, is it not all political? It is a privilege to write, and an even greater privilege to be read by anyone, and sometimes with the wind at my back the writing may occasionally be legible. I do not write to invite scorn, nor to invite respect, but if I get really lucky the writing can stimulate thinking. I also write for the very selfish purpose of animating my own processes, and engaging the best of what life offers. Above all, whether biting fire or swatting shadows, I am grateful to be gifted the freedom to write and publish whatever flows down to the keyboard. To all those who enabled this freedom, and to all those standing guard to preserve it, I am indebted.

28 Responses to “Hard Core Socialism – Clinton Picks-up The Banner”

  1. 1


    Hillary is a walking paradox; she is considered the most intelligent woman in the world, by Democrat lackeys, but she failed to pass the DC Bar Exam. However, she was smart enough to ride the coat tails of her serial rapist husband and because of this image of a stand by your man, Tammy Wynette type loyalty, she is considered to be a likely prospect for the country’s highest office. The Useful Idiots will cry out that she served as a carpetbagging Senator for New York and maintained a flawless record of accomplishing nothing, but she served under the real Alynsky Community Organizer and racked up impressive air miles and managed to observe the Benghazi Debacle without making a meaningful contribution.

    While serving as the First Madam in the White House, her main order of business was covering up the unsightly blemishes and zits created by her husband and inappropriately called bimbo eruptions. With the aid of a compliant and complicit media, this one accomplishment is the highlight of her career, and no one can dispute the aggression she used to attack these sexual assault victims. It is assumed, by the most Useful Idiots of the Left, that she can attack the job of POTUS with this same fervor, and don’t forget, she told us she has so many wonderful Socialist ideas, that we can’t afford all of them.

    Yes indeed, a country teetering on the precipice of bankruptcy is like a ship about to sink, if it hasn’t gone under it is still afloat. Rest assured, Hillary views the nation as a ship that is still afloat; if the water stays calm and there are no violent movements, why plug the leaks, it is obvious the ship can take on more water or debt, because it is still floating.

  2. 2


    A liberal’s New American Dream looks like EU, smells like EU and feels like EU. Clinton could make one Hell of a personality cult there, just like “ex”-commie Frau Merkel.

  3. 4


    Her socialist roots, by no means, is really no big secret. Nor, is there much daylight between her and Obama in policy matters. Whatever her policy differences with Obama were, they were very minor.

  4. 5

    James Raider


    @Skookum: #1
    I don’t know if you’ve wasted time to read any of Clinton’s “Alinsky” Thesis from her communist-worshiping days in college, but it’s a pathetic read. Evidently, a lifetime of “living” in America taught her little and 40 years in politics could not inform her weak mind. She’s still the same person lacking any bit of wisdom, as the Alinsky adoring fool wrote that diatribe.

    You’re right, all she could do was fly around the world accomplishing nothing other than introduce her glad-handing husband to dictators, looking for deals to make with Frank Justra et al.

  5. 7


    Hillary is becoming more obviously the modern Napoleon the Pig.

    The fact that there are so many LIVs willing to accept what this socialist says as having any basis in reality is the underlying reason the US is teetering on the brink of collapse. Once the masses are fully ensconced in the marxist philosophy that the party elite have a political right to take whatever they want from any target group to then hand out the spoils as scraps from the master’s table to the dogs the nomenclatura believe the stupid masses to be, there will be no turning back the clock.

    I would just like Hillary to be asked on live video – “If business and corporations don’t create jobs, then from whence do jobs come?”

  6. 8



    Disappointed doesn’t come close to describe my thoughts on The News’ endorsement of Greg Abbott.

    Why, the government creates jobs. Whenever the government’s inefficiency and waste prevents the current work force from getting the job done, they just hire more at top wages and hand out those benefits like candy. Of course, they have no understanding of paying the bills, like REAL businesses have to worry about.

    No doubt Hillary shares the same attitude of Bubba; loathing the military. Same as Obama as well.

  7. 9


    @James Raider: It is torturous, not really, but close to the most boring BS you read in college. As we all know, there was a formulas to follow in the liberal Arts classes and the high grades were guaranteed. I would link to it, but I am using my IPad mini, and it is generally reserved for recording my notes while working and my GPS machine. If you will provide the link, I am sure we will have a few intrepid readers who are willing to take a beating for the cause. It is worth the time to realize how incredibly stupid this presidential candidate actually is, she is way over rated; in fact, without her husband, she would be waiting tables at a truckstop in Arkansas. Do you think I am overly critical? Read the thesis.

  8. 10


    Of course Shillary is a hard core Socialist. She maintained her friendship with Saul Alinsky until his death. Not only that, she was good friends with the life-long Democratic Socialists of America couple, Richard Cloward and Francis Fox Piven. When Bill Clinton signed the Motor Voter Act that has opened up voter rolls to massive fraud, Cloward and Piven, who along with Wade Rathke were the creators of ACORN, had pushed for the act and stood behind Bill Clinton, gleaming as he signed the bill.

    Hillary, the more Socialist of the Democrat Party royality couple, would make Bubba look like a hard core Republican. But she will get some push back. A faux Indian princess, Elizabeth Warren, who ran her entire campaign on a lie, is going to throw her hat in the ring and the cat-fight will begin.

  9. 11

    James Raider


    @Pete: #7

    “If business and corporations don’t create jobs, then from whence do jobs come?”

    These ANTI-JOB geniuses should be proud of their leadership = ONE in SIX MEN 25 to 54 years old are OUT OF WORK in America.

    How do these idiots think this will improve society?

  10. 12



    While serving as the First Madam in the White House, her main order of business was covering up the unsightly blemishes and zits created by her husband and inappropriately called bimbo eruptions.

    Do not leave out the ‘risqué’ Christmas tree decorations and the diss’ing of the Marine Guards! Throwing china – and basically just being the First Bitch!

  11. 13



    I would just like Hillary to be asked on live video – “If business and corporations don’t create jobs, then from whence do jobs come?”

    Oh – come on now — everyone knows it is from the STATE and the COMMUNIST UNIONS — after all if the STATE did not allow the companies to exist and force them to bend to the COMMUNIST UNION’S gimmie gimmie – woe are we – crybaby crap – where would the jobs come from — ya just gots ta get your cart and horses straightened out!

  12. 15


    In 1992, when BJ and the skank were first pulled out of the demo-communist parties collective a$$ and stuffed in the face of the Amaerican people via the total BS interview – I believe on 60 minutes – I had a co-worker who was a 45ish year old RUSSIAN lady who had been in this country barely 10 years — we discussed how rotten those two were — and how friggin’ obvious it was that they were commies in disguise — and Natasha made it very clear to me that she was far more afraid of the hildabeast than BJ — “far more dangerous a person!”.

    She also agreed with me that there were more Bolsheviks in the US than there ever were in the Soviet Union and that it was a common opinion among her peers in Russia!

  13. 18


    @Lester: Hitler embraced the corporate world too, while they thought they were manipulating him. In the end, he forced them to do HIS bidding or cease to exist. Socialism is still socialism.

  14. 19

    James Raider


    @Bill: #18
    The ignorant simply donnot understand that ballooning government, ballooning regulations, ballooning boots on the necks of all companies, large and small, KILL jobs which is what their leaders want.

    That same ignorance also confuses and conflates the big international BANKERS with the small to medium sized companies which historically have been the job creators. The Goldman Sachs of this world only care about who can be bought. They couldn’t care much less about America and Americans.

  15. 20


    Maybe Hillary will promise to stop technological progress in order to ”save or create jobs,” as Obama and Timmy G. used to put it.
    After all, MacDonalds is planning to replace all cashiers and order-takers with a computer kiosk.
    That will save the company billions if the min. wage goes up to $15/hour.
    They can lose almost 1/2 of their current workforce!
    Applebees is dumping order-taking and cashiers, at present.
    If Hillary gets her way we can all be employed by getting rid of technology that saves labor…..like street sweepers and snow plows.
    Just like in Red China.

  16. 21


    @Bill (#18) @ James Raider (#19);

    I notice you give no concrete examples of said ‘socialism ‘ beyond JR’s vague rhetoric.


    Is it in Obamacare where insurance companies are still making their billions? In the tax cuts to the wealthy Obama continued? Grow up!

  17. 22

    James Raider


    @Lester: #21
    Perhaps the term “STATISM” would make the point more clearly — the overwhelming reach of the government bureaucracy which is invading our lives is doing its best to disintegrate your freedom.

    The current Administration has succeeded spectacularly, with the help of Congress, to grow government and government invasion of your life. Enjoy it, . . . or not.

  18. 23


    @Lester: Why would anyone spend the time to explain it to someone like you. The term Economic Justice does not exist in the capitalist world. If there were economic justice, if you didn’t work, you would not eat. Frank Marshall, Saull Alinsky and the places where Obama was educated. She with the cankles, your dream date, Hillary studied, admired and followed Alinsly. They believe in socialism for us, but not for them. What manner of idiot would make the statement jobs don’t come from corporations and businesses? Those roads were built on the taxes of those who worked for somebody. Goverment produces NOTHING. NADA, ZILCH, ZERO. Socialism only spreads poverty over a wider area and kills ambition.

  19. 24


    Hillary has “clarified” remarks she made Friday. Here’s what she told the crowd:

    “Don’t let anybody tell you . . . that, you know, it’s corporations and businesses that create jobs. You know that old theory, trickle-down economics. That has been tried. That has failed. It has failed rather spectacularly.”

    She said she “shorthanded the point,” which was to oppose “tax breaks” and “trickle-down” economics.
    She said her critics are guilty of taking her words out of context.

    But the context doesn’t help her case…..
    Right before the quote, she said raising minimum wages — which only makes workers more expensive to hire — creates jobs.

    Right after
    , she complained about tax breaks for companies that send jobs overseas, apparently without realizing that one reason businesses go overseas is because high taxes and regulations drive them out.

    I think she lost her place on the teleprompter and is scrambling.
    She sounded left-er than Fauxcahontus.

  20. 25


    @Nanny: She is just a 1960’s left over hippie skank! She’s just be a joke as a 2016 demo-commie-cRAT nominee – except the dam STOOPID RINOs will probably put up another dufus loser!

  21. 26


    Hillary’s gonna be in a dog fight with the fake Indian…..err….cat fight?…..anyway, the woofer’s gotta move to the left for the purpose massaging the Bolshevik base or she’ll be SOL before the first bell.
    I say,…You go girl!!!!!….the more she goes left, the more she’ll have to move right, should she scalp Warren.
    It’s a win win for ANY Republican (who isn’t led around by the nose by an idiot handler, like the one Mr. Romney had the misfortune to hire.)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *