Just another example of how rules and standards of accountability are different for Democrats than for Republicans!

Obama likely to escape campaign audit
By KENNETH P. VOGEL
The Politico
11/11/08

The Federal Election Commission is unlikely to conduct a potentially embarrassing audit of how Barack Obama raised and spent his presidential campaign’s record-shattering windfall, despite allegations of questionable donations and accounting that had the McCain campaign crying foul.

Adding insult to injury for Republicans: The FEC is obligated to complete a rigorous audit of McCain’s campaign coffers, which will take months, if not years, and cost McCain millions of dollars to defend.

Obama is expected to escape that level of scrutiny mostly because he declined an $84 million public grant for his campaign that automatically triggers an audit and because the sheer volume of cash he raised and spent minimizes the significance of his errors. Another factor: The FEC, which would have to vote to launch an audit, is prone to deadlocking on issues that inordinately impact one party or the other – like approving a messy and high-profile probe of a sitting president.

McCain, on the other hand, accepted the $84 million in taxpayer money, which not only barred him from raising or spending more – allowing Obama to fund many times more ads and ground operations – but also will keep his lawyers busy for a couple years explaining how every penny was spent.

Through the end of September, McCain had socked away $9.4 million in a special fund to pay for the audit.

Obama – the first presidential candidate to decline public funding in the general election – certainly would provide fodder for the green eye-shades at the FEC’s E Street offices.

Obama’s campaign admitted it initially mis-categorized the purpose of an $832,598 payment for get-out-the-vote efforts to a consulting firm affiliated with ACORN, the community organizing group that became a top target for Republicans alleging voter fraud.

And FEC analysts over the course of the campaign have written more than a dozen letters to Obama singling out hundreds of contributors for whom the campaign either didn’t supply adequate information or from whom he accepted donations exceeding the $4,600 limit.

Unchecked Money + Power = Corruption

Like the rest of the skeletons in Obama’s closet, the hidden scandals in Obama’s money machine won’t stay hidden forever.

  • Share/Bookmark
Print This Post Print This Post
This entry was posted on Tuesday, November 11th, 2008 at 8:56 am and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Trackbacks

  1. Flopping Aces » Blog Archive » Obama’s “advisors” quietly met with Hamas
  2. is the post office open on veterans day

11 comments so far

bill-tb
 1Reply to this comment  

Obmunism must not fail.

November 11th, 2008 at 10:34 am
MnGramma
 2Reply to this comment  

Admin:

Is something wrong with the thread:
“how-democrats-are-attempting-to-steal-a-senate-seat”?

Cant read comments or post comments on it.

Thanks.

November 11th, 2008 at 10:50 am
SoCal Chris
 3Reply to this comment  

Just goes to show ya the old double standard on the part of the Left…and by Left, I don’t mean Democrats necessarily–there are blue collar, more-conservative-than-not, America-loving Democrats who don’t espouse what BO stands for. So, when I refer to the Left, I mean extreme liberal, zero-conservative-thinking, non-America-loving people…hmmm, like Obama, you could say.

So, as we all know, it’s not right versus left, it’s right versus wrong. I guess the nation had to go wrong before it can go right again. I’ve got my sights on 2012.

By the way, anyone seen or heard yet about a birth certificate for fraudulently-elected BO?

November 11th, 2008 at 11:15 am
 4Reply to this comment  

MnGramma, you are showing up just fine on that post. What browser are you using?

November 11th, 2008 at 12:03 pm
road warrior
 5Reply to this comment  

The liberal illuminati didn’t care how they got their money they just knew they needed lots of it in order to win, and they did. I have no doubt they probably got some of their millions in shady ways but i think they used it well and thats how they won.

November 11th, 2008 at 2:53 pm
BarbaraS
 6Reply to this comment  

Road Warrior

I have no doubt they probably got some of their millions in shady ways but i think they used it well and thats how they won.

They used it well? What kind of cockaminy statement is that? You are saying it is all right to break the law if you use the money for your own good in a careful manner? And what does well mean? And, of course, that is how they won. They broke the law and raised $650 million probably from foreign sources which is against the law and from citizens above the limit. I cannot and will not give Obama a pass on this nor on this ties to ACORN. I respect the office of the presidency but I cannot respect Obama.

November 11th, 2008 at 4:33 pm
luva the scissors
 7Reply to this comment  

this is stupid for lack of a better word. who i the hell thinks this is a good idea? they both should be audited, not just one. it only makes sense. knew they would get away with it.

November 11th, 2008 at 8:03 pm
Fit fit
 8Reply to this comment  

That’s what happens when you call for the head of the FEC to be fired…

November 12th, 2008 at 6:21 am
eaglewingz08
 9Reply to this comment  

Excuse me, the amount of money he raised minimizes the ‘errors’? I think the vast amount of foreign money he raised is what the error is all about. Guess I’m naive that laws are supposed to mean something. Or maybe Leona Helmsley was right.

November 12th, 2008 at 2:58 pm

Leave a reply

Name (*)
Mail (will not be published) (*)
URI
Comment

If your comments get caught in spam a lot please log into your registered account before trying to comment again. You can email me if your comment is caught in spam

 

Identity Verification: If you wish to verify your commenter identity, so no one can steal it, click the below button: