28
Oct

“Elect More Democrats to High Office, and We’ll have More Bipartisanship”

Posted by: Wordsmith @ 12:21 pm in Pelosi, Politics  | 0 views

How exactly does this work:

on concerns that Democrats might control both the White House and Congress she said the following:

“Elect us, hold us accountable, and make a judgment and then go from there. But I do tell you that if the Democrats win, and have substantial majorities, Congress of the United States will be more bipartisan,” said Pelosi.

So, elect more and more Democrats to Congress, and there’ll be more bipartisanship?

How can anyone argue with that kind of logic?

Makes sense. [/sarcasm]

  • Share/Bookmark
Print This Post Print This Post
This entry was posted on Tuesday, October 28th, 2008 at 12:21 pm and is filed under Pelosi, Politics. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Trackbacks

16 comments so far

Dan Cleary
 1Reply to this comment  

Nancy Pelosi has an uncanny ability to make Cynthia McKinney seem like Einstein.

The Dems have some nerve harping on Sarah Palin’s supposed lack of intelligence with a dim bulb like Nancy Pelosi at the helm.

October 28th, 2008 at 12:46 pm
stix1972
 2Reply to this comment  

WTF This is a joke right???? The Onion???? Mad TV???

I mean since they got into power we just had so much bipartisanship. Just look at all the wonderful things they have done. crickets crickets….

October 28th, 2008 at 1:11 pm
thuan
 3Reply to this comment  

Dims’ code word for Bipartisan=RADICAL.
Tax cut for the middle class=Massive tax increase
Spead the well=Welfare

October 28th, 2008 at 4:00 pm
Timothy
 4Reply to this comment  

Bipartisan to the Dems means that the other side surrenders to your whims.

October 28th, 2008 at 4:15 pm
Rocky_B
 5Reply to this comment  

My guess is Nancy’s been smoking the same Peruvian gaffe’ing weed as Biden.

October 28th, 2008 at 5:03 pm
Rocky_B
 6Reply to this comment  

Or she meant to say, “Bye partisan.”

October 28th, 2008 at 5:05 pm
crazy
 7Reply to this comment  

She means more take or leave it legislation like the $853B $700B Bailout Bill.

October 28th, 2008 at 6:50 pm
Dan Cleary
 8Reply to this comment  

I recall John Hinderaker saying that one silver lining of an Obama victory will be that Democrats will finally have to take responsibility for their actions.

I’m not sure if I’d call that a silver lining (the national security implications are worrisome – just ask Joe Biden), but it’s a good point. Although I get the feeling Dems will still figure out a way to blame Bush, Republicans, conservatives, etc. for any bad news.

October 28th, 2008 at 8:21 pm
clarky
 9Reply to this comment  

Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid are really what scares me most about an Obama Presidency. While he scares me plenty on his own, the huge majority the democrats look to have in congress is even worse. The branches of our government were set up to be checks and balances. There is nothing balanced about a government run by Pelosi-Reid-Obama. This fact alone is reason enough to vote for McCain.

October 28th, 2008 at 8:26 pm
Jim
 10Reply to this comment  

I remember living in Louisiana When Edwin Edwards was on his first run for Gov, against a popular N. Louisiana Repub. At that time La. was a true one party state, with massive corruption. Ok, the point. Edwards said tha La. needed a two party system, but voting Republican wasn’t the way to get it.

October 28th, 2008 at 8:41 pm
Leah
 11Reply to this comment  

Pelosi is an idiot. I cannot wait until her seat’s taken from her and she is shut up for good. She’s supposed to represent me? I don’t think so.

October 28th, 2008 at 8:43 pm
luva the scissors
 12Reply to this comment  

she is nuts and we all know it. she is drunk with power. what a moron.

October 28th, 2008 at 8:57 pm
Elektra
 13Reply to this comment  

lol…Who applies for a job this way? In an interview, do you grab your resume’ out of the bosses hand and say, “Forget that! Just hire me and we’ll take it from there.”!?!?! This is typical, though. Just like the Liberal view on abortion, they think good judgment comes AFTER choice and accountability!

October 28th, 2008 at 9:51 pm
BarbaraS
 14Reply to this comment  

I haven’t forgotten the bipartisanship practiced by the democrats when they controlled all three seats of power. The arrogance was pretty much like Obama’s. Their attitude to republicans was this is the way it will be and you have no power to change it. That’s the democrat notion of bipartisanship.

October 28th, 2008 at 10:36 pm
BarbaraS
 15Reply to this comment  

Also the only person running against Pelosi is Cindy Sheehan. That’s all we need is to give that dweeb a voice and seat in the house. Face it. San Francisco is a lost cause and they should form their own country.

October 28th, 2008 at 10:40 pm
Leah
 16Reply to this comment  

San Francisco HAS been a lost cause. That’s not news to me, and shouldn’t be to the people on this site. Remember the post that mentions SF “taking a dump” on the electoral system a few months back?

October 28th, 2008 at 11:46 pm

Leave a reply

Name (*)
Mail (will not be published) (*)
URI
Comment

If your comments get caught in spam a lot please log into your registered account before trying to comment again. You can email me if your comment is caught in spam

 

Identity Verification: If you wish to verify your commenter identity, so no one can steal it, click the below button: