Democratic Voters Do Not Support Israeli Air Strikes

I wonder if they polled the same Democrats who thought Sarah Palin was Obama’s running mate, thought Republicans controlled congress and knew every smear thrown at Sarah Palin but had never heard the truth about Obama, Rezko and Ayers?

It’s pretty clear that these no nothings are totally unaware of the long term diplomatic process that has been going on for decades trying to bring peace between the Israelis and the Palestinians.

And every time Israel has traded land for peace the Pallys have used the land as a base to launch further attacks on Israel.

I doubt the nit wits on the Dem side of this poll are aware that the Pally’s don’t care about peace. Their intention is to destroy Israel. And they MEAN it!

Thinking about Obama’s lack of response to a major world event, a conclusion I reached earlier is that his cabinet to be may be split and Obama can’t form an opinion because he is depending on the team to tell him what to do. Now that we see the polls, I think it also may be a bit of the age old democrat finger in the wind thing.

Democratic Voters Do Not Support Israeli Air Strikes

Um, am I supposed to be surprised by that? Because I’m not.

And Obama? Sheesh. What I’m getting from his silence is that he either doesn’t support Israel, doesn’t want to dare agree publicly with Bush, or is the master of indecision. Newsflash, Obama – this kinda stuff comes with the job you claimed you wanted. It’s not like you’ve been asked to send troops into the region. All people want is your position on this – easily the simplest thing anyone can do. If you can’t manage that, don’t bother showing up to takeover.

Obama is properly keeping his mouth shut so as not to confuse the world as to the US position on anything until he takes office. If he said something wouldn’t you be criticizing him for interfering? Let’s hold our criticism until it is warranted, else we sound like the Dems who blamed Bush for everything including Hurricane Katrina.

There will be plenty of Obama statements to criticize in the future.

Funny you don’t think that way about Obama, the candidate, speaking out on Iraq, Afghanistan, troops withdrawals, trying to postpone SOFAs, and negotiations with despots and tyrants, bigterguy. Also hypocritical that you don’t mind him speaking out as PEBO on auto bailout, and other economic policies, Iran, troop withdrawal and everything else during his transition period. Until he decided to vacation in Hawaii, he raced to the media dais daily. And many of his statements ran counter to the current US position.

But for you, it’s okay for him to vote “present” on the largest issue on the int’l front while hiding behind the same excuse (one POTUS at a time). An excuse to be silent that he has trotted out only for this.

Do I want him to make a comment? Yes. Like so much else about Obama, we are clueless to how he genuinely stands. Rahm, the mouthpiece, made it abundantly vague on the talking head circuit last week.

Will I like what he says? Who the heck knows…. can’t tell you until he says it. But like so many other times, Obama dodges and deflects instead of answering. This is my major problem with Obama. Soaring rhetoric with lofty phrases that says nothing, and attempts to straddle the fence.

You are one of those that will be happy to extend Obama’s “affirmative action” honeymood period into 2010, I see. Until then, the man’s sheeeeet don’t stink. Get back to us in, say, about 18 months of so.

Let’s see… that would be 55% of the same types who don’t know who Pelosi or Reid are? Or perhaps those who didn’t know which policy belonged to which candidate in the 2008 election?

Right… polls… feh. Ask 1000 idiots a question, and you’ll get 1000 idiotic answers and opinions.