Obama: I will allow illegals to continue to sexually assault American children until I get what I want

By 46 Comments 2,318 views

illegal criminals

Barack Obama has demanded immigration reform and hasn’t gotten it from Congress and consequently has adopted a dark and dangerous policy. He has decided to put the lives and well being of Americans and their children at risk for political gain. The other day he said that immigration reform was necessary for our “safety and security”:

“Our broken immigration system makes it harder for our law enforcement agencies to do their job,” Obama said.

“Our system is not fair to workers, is not fair to businesses and and is not fair to law enforcement agencies.”

And he asserted that is only a narrow window to get it done before the midterm elections. But why is it so important to Obama that it be done before November? Might he be planning to issue an executive order allowing newly legal immigrants to vote immediately?

But then he said that immigration enforcement “isn’t smart”:

Cops should be going after major criminals, not the many illegal immigrants that are quietly living in their districts, said Obama, who has twice sworn to uphold the nation’s laws.

“You’ve got to spend time dealing with somebody who is not causing any other trouble other than the fact that they were trying to make a living for their families,” Obama said.

“That’s just not a good use of our resources. It’s not smart. It doesn’t make sense,” said Obama, who has already directed immigration police to minimize enforcement of illegal living far from the border.

Thus in that spirit Obama decided to release 36,000 illegal alien criminals from detention, including those who committed homicides:

Among the 36,000 immigrants whom U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement released from custody last year there were 116 with convictions for homicide, 43 for negligent manslaughter, 14 for voluntary manslaughter and one with a conviction classified by ICE as “homicide-willful kill-public official-gun.”

This includes:

• 116 homicides
• 426 sexual assaults
• 303 kidnappings
• 1,075 aggravated assaults
• 1,160 stolen vehicles
• 9,187 dangerous drug possessions
• 24,822 DUIs (15,635 for liquor and 9,187 for dangerous drugs)
• 303 flight escapes

One of Obama’s protected children killed a nun:

The deadly results of President Obama’s “supervised release” program for illegal immigrants were exposed long ago by a Judicial Watch investigation of a Bolivian national (Carlos Martinelly-Montano) who killed a Virginia nun in a drunk-driving accident.

A Homeland Security report obtained in the course of JW’s probe details policies and actions of the Obama administration and local governments that allowed Montano, an illegal alien who committed a series of crimes, to remain on the streets despite being subject to deportation. Rather than detaining Montano, federal authorities determined that he was a candidate for the Alternatives to Detention (ATD) program, which supposedly monitored his whereabouts.

On August 1, 2010, while under the influence of alcohol, Montano crashed his car into another vehicle, killing one nun and critically injuring two others. Last year he was sentenced to 20 years in prison, but the fact remains that the tragedy never should have occurred. Federal immigration authorities never should have freed Montano under Obama’s outrageous “supervised release” program.

Incredibly, the administration continues full throttle with the controversial program. Earlier this week, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) released “waves” of illegal immigrants detained in facilities across the nation. The administration claims that impending budget cuts forced the move and in a statement to the media ICE said the detained aliens have been placed on “an appropriate, more cost-effective form of supervised release.”

It’s about saving money, says Obama:

A mainstream newspaper well known for its pro Obama reporting called the move a “highly unusual effort to save money.”

Meanwhile, $474 million was blown on failed Obamacare websites.

Here is a link to the most outrageous crimes committed by illegal aliens in 2013.

Here is a link to a list of illegal alien crimes against children. One of them:

On Friday, police in Harlingen arrested Luis Alberto Sosa Reyes, 27, after he reportedly forced a 14-year-old girl to have sex for money.

The victim who lives on Pat Neff Street reported that Reyes raped her after she refused his sexual advances, then gave her an undisclosed amount of cash, according to police.

The attack occurred at a home on the other side of town.

Reyes has been charged with sexual assault of a child. He is currently being held at the Cameron County Jail on an immigration detainer.

There’s more about the victims of illegal alien criminals here.

No problem, says Barack Obama. Most illegals are not making trouble so American citizens who are the victims of these crimes are merely acceptable collateral damage in the effort to increase the democrat voting rolls.

ICE wants to do its job but

“ICE officers and law enforcement officers around the country stand ready to enforce our laws, but are being prevented from doing so by executive fiats issued by the Obama administration.”

When it came to gun control Obama took the philosophy

If we can ‘save even one child’ we should

Yet when it comes to illegals he’s not concerned with saving anyone’s child. Obama’s game plan is clear. He’s willing to sacrifice our children for democrat votes and he means to allow the sexual assaults of children, crimes and killings to go on until he gets his way.

It’s a sad day when the President of the United States, sworn to uphold the law of the land, scorns it instead at the cost of the lives of American citizens and their children.

UPDATE

Let’s add another notch in the Obama amnesty belt:

Chiracahua park employee recalls near-deadly attack

TUCSON – A park employee left for dead at the Chiracahua National Monument nine months ago, speaks out about her attack.

Karen Gonzales, 60, was viciously beaten in broad daylight in one of the park restrooms.

She suffered a brain injury and is now walking with a limp. She tells News 4 Crime Trackers, “I will never forget his face coming at me.”

Gonzales was cleaning the women’s restroom at the Faraway Ranch Campground when she heard a noise, looked up, and saw her attacker come at her with a rock.

The DNA evidence left behind tied 33-year-old Gilbert Gaxiola as her attacker. The Cochise Country Sheriff’s department confirms Gaxiola is an undocumented immigrant.

According to Cochise Co. Sheriff’s investigators, Gaxiola hit her so hard, it broke the rock.

DrJohn has been a health care professional for more than 30 years. In addition to clinical practice he has done extensive research and has published widely with over 70 original articles and abstracts in the peer-reviewed literature. DrJohn is well known in his field and has lectured on every continent except for Antarctica. He has been married to the same wonderful lady for over 30 years and has three kids- two sons, both of whom are attorneys and one daughter on her way into the field of education. DrJohn was brought up with the concept that one can do well if one is prepared to work hard but nothing in life is guaranteed. Except for liberals being foolish.

46 Responses to “Obama: I will allow illegals to continue to sexually assault American children until I get what I want”

  1. 1

    john

    The Bible is QUITE clear on how to deal with any immigrant. Leviticus Chapter 19
    33 And if a stranger sojourn with thee in your land, ye shall not vex him.

    34 [But] the stranger that dwelleth with you shall be unto you as one born among you, and thou shalt love him as thyself; for ye were strangers in the land of Egypt: I [am] the LORD your God.

  2. 2

    ThunderGod

    Hahahaha, Biblical quotes, john? How hypocritical!

    That speaks of strangers, also translated as travelers; it does not apply to a thief in the night.

    Nice try, though, for a Leftist stain like yourself. Next?

  3. 3

    Nanny G

    I don’t know about non-sanctuary states, but in CA no illegal alien could be arrested UNLESS he committed a felony (not a minor crime) right in front of a police officer who didn’t already know him (stalker) .
    As a result, citizen calls to 911 were useless.
    You could see a man raping a woman, call 911 and, if police got there when he was running off, they could do nothing!
    So, at least in CA, those people Obama is freeing are the worst of the worst.

  4. 4

    Bill Burris

    @john: To quote Everett McGill “That’s not the issue Delmar. Even if that did put you square with the Lord, the State of Mississippi’s a little more hard-nosed. ”

    Jesus never advocated breaking the law. However, john, should you want to support illegal immigrants by the millions, why don’t you just go right ahead and allow them to live in your home, for free.

  5. 5

    retire05

    In 2006, criminal psychologist and instructor in criminal psychology to numerous police departments, Dr. Deborah Schruman-Kauflin, Ph.D., released her study of illegals who committed sex crimes and/or murders in the United States. Her study included 1,500 illegals and reviewed those cases that occurred between 1999-2006. Her findings were shocking, to say the least.

    In the sex crimes category, Dr. Schruman-Kauflin found that the majority of criminals were from Mexico; that the average number of victims was 4, and that these were relatively young (early 20’s) men. She states in her study

    “The 1500 offenders in this study had a total of 5,999 victims. Each sex offender averaged 4 victims. This places the estimate for victimization numbers around 960,000 for the 88 months examined in this study. ”

    The study, probably the most complete criminal study on illegals, was ignored by the power that be. We can’t have the public understanding that illegal drunk drivers kill more Americans every year than Al Qaeda slaughtered on September 11, 2001.

    Illegal immigration will have the same effect it had on ancient Rome. It will, eventually, help destroy our society. You can’t allow those who view 12 year old girls as legal because they are legal age in Mexico, continuing to rape and molest our children. The “dark” side of illegal immigration is the dirty little secret no one wants to talk about.

  6. 6

    Redteam

    @retire05: I don’t understand why the Dimocrats want all these criminals in the US. Just doesn’t make sense. But then, no one has ever accused Dimocrats of being sensical.

  7. 7

    retire05

    @Redteam:

    Two reasons: power, and votes.

    Ask Henry Bonilla. He was in a run off with Ciro Rodriquez. ACORN, and La Raza, worked that district and registered anyone who could sign a X on a voter registration card. Bonilla, a very popular Republican, lost to Rodriquez in what everyone in Texas knew was an election tainted by illegal voters.

    Rodriquez finally lost to Quinco Canseco, another Texas Republican. Why do you think the Eric Holder Department of Just-us sued Texas over voter I.D. laws? Too many Tejano Republicans in Texas.

    But voter disenfranchisement due to voter I.D. is a myth as just recently proven in our own local elections. We had mayoral and city council elections last Saturday and the voter turn out set a record. Anyone who did not have the proper I.D. had to cast a provisional ballot. Out of record number of ballots cast, we had TWO provisional ballots with a record number of minority voters turning out.

    But the Dems think that if they can pass amnesty, then they will win even more elections in states heavily populated with illegals (California, Texas, New Mexico, Arizona and New York).

  8. 8

    FAITH7

    When you make a demographic move you must bring ‘yourself’ with you. You will also bring your ‘mindset’ with you. The things that are woven in the very fabric of your life…
    …. Not to mention any (transmittable) diseases you may be carrying around with you …

    The illegals, who primarily use the ” back door ” to America is reserved for those who (obviously) have no regard for any Law including the laws of said country (United States) . These are the frauds, the criminals; criminal mind set- rapists-thugs-thieves-frauds-gang members.. inclusive of those who break the law by coming here illegally and are really illegitimate in this society.

    Our Politicians, the Democrats/Rino’s /liberals will cry ‘they come for the opportunity”… Yea, well so do many other immigrants… But THEY do it through the FRONT DOOR….What makes these illegal law breaking people so special they cannot follow the rules like so many other (legal) immigrants do?

    Why come to America if you don’t want to assimilate and ‘become’ an ‘American’? It is fact people who truly want to become an American and learn the proper way, our Constitution, about our Legislative Branches, our Judiciary our LANGUAGE (English)…come through the FRONT DOOR.By doing so they will find “better” opportunity and actually ‘be’ a part of society instead of the fringe of society…

    What “positives” came out of the Amnesty during the Reagan era? None. That nonsense only encouraged and set the tone for MORE illegal persons to come to the United States. Many came here primarily from Mexico hoping for another ’round of Amnesty’…which is why they are hanging around illegally for so long.

    You want it then work for it like everyone else…get in line!

    More proof we have Ass hats (Dems and Rino’s) making stupid decisions for us…and ‘we’ know they are stupid decisions being made ‘against’ what ‘this’ society wants.

  9. 10

    Nanny G

    @FAITH7: When you make a demographic move you must bring ‘yourself’ with you. You will also bring your ‘mindset’ with you. The things that are woven in the very fabric of your life…
    …. Not to mention any (transmittable) diseases you may be carrying around with you …

    The illegals, who primarily use the ” back door ” to America is reserved for those who (obviously) have no regard for any Law including the laws of said country (United States) . These are the frauds,…..

    You reminded me of the terrible losses CA had a few years back because poultry handlers in the egg and chicken industry there were taking the word of potential employees that they had not handled any potentially infected birds. Naturally an illegal alien LIED about his previous work with fighting cocks, and their diseases.
    So, CA lost about a BILLION dollars killing animals all over the state.
    Even birds at zoos had to be quarantined.
    A couple years before that disaster another illegal alien lied to get a job on a dairy farm.
    He had TB.
    Cows and cattle readily get TB from humans.
    Another BILLION dollars lost because illegal aliens bring their culture of law-breaking, their mindset, as well as their transmittable diseases with them.
    All our ”strict health laws” meant nothing to these illegals.
    Break one law, break all laws, it’s all the same to them.

  10. 11

    Ditto

    Obama is using the bully tactic of fear of what an uprising by illegal aliens will do if denied amnesty, to force amnesty. This despicable action, along with his open blatant dictatorial violations of the Constitution makes Obama a domestic enemy.

  11. 12

    Rob in Katy

    I am a proud recipient of one of those diseases that we had defeated and that is now being brought back in by 3rd worlders. Had a nice case of whooping cough a few years ago, darn near killed me and at the time doctors were not aware that it was being brought back in. I live in a small town in Texas that we didn’t know was also a hotbed of illegals. Our “generosity” is going to destroy the country.

  12. 13

    retire05

    @Rob in Katy:

    My spouse had just been treated for whooping cough, which was even more dangerous due to previous open heart surgery. And yes, there is a rapid increase in cases here in Texas due to being at epidemic levels in Mexico and the number of illegals who enter our state while in early incubation stages, because a) they are unaware they are infected or b) are crossing into our state illegally knowing they can obtain free medical treatment here.

    So you go to your local Wal-Mart, HEB, stand in line behind/in front of someone who is infected and wholla! you are now infected with a disease that becomes more dangerous with age.

    Not to mention the incurable strains of TB that is increasing in the border county colonistas. And what is the progressive answer? You would think fewer illegals. No, no, no, their answer is more taxpayer funding to treat the illegals who present themselves to our ERs for free medical care. My answer is to bill every one of the nations to the south of our borders for the care of their citizens. And if they don’t pay that bill, they get not one damn dime in foreign aid. And once we treat those illegals, they are then stabilized and returned to their own nation.

    The lure to chase El Norte is not jobs; it is the free services they can get once they get here. Mexico, and all Central/South American nations, refuse to care for their own peon class, so they get dumped on us. Now, those that leave their prayer rugs in our southern deserts are a whole different story. No one pays $10-40K to a coyote to come here for a minimum wage job.

  13. 14

    Nanny G

    At least there’s a vaccination for whooping cough.
    For blacks I’m mystified.
    When Obama entered office on January 20, 2009, U.S. unemployment for blacks aged 16 to 19 grew from 35.3 to 36.8 percent.
    While 29.6 percent of blacks aged 16 to 19 were working when Obama took power, only 27.9 percent were employed last month.
    In that same interim the share of black Americans living in poverty expanded from 25.8 to 27.2 percent.
    Inflation-adjusted median household fell from $34,880 to $33,321 for black households, worse than the average loss by over $20,000!
    Black home ownership was 46.1% of their population when Obama took office, now it is down to 43.3 percent.

    When America’s blacks look at all Obama is doing for illegals they should ask themselves: What has Obama done for blacks lately?

    Stats from:
    http://www.nationalreview.com/article/378087/black-americans-are-worse-under-obama-deroy-murdock

  14. 15

    Common Sense

    @Nanny G: I live in San Diego County and your are right on!! Visit any ER, School, Social Security Office, DMV, or Law Enforcement facility and you will see illegals stealling our reources every day!!

  15. 16

    retire05

    @Nanny G:

    At least there’s a vaccination for whooping cough.

    How is that relevant, Nanny G? Why should Americans now have to worry about a disease that was virtually wiped out in our nation, as was TB and polio, due to those who enter our nation illegally? And what vaccination is there for the new strain of TB that has entered via our southern borders that is incurable?

    For blacks I’m mystified.

    I don’t understand why. It is just as racist to vote FOR someone due to the color of their skin as it is to vote AGAINST someone due to the color of their skin. Not withstanding the fact that black Americans have been sold a bill of goods by Democrats who claim for their own all the work that was done by Republicans for civil rights. How many blacks do you think know that Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., was a Republican or have ever read the writings of Frederick Douglas or understand that Barbara Jordan was a conservative Democrat who warned about the harm that would be caused to our society by illegal immigrants?

    Instead, black children are taught of the horrors of slavery, Jim Crow and the violence of the civil rights movement. But ask one of them what the real purpose of the Buffalo soldiers was and they can’t tell you.

  16. 17

    Rob in Katy

    @Nanny G:

    We were all vaccinated, and then it was wiped out and boosters were not required, then the government is allowing it to reoccur. Tell me what happens everything this happens with a virus, it comes back stronger and more resistant to treatment. To quote Joe Plugs: This is a big fucking deal!

  17. 18

    ilovebeeswarzone

    John
    that”s what AMERICA HAS BEEN DOING SINCE THE BEGINING OF AMERICA THE USA,
    they stayed and multiplyed,
    now after those century the land has gotten too small,and the jobs has gotten too scarce,
    the poors has become too many, the people are spending too much on the poors, and
    those citizens working hard and begin to see no end to their charity they gave for century,
    AND THE GOVERNMENT HAS LET DOWN THE PEOPLE which has been paying for them from day one, THAT GOVERMENT ALSO ABUSE THE KINDNESS OF THE PEOPLE BY MULTIPLYING THE SERVICES FOR NOT THE PEOPLE BUT FOR THEMSELVES,
    THEIR SECURITY IS PROTECTED BY AN ARMY OF PEOPLE JUST DOING IT FOR THEM, WHILE THE CITIZENS CANNOT COUNT ON ANYONE TO PROTECT THEM, THEY ARE EVEN BEING AGRESSED BY THIS GOVERNMENT OUT TO CEASE THE PEOPLE ASSETS
    THERE IS NO PLACE TO TURN AND TRUST FOR THE CITIZENS,
    BECAUSE OF WHAT THEY SEE HAPPENING,
    IN this USA, NOW ARE FINDING THERE IS MORE working for government than citizens outside the government paying for them,
    so you cannot say the people didn’t try to help the foreiners,
    they did beyond their capacity,
    now the time has come to concentrate on the AMERICAN’S NEEDS , THE ONES PAYING FOR THE GOVERNMENT WHICH ABUSE THE PEOPLE ,WITH THEIR POWER GRAB, IN THESE LAST YEARS,
    AND ACCEPT ANY ILLEGALS TO MIX WITH THE GOOD AMERICAN’S FAMILY CONCERN BY THEIR
    NEW NEIGHBORS, PLAYING ON THEIR LAND AS IF IT IS THEIR OWN,
    THAT’S WHY YOU MUST NO MORE ACCEPT ANY ILLEGALS, BECAUSE THE LAND IS NO MORE
    TO BE CLAIMED, THAT LAND IS FOR AMERICANS ONLY,
    AND THE BORDERS MUST BE CLOSE AT ONCE,

  18. 19

    enchanted

    Obviously barry doesn’t give a rats ass about the American people. This is the reason the Constitution makes the edict that those who hold the office of the president and/or vice president need to be natural born -born to TWO US American citizens. You cannot allow for divided loyalties. I am not quite sure who he is loyal to but it sure as heck isn’t the United States.

  19. 20

    Redteam

    @enchanted:

    You cannot allow for divided loyalties.

    That’s why we don’t need any Canadian-Americans, Cuban-Americans or Indian-Americans, they might be just as loyal as this Muslim-Kenyan is.

  20. 22

    Redteam

    @retire05:

    Did you vote for John McCain?

    I don’t believe that the definition of natural born citizen applies to ‘where’ someone is born. Just that they have two citizen parents. I always vote in the presidential election, so I probably did. He’s not one I’m enthused by and would not vote for him again. He has become a liberal. (if he wasn’t always)

  21. 24

    retire05

    @Redteam:

    I don’t believe that the definition of natural born citizen applies to ‘where’ someone is born. Just that they have two citizen parents

    I don’t believe that anywhere in any of the writings of the Founders, or those who supported the 14th Amendment, stated that there had to be TWO citizen parents. If you can find that history for me, I would appreciate it.

  22. 25

    Redteam

    @retire05:” I don’t believe that anywhere in any of the writings of the Founders, or those who supported the 14th Amendment, stated that there had to be TWO citizen parents.”

    It’s right there in the Constitution where it says Natural Born citizen. The definition of natural born citizen is one born without split allegiance. That is a citizen naturally, not by a law. If one of your parents is not a US citizen, then it takes a law to make you a citizen, therefore not natural born.

  23. 27

    retire05

    @Redteam:

    So the question is posed to you; if the nominees were Hillary Clinton, Marxist and Ted Cruz, Constitutionalist, would you not vote and therefore contribute to a win by Hillary?

  24. 28

    Redteam

    @retire05: Let me ask you this. Suppose the choice was between Hillary and Jesse Jackson? We have an ineligible person in the office now, see what’s he’s done? I won’t vote for any ineligible person.

  25. 29

    retire05

    @Redteam:

    Let me ask you this. Suppose the choice was between Hillary and Jesse Jackson?

    #1: Clinton and Jackson are both Democrats so you presented a highly unlikely situation

    #2: You don’t answer a question by asking another question. You’re smart enough to know that, so I can only assume you are dodging the question.

  26. 30

    Redteam

    @retire05:

    can only assume you are dodging the question.

    I clearly said: ” I won’t vote for any ineligible person.” That seems quite clear. I also will not vote for anyone that is not a conservative.

  27. 31

    retire05

    @Redteam:

    I won’t vote for any ineligible person.

    You consider Ted Cruz to be ineligible, and as a conservative, I don’t see how you could ever vote for Hillary, so that means that you would contribute to a Hillary win by not voting. Would you really help contribute to a Hillary win, condemning our nation to another Marxist president, because of your concept of what the Constitution says? Really, Redteam?

  28. 32

    retire05

    @Redteam:

    I clearly said: ” I won’t vote for any ineligible person.”

    That train has already left the station. The best we can hope for is that there is still time to save this nation from the Frankfurt Marxists that have just about achieved every one of their goals.

  29. 33

    ilovebeeswarzone

    IF ONLY ONE VOTE FOR THE WRONG PERSON BECAUSE HE FIND HIM CUTE OR IS INFATUATED BY HIM,
    THAT PERSON PUT THE WHOLE AMERICA IN DANGER,
    WELL YOU DON’T HAVE TO TAKE MY WORD,
    SEE YOUR OWN VOTE, OR LACK OF VOTE, AND WHAT IT HAS DONE TO THE WHOLE USA,
    BECAUSE YOU THOUGHT YOU WHERE ALONE, AND LET DOWN THE REST OF AMERICA,
    YOU HAVE DONE A CRIMINAL ACTION,
    and put all the citizens in troubles which will take times to come back ahead,
    because of your lack of responsibility,

  30. 34

    Redteam

    @retire05:

    Would you really help contribute to a Hillary win, condemning our nation to another Marxist president,

    I don’t understand anyone supporting a person for president of the US that is not eligible to be the president. If we’re just going to flush the constitution for the sake of electing the right person, why is one form of lawlessness preferable to another. Vladimer Putin is just as eligible to be president as Ted Cruz, would you vote for him?
    I will answer one of my own questions, yes, some forms of lawlessness are preferable to others, but once we condemned ourselves to settling for ineligible people, the slope will only get slippy-er. Where should we draw the line? Is it only people that are a ‘little bit’ ineligible or is the door now open to anyone in the world, regardless of country of citizenship?

    That train has already left the station. The best we can hope for is that there is still time to save this nation from the Frankfurt Marxists that have just about achieved every one of their goals.

    Including, I might point out, the goal of electing anyone to the US presidency, regardless of qualifications. I don’t think we should be endorsing their goals. Keep the presidency for natural born US citizens. Let Putin run Russia and Fidel stay in Cuba.

  31. 35

    ilovebeeswarzone

    THE DANGER WHICH PREVIOUS WARS TAUGHT US, IS, THAT, SO MANY GOOD PEOPLE HAD TO DIE, TO GET RID OF ONE MAKING THE WAR HAPPEN BY HIS EVIL ACTIONS,
    ALL THOSE GOOD PEOPLE CEASE TO LIVE BECAUSE OF ONE EVIL,
    AND NONE FIND THE WAY TO ELIMINATE ONE EVIL, BEFORE THE WAR BEGAN,
    WHICH WAS TOO LATE, AFTER,THE FIRST DEATH OF A BRAVE,
    IRONIC IS IN IT, THAT EVIL ONE WAS NOT EVEN WORTH ONE LIFE,
    REMEMBER HITLER, HE WAS NOT WORTH DYING FOR,
    and all those who follow by instigating hate,enough to turn a nation into that same hate, so to make war,
    none are worth one death of a brave,
    look at all of those evil and see how so lower than the citizens
    they have become,
    they are unworthy of being listen to, they lost,
    THEY NEED TO HAVE THEIR POWER REMOVE AS SOON AS THE DEMENTIA IS VISIBLE, IT DOESN’T TAKE YEARS EITHER,
    IT’S VISIBLE VERY SOON AFTER THEY HIT THEIR CONFORT ZONES AND ARROGANTLY STEP OVER THE LAWS THEY WHERE ELECTED TO PROTECT,

  32. 36

    retire05

    @Redteam:

    I don’t understand anyone supporting a person for president of the US that is not eligible to be the president.

    I am more fearful of the direction our nation is taking than I am we will elect someone you have determined is not eligible to hold the office of the Presidency.

    I find it distressing that you would prefer to have Hillary for president than someone you know is a core Christian conservative because you misread the Constitution. It is that kind of narrow thinking that got us to the point we are now.

    The slippery slope you should be worried about is the radical, and rapid, trend toward Marxism in this country.

  33. 37

    Ditto

    @Redteam & retire05:

    I’m not all that convinced that Perry is as much a Conservative as he’s been made out to be. How many Conservatives has he endorsed? How about we leave Ted Cruz in the very useful position where he is, and instead support Sara Palin for President. She’s a woman, a Constitutional Conservative and has actual Executive decision making experience (the last two unlike Hillary, and if the left tries to bring out that she resigned from Governor, well Hillary resigned too as Sec of State.). Palin could even tap Allen West, Ben Carlson, Bobby Jindal ore ven try to draw establishment votes with Condi Rice for her VP choice.

  34. 38

    Redteam

    @Ditto: I could certainly be for Palin if she’s the nominee and I like Kasich (both eligible) Hillary would make a terrible president but she is eligible.
    Retire, you’ve said that I’ve misread the Constitution. It’s very simple and I don’t see any way it can be misread. It says ‘natural born citizen’. How can that be misread? If it takes a law to make you a citizen, then it’s not natural, it’s law (man) made. It takes a law to make a native born citizen or a naturalized citizen. There is no law that makes a person a natural born citizen. The libs worked hard and diligently to make Obama eligible, but since he did have and still has split allegiance and may not even be a US citizen (may have given up citizenship when moved to Indonesia), I would say they’ve succeeded, even to the point that a conservative like you will argue that eligibility is not important for the office of President of the USA. There is no case that I will vote for Hillary, even if she is the only eligible person on the ballot. Who I vote for is not going to determine who wins anyhow, the state of Louisiana, like Texas is going to go Republican regardless of my vote.
    You said: “I find it distressing that you would prefer to have Hillary for president than someone you know is a core Christian conservative” I will never prefer Hillary as president under any circumstances, will not vote for her. Cruz might fill the office well, but would never be the President, as in Obama’s case, he would only be a usurper and not the president.

  35. 39

    Redteam

    I would like to point out that one real trouble spot for me with Cruz, is that he has no executive experience. Much like Obama, he has never done anything except be a politician. But that seems to be the way it is for many.

  36. 40

    Bill

    @Ditto: I like Palin but when she resigned as governor (for reasons I fully understand), she relinquished any possibility of seeking public office again. In the first place, the left now knows the tactic that works on her; brutally and viciously attack her family. So, if they did that again, would she resign again? Secondly, having resigned from office will be used against her in any campaign, making her very vulnerable and a risky candidate.

    She was treated harshly by the left and the media in a way that, if applied to a left wing candidate, would be considered a second front in the “war on women” (just look at how they have circled the wagons around Hillary over the very legitimate issue of her health) and has proven time and time again to be a worthy candidate and far more intelligent than the detractors who demean that intelligence. But, she can no longer be considered a viable candidate. Too fragile.

  37. 41

    ilovebeeswarzone

    AT LEAST, SARAH PALIN IS BELIEVED ON EVERY WORDS SHE TELL,
    that is such comfort for the citizens, and she know what she is talking about,
    if she would have work with any other candidates, she would have made him or her take the PRESIDENCY,
    McCain slept on the job, she had to run faster to make it up for him not moving,
    SHE IS ONE OF THE TREASURES, OF AMERICA,
    AND NOW WE KNOW SHE WAS SILENCE, WHAT A MISTAKE THEY DID, THEY GAVE AMERICA TO ONE UNFIT UNDESERVING TO BE ON TOP,
    SHE CAN DO A 100% BETTER THAN OBAMA, EVEN NOW AS WE SPEAK,

  38. 42

    Ditto

    @Bill:

    Hillary resigned as secretary of state. Does that mean she she relinquished any possibility of seeking public office again? Did she resign because of the supposed brain injury that Carl Rove claims she may have” If so health reasons would be a reason to disqualify her. Was the job of Secretary of State too tough for her?If it was, than she certainly couldn’t handle being President. Was it so she wouldn’t have to continue covering up for the deadly incompetent handling of Benghazi, any more than she already had? The fact that we still don’t know where she or the President were, that it happened under her watch, and that she allowed without any dispute the false “Protest over a video” story to go forward means that as president she might allow cover-ups of her own.

    Palin didn’t resign because of attacks on her family, she resigned because of the numerous frivolous lawsuits that leftist operatives were throwing against the office of Governor,the fact that the lawsuits were interfering with her performing her duties of office, and how much the lawsuits were costing the Alaskan people to fight. As President, by Federal law Palin would be immune from that kind of attack.

    I say you can’t have it both ways, If Palin should not be considered because she resigned over floods of politically influenced frivolous lawsuits, then Hillary certainly cant either for much more valid reasons.

  39. 43

    ilovebeeswarzone

    Bill
    tell me if i”m wrong,
    i think that any civilian, can runn for the position of PRESIDENT,
    we saw it right under our nose, the importance for the people is to ask some serious questions and true certificats to prove they are elligeble, and demand AN 100% ALLEGIANCE, TO THIS AMERICA,
    AND DEMAND a brain scan to make sure he or she is of POSITIVE sound mind, and a health scan and a history scan, and a drug scan, AND QUESTIONS TO ANSWER OF HIS OR HER KNOWLEDGE
    OF THE WORLD ‘S HISTORY, AND OF THE AMERICA HISTORY,
    but if he or she pass that, even not being in the Capitol, establishment has no relevance on her or his possibility to run, that would even bring an era of freshness, and brightness, to the governing and the government,
    WHICH has grown to falling into against what the framers had wanted, not this socialist marxist MINDSETS DANGEROUS FOR THIS AMERICA’S LAWS,who worked FROM CENTURYS,
    FOR, the pursuit of happiness on the civilians, i mean an ALLEGIANCE TOTAL, real booster for AMERICANS AND AMERICA A REJUVINATION OF ALL THE PEOPLE WHO SEEK TO BE FREE
    UNDER THE LAWS OF THIS LAND NOT THEIR OWN, as it is now,
    and i remind you that is the way it was at the birth of this NATION,

  40. 44

    Jess

    Obama has done NOTHING for any American citizen since getting in office. These illegals that are coming thru not only have tb and whooping cough. But also scabies and chicken pox. Which we vaccinate for. Obama is killing our country. With scandal after scandal you’d think congress would call for impeachment hearings. God knows wat more were in store for. Each and everyone of us will b affected in sum way. What’s next taking our guns? Sending us to Fema CPA. It’s only gonna get worse

  41. 45

    ilovebeeswarzone

    I was re looking at the REPUBLICAN DEBATE in SOUTH CAROLINA of 2012,
    AND THERE WAS, RICK PERRY, MITT ROMNEY, RICK SANTORIUM, RON PAUL,
    LAST BUT NOT LEAST, GINGRISH,
    THEY ALL WOULD HAVE DONE A GREAT JOB FOR THE PEOPLE,
    ANY OF THEM WOULD HAVE BEAT OBAMA BY A LONG SHOT,
    AND PRODUCE THE JOBS NECESSARY TO HAVE PEOPLE WORK AND EARN GOOD MONEY,I WANT THEM ALL PRESIDENT TOGETHER AS ONE,IS IN IT A NEW PACKAGE DEAL THAT AMERICA CAN AFFORD, AFTER HAVING LETTING GO ALL THE LAWYERS EXCEPT ONE, ALL THE UNIONS,
    3/5 OF AGENCIES,
    2/4 OF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES, NON UNIONIZE,

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *