Obviously, Obama has higher priorities! Like seeing how many times he can say “I” or “my” in his next speech!

General Stanley McChrystal told CBS reporter David Martin in a television interview that aired Sunday on 60 Minutes that he’s only spoken with the President once in the 70 days since being appointed by Obama to oversee our efforts in Afghanistan.

Remember that during the 2008 campaign and at the start of the Obama Administration the focus was on making Afghanistan the highest priority national security issue.

Remember also that in 2008, candidate Obama promised to listen to the generals. This was a mantra that Democrats beat like a drum during the Bush years.

But now, the Gen. McChrystal writes a requested report leaked in PDF in which he says:

“Failure to gain the initiative and reverse insurgent momentum in the near-term (next 12 months) — while Afghan security capacity matures — risks an outcome where defeating the insurgency is no longer possible.”

Time is critical to turning this situation around. But Obama’s response is to wait, study and evaluate. Evaluate what? Either you believe the general you appointed knows what he is talking about and give him the support he requests or you don’t.

Team Obama will only start discussing the issue this week with the first of what is billed as a series of meetings with no deadline set for reaching a decision regarding Gen. McChrystal’s request for tens of thousands of additional troops.

How long will we have to wait until a reporter asks Obama why he doesn’t listen to his general?

How long will our troops in Afghanistan have to wait to find out whether the Commander in Chief will support their mission?

  • Share/Bookmark
Print This Post Print This Post
This entry was posted on Monday, September 28th, 2009 at 8:41 am and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Trackbacks

  1. Obama and McChrystal: 70 Days and one spoken conversation on Afghanistan « The Western Experience
  2. Afghan General: “Obama and I have spoken once in 6 months” *update* Video: Senator responds
  3. Flopping Aces » Blog Archive » A Brief Timeline of President Obama’s Benchmark Statements on the “War of Necessity”
  4. “US:Obama Talked with His Military Commander Only Once in 70 Days: Is This Any Way for the CIC to Run a War…….?” and related posts - KuASha Organization
  5. Tweets that mention Flopping Aces » Blog Archive » How Can Obama “Listen to the General” In Charge of Afghanistan If He Has Only Spoken to Him Once? -- Topsy.com
  6. Flopping Aces » Blog Archive » War Done Smarter and Cheaper
  7. “Obama Has Only Spoken To The US Commander In Afghanistan Once” and related posts « Twitter

15 comments so far

ObamaIsAJugearedDunce
 1Reply to this comment  

Pish posh- oba mao hasn’t time to dilly dally talking about the well being of baby killers in some far away land called avgoneistahn, he has important things to do- like jetting off to Denmark to make a plea for his fake home town to get the budget crushing olympic games!

September 28th, 2009 at 8:44 am
kjc
 2Reply to this comment  

So Obama has spoken to David Letterman more than he has spoken to his general in charge of the war effort in Afghanistan.

September 28th, 2009 at 9:26 am
Eddie
 3Reply to this comment  

He’s saving Afghanistan for the proper time to distract from something else, and to undercut the political opposition by showing how involved he is in the military. He doesn’t lie, he is “evaluating the situation,” it’s just that you can’t assume you know what he means by “situation.”

September 28th, 2009 at 9:53 am
Michelle
 4Reply to this comment  

Nice that the Olympics in Chicago are more important than war.

September 28th, 2009 at 11:06 am
Tom N
 5Reply to this comment  

Good thing elections don’t matter – but they do. Who ever voted for Obama will have to live with that decision.

September 28th, 2009 at 1:15 pm
Old Trooper
 6Reply to this comment  

Obama talks and does not listen. Surprised?
I am not.

September 28th, 2009 at 3:12 pm
Joe Smith
 7Reply to this comment  

How long did it take Bush to listen to our military leaders and commit more troops to Iraq? That we are in this situation at all is that GB didn’t listen to our military leaders before going into Iraq and didn’t send the number of troops they asked for to start with. And he took troops from Afghanistan that we are now talking about putting back.

September 29th, 2009 at 4:37 pm
Missy
 8Reply to this comment  

@Joe Smith:

Tommy Franks has a different view. He has told the American people that he used 9,000 plus U.S. troops to fight the war in Afghanistan, at the start of OIF 10,000 U.S. troops were fighting in Afghanistan. Now, how many troops has Obama sent over to bring the troop strength up to a bit over 60,000, 21,000? Leaves me to believe that in spite of the number of troops in Iraq, GWB had increased troop strength over the years in Afghanistan.

Tommy Franks has also spoken against the Shinseki, Powell myth that an “overwhelming force” ground troop strength was asked for in the run up to OIF. He has stated often times and written in his book, “American Soldier” that he had the troops he wanted and needed, if he wanted more the Bush Admin would have provided them.

President Bush did listen to his generals, ask Casey and Sanchez why they were replaced by Petraeous and Odiarno after their policies failed. I seem to remember Petraeous had a COIN plan he presented to P Bush prior to being given the job, there P Bush goes, listening to his commanders again.

September 30th, 2009 at 4:46 am

Leave a reply

Name (*)
Mail (will not be published) (*)
URI
Comment

If your comments get caught in spam a lot please log into your registered account before trying to comment again. You can email me if your comment is caught in spam

 

Identity Verification: If you wish to verify your commenter identity, so no one can steal it, click the below button: