Congressional Dems planning mother of all spending “last hurrah”?

Loading

©2010 Dennis MacDonald and World of Stock

While fiscal conservatives grow more angry at the GOP for aiding and abetting spending with the now called “Stimulus II” Bush tax framework agreement, our FA Founding Father, Curt, wisely pointed out there is a lot of faux rage and posturing going on within the Democrats over the agreement in his Dec 9th post.

I don’t buy the public bruhaha either.

Granted, there’s bound to be well deserved embarrassment because – after years of raging about tax cuts in general – the Dems piled on tax cuts and credits onto the Bush tax policy extension as a condition for their support. Then, of course, the GOP fell into the trap of doing a Christmas repeat with UI benefits, that will expire a year from now. A political potential at a “Scrooge redux”, so to speak.

This reversal of tax cutting economic policy, in itself, is another indicator that Obama and the Dem Congress might be catching on that not only did their stimulus fall flat, but that the step up in rising mortgage rates indicate Bernanke’s Fed Reserve Policy is backfiring.

Were that not enough to sense new rumblings in the air, even the POTUS himself had a freudian slip of ideology when he proposed an overhaul of the IRS tax code “…to lower rates and raise revenues…” as a method of tackling the nation’s unsustainable debt. An effort I could get behind, mind you… possibly one of the very few since Obama has taken office.

What has become obvious is Obama is astutely aware that he’s in a rock and a hard place. He’s so riled his progressive base that they’re actively seeking a 2012 challenger. The nation has made sure he’s lost his power structure in Pelosi’s House, and Reid’s supermajority is to become but a nation’s nightmare of yesterday.

But those in Congress, who have been addicted to absconding from taxpayers’ wallets for years, do not go down quietly. So one has to wonder if all their posturing is not only to hide their overt change of heart over tax cuts and business credits, but also to serve as the main attraction while more serious spending passes quietly in the pre Christmas nights.


One of those is the ever ongoing funding of Congress… the latest incarnation of the Continuing Resolution being HR 3082, which passed the house late Wed eve, Dec 8th, by a 212-206 vote. 35 Dems defected on the CR, siding with 171 GOPers. While reasons may vary, for many it had to do with the stealth funding for O’healthcare buried in the text. Specifically the funding is for Sections 4001, 4004, 4201 and 4301 of HR 3590, aka the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (if that ain’t a hoot of an oxymoron in retrospect…).

But word is, the piling on isn’t done with the Continuing Resolution even yet. According to Phil Kerpin’s report on Fox News, the Senate is rumoured to tag on “…a full-blown omnibus appropriations bill packed with pork-barrel earmarks, spending increases, and even more funding for every top Obama administration priority.

In short, while the media covers the Dems vaudeville in-fighting act with relish, the usually quiet business of keeping the government running is slated to be a last hurrah of spending by the lame duck Supermajority. But wait… it gets worse. If they didn’t already have the numbers in the Senate, there’s a few sour grapes GOPers willing to defect in order to bring home the pork in time for Christmas dinner.

The most likely to play ball are three retiring appropriators: Kit Bond of Missouri, George Voinovich of Ohio, and Robert Bennett of Utah who will never face voters again. Plus, there’s also the highest-ranking Republican appropriator: Thad Cochran of Mississippi.

We don’t know which earmarks made it into the omnibus yet but we do know that Kit Bond requested 142 earmarks this year totaling over $600 million. George Voinovich requested 172 earmarks totaling over $460 million, Robert Bennett requested 321 earmarks topping $1.3 billion, and Thad Cochran requested a whopping 712 earmarks totaling over $2.4 billion.

Other Republican senators worth worrying about identified themselves last week when they voted against the Coburn-McCaskill amendment to ban earmarks: Susan Collins (R-Maine), Jim Inhofe (R-Okla.), Dick Lugar (R-Ind..), Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), and Richard Shelby (R-Ala.).

Needless to say, pressure needs to remain in order to make sure that the new faces, and incumbent Congress, clearly heard the “Thou shalt not spend” commandment, delivered to them just a little over a month ago. Because, apparently, all too many seem to have forgotten, or simply don’t care.

For more information, and ways to speak up via petitions, Americans for Prosperity – that evil organization singled out by Obama as a “foreign influenced” threat – set up a project website called November Speaks…. including a virtual march on Washington. Yes, folks… in this new age, “pajama clad” bloggers can still march on Washington from the comfort of their keyboards. Make your voices continued to be heard.. and then start reminding them of the 2nd commandment…. “Thou shalt cut expenses, just like the American families have to do!”

It has become abundantly obvious in all too short of a time that none of us can afford – literally – to turn our backs on the beltway, and that memories of those holding seats still are very short term. If we are to return some stability to the American economy, and slowly but surely tackle the debt, some big “changes” need to be done. And none of them resemble what “change” we’ve seen for the past two years. The spending must stop, and the hard task of incremental cutting and slicing away is overdue to begin.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
78 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

“What kind of dog did you say that was mister?”

“Before I cut off his tail and painted him yellow, he was an alligator.”

Some people are fooled more easily than others; others offer nothing, yet they tie up the commentary with witless and provocative remarks that serve only to destroy the opportunity to engage and discuss issues in an intelligent forum.

I have no proof, but I think our old National Socialist collaborator pays these people by the column inch to destroy meaningful dialog. If we spend our time engaging this harpie from the Socialist sewers, our time and commentary will become as insipid, boring, and meaningless as the liberal commentary and that my dear friends is the purpose of our latest manure slinger.

Have at it, if you want to play their game, but you will find that others are losing interest.

Smorg… “As I have mentioned before, I went through school with the sole goal of getting out. At the age of 18 I accomplished my main goal in life.”

The “Old Trooper”… “my 30 Years in the US Military dealing with US Forces and Allies.”

Magnificently educated AND a lifetime of training in following orders and not thinking for them self.

I must have been crazy to disagree with such a “think tank”.

Keep up the good work boys
Mrs. N

@Mrs. Neutron:

Good morning…glad you stopped by again today because I have a question.

When did lying, or more specifically, libel become acceptable behavior from a self-professed Conservative?

The “Old Trooper”… “my 30 Years in the US Military dealing with US Forces and Allies.”

Magnificently educated AND a lifetime of training in following orders and not thinking for them self.

More dogma from an intellectual dog. Ms. Neutron, you really aren’t very bright. Your primary goal here seems to be to insult those far more intelligent than yourself..which means pretty much everyone.

@Mrs. Neutron:

Magnificently educated AND a lifetime of training in following orders and not thinking for them self.

I must have been crazy to disagree with such a “think tank”.

You didn’t mean perhaps…..”thinking for”…themselves? I would think a “ahem” gracious, educated person such as yourself would appreciate the fact that someone who has, during a large portion of his life, put his life on the line enduring injuries, IOW, shot by the enemy, so many can have the freedom of expressing themselves. Perhaps a person, such as yourself would knock that chip off their shoulder and show a modicum of respect when addressing a true American hero. Not only has he devoted a career of service to our nation, his daughter is following in his footsteps. You are, with every comment, digging a deeper hole and proving to be a POS Behar.

Since you obviously have not bothered to peruse our archives, you are functioning without a clue as to who Old Trooper is, again making a complete fool of yourself.

@ Mrs. Neutron…Thanks for Your Support. We Defend those that Deserve it the Least with no Prejudice. Even Phony Pseudo Intellectuals …Like…You… 😉

NEUTRON THAT IS A SMALL PARTICLE IN THE UNIVERSE IS NT IT,?
AND IT REPRESENT EXACTLY WHAT YOU ARE

B_Rob, hi, wait til 2012, and you will see the facts ,yes, those you are talking about,
those facts coming as reality, FROM THE CONSERVATIVES OF THIS NATION to help all AMERICANS, HERE AND ABROAD, I AM SURE YOU WILL BE SURPRISE TO RECOVER THE REAL AMERICA LOVED BY HER PEOPLE.

@Mrs. Neutron: #60

I agree with Skookum in comment #59 and wasn’t going to comment any more, even before he wrote it. Since you commented to me personally, I will. I am applying the wrestling with a pig in the mud rule here.

QUESTION
Why is arguing with a truck driver like wrestling with a pig in the mud.

ANSWER
After a while you finally figure out that the pig likes it.

I used to do like you are doing and found fault with everybody to bring them down to my level. I found out it only turned people against me. I read the book, “How To Win Friends And Influence People” and found out the teachings work. I suggest you read it.

Doesn’t it say somewhere in the Bible, “Judge not, lest ye be judged?”

SMORGASBORD, PLEASE MY FRIEND, I DO’NT WANT A FRIEND LIKE NEUTRON,
I HAVE ALL MY FRIENDS HERE, AND SOME MORE WHO COME SOMETIMES,
WHAT ELSE CAN I ASK FOR, AND WE STILL FIND NEW ONE OTHER THAN THIS NEUTRON.
WHICH HAS NOT PROVE TO BE CONSERVATIVE AT ALL

@ilovebeeswarzone: #68

The worst thing we can do with people like this is to keep talking about them. Let’s try ignoring them and maybe they will go away.

Federal Judge Rules in Favor of Virginia’s Central Challenge to Health Care Law

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/12/13/federal-judge-rules-favor-virginia-challenge-health-care-law/

Federal Judge Rules in Favor of Virginia’s Central Challenge to Health Care Law

By Lee Ross

Published December 13, 2010 | FoxNews.com

Casting an unmistakable and perhaps permanent pockmark on the face of the Obama administration, a federal judge in Virginia ruled Monday that a major component of the new health care reform law is unconstitutional.

Judge Henry E. Hudson ruled Monday for the state’s claim that the requirement for people to purchase health care exceeds the power of Congress under the Constitution’s Commerce Clause or under the General Welfare Clause.

“It is not the effect on individuals that is presently at issue — it is the authority of Congress to compel anyone to purchase health insurance,” wrote Hudson, who was appointed to the federal bench in 2002 by President George W. Bush.

“Every application of Commerce Clause power found to be constitutionally sound by the Supreme Court involved some form of action, transaction or deed placed in motion by an individual or legal entity. The constitutional viability of the minimum essential coverage provision in this case turns on whether or not a person’s decision to refuse to purchase health care insurance is such an activity,” he wrote.

Hudson’s eagerly awaited decision invalidates the requirement that all Americans purchase health insurance by 2014 or face a federal fine. Hudson’s decision is the first striking down part of the controversial legislation.

The Obama administration is likely to appeal Monday’s ruling to the Richmond-based Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals. It is widely expected that no matter the outcome before that court, the case will ultimately go before the Supreme Court, as even Hudson acknowledged.

“This case, however, turns on atypical and uncharted applications of constitutional law interwoven with subtle political undercurrents. The outcome of this case has significant public policy implications. And the final work will undoubtedly reside with a higher court,” he wrote.

In his ruling, Hudson wrote that he is severing that portion of the law, known as Section 1501, but is not granting an injunction against the entire law.

But Section 1501 is the portion of the law that collects most of the money that is supposed to flow into the system from millions of additional participants. Without it, the law’s execution could be severely compromised and could rock the foundation of other provisions in the legislation.

The lawsuit is just one of nearly two dozen challenges filed in federal courts across the country. Another high-profile suit filed in Florida and joined by 20 states and the National Federation of Independent Businesses will go before Judge Roger Vinson on Thursday.

Administration officials insist health care exchanges and many other aspects of the law would survive, and implementation of the law would proceed. They said they don’t anticipate an adverse ruling in Virginia or Florida to affect many aspects of the law.

Nancy Ann DeParle, head of the White House Office of Health Reform, said the ruling is one of three that have come down so far, and the other two have ruled the provision is constitutional.

The provision “is key to making sure that we can ban the pre-existing conditions exclusions, the requirements that health insurance policies have had that have said they won’t cover people who have pre-existing conditions or are already sick. So it’s a really important provision and we’re confident we’ll prevail on it in the end,” DeParle told Fox News.

The case decided Monday was filed by Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli on March 23, the same day that President Obama signed the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act into law.

In the lawsuit, Cuccinelli said the federal government is constitutionally prohibited from forcing Americans to buy insurance.

“The status of being a citizen or resident of the Commonwealth of Virginia is not a channel of interstate commerce; nor a person or thing in interstate commerce; nor is it an activity arising out of or connected with a commercial transaction,” Cuccinelli wrote in his lawsuit.

In an interview with ABC News last month, President Obama defended the mandate.

“What I think is appropriate is that in the same way that everybody has to get auto insurance and if you don’t, you’re subject to some penalty, that in this situation, if you have the ability to buy insurance, it’s affordable and you choose not to do so, forcing you and me and everybody else to subsidize you, you know, there’s a thousand dollar hidden tax that families all across America are — are burdened by because of the fact that people don’t have health insurance, you know, there’s nothing wrong with a penalty,” he said.

Florida Gov.-elect Rick Scott, who gained prominence in his state and nationally during the health care debate, said the Virginia ruling “is great for Floridians and for Americans everywhere.”

“Obamacare is the biggest job killer in the history of this country and this decision will go a long way toward restoring the certainty businesses need to start hiring and restoring some sanity to the federal government,” he said in a statement.

OK now. This is EXACTLY what Happens when the American Voters selected the 111th Congress, the MOST Constitutionally and Economically ILLITERATE Congress…EVAH!
PS..Da POTUS, bein a Constitutional Scholar, a Genius & ALL, Shudda known better that to sign off on this POS. NONE of these DULLARDS read the Bill?????
😛

OT2, @ #70,
Thanks for posting the news.
I’ve been painting.
Missed it.
There will no doubt be a challenge all the way to the Supreme Court.
I wonder how that body will rule.

OLD TROOPER 2, you have made many STATES leaders and their AMERICANS very happy just before CHRISTMAS ,BY ANOUNCING this good news, the BUSYNESSES WIL HAVE A SY OF RELEIF THEY MUCH NEED AT THIS TIME,
THANK YOU

For those of you, who struggled with the predatory grading of first year university English classes, I ask you to analyze this prose from the most intelligent man in the world:

“What I think is appropriate is that in the same way that everybody has to get auto insurance and if you don’t, you’re subject to some penalty, that in this situation, if you have the ability to buy insurance, it’s affordable and you choose not to do so, forcing you and me and everybody else to subsidize you, you know, there’s a thousand dollar hidden tax that families all across America are — are burdened by because of the fact that people don’t have health insurance, you know, there’s nothing wrong with a penalty,” he said

Read that two or three times and pretend it makes sense, if you have the patience. This man couldn’t pass freshman English and the Socialists still insist on heralding him as a scholar, this is the reason he doesn’t speak without a teleprompter, because he can’t.

I only have six years of formal education; yet, to me, this reads like the speech of an illiterate. I am probably the last one that would be considered an Elitist intellectual snob within our group, so please don’t throw that at me. We are reading the words of a president who was touted to be an honors’ graduate of an ivy league school: a man who is intellectually beyond the most gifted among us and this is the message he has for us.

This is why his grades and records are sealed from us: he is an intellectual lightweight. We have an empty suit playing at a role, nothing wrong with that if you are in Hollywood, but this is the most powerful position in the world and we have a manufactured persona playing at being president.

Skook,

Thanks for the welcome chuckle before dinner.

And . . . “we have a manufactured persona playing at being president” – rather says it all. Yet, still, the MSM seems void of embarrassment, . . . strange.

My pleasure JR.

It is not reasonable to expect people to be embarrassed for doing their job. The Media has been bought and paid for, their Socialist dreams should be their just reward; unfortunately, we stand in the way of a Socialist Dystopia and we, the bloggers of the internet, have been much more effective delivering the message, much to the chagrin of the professional journalists of the Obama propaganda machine. If we are to put our faith in political correctness, it is our assigned mission to feel empathy with their failure, incompetence, and stupidity; unfortunately, I can’t find the compassion within me to feel compassion for the outrageous bumbling of the self-anointed fourth estate. If the best they can do is stick their butt over the hog pen to take a dump, why should we worry that they fell back in the slop and the hogs are still hungry?