Silent Scandal [Reader Post]

By 18 Comments 365 views

If a scandal isn’t reported by the media, does that mean it never happened?

For the millions of Americans who don’t watch Fox News or listen to talk radio, the answer is a resounding yes.

Last Friday, November 20, evidence came to light that “appears to show a conspiracy to falsify data and suppress academic debate in order to exaggerate the possible threat of man-made global warming.” Translation:

The global warming movement rests almost entirely on the IPCC’s claim to represent the “consensus” of climate science. That entire movement now stands discredited.

In the face of this absolutely shameful and possibly criminal revelation of chicanery, deceit and manipulation of data, the mainstream media has stuck to their decades long policy of ignoring any evidence or opinion that challenges their firm belief that the world is undergoing a climate crisis. A crisis that can only be rectified if all global citizens drastically change their behavior.

Despite these revelations, the AP’s science writer continued reporting on the worsening climate non-crisis, “Since the 1997 international accord to fight global warming, climate change has worsened and accelerated — beyond some of the grimmest of warnings made back then.” Scary stuff, if it were true.

CNN chimed in, reporting their own shocking headlines: Sea Level Rise Could Cost Port Cities $28 Trillion. Remember, this ‘news’ story was published after evidence had come to light that credibly challenged the very facts CNN was reporting. Yawn.

Six days after this scandal came to light, ABC, CBS, CNN, MSNBC and NBC had yet to make their viewers aware of what is being called “the greatest [scandal] in modern history.” A scandal that could derail the whole concept of man-made global warming. And, coincidently, the $129 billion carbon market that rests on this shaky and manipulated data.

Also ignoring this scandal is our very own president, who announced last Wednesday that he will attend the long-anticipated, high-stakes global climate summit in Copenhagen. Obama’s climate czar, Carol Browner, announced on the very same day that global warming science is “settled.’ No need to even address those pesky e-mails that purport to show differently.

“I’m sticking with the 2,500 scientists. These people have been studying this issue for a very long time and agree this problem is real,” said Ms. Browner. The 2,500 hundred scientists, by the way, are comprised mainly of United Nations bureaucrats who have a vested interest in the massive wealth re-distribution that they suggest as a solution to this non-crisis.

On Thursday, more evidence of climate chicanery came to light – but was again ignored by the media. Gerd Leipold, the outgoing leader of Greenpeace, admitted that his organization’s recent claim that the Arctic Ice will disappear by 2030 was “a mistake.” Oops.

Also on Thursday, information surfaced that indicates Australia, also, appears to have been tinkering with raw data in order to make “global warming’ appear scarier that it really is.

Again, no mention was made in the U.S. media. Oh, CNN did finally acknowledged the issue yesterday by reporting that there was “very little context” in the e-mail evidence. CNN declined to publish any of the damning e-mails and they failed to identify any of those ‘leading scientists’ whose work has been shown to be a possible fraud.

Those ‘leading scientists’ then continued with business as usual, issuing another dire proclamation, “Tackling climate change will help prevent millions of deaths among people who are alive now and save the world for future generations.”

These same scientists then responded to the damning evidence to the contrary in the usual way. By attacking and discrediting the motives of the messenger. “We’re facing an effort by special interests who are trying to confuse the public,” said Richard Somerville, Distinguished Professor Emeritus at Scripps Institution of Oceanography and a lead author of the UN IPCC Fourth Assessment Report.

As of this writing, Fox News is the only national outlet reporting on this scandal. Website WattsUpWithThat and Canada Free Press appear to be the only media investigating the hacked e-mails that seem to show a decades long conspiracy to fudge climate data and squelch any and all opposing data and scientists.

The ‘garbage-in, garbage-out’ climate models the IPCC use as proof of global warming  now appear to be false. Global ‘leaders’ conveniently ignore the burgeoning scandal and continue to insist that unless a massive re-distribution of global wealth is immediately enacted, global warming will threaten every man woman and child on earth.

Americans can disagree on the extent of climate change and even question man’s role in it. The issue at hand however, is the fact that the media, whose job is to report facts, has declined to do so. The media, with Fox News as the only exception, have bought into Dan Rather’s “fake but accurate” view of the so-called ‘global-warming’ crisis.

Father Earth, Algore sums it up best: “This is not a political issue, or a scientific issue or a psychological issue – it’s a moral issue. If anything it’s actually a spiritual issue.” There you have it. If you don’t agree with the unscientific ‘consensus’ than you’re a really stupid, bad and immoral person. The left has spoken and the media agrees. Case closed.

Crossposted from Right Bias

18 Responses to “Silent Scandal [Reader Post]”

  1. 1

    Common Sense

    Can you imagine how the MSM would be howling if Bush where President and this happened. It’s amazing to me how 0-bama and the wacho liberals own the press. By the time America realizes what a fraud 0-bama is, they will have some explaining to do.

  2. 3


    The answer to your question is yes. If the MSM doesn’t mention it, it never happened at least in the minds of the people who rely on it for their news. They realize this and that’s why they stonewall. But the number of people who use other sources for their news, such as the internet, is growing and it may be impossible for them to keep it quiet forever. I often wonder if what I thought happened when I was younger was not true but just the spin of the media.

  3. 7


    I guess you could say I’m torn on this: The media should be covering this story. No, they should be pursuing it like a pack of dogs. At the same time I have to admit that not hearing a word from Al Gore is something to give thanks for even under these circumstances.

    Senator Inhofe says he intends to hold hearings on this scandalous corruption of scientific data and I think he ought to publicly invite Al Gore to testify. If Gore declines, Inhofe should use a subpoena and tell him to bring his Nobel Prize along with him as evidence of massive fraud.

  4. 8



    tfhr: If Gore declines, Inhofe should use a subpoena and tell him to bring his Nobel Prize along with him as evidence massive fraud.

    Maybe, if they are held in the spring, Gore and Obama can do a pissing contest of comparison of medals, eh? LOL

    I may be mistaken, but I believe the hearings Inhofe wants to hold relate to Congressional funding of climate studies…. now that their integrity has been called into question. He’s given instructions to relevant businesses and federal agencies not to delete any information and wait for an FOIA. I believe, in order to address the corruption, it has to be tied to the taxpayers dime and Congressional allocations as the prime subject matter.

    But then I could be wrong.

    Had to laugh at the “not hearing a word from” AlGore-has-no-rhythm. Ah yes, ’tis the season to give thanks for our abundance of blessings. :0)

  5. Nancy: Thanks for that superb summation of the problem. But despite the willful denial by WARMERS and climate criminals (they are the true deniers and flat eathers with their phony models) the public is catching on…. slowly!

    Imagine what would happen if the “news” media accurately reported the story of the cooked data? Copenhagen and Cap and Tax would be dead as well as any other UN IPCC effort. And since that massive socialist one world government undertaking is “too big to fail” the media will do everything they can to sweep this story under the rug.

    Even still, people can see with their own eyes that the seas are not rising, that hurricanes are LESS numerous and intense and that it is getting colder, not hotter.

    The way I see it, the WARMERS have a few more years left to sputter on with their scaremongering before it all comes crashing down. Let’s hope that happens BEFORE a world “climate” treaty or Cap and Tax is signed.

  6. 12


    It would be an interesting survey to see what percentage of Americans recognize the following:

    Van Jones


    Global Warming Fraud

    Tax Cheat Treasury Secretary

    Any more stories reported exclusively on Fox or here on the Net?

  7. 13

    Old Trooper

    As far as I know, Gore is Not a Scientist, He is a Used Car salesman and in it for the CA$H.

    This Global warming business is not founded on any Science and wasting Taxpayer cash for foolishness like this is unconscionable.

    Gore found a racket since he could not make it as a Politician. Basing conclusions re: Warming on skewed or manipulated data is fraud on a grand scale. Every Clown that is pushing Carbon Credits or willing to get Cap & Tax pushed on Us is suspicious, not a Scientist of any variety and are selling what amounts to snake oil.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *