Bush’s speech today at The Heritage Foundation:
He laid out the Democrats and their masters, MoveOn.com and Code Pink:
Congress also needs to pass the Department of Defense spending bill,
as well as the funding bill for our nation’s veterans. There are reports that
congressional leaders may be considering combining the funding bills for our
military and our veterans together with a bloated labor, health and education
spending bill. It’s hard to imagine a more cynical ploy than holding funding for
our troops and our wounded warriors hostage in order to extract $11 billion in
wasteful Washington spending. If the reports of this strategy are true, I will
veto such a three-bill pileup. (Applause.)I ask Congress to send me a
clean veterans funding bill by Veterans Day; and to pass a clean defense
spending bill. Congress needs to put the needs of those who put on the uniform
ahead of their desire to spend more money.When it comes to funding our
troops, some in Washington should spend more time responding to the warnings of
terrorists like Osama bin Laden and the requests of our commanders on the
ground, and less time responding to the demands of MoveOn.org bloggers
and Code Pink protesters.
Right on!
Meanwhile the Democrats have scheduled another fruitless vote to be held in the near future seeing as how Bush will again veto, as he promised to do many times already, the “new” SCHIP bill which still funds middle-class families AND adults:
The Senate passed another version of the hotly debated children’s health insurance bill Thursday, but it’s doomed for another veto thanks to a last-minute breakdown in bipartisan negotiations.
Republican leaders in both chambers stepped in to quash negotiations between key senators and House GOP holdouts whose support could have led to a major breakthrough on the bill. Lacking a new agreement, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) was forced to hold a vote sooner than expected.
The bill passed 64-30. The legislation now lacks veto-proof margins in both the Senate and the House, where it passed last week 265-142.
President Bush is expected to veto the bill quickly — as he did an earlier, similar measure — leaving the State Children’s Health Insurance Program in limbo. Democrats want to spend an additional $35 billion over the next 10 years to cover 10 million uninsured children, but Bush has said that would make the program too expensive.
Of course Politico fails to mention it funds adults as well as children, something it was never intended to do along with funding those who do not truly need the free money. THAT is why he is vetoing this measure, as he should. He was willing to add 5 billion to this program but noooooooo, the Democrats had to pick a political fight in the hopes of throwing a few jabs at the “heartless” Republicans. A political fight they knew they would lose once, and now know they will lose again.
Does this knowledge make them pause and reconsider? Nope. Instead they waste time on this bill and other important bills, like funding our troops. Don Surber:
The federal budget year began Oct. 1 without a budget. The
Democratic Congress has yet to send even one budget bill to the president.And they wonder why their job approval is 11%.
44 Republican senators sent a letter to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi
and Senate Plurality Leader Harry Reid urging them to pass stand-alone Defense
and VA spending bills by Veterans Day. The letter included this zinger: “Our
soldiers and veterans already have done so much for our county. The Democratic
Congressional Leadership should not now cynically use them to shoulder a bloated
‘minibus’ funding bill up Pennsylvania Avenue and wrest billions in excessive
spending.”A minibus. I love it.
Sean Kevelighan, a spokesman for the White House budget office,
told CQ: “They need to send the president a clean veterans’ funding bill that we
have already agreed to by Veterans Day, so we can keep America’s promise to
those who have defended our freedom and are recovering from injury.”
They hold wounded veterans healthcare hostage, funding for our troops hostage, send bills they know will never get passed to the President, and in the end get absolutely nothing done.
Way to go you “most ethical congress ever!”
I guess the only good thing to come out of this is the fact that the Democrat led Congress is pushing their approval ratings to historic lows. Will this be enough to send a message to voters come 2008?
Other’s Blogging:
See author page
It appears the most rabid democrat now realizes the democrat leadership of congress is worthless, along with most of the democrats in congress. They’re only concerned with their personal political power and the he** with the American people.
I snarfed coffee at this one:
http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5hmzyiVIIB2w-pCeJrPL8qU3y5DKgD8SL4T2G1
Even Pelosi Is Disappointed in Congress
By CHARLES BABINGTON — 13 hours ago
WASHINGTON (AP) — Add House Speaker Nancy Pelosi to the list of Americans who think Congress is doing a lousy job.
Hours after touting the Democratic-controlled Congress’ achievements at a ceremony on the Capitol steps Thursday, Pelosi confessed that she would give the legislative body low marks if a pollster asked her.
“I know that Congress has low approval ratings,” Pelosi, D-Calif., said at her weekly news conference. “I don’t approve of Congress, because we haven’t done anything that — we haven’t been effective in ending the war in Iraq. And if you asked me in a phone call, as ardent a Democrat as I am, I would disapprove of Congress as well.”
Not surprisingly, Pelosi said President Bush and his Republican allies are mostly to blame. She noted that Bush has vetoed Democratic-led efforts to wind down the war, expand a children’s health program and broaden stem cell research.
In the October AP-Ipsos poll, Americans gave Congress a 22 percent approval rating, the lowest score since the poll began in late 2003.
Pelosi, who became speaker in January, found some rays of sunlight among the clouds. She cited a new Pew Research Center survey in which 44 percent of those polled said the Democratic Party can better manage the federal government, while 32 percent chose the Republican Party.
“I’m very proud of what we have done,” Pelosi said. Her Capitol steps ceremony touted a higher minimum wage, lower student loan interest rates and a new law tightening lobbying and ethics regulations.
The key to boosting her party’s image, she said, is “to get through the fog of war, because there is no question that the war in Iraq has eclipsed much of what we have done.”
you mean responding like this:
August 6, 2001: Bush Tells CIA Regarding Bin Laden Warning, ‘You’ve Covered Your Ass, Now’
Supposedly, just after a CIA briefer presents President Bush the later infamous PDB (Presidential Daily Briefing) entitled “Bin Laden Determined to Strike in USâ€Â(see August 6, 2001), Bush tells the briefer, “You’ve covered your ass, now.â€Â
Unless Ron Suskind can quote the briefer or cite a non anonymous source, it’s just a claim, but it’s also moot. 15 of the 19 hijackers were flagged and/or stopped by security. The problem was that the security was looking for bombs not suicidal hijackers. I also LOVE the part where failed counter-terrorism czar Clarke whines about how there was no cabinet meetings re intel warning. Brilliant. All the guy’s doing is complaining that he should have still been a powerful cabinet level guy when the fact is that alerting the Secretary of Labor, the Secretary of Education, notifying the Department of the Interior etc (ie the full cabinet) would’ve been useless. The only people that needed to be involved were the intel agencies, and since the CENTRAL intelligence agency provided the brief, the intel was intrinsically disseminated. When W asked the FBI and CIA what was being done, he was told there were 70 investigations under way. Ok. That’s more than an previously (far more than any the Clinton Admin ever conducted). Basically, W did what he was supposed to do. It was the system that failed. The problem with people aiming to point fingers and blame at W rather than the systemic flaws that the 911 Commission AND the joint Congressional inquiry found as well is that by pointing fingers at W, it suggests that a different butt in the chair behind the desk at 1600 PA would’ve prevented the attacks, and since a different butt HAD been in that chair, it’s apparent that such politically partisan spin is both useless, and contrary to fact.
Nice try lutton, but you’re Bushbash attempt fawns in the face of history. Maybe if the 911 Commission and other investigations had found the President negligent, you’d have a grain of sand to stand upon, but instead the various investigations (bi-partisan, independent, etc) found that Presidents Clinton and Bush both failed, and that even had their failures not occurred it’s likely the attacks would have still succeeded.
Nah, if you want a real bad guy, a real failure, a real culprit…blame the murderers.