4
Oct

Sarah Palin Gives More To Charity Than Biden

Posted by: Curt @ 8:34 am in Joe Biden, Sarah Palin  | 7 views

Recall Biden’s quote from not too long ago:

Catholic social doctrine as I was taught it is, you take care of people who need the help the most.

Too bad he only talks about helping those in need rather then doing it….

As Sarah does:

Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin made considerably less money than rival Sen. Joe Biden, but the Palin family gave more to charity in the last two years than Biden has in the last eight combined, according to Palin’s tax records released Friday afternoon.

Palin, the running mate of presidential candidate Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), and her husband Todd reported meager earnings from 2006 and 2007, at least by presidential-politics standards.

In 2006, the Palins paid $11,944 in taxes on $127,869 in income. In 2007, they paid $24,738 on $166,080.

But in 2006, they donated $4,880 to charity, and in 2007, they donated $3,325.

By contrast, Biden (D-Del.), Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama’s running mate, has donated a total of $3,690 since 1998 despite his higher Senate salary, according to an analysis posted by National Review.

Of course what Biden meant was that it was better to spend YOUR money to redistribute to those in need rather then his own.

Once again proving the study done by Arthur C. Brooks as written about in his book Who Really Cares: The Surprising Truth About Compassionate Conservatism:

— Although liberal families’ incomes average 6 percent higher than those of conservative families, conservative-headed households give, on average, 30 percent more to charity than the average liberal-headed household ($1,600 per year vs. $1,227).

– Conservatives also donate more time and give more blood.

– Residents of the states that voted for John Kerry in 2004 gave smaller percentages of their incomes to charity than did residents of states that voted for George Bush.

– Bush carried 24 of the 25 states where charitable giving was above average.

– In the 10 reddest states, in which Bush got more than 60 percent majorities, the average percentage of personal income donated to charity was 3.5. Residents of the bluest states, which gave Bush less than 40 percent, donated just 1.9 percent.

– People who reject the idea that “government has a responsibility to reduce income inequality” give an average of four times more than people who accept that proposition.

Do as I say, not as I do…

  • Share/Bookmark
Print This Post Print This Post
This entry was posted on Saturday, October 4th, 2008 at 8:34 am and is filed under Joe Biden, Sarah Palin. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Trackbacks

  1. Flopping Aces » Blog Archive » AP - Sarah Is Elitist
  2. Flopping Aces » Blog Archive » All He Ever Needed to Know About Communism, He Learned in Kindergarten

5 comments so far

 1Reply to this comment  

Yep, no surprise there! Libs think that the government is somehow the best way to meet the needs of the people? Really? Any of us who have worked in the federal government know better. Most of the money taxpayers are compelled to hand over to the federal government is wasted on buildings, bureaucrats and boondoggles.

If instead of throwing our money down that rathole, taxpayers donated directly to local charities in their communities there would be no poverty, no homeless people (unless by choice), no hunger, no illiteracy and every uninsured person could get free medical care from a local private clinic.

AND, we could save the planet from the evils of global warming by eliminating all those bureaucrats driving to work every day and the fossil fuels required to heat, cool and light their oversized office buildings.

The reason Democrats use the wasteful and inefficient federal government as the clearinghouse for all these social ills which could be best addressed at the local level is clear: They put politics before caring for the poor, the sick and the needy. Like everything else they do they put politics before country. And they know that if we are dependent on government we will forced to look to them for help.

October 4th, 2008 at 8:52 am
suek
 2Reply to this comment  

That averages out to about $5.00 per week. Plus a little extra for Christmas and Easter, I guess.

Wow. Impressed I’m not…

October 4th, 2008 at 10:56 am
Curt
 3Reply to this comment  

Sarah gave 4% of her and Todd’s income to charity in one year while Joe gave one tenth of one percent of his salary to charity over ten years.

Adjusted
Gross Income Charity

1998 $215,432 $195

1999 $210,797 $120

2000 $219,953 $360

2001 $220,712 $360

2002 $227,811 $260

2003 $231,375 $260

2004 $234,271 $380

2005 $321,379 $380

2006 $248,459 $380

2007 $319,853 $995

Total $2,450,042 $3,690

October 4th, 2008 at 11:19 am

Leave a reply

Name (*)
Mail (will not be published) (*)
URI
Comment

If your comments get caught in spam a lot please log into your registered account before trying to comment again. You can email me if your comment is caught in spam

 

Identity Verification: If you wish to verify your commenter identity, so no one can steal it, click the below button: