Obama: You can put lipstick on a pig, but it’s still a pig

Obama must not have gotten the memo about the women voters that are currently jumping ship.

Obie givin’ Hillary! the finger:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DygBj4Zw6No

His Granny should have taught him more about respect toward women.

Reminiscent of when he was caught giving the finger to Hillery. this person is a thug nothing more nothing less, has no respect for anyone let alone women. CAN’T AFFORD THIS CREEP.

What a jerk!!! I suggest ALL WOMEN SEND OBAMA OUR LIPSTICK!!!!

Send him a message that we are voting for Palin. What a sexist PIG!!!

He is going to lose big among women!

Campaign is in freefall, maybe they should try and put some lipstick on their pig.

“Obama: You can put lipstick on a pig, but it’s still a pig”

Translation: “I don’t want or need the woman vote.”

Man, Obama’s getting dumber by the day.

Are Obambis peeps really so stupid to believe that how a comment is perceived by the press counts more than what the voters think about it?

Soon he will have two women on his side, his wife and Oprah.

Oprah, educated and smart women in the same sentence does not compute.

That is a good joke line though.

why doesn’t the troll crawl back under their bridge. they freaking because obama is in a free fall. he is losing ground and if he keeps this up he won’t be elected president of his neighberhood association.

[wah wah snort huff wah] by ‘McCain said the same of Hillary’.
Hey, Mstsoh, you sort of sound like a…pig? But, I digress…

This is McCain’s statement ABOUT HILLARY’S PROPOSAL:
["I think they put some lipstick on a pig, but it's still a pig," he said of her proposal.]

You can say that Obama just brought this statement out of the dusty political library of attack speeches, but one (on the Obummer campaign staff) would think that there’d be an expected uproar since Sarah Palin made a powerful statement about Pit Bulls and lipstick less than a week ago. So, what does that say about Obama’s judgement unless, in fact, he WAS making a direct reference to the person of Sarah Palin, one who is anything but a pig?

Maybe Obama wasn’t being a jerk. Maybe he really is too dumb to know how that would be taken, and too dense to realize what the crowd thought he meant.

OK, anonymoid brain-dead dimwit, let’s say for argument sake that Obama called the change she and McCain advocate “a pig” instead of her. Let’s look at the facts to see if Obama’s accusation holds water, or is itself a bit of pigvomit.

1. With regard to Palin, she has CUT EARMARKS and continues to try to do so, even to the point where the powerful Alaska senator, who could get almost as much in earmarks as he wanted, because as he says “Alaska [meaning Gov., Palin] doesn’t want earmarks.”
http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/09/02/barack-obama-powerless-to-bring-his-followers-to-decency/#comment-109370

2. McCain doesn’t get ANY earmarks, compared with Obama’s $$$$$$BILLION!!!
http://astuteblogger.blogspot.com/2008/06/obama-on-pace-for-1000000000000-billion.html

And I stand by what I said about O’Bumbler being an immature classless twit, about on your level or lower, as this video of the high school class clown giving Hillary the finger (everyone in the audiance knew what he meant).

Oh, and let’s not forget Biden,…
http://sigmundcarlandalfred.wordpress.com/2008/08/27/obama-directed-34-million-earmark-for-bidens-son/
…who is in it with his son and brother
http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/09/02/barack-obama-powerless-to-bring-his-followers-to-decency/#comment-109370
…who were just indicted for being crooks.

So, let’s summarize. Obama and Biden are for more of the same old corruption, while McCain and Palin are for reforming the system. O’Bumbler’s “change” is “the same, only a lot more so” while McCain’s is, Let’s do what we can to REALLY fix the problems.

Now, stoopid ignant troll, go slither, crawl, or hop away before someone steps on you.

McCain said the same of Hilary:

Reading your postings is reminiscent of talking to a 6 year old. Get a life you dolt! There is zero substance to anything you are saying. I would recommend using logic, but I suspect that may be above your pay grade.

oops, that first link in my last comment (to show Palin has CUT earmarks to the point that she has upset Alaska’s Senator Stevens who wants a lot more) should have been this….
http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/09/02/barack-obama-powerless-to-bring-his-followers-to-decency/#comment-109499

anonymoid brain-dead dimwit doesn’t want to deal with the material I sent in because it will make him look like the fool he is.

And what about the wolves? Predators are dangerous and kill livestock, destroying people’s work and endangering them. But the morons who love destruction are never in favor of anything productive, so enjoy the CNN hit piece, then you can have your mommie change your little nappy and give you a bottle.

Meanwhile, if you get stepped on, don’t say I didn’t warn you.

“You can put lipstick on a pig,” he said as the crowd cheered. “It’s still a pig.” “You can wrap an old fish in a piece of paper called change. It’s still gonna stink.”

Does anyone actually believe this wasn’t planned in advanced? It’s offensive and the point is to generate deniable outrage to hijack the narrative and put his own spin on the last news cycle. The media are carrying his water big time.

Yes we hear the talking points,

Aldo Leopold, a “poet” ooooooooh, he must be so much wiser than you (which I can believe, ’cause he’s got you hoodwinked into thinking so).

Now, how about those nasty things called “facts” that always escape you Lefties, till they disurb your reveries like sand in the gears of your overtaxed little brains which brings your “thought” process (such as it is) to a hault, and forces you to lapse into fantasy mode where you can wander about unhindered by reality.

“…we’re shorsighted and stupid”

Yes, you are.

If you are prepared to elect someone who’s friends and associates …
http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/viewSubCategory.asp?id=800
are nearly ALL liars, crooks, terrorists, con-artists, and other assorted low-lifes
http://www.theodoresworld.net/archives/2008/04/post_32.html
…just because some poet is sad at the death of a wolf, then you are REALLY short sighted and VERY stoopid!!!!

Ahhh, but it “FEELS” sooo right, doesn’t it?! Yeah, and when you can’t think, you rely on your feelings to tell you what to do. Except, that puts you at the mercy of those who can manipulate those feelings, like “poets” and con-artists and two-bit hack politicians like Obama who has never accomplished anything positive, but has hurt an awful lot of his constituents.

In cahoots with Rezko and other Chicago crooks O’Bummer rewarded incompetance and allowed his constituents’ neighborhoods to deteriorate in order to enrich himself and his crooked friends.
http://directorblue.blogspot.com/2008/08/mr-obamas-neighborhood.html
You claim to be worried about stewardship of the planet and want to elect such a derelict? You’re not just stoopid, you’re soul-dead.

Is this supposed to be funny.

And I guess those German and English votes will do really good in November.

you are really winning over some votes here with all this BS.

Global Warming is a natural thing and it is going to start cooling again.

Maybe you should take another hit from the bong with these idiotic videos

RE: Yonason

That is exactly my point, who cares about what the world wants – of course the world will want a democrat leading the U.S., tradionally there are far more handouts under a democrat administration… I guess it would be in their best interest to push for Obama. This guy has virtually no experience, questionable personal associations and no political substance. I really can’t understand how anyone can take this campaign seriously? I won’t question his patriotism but I do question his judgement or, lack there of… As each day passes and he adds NOT ONE one reason to cast a vote in his favor, his true colors are increasingly shining through. He is a stuffed suit with no plan for our country other than to raise the taxes and have Americans depend more on social programs and government direction even more so than they do now. Change? Socialism is not the change we should be looking for…

I had enough of hitting my head against the wall with this troll also. he brought nothing to the conversation except talking points from the DNC and Obama campaign.

“Being drunk and stupid is no way to live your life”

““Being drunk and stupid is no way to live your life”” — stix1972

Yeah, but it makes them FEEEEEEL so good, …..at least till they sober up, if that’s possible.

“Don’t see it as a total waste of time however, you humored me, kind of fun to play with such small minds.”

Oh good grief! Is that moonbat STILL at it?

So much for his/her/it’s much ballyhooed insistence that we should be talking about the “issues.” All I’ve seen from that fingerpointer is a stream of insults.

Ah well, when the bloom is off the Obama rose and the public has turned away from the false prophet and is admiring a REAL and authentic candidate like Sarah Palin I guess insults are all the left is left with.

whats really funny about this is he plagerized it as well
i see he has been learning the ropes from Biden

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2078854/posts

LOL the number of gaffes this guys does, if the media were half as critical of him as they were of Dan Quayle, he would have been toast MONTHS ago

Check out what the democrats have posted on their official website, quick before they take it down. It appears the Obamabots knew exactly what he was talking about.

http://www.democrats.org/page/community/post/elizabethberry/Cgsq

Obama isn’t so stupid as to not understand why the crowd rose and appaulded when he uttered the “lipstick on a pig” line. It really wasn’t that great, especially if you assume it not to be an insult. If he had been smart, he would have put an end to it right there. At least with one of those “no no no no” lines that he does so well, but instead he just went on.

It was rude, lewd and totally unprofessional.

And Howard Dean should leave the country.

Can we just ban this ass???? I am tired os seeing this BS in my email box every minute.

Your Childish comments are just as bad as the rest of Obama’s followers going after Palin.

Do any Liberals have any mind of their own??? Just asking. Biden, Obama, Michelle Obama and the rest f them just keep on plagiarizing everyone elese’s speeches.

they have not had anew idea in 40 years or more either. Obama’s change is the same old Liberal utopia of the 60’s.

Where’s the reference to Sarah Palin? There isn’t any. It’s a common phrase and Obama even explained the context. So common even John McCain has been known to use it.

Markg8, I can’t say for any certainty that he meant to call Sarah Palin a pig; but unless he just isn’t that bright, and I think he is a bright man, he HAD to have known that in wake of Palin’s popularity and hoopla surrounding her pitbull/lipstick comment, that using this common expression under these circumstances…it’s innuendo and a double entendre.

CODE WORD “LIPSTICK”

“Where’s the reference to Sarah Palin?” — markg8

It’s the act of putting on lipstick, and O’Bummer’s sick joke is that he switches a pig for a pitbull. He also uses a decoy subject, but it was obvious to his audience what he was doing, and since he didn’t correct them, that means he meant it the way they took it.

If you’re so dense you can’t see what O’Bumpkin was doing, no wonder you’re voting for him. And, since his audience not only got it, but laughed at it, it’s also no wonder they are voting for that sleezebag, even though they are cleary smarter than you, though not by much.

See my previous post on this, when they dig it out of the spam-filter.

I agree let’s send the Obama campaign our lipstick

What a Moron he knew exactly what he was doing.

I despise that idiot

It’s very sensationalist of you all to get so upset over one thing, when there really are bigger problems at hand, in all of the current parties.

I’m not upset. I think it was a mistake for whats-her-name to demand an apology and for my team to get so “huffy and puffy” bent out of shape over this.

Palin herself, should just laugh it off and joke about it.

If you want to hit him where it hurts, make fun of his foreign policies or something like that. You know, the issues. Those things you all forgot about?

Just because this is talked about (you want to know how to make an issue disappear? Quit talking about it….yet you couldn’t help but leave a comment, drawing attention to this thread, yet again) doesn’t mean the actual issues aren’t being talked about as well. It’s all part of the political game. character matters, background history, AND the issues. And Obama, the supposed “new kind of politician of change”, is playing the game well, straight out of the “Karl Rovian” playbook and Chicago-style dirty politics. Obama’s no more “holier than thou” than the next politician.

@Wordsmith, I totally agree. It looks bad for her to demand an apology, but she honestly does deserve one. This country needs some civility, especially from our potential leaders. Whether Obama’s comment was just a joke gone wrong, or an actual insult, it was a bad move on his part.

The thread may have lost its lustre, but it’s still an issue. I heard just recently about this, so it’s not like the issue has gone away. That’s why I decided to weigh in.

-I see your point though. It’s all part of the game, but it’s weird that it is. We’re not going to be run by Obama’s or McCain’s off-handed comments. We’re going to be run according to his policies, his platforms. If there were a candidate with a policy that could put an end to national debt, bring world peace, and put an ice cream cone in every American’s hand, then I wouldn’t care if he (or she) called someone a name, or made a vaguely offensive comment about the other candidate, because those things don’t (or at the very least shouldn’t) matter.

Now…

“You Lefties are totally out to lunch, accusing us of not dealing with the issues when we are.”

First, may I respond with the fact that 1…2…3…4… oh, about the first 37 responses to this article were nothing but “Wow, Obama sure does suck.” That was what I was referring to when I said that these people aren’t dealing with the issues.

Second: yes, because it was always clearly defined that I’m even on the Left. That’s another thing wrong here: jumping straight to political lines. “The Lefts are…” “Those crazy Rights…” I’m not representing my party, I’m representing me. Don’t blame my supposed party for what I say, blame me.

I’m trying to deal with this…nonsense because if someone doesn’t point out that this is an irrelevant topic to discuss, then you guys won’t ever stop.
If I may bring some sort of analogy to this: Iraq sucks. Bush’s job is to run America, not to get involved with Iraq, but if he doesn’t do anything about it, it will get worse. Now obviously that plan didn’t quite work out, but ideally, it should have. Same here: I’m trying to stop something that, if left unchecked, will result in skewed and uneducated opinions about a political candidate who should be judged on policy rather than off-handed remarks.

O’Bummer…wait, are you referring to Bill O’Reilly, or Barack Obama? Either way, your pet names aren’t witty. You’re not in third grade.

“…this is an irrelevant topic to discuss,…” — Patrick Murphy

No, it’s not. It points out what a childish twit O’Bummer is. (and I’ll use whatever cute little names I chose to characterize that jerk.) He gave Hillary the finger, (as Aye Chyhuahua pointed out in the first post above),
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DygBj4Zw6No
…and he and the appreciative jerks in his audience knew what he was doing. It is important to realize that he is a childish twit. No sleeze is beneath his “dignity.” Someone whose “humor” is straight out of the toilet is NOT the kind of person I want in the White House.

“First, may I respond with the fact that 1…2…3…4… oh, about the first 37 responses to this article were nothing but ‘Wow, Obama sure does suck’.” — P.M.

As I just pointed out, post #1 by AyeChyhuahua cites a video where O’Bozo acts like a nasty child, something that’s important to know about him. The ‘FACT’ is that you ignored that, and sought to mis-characterize it as irrelevant. That’s why I call you a Lefty, because you distort or dismiss what others say when it doesn’t suit your narrative.

Aye also shows (#14) the video where O’Bumpkin says “hold on a second, SWEETIE” to a female reporter, and then never does answer her question.

So, since all this is a reflection of his “character” (or, rather, lack thereof), it is important for people to know about, and get a clear appreciation of just how immature, mean and petty he is.

He does “suck.” He is a schmuck. And you are a Lefty. Deal with it.