Liberals voice concerns about Obama

Scott:
“Oh, what a tangled web we weave…..”
“When we first practise to deceive!” Sir Walter Raleigh

Now that the Supreme Court has refused to hear the appeal by Leo Donofrio on his suit that Obama was ineligible to run for president due to dual citizenship, we will simply have to look to Berg’s suite that Obama was born in Kenya. I did not expect Donofrio’s suit to succeed, as the legal issues of such were vague, at the least, and there is nothing to suggest having ‘dual’ citizenship, sic, would disqualify Obama.

However, the case of the bogus birth certificate, is ongoing, and this is of interest since it claims that Obama was born outside the US and is rapidly going clarity as people come forward. We will simply have to see if the actual issue is clarified by SCOTUS or will they leave it in the dark.

Bill Clinton was a pathological liar, but the MSM excused his behavior at every turn. It was explained to us that he campaigned on the left (in other words, lied to the left, then dumped them)and moved to the center, now we are told the same about Obama, in fact, come to think of it, we are told nearly all the same things about Obama by the MSM that they told us about Clinton, except for ‘that woman’.

If it is going to become business as usual for the Democratic candidate to lie to their electorate to garner their votes them cast them aside in disdain, then the very first thing we can assume of the Democratic candidate right off the bat is that he is a liar.

FLICK the liberals

Partisans on both sides only saw Obama as they wanted him to be. Anyone paying attention to what he said from the very begining would not be surprised at all by Obama’s cabinet picks or decisions.

Hussein O made promises he knew the lefties wanted the hear.
He’s going to the white house.

The leftie whiners are still in momma’s basement.
The biased news (sic) who got him elected are filing for bankruptcy.
The unions who gave him millions now see his backside with a kiss here sign on it.

I love the daily comedy of Hussein giving the liberals the finger.

No Hard Right you were listening to Rush in order to know what to think.

I don’t listen to Rush, Moron. And unlike you, I do think.

Fine, you think up your own crazy sh*t. Good for you.

91 posts worth so far… maybe you should get a hobby that involves leaving the house.

What is it about the right that so many politicians like? It is funny that so many despise the right or so they say, but they move in that direction a lot. More often than not. Maybe there is something in that “right” direction.

Larry, who are his centrist picks?

Well this brings other cliche’s to mind:
“You can’t get something for nothing.” & “You get what you pay for.”

People ignored all of Obama’s lies when it was the conservatives who pointed them out and put their votes behind a candidate who promised them free money they didn’t earn courtesy of big government. And now that he’s flip-flopping once again they act all surprised. Well, “Get over it.” You put this on the rest of us so you have nothing to gripe about. Unless you want to band together, protest, and demand a recall. Libs do love their ‘do-overs’. We certainly wouldn’t stop you.

I especially liked the:

“He has confirmed what our suspicions were by surrounding himself with a centrist to right cabinet. But we do hope that before it’s all over we can get at least one authentic progressive appointment,” said Tim Carpenter, national director of the Progressive Democrats of America.

Allow me to clarify the definitions by the Ultra-libs:

Centrist=Left
Right=Left of Moderate

And “Left-to-Left of Moderate” is exactly how many Conservatives now view what Bush’s administration was in comparison to Conservative standards. Although he wasn’t to the extreme as the socialist Clintons, as much as Republicans wanted Bush ideologically on their side, Dubya was pretty much a RINO in practice. Still, when balancing choices between two “evils” he was a better selection than either Gore or Kerry.

Knowing how Obama seems to goes wherever “political expediency” takes him; What we don’t know is what has suddenly motivated him to switch from “radical left” to “run-of-the-mill left”. Was he influenced by the presidential “need-to-know” information handed over to him by Bush prior to this transition? Is it candor & precautions following a review of security & intel briefings? Perhaps the guidance of a higher “Illuminati” hierarchy?

And then there’s Fit-Fit suddenly back-pedaling with:

Anyone paying attention to what he said from the very begining would not be surprised at all by Obama’s cabinet picks or decisions.

After we’ve listened to months of him here touting the pure Koolaid drinker talking points.

Scott put it best:

BWUAHAHAHAAHA!!!……………………………………………………….Merry Christmas

Will there be “clean coal” technology in the Liberal stockings this year or will even that be nixed by his running-elf Biden?

The Supreme Court filing (application, brief etc.) in the Connecticut Wrotnowski case is soooooo much better than that in the New Jersey Donofrio case (apparently hurredly written before the Nov 4 election) that I don’t think Team Obama should get too comfortable with the Court’s denial of the first case since the second case IS distributed for Dec 12 conference. How the heck can anyone effectively counter this (great work Leo):

http://www.filesend.net/download.php?f=fb6dc015edba6d8ec689b56a06b79d0b

“Barack Hussein OBAMA, in conjunction with the co-defendants, has reportedly spent between $800,000 to close to $1,000,000 (one million dollars), using at least three different law firms to fight these civil actions. Now, consider that each and every one of the lawsuits filed against him could be immediately dismissed by the mere production of a single piece of paper that is available to him for the paltry sum of $12.50 at a recorder’s office in Hawaii. Keep in mind that at this point, OBAMA would likely not even have to make the document public, but provide it to the applicable judge or official for verification purposes to make this controversial maelstrom disappear.
As an investigator and a rational American citizen, I have to ask myself why Barack Hussein OBAMA has chosen not to dispose of this very simple matter in the most logical and expeditious manner possible.
http://www.homelandsecurityus.com/20081207DJH

Hum! It makes you wonder what this guy wants to hide to the population?

If it is going to become business as usual for the Democratic candidate to lie to their electorate to garner their votes them cast them aside in disdain, then the very first thing we can assume of the Democratic candidate right off the bat is that he is a liar.
———

Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhh The Olde Chicago Way……

These people aren’t moderates:
Rahm Emmanuel, Hillary, Bill Richardson, Cecilia Muñoz, Eric Holder. How about the other what, former Clinton administration stooges? They were leftists, but not batshit crazy leftists.

Slate has a list of current appointments and some believed to be pending. They don’t look like moderates to me for the most part. FYI, Janet Napalitano is NOT a moderate.
http://74.125.95.132/search?q=cache:8YsH1BLblxsJ:www.slate.com/id/2205007/+obama+and+the+clinton+admin+picks&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=4&gl=us

Rocky B,

I’d like to see an example of one radically leftist thing I have ever said.

Hard Right,

How about you give an example of what a moderate looks like in your world. Who do you consider moderate?

“No Hard Right you were listening to Rush in order to know what to think.”

Don’t you just love it when liberals throw out that old canard? Rush Limbaugh gives us his take on current events every day. You can either agree or disagree. It’s no coincidence that Limbaugh’s listeners are the better-informed than most people on these issues. I believe it was the Pew Research group who conducted a survey. This dovetails into the Zogby study of Obama voters who could not answer 12 simple questions about the issues correctly. They could tell you about Palin’s wardrobe or her daughter’s pregnancy but they didn’t know who Bill Ayers, Tony Rezko and Berardine Dohrn are, nor did they know any of his policy positions. Howard Stern did a “man-on-the-street” interview and Obama supporters didn’t even know that Palin was NOT Obama’s VP pick. This is why competency testing should be mandatory for voter registration. Idiots elected an empty suit to be POTUS…we are truly screwed.

A similar study to Zogby’s of McCain voters showed a better grasp of the issues. So listening to Rush is probably the best thing you can do for yourself in order to keep abreast of current political events. You get the news stories from the MSM without the full truth, then you get the rest of the story from Rush, Levin, Ingraham, Hannity and the Fox Folks.

The NY Times is a horrible source for truth…All the news that Fit Fit will swallow…

So McCain and Kerry would be moderates per Jarhead’s definition.

Wow, the groupies at Firedoglake are losing that loving feeling:

http://firedoglake.com/2008/12/07/obama-deputy-steve-hildebrand-liberals-need-to-stfu/

Comment section is entertaining.

As an investigator and a rational American citizen, I have to ask myself why Barack Hussein OBAMA has chosen not to dispose of this very simple matter in the most logical and expeditious manner possible.

I believe it was Mike who made a very intriguing suggestion. Politics is war.

The name of this blog is Flopping Aces. So let’s use a poker analogy. You are playing stud poker, holding a winning hole card. Do you call and show or do you string it out, to get more chips in the pot?

Let’s say this builds to a huge maelstrom. The whole country gets caught up in the drama. It’s on all the news shows, even in the MSM. It’s the big water cooler topic in the country. Then, at the final moment, it’s time to show the hole card. And it’s an ace, to complete the straight.

Do you know what Obama has then accomplished? He’s basically immunized himself from any and all innuendo for the rest of his term.

May be a stretch — but it was Mike’s (if memory serves) idea and he just might be correct.

- Larry Weisenthal/Huntington Beach, CA

KOokS indeed.

That’s twice I’ve agreed with you, you must be having a rather lucid day. Have they worked out your medication?

Funny, I was going to ask you that myself unFit.
FYI, I go where the facts take me. You believe only what fits into your fantasy world.

Maybe that’s because Afghanstan became a NATO war in the summer of 2006, Fit.

Scott,

Pointing fingers at Democrats isn’t an answer to the oversight. I’m not a Democrat so find someone else to defend that point.

My opinion is that it’s been more than just lipservice that’s been forgotten in Afghanistan.

I’m trying to teach Hard Right the difference between fact and opinion.

The fact is no one mentioned Afghanistan. What that means or says about the GOP is an opinion

fit fit;
I didn’t say you were spouting radical left agenda, I was refering to your propensity during the campaign to mirror the positions on issues being set forth as the Obama-Biden platforms. Now he appears to your own party supporters as having no intention of adhere to the far left agenda he ran on by his selections of cabinet members. To which you come back with an, “I knew it all along & told you so” stance. So I accused you of back-tracking. Where in your FA posts prior to the election did you predict that he would move to the left’s version of “center” in his selection of cabinet members or on the policies after elected? In a quick review of your past posts, besides the campaign propaganda, it seemed you were more concerned with bashing Palin at every opportunity, giving us the same banal unfounded crap as the media & Daily Kos, and ignoring any positives in her political history. Then after the election you began giving the Repubs here Lib Dem recipes on how the RNC should overhaul their party to be competitive.

Then in post 43 of this thread, you follow up your feeling offended post, by citing as source a link to a story via socialist George Soros’ mouthpiece Arianna Huffington’s web-news, which turns out to be just another National Inquirer type rag opinion pieces disguised as news from Huffington’s pool of biased reporters. So which is it? If you keep throwing us garbage like that instead of something substantial and factual based, then what you donate to debate is no better than what we get from the fly-by moonbats.

Thank you BTW, in post 46 for actually providing something factual in support of one of your arguments for a change. Took me a little while to read through all the prepared speeches since I’m also in preparing for the holidays mode, yet I don’t see the failure to mention Afghanistan along with all the other serious issues being discussed as I position of non-support by the RNC for our troops. They may not always say it in words, but in deeds, Republicans seem much more likely to come out and sit down with the troops, take their pulse and actually find out what they are thinking, rather than hanging out with the officers and local officials for photo ops.

In my 21+ years of service in the USAF, I found Repubs politicians much more likely to come out to the flightline and get involved in talking to the people with the sweat on their brow. Or to come out to a hanger and mention their support, discuss issues being pursued, & goals that meant something to us, which would usually be followed by some Q&A. Hell I even got a wake-up following a night shift once by a party going room-to-room checking out our living conditions. When Dems came out, the only way you actually found out they were there was by a write-up in the base newspapers. Or perhaps once in a while you might see a convoy of staff cars cruising by.